Legislature(1993 - 1994)
04/25/1993 12:10 PM House FIN
| Audio | Topic |
|---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
HOUSE BILL NO. 188
"An Act relating to forfeiture of certain property; and
providing for an effective date."
Co-Chair Larson noted that HB 188 would utilize asset
forfeiture as a tool for combating drugs and violent crimes.
Attorney General Cole suggested that page 7, line 2 be
amended to read, "did not know before parting with the
9
property that the property would be used in the manner that
resulted in it being subject to forfeiture." He noted that
present law does not allow for the forfeiture of "real"
property. He emphasized that drugs are produced and grown
on "real" property. He clarified, in response to a question
by Co-Chair MacLean, that the amendment would prevent the
owner from forfeiture of rental property if they did not
have knowledge of the crime. Representative Grussendorf
pointed out that the property can still be seized until the
owner proves his innocence.
Attorney General Cole asserted that the legislation will
curtail drug activity. Co-Chair MacLean suggested that on
page 3, line 16 "indictment" be deleted and "conviction"
inserted. Mr. Guaneli observed that other states do not
require convictions. He noted that conviction is not
dependent on whether an act took place.
(Tape Change, HFC 93-126, Side 1).
Attorney General Cole continued to discuss the forfeiture of
property for use in drug crimes.
Co-Chair MacLean referred to page 6, lines 11 - 18. She
noted that up to 90 percent of the net value of seized
property could be transferred to one or more agencies or
political subdivisions of the state for use in furtherance
of the administration of justice. Representative
Grussendorf expressed concern that transfers would be under
the jurisdiction of the commissioner of the Department of
Public Safety. Mr. Guaneli discussed procedures used by
federal law enforcement agencies. Attorney General Cole
that the federal government currently takes real property
seized in state cases.
Representative Brown referred to testimony by Shelley Owens
before the House Judiciary Committee. She noted that
forfeiture of a persons bank account after indictment could
eliminate the defendants ability to obtain independent
defense counsel which would increase the burden on the
Public Defender. Representative Brown quoted Ms. Shelley as
saying, "one-half of people who lose property under
forfeiture laws have not been charged with a crime, and 80
percent of people who lose their property don't or can't
contest the forfeitures."
Attorney General Cole emphasized that, if HB 188 is adopted,
the state would initiate proceedings rather than deferring
all drug forfeitures to the federal government.
Co-Chair MacLean referred to page 1, lines 8 - 10, CSHB 188
(JUD). Attorney General Cole stressed that before property
10
is forfeited the owner must know that the property is being
used in an illegal drug activity. Representative Brown
argued that the burden of proof is on the person whose
property is being seized. Mr. Guaneli clarified that
property can be seized before guilt is ascertained.
Representative Foster asked if HB 188 would go beyond
federal forfeiture laws. He noted that grand juries
generally support indictments. He did not support seizure
on indictment.
Representative Brown noted the difficulty of evicting
tenants that may be involved in drug traffic.
Co-Chair Larson MOVED to ADOPT language amending page 7,
line 2 to read, "did not know before parting with the
property that the property would be used in the manner that
resulted in it being subject to forfeiture." Representative
Brown noted that the amendment would include property from
which the owner is not yet parted. There being NO
OBJECTION, it was so ordered.
Co-Chair MacLean MOVED to AMEND on page 3, line 16, to
delete "indictment" and insert "conviction". Representative
Hanley observed that the grand jury does not convict. Co-
Chair MacLean MOVED to AMEND the motion to a conceptual
amendment to make the legislation applicable after
conviction not indictment. Representative Martin maintained
that a criminal would have time to hide assets. Attorney
General Cole stated that the amendment would make the
legislation ineffectual. Representative Martin OBJECTED to
the motion. Co-Chair MacLean asked that HB 188 be HELD in
committee. Co-Chair MacLean WITHDREW HER AMENDMENT.
HB 188 was HELD in Committee.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|