Legislature(2023 - 2024)DAVIS 106
01/24/2024 06:00 PM House WAYS & MEANS
Note: the audio ![]()
and video ![]()
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB190 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| += | HB 190 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 194 | TELECONFERENCED | |
HB 190-ALASKA SUNSET COMMISSION
6:01:12 PM
CHAIR CARPENTER announced that the only order of business would
be HOUSE BILL NO. 190, "An Act establishing a violation for
hindering the Alaska Sunset Commission; relating to the duties
of the legislature; establishing the Alaska Sunset Commission to
review and make recommendations on discontinuation of or changes
to state entities; relating to the powers and duties of the
Alaska Sunset Commission; and providing for an effective date."
6:01:52 PM
KENDRA BROUSSARD, Staff, Representative Ben Carpenter, Alaska
State Legislature, presented HB 190 on behalf of the House
Special Committee on Ways and Means, sponsor, on which
Representative Carpenter serves as chair. She spoke from the
sponsor statement [included in the committee packet] which read
as follows [original punctuation provided]:
Alaska spends twice as much as other states on
government. There is not enough time or information
available to utilize the annual budget process to
ensure efficient spending, effective service delivery
and continual process improvement in state agencies.
The Executive Budget Act requires the Governor and his
agencies to use performance and financial data in its
budgeting process and to provide such information to
the legislature for its budget deliberations.
Nonetheless, the Executive Budget Act is not being
followed by the executive or the legislature as it
should. Data provided by executive departments is
insufficient for program evaluation, planning and
budgeting.
In addition, for the past ten years, the State Auditor
has produced performance review audits of state
agencies. Again, these resources are not being
utilized by state agencies or the legislature, and the
statute is sunsetting.
HB 190 aims to both provide usable data and impose
recourse into the review process. Adding an extensive
third-party review, and the real risk that an entity
of government will be eliminated by law, may be the
external disruption necessary to lead to leaner
government.
HB 190 "The Alaska Sunset Commission Act" will help
ensure adherence to performance requirements and
process improvement in the operation of our state
government. The bill establishes the Alaska Sunset
Commission under the Lieutenant Governor as an
independent and objective group charged with reviewing
each department by division in the state on a rotating
schedule.
The Commission will be comprised of seven individuals
from the private sector with financial, budget
analysis, accounting, operations management, and other
areas of expertise who will be appointed by the
governor (3), speaker of the house (2) and president
of the senate (2). Commissioners will have staggered
terms of five years, choose a chair, and will serve
without compensation but commissioners will be
entitled to per diem and travel expenses authorized
for boards and commissions. The Commission may employ
staff and hire consultants as it determines necessary
to perform its duties.
Duties of the commission will be to determine whether
there is a public need for the continuation of the
entity and to make a recommendation to the legislature
to continue, discontinue, restructure, or transfer the
duties and programs of the entity to another entity.
The Commission will review the entities of one
department each year that will include adherence to
financial and performance requirements under the
Executive Budget Act, utilization of process
improvement, efficiency of operations, overlap with
other state entities, and the extent to which the
entity is making it difficult to do business in
Alaska.
The Commission will submit a report to the Governor
and Legislature within the first 10 days of
legislative session that includes a recommendation to
continue, discontinue, restructure, or transfer duties
to another entity.
Along with the submission of the report to the
legislature, the Commission will provide any
recommended statutory changes necessary to accomplish
the recommendations in the report to the Rules
Committees with requests to introduce the legislation.
If the legislature does not act on the Commission's
report, the entity subject of the report will be
sunset at the conclusion of the following fiscal year.
6:06:13 PM
MS. BROUSSARD provided a sectional analysis of HB 190 [included
in the committee packet]. She said Sections 1-5 amend the State
Personnel Act to include the Alaska Sunset Commission. Section
1 allows persons who hinder the work of the Alaska Sunset
Commission to be fined by those who may hinder the work of the
Legislative Budget and Audit Committee. Section 2 provides that
a person who has been convicted under Section 1 of this Act
cannot be appointed to state services unless a waiver is granted
by the commissioner of administration. Section 3 makes public
information that a state employee has been dismissed or
disciplined for a violation of interference or failure to
cooperate with the Alaska Sunset Commission. Section 4 allows a
state employee to be disciplined or dismissed for failure to
give cooperation to the Alaska Sunset Commission. Section 5
makes interference or failure to cooperate with the Alaska
Sunset Commission a matter of public concern. Section 6 amends
the Public Record Disclosure Act to add the Alaska Sunset
Commission to the definition of "public agency."
MS. BROUSSARD stated that Section 7 adds a new section of law to
establish the Alaska Sunset Commission under the lieutenant
governor. The commission consists of seven public members
appointed by the governor, speaker, and senate president for
staggered five-year terms. It establishes the qualifications of
appointed members, selection of a chair, and allows the
commission to employ staff and hire consultants. Commissioners
will receive per diem and travel expenses. Section 7 provides
the power and duties of the commission, including reviewing the
activities of each state entity subject to commission review
state entities, and make recommendations to the legislature.
Prior to the commission's review of an entity, each state entity
shall provide to the legislature a report of the entity's
evaluation of its adherence to the criteria for the commission's
review under this Act. Section 7 provides for a schedule of
entities to be reviewed. The entities are each of the entities
of a one state agency or the University of Alaska each year for
2024 through 2035. Section 7 provides the criteria for review,
including the adherence to performance requirements set under
the Executive Budget Act, alternative methods for delivery of
services, organizational processes, efficiency with which the
entity operates, reorganization potential, and the extent to
which statutory changes are necessary for the entity to meet the
desired improvements. Section 7 requires the commission to hold
public hearings and accept public testimony. It requires a
report by the commission following each review of a state entity
with a recommendation to the legislature to continue,
discontinue, restructure, or transfer the duties and programs of
the entity and a recommendation on a winding down period for the
entity to conclude its business or provide for a restructuring
plan. The commission shall include in the report draft
legislation to implement the recommendations of the commission
with a request to the rules committees to submit the legislation
for introduction. Section 7 provides that if the
recommendations of the commission are not implemented by law,
the entity subject to review will be sunset on June 30 of the
fiscal year following the review. It also provides definitions.
MS. BROUSSARD related that Section 8 repeals statute governing
the disposition of entities, statutes related to sunsetting
performance reviews. Section 9 repeals Performance Review State
Law 2013 that is set to sunset July 1, 2023. Section 10 makes
Section 9 of this Act immediately effective.
6:10:35 PM
MS. BROUSSARD commenced a PowerPoint presentation [hard copy
included in the committee packet], titled "HB 190 Alaska Sunset
Commission," dated 1/24/24. She reviewed slides 2-5 regarding
how the Alaska Sunset Commission will work, which read as
follows [original punctuation provided]:
[slide 2]
The Sunset shines a light on state agencies and
programs to see if they are still relevant in a
changing world. If the answer is yes, the Sunset
recommends improvements to make them more effective
and efficient. If the answer is no, the sunset
recommends abolishing the agency or transferring its
functions to another agency with related functions.
[slide 3]
The Commission would be administratively housed under
the Lt. Governor. Commissioners will be appointed by
the Governor, Speaker, and Senate President.
The Commission shall be proficient in financial
management, business operations, budgeting economics,
process improvement or government efficiency.
The Commission may hire staff and consultants with
similar proficiencies to conduct a review of each
entity of a Department.
HB 190 would Require the Commission to hold public
hearings.
The Commission drafts legislation that must be acted
upon or the entity will sunset.
[slide 4]
• Sunset Staff Evaluation
o Each year, the Commission will review one state
department and each of its entities: divisions
and corporations. Sunset staff will perform
extensive research and analysis to evaluate the
need for, performance for, and improvements to
the entity under review.
• Sunset Commission Staff
o Reviews the agency's self-evaluation report
o Receives input from interested parties
o Evaluates entity and identifies problems
o Develops recommendations
o Publishes staff reports
• Sunset Commission Deliberation
o The Sunset Commission conducts a public hearing
to take testimony on the staff report and the
agency overall. The Sunset Commission conducts a
second meeting to vote on which changes to
recommend to the Legislature.
[slide 5]
• Public Hearings
o Sunset staff presents its reports and
recommendations
o The agency presents its response
o The Sunset Commission will hear public testimony
and receive written comments
o The Sunset Commission will meet again to consider
and vote on recommendations
o Public Input is published on the website
o The Sunset bills will go through the normal
legislative process
• Legislative Action
o The Sunset bill on an entity is drafted and
submitted through the Rules Committee
o The Legislature will consider the Sunset
Commission's recommendations and make its final
decisions
o The Senate and the House conduct committee
hearings and debate/Amend the bill
o Bill passes or fails adoption
o If the Legislature fails to adopt or act on a
bill, the entity sunsets at the end of the
following fiscal year.
6:13:32 PM
MS. BROUSSARD stated that HB 190 is modeled after the Texas
Sunset Commission. She moved to slides 6-8 regarding the model
in Texas, which read as follows [original punctuation provided]:
[slide 6]
The sunset process is a key legislative oversight tool
that significantly streamlined and improved Texas
government since it was created by the Texas
Legislature in 1977. Sunset promotes a culture of
continuous improvement in state government by
providing objective, nonpartisan public forum for
evaluating the need for state agencies and their
effectiveness, efficiency, and responsiveness to the
public.
[slide 7]
The Sunset Commission reviewed 21 entities for the
88th Legislative Session in Texas, resulting in 235
recommendations to streamline state government while
enhancing services to our citizens. Generally, the
recommendations eliminate unnecessary regulations, and
improve accountability, align agencies' procedures
with best practices, and strengthen effective delivery
of services to Texans.
[slide 8]
The Texas Sunset process has led to major policy
changes in almost every area of state government.
Sunset recommendations also have eliminated
duplication among agencies and programs, increased
public participation, helped with government
accountability, and improved the quality and
efficiency of government services.
MS. BROUSSARD turned attention to slide 9, "Sunset's Impact
Since 1977," which read as follows [original punctuation
provided]:
Streamlining Texas Government
• 42 entities and programs have been abolished
• 52 entities and programs have been abolished and
transferred or consolidated
Saving Taxpayer money
• $1 billion in state and federal savings and revenue
gains
• Return of $18 for every $1 appropriated to the
Sunset Commission since 1985
Providing Effective Oversight
• 570 reviews of state agencies and programs conducted
• 80 percent of Sunset recommendations to the
Legislature have become state law since 2001
MS. BROUSSARD displayed slide 10 which listed State of Alaska
department entities as follows [original punctuation provided]:
• Department of Administration - 15
• Department of Commerce, Community and Economic
Development - 18
• Department of Corrections - 4
• Department of Education and Early Development - 5
• Department of Environmental Conservation - 5
• Department of Family and Community Services - 7
• Department of Fish and Game - 10
• Department of Health - 8
• Department of Labor and Workforce Development -
11
• Department of Law - 8
• Department of Military and Veterans Affairs - 12
• Department of Natural Resources - 13
• Department of Public Safety - 14
• Department of Revenue - 16
• Department of Transportation and Public
Facilities - 31
• University of Alaska - 3
Total amount of Entities = 180
MS. BROUSSARD, in conclusion, showed helpful links on slide 11
and offered to answer questions.
6:15:44 PM
REPRESENTATIVE GRAY inquired about how the Executive Budget Act
is different than HB 190.
6:16:03 PM
DONNA ARDUIN, Staff, Representative Ben Carpenter, Alaska State
Legislature, replied that the Executive Budget Act, Title 37,
requires, among other things, for the legislature to set
missions for state agencies, key performance indicators,
performance measures, and how those should be measuring
everything that the agencies are doing. So, one criterion for
the Alaska Sunset Commission is to ensure that the agencies are
adhering to the standards set by the legislature.
REPRESENTATIVE GRAY asked whether the most critical failure in
the Executive Branch and the legislature not following the
Executive Budget Act is that the legislature isn't following up.
MS. ARDUIN responded that technically it's the legislature that
isn't following what is required. The legislature is required
to set the missions and performance measures for the agencies.
The Executive Branch has kept a schedule of missions and
performance indicators. However, those aren't being used in
either the budgeting process or the management process of those
agencies.
REPRESENTATIVE GRAY asked how the Executive Budget Act should be
followed by the legislature and why the legislature isn't doing
it. He further asked about what an individual legislator should
be doing to follow the Act.
MS. ARDUIN answered that the Alaska Sunset Commission would,
among many other criteria, be reviewing adherence to the
Executive Budget Act, whether there is an alternative delivery
method for those services and performance requirements, the
extent to which the entity is organized in a manner for business
process improvement, efficiency within the way the entity
operates, and whether there is any overlap of services with
other entities.
6:18:55 PM
CHAIR CARPENTER addressed Representative Gray's question about
what the legislature should be doing to follow the Executive
Budget Act. He outlined the long list of what legislators do
each day throughout a legislative session and stated that the
process of doing a deep dive into evaluating management of all
180 entities is therefore beyond the scope of what legislators
can do. But the Executive Budget Act says the legislature is
supposed to provide the guidance for mission, goals, and
performance measures to the executive branch for all 180
entities to ensure that the government is being managed
appropriately. Given the legislature isn't going to get to it
with business as normal within a legislative session, the intent
of HB 190 in creating the Sunset Commission is to complement the
responsibilities of both the Executive Branch and the
legislature in providing public input as to how the government
of the people for the people is supposed to be run.
6:20:39 PM
REPRESENTATIVE GRAY remarked that it sounds like [the Executive
Budget Act] had unrealistic expectations of how the legislature
could possibly do what the Act asks it to do for 180 entities.
CHAIR CARPENTER replied that he can't say it was unrealistic at
the time it was written. But, he continued, he knows that in
his own everyday business being able to review the missions and
measures for each department is outside the scope of his
available time unless he were to pare down what he is trying to
do within the legislative session.
REPRESENTATIVE GRAY stated that doing these deep dives into 180
entities seems like a big job for [seven] people to do who are
not compensated.
CHAIR CARPENTER answered that the fiscal note is just over $1
million because the commission is empowered to hire staff to do
most of that work daily. The commissioners would give guidance
to and supervise the trained staff and would meet periodically
to review and publish recommendations to the legislature and the
Executive Branch.
6:22:34 PM
REPRESENTATIVE TILTON, to give an idea of the time involved,
recounted that in 2012 or 2013 the "finance committee" on which
she was staff conducted a deep dive on every division within the
Department of Health and Social Services. While not as
extensive as is proposed in HB 190, she said, it took a full
interim to review each division's mission, measures, what the
public thought the division did well, and what the division
thought it did well.
CHAIR CARPENTER commented that legislators are looking at this
from a legislative perspective but when looking at it from a
bureaucracy's perspective, [an agency] is busy doing day to day
functions, and to add on a review of how it is doing business
becomes a big burden. So, help must be asked from somebody to
do a review periodically of whether things are headed in the
right direction.
REPRESENTATIVE TILTON concurred with asking the administration
to do this kind of review, especially during session, since it
was difficult even during the interim given the department was
carrying on with its business.
6:25:24 PM
REPRESENTATIVE MCCABE proffered it would take 16 years to go
through all 16 departments. He asked whether the assumption
being used here is based on Texas making $18 per $1 from its
commission.
CHAIR CARPENTER responded that past performance doesn't predict
future returns. He said he doesn't know that Alaska can achieve
the same rate of improvement as Texas as he hasn't attempted to
quantify that. Regarding the length of time, he stated the
process might be quicker based on some departments being made up
of only a few entities.
6:27:27 PM
REPRESENTATIVE GROH stated it is clear and undisputed that the
governor and legislature could do this now, though it hasn't
occurred. He inquired about the accountability and transparency
of non-elected commissioners doing this work versus elected
constitutional officers of the legislature and the governor.
CHAIR CARPENTER answered that he isn't too concerned with the
commissioners not being duly elected because the recommendation
that they make is going to the duly elected representatives.
That is in the same vein as non-elected staff or consultants
hired by the legislature to provide advice, and the legislature
then chooses whether to act on that advice. The bill is drafted
to force the legislature to take seriously what those
commissioners have said and act upon it in some form.
REPRESENTATIVE GROH commended Chair Carpenter for bringing
forward the recommendations of the fiscal policy working group,
one of those recommendations being for budget reductions over
time. He said he is interested in efficiencies and finding the
right reductions to make is a good thing for the state in
combination with other steps to resolve the state's deficit. He
said he would like to learn more about the actual experience of
Texas and how exactly it worked.
CHAIR CARPENTER drew attention to the links provided on slide
11, one of which is for the Texas Sunset Advisory Commission.
He encouraged members to do their due diligence, learn about
what Texas has done, and come back for discussion.
6:31:32 PM
REPRESENTATIVE GRAY asked whether anything about HB 190 is
changed in the context of the governor having 13 executive
orders (EOs) to eliminate some boards and commissions and
consolidate. He further asked whether the governor would still
be able to do this same thing if HB 190 were in effect.
CHAIR CARPENTER offered his belief that nothing in HB 190
addresses the governor's authority to restructure the government
per the constitutional and statutory that he has now. The bill
should be thought of as an addition to both the governor's and
the legislature's authorities because the legislature can also
restructure. The bill provides a level of detail through a
consistent study methodology that gives better data and better
information.
REPRESENTATIVE GRAY agreed.
6:33:08 PM
MS. ARDUIN returned to Representative McCabe's point. She
clarified that in HB 190 there is a one year and an order for
the entities to review. She suggested members look at that
provision and determine whether they would like some flexibility
in that or a timeframe change. She further clarified that the
entities being reviewed under the departments include the
divisions as well as the corporations, boards, and commissions
underneath the department. Corporations, she advised, have not
had the kind of review or oversight that some of the agencies
and divisions have had.
REPRESENTATIVE MCCABE posed a scenario in which the legislature
receives a report that says to shut down an entity but the
legislator in whose district the entity is located doesn't want
it shut down, causing it to become a political football. He
asked whether there is a way to make the language take it away
from the legislature, so it isn't so political and is more
economic driven.
MS. ARDUIN responded that while the legislature has had failures
in the past to follow through on any type of recommendations,
there is a lot of teeth in this. The commission can submit any
bill it would like through the rules committee and if the
legislature doesn't take up the bill or pass the bill the
legislature can amend the bill that entity will automatically
be sunset at the end of the next year.
6:35:34 PM
REPRESENTATIVE GRAY surmised that the commission could find that
something should be eliminated, the legislature takes it up and
decides to eliminate it, but the governor vetoes the bill and
therefore it isn't eliminated.
MS. ARDUIN confirmed that that is correct.
REPRESENTATIVE GRAY presumed this would always be reported to
the legislature, not a situation where the commission recommends
elimination, and the governor decides to eliminate it. He noted
the large number of EOs and postulated that this would just be a
different avenue for the legislature to eliminate boards and
commissions or change boards and commissions.
MS. ARDUIN responded that the governor's EO reorganization
abilities are simply to reorganize, not to remove any of the
powers and duties of any entity or change the management
structures; anything on statute under those boards would now
fall to somebody else. The Sunset Commission could recommend
those things, but HB 190 goes far beyond the ability to
reorganize as in the governor's executive orders. The bill
allows for changes in programs, changes in the way programs are
delivered, and changing the management of those programs.
6:37:18 PM
CHAIR CARPENTER stated he will look for case studies from Texas
and bring them forward as examples of how they worked in Texas.
REPRESENTATIVE GRAY stated that he likes HB 190.
MS. ARDUIN related that the Texas Sunset Commission is proud of
having implemented more responsiveness to the public, which is
not done when audits are conducted of departments in Alaska.
6:38:04 PM
REPRESENTATIVE MCCABE noted that there are DOTPF roads and city
roads within the Municipality of Anchorage that are snowplowed.
He asked how a snowplowing recommendation from the Sunset
Commission would be handled when there are cross agency or cross
governmental entities involved.
MS. ARDUIN replied that when the Sunset Commission reviews an
entity, that entity and all its subdivisions must submit a
report to the commission, so the entity is the first reporter to
say it has issues. Then as the commission continues its work,
it involves the public, which in this scenario would involve
folks from Anchorage. The commission would hold public hearings
and then come up with its recommendations.
CHAIR CARPENTER stated that in addition to employees of the
commission who are subject matter experts, the commission is
empowered to bring in expertise to help in solving a problem.
If there were issues with the Municipality of Anchorage or any
jurisdiction, there would be an opportunity for collaboration
and public involvement to provide understanding and
recommendations, which currently isn't being done so it would
force the legislature and the executive. In addition to
statutory change, [HB 190] provides for changes to regulation,
which wouldn't require action on the legislature's part, only
action on the Executive Branch's part.
MS. ARDUIN added that HB 190 also gives the commission's staff
and consultants the ability to attend any meeting of the
department and have access to any information that the
department has available, something that is much more difficult
for legislators to do on a daily basis.
6:41:25 PM
REPRESENTATIVE GRAY stated that Anchorage taking over all the
snowplowing would be a very complicated. He asked whether the
Executive Budget Act should be repealed if HB 190 is passed
given the Act isn't serving its purpose and isn't being done.
CHAIR CARPENTER answered that he has another bill that rewrites
the Executive Budget Act to draw the legislature's attention and
help the legislature better follow the Executive Budget Act.
The Sunset Commission would be a second tool that helps both
branches achieve a leaner government that isn't tied into the
Executive Budget Act.
REPRESENTATIVE GRAY said his research of the Texas Sunset Act
found an example of an environmental agency that was not
enforcing regulations. [The Texas Sunset Commission] forced the
agency to start doing its job rather than eliminating the
agency. So, it's about making an agency do its work as well as
about making it leaner.
CHAIR CARPENTER concurred that a review by either the
legislature or the commission could result in a recommendation
regarding an inefficiency or a recommendation regarding work
that isn't being done.
6:44:14 PM
REPRESENTATIVE TILTON noted she understands that there is a cost
benefit but inquired about the commission's [proposed] budget
given that staff and consultants come at a high price.
CHAIR CARPENTER invited the Office of the Lieutenant Governor to
review the fiscal note that it drafted for HB 190.
6:45:26 PM
KELLY HOWEL, Chief of Staff, Office of the Lieutenant Governor,
explained that the bill's fiscal note for the first year is
$1,150,000, which includes startup costs, and then about $10,000
less through the out years. She pointed out that HB 190 gives
the commission the discretion to hire staff, the number of
staff, and qualifications of those staff, so assumptions had to
be made when estimating the fiscal note. The assumption made
for staff was a minimum of five, which would include
administrative support, an accountant, auditors, and, as the
Texas Sunset Advisory [Commission] has done, an attorney to
provide legal advice. Travel costs are estimated at about
$23,000 a year for the commission to meet and for staff travel
to do audits. Contractual services for setup costs, office
space and leasing costs, and consultant costs are estimated at
$200,000 per year. Commodities are supplies that are seen in
the startup year but not the out years.
6:48:10 PM
REPRESENTATIVE TILTON recommended that the Alaska Sunset
Commission be stationed on the road system so the public can
attend and participate in the transparency.
6:48:34 PM
REPRESENTATIVE GRAY stated that Section 1 of HB 190 puts in some
teeth by providing that someone who refuses to cooperate with
the Legislative Budget and Audit Committee can be fined $5,000.
He surmised this is being added to something that already exists
if someone doesn't cooperate with the committee.
CHAIR CARPENTER confirmed that that is correct.
REPRESENTATIVE GRAY asked whether people don't cooperate with
the Legislative Budget and Audit Committee and whether those
people are fined. He said he wants to know that there are teeth
and an enforcement mechanism when somebody refuses to cooperate.
CHAIR CARPENTER responded that he has only been chair of the
Legislative Budget and Audit Committee for a year, so he doesn't
have an historical answer. However, to his knowledge, the
Legislative Budget and Audit Committee has never fined anyone
for not providing information, and to his knowledge, there has
never been a problem over the last year with information not
being presented to the committee on ask. He noted that the
Legislative Budget and Audit Committee includes the Legislative
Finance Division and the Legislative Audit Division.
6:50:25 PM
CHAIR CARPENTER announced that HB 190 was held over.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| HB 190 v.B.PDF |
HW&M 5/9/2023 6:00:00 PM HW&M 1/24/2024 6:00:00 PM HW&M 1/31/2024 6:00:00 PM HW&M 2/14/2024 6:00:00 PM |
HB 190 |
| HB 190 - Sponsor Statement.pdf |
HW&M 5/9/2023 6:00:00 PM HW&M 1/24/2024 6:00:00 PM HW&M 1/31/2024 6:00:00 PM HW&M 2/14/2024 6:00:00 PM |
HB 190 |
| HB 190 - Sectional Analysis.pdf |
HW&M 5/9/2023 6:00:00 PM HW&M 1/24/2024 6:00:00 PM HW&M 1/31/2024 6:00:00 PM HW&M 2/14/2024 6:00:00 PM |
HB 190 |
| HB190 Alaska Sunset Commission Presentation.pdf |
HW&M 1/24/2024 6:00:00 PM HW&M 1/31/2024 6:00:00 PM HW&M 2/14/2024 6:00:00 PM |
HB 190 |
| HB 190 List of Divisions and Corporations Under Each Department (for presentation).pdf |
HW&M 1/24/2024 6:00:00 PM HW&M 1/31/2024 6:00:00 PM HW&M 2/14/2024 6:00:00 PM |
HB 190 |
| HB 190-OOG-LTG-01-11-24 Fiscal Note.pdf |
HW&M 1/24/2024 6:00:00 PM HW&M 1/31/2024 6:00:00 PM HW&M 2/14/2024 6:00:00 PM |
HB 190 |