Legislature(2023 - 2024)DAVIS 106
02/15/2024 03:00 PM House HEALTH & SOCIAL SERVICES
Note: the audio
and video
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB242 | |
| Confirmation Hearing(s)|| Board of Massage Therapists | |
| Executive Order 125 | |
| HB187 | |
| HB260 | |
| HB258 | |
| HB242 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| *+ | HB 187 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 260 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 258 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| += | HB 242 | TELECONFERENCED | |
HB 187-PRIOR AUTH EXEMPT FOR HEALTH PROVIDERS
3:59:18 PM
CHAIR PRAX announced that the next order of business would be
HOUSE BILL NO. 187, "An Act relating to utilization review
entities; exempting certain health care providers from making
preauthorization requests for certain services; and providing
for an effective date."
4:00:00 PM
REPRESENTATIVE SUMNER, as prime sponsor, gave the sponsor
statement for HB 187 [included in the committee packet], which
read as follows [original punctuation provided]:
HB 187 aims to reduce the wait time for certain health
care services by exempting health care providers from
making preauthorization requests for said services.
Currently, Alaskans who need certain health care
services must wait days and even weeks at a time to
get pre-authorized to receive health care services
because of the processing time between the health care
provider and insurance companies. This bill would help
Alaskans receive health care services immediately,
especially health care services that could save their
lives.
This bill would create a utilization review entity
that may evaluate whether a health care provider
continues to qualify for an exemption if during the
most recent 12- month period, the utilization review
entity has approved or would approve at least 80% of
the prior authorization requests submitted by the
health care provider for that health care service.
The Health Care provider is not required to request an
exemption to qualify for an exemption. A utilization
review may not deny or reduce payment for a health
care service that is exempted.
Other states with prior authorization exemptions have
seen increased frequency of patients who receive the
health care services they need expediently.
This bill will help Alaskans receive fast, efficient,
and quality healthcare when they need it without
waiting for a preauthorization process that could
cause their health to decline even more.
4:01:42 PM
SARENA HACKENMILLER, Staff, Representative Jesse Sumner, Alaska
State Legislature, on behalf of Representative Sumner, prime
sponsor, presented the sectional analysis for HB 187 [included
in the committee packet] which read as follows [original
punctuation provided]:
Section 1: AS 21.07.005(a) is amended to insert the
following language into sub-section (1) under (a) so
it reads "the structure and operation of utilization
review and benefit determination processes, including
processes for utilization review entities under AS
21.07.100".
Sec. 2. AS 21.07 is amended by adding a new section
called Sec. 21.07.100. Utilization Review Entities to
implement the following:
A utilization review entity may not require a health
care provider to complete a prior authorization for a
health care service for a covered person to receive
coverage for the health care service if, during the
most recent 12 month period, the utilization review
entity has approved or would have approved at least
[80] percent of the prior authorization requests
submitted by the health care provider for that health
care service.
A utilization review entity may evaluate whether a
health care provider continues to qualify for an
exemption not more than once every 12 months. A
utilization review entity is not required to evaluate
an existing exemption, and nothing prevents a
utilization review entity from establishing a longer
exemption period. A health care provider is not
required to request an exemption to qualify for an
exemption.
If a health care provider does not receive an
exemption, the health care provider may, once every 12
months of providing health care services, request the
utilization review entity to provide a determination
to deny a prior authorization exemption under (a) of
this section. The utilization review entity shall
provide to the health care provider an explanation of
how to appeal the determination.
A utilization review entity may revoke an exemption
after 12 months if the utilization review entity does
the following:
• Decides that the health care provider would not have
met the 80% approval criteria based on a retrospective
review of the claims for the health care service for
which the exemption applies for the previous three
months or the period needed to reach a minimum of 10
claims for review.
Provides the health care provider with the
information used by the utilization review entity to
make the determination to revoke the exemption.
• Provides an explanation to the health car[e]
provider on how to appeal the determination.
The exemption remains in effect until the 30th day
after the date the utilization review entity notifies
the health care provider of its determination to
revoke the exemption or, if the health care provider
appeals the determination, the fifth day after the
revocation is upheld on appeal.
A determination to revoke or deny an exemption by a
utilization review entity must be made by a health
care provider licensed in Alaska with the same or
similar specialty as the health care provider being
consider for an exemption and must have experience in
the health care service, they are providing for which
the requested exemption applies.
A utilization review entity must provide a health care
provider who receives an exemption of this section
with a notice that includes the following:
• A statement that the health care provider qualifies
for an exemption from a prior authorization
requirement and the duration of the exemption.
• A list of health care services for which the
exemption applies.
A utilization review entity may not deny or reduce
payment for a health care service exempted from a
prior authorization requirement, including a health
care service performed or supervised by another health
care provider when the health care provider who
ordered the service received a prior authorization
exemption, unless the health care provider providing
the health care service does the following:
• Knowingly and materially misrepresented the health
care service in a quest for payment submitted by the
utilization review entity with the specific intent to
deceive and obtain an unlawful payment form a
utilization review entity.
Failed to substantially perform the health care
service(s)
In this sectional analysis, the following are defined:
• "Health care services" means the following:
o The provision of pharmaceutical products, services,
or durable medical equipment
o A health care procedure, treatment, or service
provided in a health care facility licensed in Alaska
or by a Doctor of Medicine, Doctor of Osteopathy, or
within the scope of practice of a health care
professional who is licensed in Alaska.
• "Health maintenance organization" has the meaning
given in AS 21.86.900.
• "Prior authorization" means the process used by a
utilization review entity to determine the medical
necessity or medical appropriateness of a covered
entity to determine the medical necessity or medical
appropriateness of a covered health care service
before the health care service is provided or a
requirement that a covered person or health care
provider notify a health care insurer or utilization
review entity before providing a health care service.
• "Utilization review entity" means an individual or
entity that performs prior authorization for the
following:
o An employer in Alaska with employees covered under a
health benefit plan or health insurance policy.
o A health care insurer
o A preferred provider organization
o A health maintenance organization
o An individual or entity that provides, offers to
provide, or administers hospital, outpatient, medical,
prescription drug, or other health care benefits to a
person treated by a health care provider licensed in
Alaska under a health care policy, plan, or contract.
Sec. 3. This Act takes effect immediately under AS
01.10.070(c)
4:07:54 PM
CHAIR PRAX announced the committee would hear invited testimony
on HB 187.
4:08:09 PM
PAM VENTGEN, Executive Director, Alaska State Medical
Association, expressed her support for HB 187. She explained
how prior authorization works and how it is often a barrier to
treatment. She gave statistics and examples of prior
authorization having a negative impact on patient care, and said
oncology is especially impacted by the prior authorization
issue.
4:11:04 PM
REPRESENTATIVE MINA asked how often claims are denied due to
prior authorization and how much time goes into appealing those
claims by patients trying to get services.
MS. VENTGEN replied that the American Medical Association has
that data, and she will forward that information to the
committee members.
4:12:17 PM
REPRESENTATIVE RUFFRIDGE described how much time goes into
processing prior authorizations, leaving less time for patient
care.
MS. VENTGEN agreed with Representative Ruffridge and responded
with specific examples.
4:13:38 PM
REPRESENTATIVE MINA asked Ms. Ventgen what feedback she receives
from insurance companies regarding the potential for waste and
fraud under this scenario.
MS. VENTGEN explained that insurance companies claim a bill such
as this leads to waste and fraud. However, similar bills in
other states have shown that when 80 percent of claims are
approved, incidents of fraud and waste go down considerably. If
half of the physician's prior authorization requests are denied,
that raises more of a question. That is why the bill sets the
number at 80 percent. Physicians who have a lower percentage of
reliable authorizations will still need to use prior
authorization.
4:15:51 PM
EZEQUIEL SILVA, MD, Member, Texas Medical Association, shared
his experience with issues caused by delayed or denied prior
authorizations. He gave examples of significant lags in care
because of slow authorizations. The serious adverse events
motivated the Texas State Legislature to pass a bill similar to
HB 187, and since that time, Texas has seen positive results.
He expressed support for HB 187.
4:17:52 PM
LORI WING-HEIER, Director, Division of Insurance, Alaska
Department of Commerce, Community, and Economic Development,
explained that the prior authorization issue is very emotional
for many people, "because when you want your health care
service, you want it now." On the other hand, people want
affordable health care. The providers claim this bill will
reduce costs, but insurers say if there is no review of
treatment, it may be even more costly. She explained how the
external review process works.
4:19:59 PM
CHAIR PRAX questioned whether the division has data regarding
the records of physicians who no longer need prior authorization
because their treatment authorizations are correct 80 percent of
the time.
MS. WING-HEIER replied that she didn't have that data but would
see what was available.
CHAIR PRAX asked whether the percent of appeals was significant.
MS. WING-HEIER explained that not many people go directly to
insurance companies with grievances about authorizations. She
would have to ask the insurance companies about the numbers, and
it would take several weeks to get the information about how
many grievances insurance companies had regarding prior
authorizations.
4:21:48 PM
REPRESENTATIVE SADDLER questioned what constitutes a utilization
review entity as referenced on page 4 of HB 187and whether there
were any in Alaska.
MS. WING-HEIER replied that there are utilization review
entities in Alaska. She described the procedure a person would
go through when a prior authorization is denied. She would get
the names of utilization review entities to the committee.
REPRESENTATIVE SADDLER reiterated his understanding of the
workflow for prior authorizations grievances and reviews.
MS. WING-HEIER said the review process starts with the insurance
company saying yes or no. If the patient or physician is not
happy with the answer, then it goes to the division. At that
point the division asks for an external review. Once the
external review is returned to the division, it informs all the
parties: the insurer, the provider, and the patient.
4:24:16 PM
CHAIR PRAX reiterated his understanding that once a service
provider proves that 80 percent of the prior authorizations have
been accepted, then that provider would not need to request
prior authorization review. He asked whether that was a
lifetime exemption.
4:25:12 PM
REPRESENTATIVE SUMNER called attention to Section 2, line 8.
CHAIR PRAX requested clarification concerning an insurer's point
of view.
REPRESENTATIVE SUMNER described how the utilization review
entity would make that determination.
4:27:13 PM
CHAIR PRAX announced HB 187 was held over.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| HB 187 Letter of Support - AHHA.pdf |
HHSS 2/15/2024 3:00:00 PM |
HB 187 |
| HB 187 Sponsor Statement.pdf |
HHSS 2/15/2024 3:00:00 PM |
HB 187 |
| HB 187 State Law Chart.pdf |
HHSS 2/15/2024 3:00:00 PM |
HB 187 |
| HB 187 Survey Data.pdf |
HHSS 2/15/2024 3:00:00 PM |
HB 187 |
| HB 187 Version A.pdf |
HHSS 2/15/2024 3:00:00 PM |
HB 187 |
| HB187 Sectional Analysis.pdf |
HHSS 2/15/2024 3:00:00 PM |
HB 187 |
| Emily Foster's Resume.pdf |
HHSS 2/15/2024 3:00:00 PM |
Governor's Appointee |
| Barbara Tyndall Application Redacted.pdf |
HHSS 2/15/2024 3:00:00 PM |
Governor's Appointee |
| Barbara Tyndall's Resume.pdf |
HHSS 2/15/2024 3:00:00 PM |
Governor's Appointee |
| HB 187 Fiscal Note DCCED.pdf |
HHSS 2/15/2024 3:00:00 PM |
HB 187 |
| EO 125 Transfer Function of AK Council on EMS to DOH.pdf |
HHSS 2/15/2024 3:00:00 PM |
EO 125 |
| EO 125 DOH Statement of Cost.pdf |
HHSS 2/15/2024 3:00:00 PM |
EO 125 |
| EO 125 legal memo.pdf |
HHSS 2/15/2024 3:00:00 PM |
EO 125 |
| HB 258 Amendment B.2 #1.pdf |
HHSS 2/15/2024 3:00:00 PM |
HB 258 |
| HB 258 Amendment B.3 #2.pdf |
HHSS 2/15/2024 3:00:00 PM |
HB 258 |
| HB 258 Amendment B.4 #3.pdf |
HHSS 2/15/2024 3:00:00 PM |
HB 258 |
| HB 258 Amendment B.1 #4.pdf |
HHSS 2/15/2024 3:00:00 PM |
HB 258 |
| HB 258 Amendment B.5 #5.pdf |
HHSS 2/15/2024 3:00:00 PM |
HB 258 |
| HB 187 Premera Letter.pdf |
HHSS 2/15/2024 3:00:00 PM |
HB 187 |
| HB 187 Letter from AETNA.pdf |
HHSS 2/15/2024 3:00:00 PM |
HB 187 |
| EO 125 Presentation 2.15.24.pptx.pdf |
HHSS 2/15/2024 3:00:00 PM |
EO 125 |
| Letter to House HSS regarding IRO 021624.pdf |
HHSS 2/15/2024 3:00:00 PM |
HB 187 |
| EO 125 SE Region EMS Council Testimony.pdf |
HHSS 2/15/2024 3:00:00 PM |
EO 125 |
| EO 125 Pam Ventgen Testimony.pdf |
HHSS 2/15/2024 3:00:00 PM |
EO 125 |
| EO 125 - Brian Webb.pdf |
HHSS 2/15/2024 3:00:00 PM |
EO 125 |
| HB 187 AK Medical Association Testimony.pdf |
HHSS 2/15/2024 3:00:00 PM |
HB 187 |
| HB 187 AHIP Comments AK.pdf |
HHSS 2/15/2024 3:00:00 PM |
HB 187 |
| HB 187 ANTHC Support.pdf |
HHSS 2/15/2024 3:00:00 PM |
HB 187 |
| HB 187 AK Medical Association Testimony.pdf |
HHSS 2/15/2024 3:00:00 PM |
HB 187 |