Legislature(2001 - 2002)
04/17/2001 01:46 PM House FIN
| Audio | Topic |
|---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
HOUSE BILL NO. 187
An Act relating to the destruction, desecration, and
vandalism of cemeteries and graves.
REPRESENTATIVE JIM WHITTAKER introduced his Chief of Staff,
Lori Backes. He noted that under the current Alaska
Statutes, there are no provisions relating to the vandalism
or desecration of modern cemeteries and memorials.
LORI BACKES, STAFF, REPRESENTATIVE JIM WHITAKER, commented
that acts of vandalism are currently punishable under
statutes that relate to criminal mischief, however, the
degree of crime centers around monetary value of the damage
and does not recognize the personal insult and emotional
injury to a family, community or tribe that has suffered
when these areas are vandalized.
Ms. Backes noted that HB 187 clearly states that it is a
crime of criminal mischief in the second degree if a person
intentionally abuses these sites. The bill would insert
language into statutute making it a crime of criminal
mischief in the second degree. Recognizing that there may
be circumstances where memorials, tombs or gravesites must
be altered, moved or removed, HB 187 places into statute an
affirmative defense if the defendant is an employee of the
cemetery acting on behalf of the cemetery or is "otherwise
authorized by law to engage in the conduct.
Vice-Chair Bunde asked how the legislation would impact
archeological digs. Ms. Backes explained that
Representative Whitaker's office had been in contact with
the University of Alaska's Anthropology Department and they
have no problem with the wording of the legislation. They
are already protected under laws that allow them to obtain
State permits and/or federal permits if the sites are on
federal land.
Vice-Chair Bunde asked if the legislation would give false
hope to certain Native groups that think that archeological
digs would stop with passage of the legislation. Ms. Backes
replied that the legislation would not give them false hope.
Burial sites are already protected under the Preservation
Act. The hope that the bill is attempting to give is that
there will be some type of penalty that a person could be
charged with if a person were to damage a modern cemetery.
The bill's verbiage does not address the historic sites.
Representative Whitaker added that the bill was not all
encompassing and that it should not be misconstrued to be.
Representative Croft asked the appeal portion found in AS
41.25.200©. Ms. Backes replied that statute was the portion
of statute intended to protect gravesites, however, it had
been placed under the Alaska Historic Preservation Act. The
concern with that is that it would mainly protect historical
burial sites, not modern cemeteries. The proposed bill
would move the protection to another statute.
Representative Croft referenced Page 2, Line 18, noting that
the exception when on a State permit. He asked when on
federal land, would the archeological digs have to obtain
both a State and federal permit. Ms. Backes explained that
on federal land, they would not need to obtain a State
permit. She stated that the bill drafter suggests that the
language "authorized by law" would cover that concern.
Representative Davies asked what the penalty for crime of
criminal mischief in the second degree would be classified
as. Ms. Backes advised that penalty would be a Class C
felony and would result up to five years in prison and a
$50,000 dollar fine.
Representative Whitaker interjected that it was intentional
to raise it to that level. He noted that there had been
extensive hearings in the House Judiciary Committee
regarding those concerns. He added that there would be no
fiscal impact.
Representative Hudson MOVED to report CS HB 187 (JUD) out of
Committee with individual recommendations and the fiscal
notes.
Representative Harris asked the reason for the indeterminate
fiscal note by the Department of Administration. Ms. Backes
explained that it was indeterminate because the Department
is not certain how often there would be prosecuted cases
coming forward and what those costs would be.
There being NO OBJECTION, it was so ordered.
CS HB 187 (JUD) was reported out of Committee with a "do
pass" recommendation and with zero fiscal notes by the
Department of Law dated 4/10/01, the Alaska Court System
dated 4/10/01, and Department of Administration dated
4/10/01.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|