Legislature(2009 - 2010)SENATE FINANCE 532
04/13/2010 09:00 AM Senate FINANCE
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB20 | |
| HB344 | |
| HB52 | |
| HB354 | |
| HB168 | |
| HB306 | |
| HB114 | |
| HB186 | |
| HB319 |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| += | HB 20 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 344 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 52 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 354 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 168 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 306 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 114 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 186 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 319 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 315 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED |
CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 186(FIN) am
"An Act declaring that certain firearms and
accessories are exempt from federal regulation."
Co-Chair Hoffman noted it was the first hearing of the
bill.
REPRESENTATIVE MIKE KELLY, SPONSOR, reported that the bill
would allow firearms built in Alaska for use in Alaska not
be subject to federal regulations and would permit the
Attorney General to protect anyone who engages in the
production of firearms in Alaska from federal interference.
He thought the bill could cause problems at the federal
level, but he believed it shouldn't.
10:28:10 AM
DEREK MILLER, STAFF, REPRESENTATIVE MIKE KELLY, shared the
sectional analysis. Section 1 is a findings section
declaring the authority of the Act to be the Second, Ninth,
and Tenth Amendments to the Constitution of the United
States. Section 2 is the Alaska Firearm Freedom Act as
stated in the bill. It declares that a personal firearm, a
firearm accessory, or ammunition that is manufactured
commercially or privately in Alaska and that remains in the
state is not subject to federal law or regulation.
Co-Chair Hoffman noted an indeterminate fiscal note from
the Department of Law.
10:30:29 AM
GARY MARBUT, SHOOTING SPORTS ASSOCIATION, MONTANA,
explained that he wrote the Firearms Freedom Act and seven
states now have this law. It has been introduced in 20
other states. It is a states' rights challenge to federal
commerce clause authority. He spoke about the economic
impact of this legislation to Alaskans. He suggested there
would be no litigation from the federal government. There
is currently private litigation regarding the legislation
in Montana. He said that the purpose of the legislation is
to challenge the federal government and overturn the
commerce clause precedent.
10:33:24 AM
Senator Huggins asked which categories of firearms would
qualify under the bill. He wondered if the Kodiak Company
that markets bullets nationally would qualify. Mr. Marbut
stated that existing manufacturers must have federal
firearms licenses and would not avail themselves of this
legislation. He gave an example of smaller, local shops
that would qualify.
Senator Huggins asked if two examples of hypothetical guns
would qualify. Mr. Marbut said the first example would not,
but the second one would. Only an Alaska-made gun would
qualify.
Senator Olson asked if handguns are included in the bill.
Mr. Marbut said they were.
HB 186 was heard and HELD in Committee for further
consideration.
10:37:11 AM
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| HB 168 Amendment 1 Ellis 041310.pdf |
SFIN 4/13/2010 9:00:00 AM |
HB 168 |
| HB 315 Proposed SCS Version R 041310.pdf |
SFIN 4/13/2010 9:00:00 AM SFIN 4/13/2010 1:30:00 PM SFIN 4/13/2010 2:30:00 PM |
HB 315 |