Legislature(2021 - 2022)DAVIS 106
04/27/2021 03:00 PM House HEALTH & SOCIAL SERVICES
Note: the audio ![]()
and video ![]()
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB116 | |
| HB105 | |
| HB184 | |
| HB106 | |
| SB65 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| += | HB 184 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 116 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 105 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 106 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | SB 65 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED |
HB 184-REQUIRE TRIBAL CHILD WELFARE COMPACT
3:52:37 PM
CO-CHAIR SNYDER announced that the next order of business would
be HOUSE BILL NO. 184, "An Act requiring state participation in
a tribal child welfare compact."
3:53:01 PM
CO-CHAIR SNYDER opened invited testimony on HB 184.
3:53:29 PM
The committee took an at-ease from 3:53 p.m. to 3:56 p.m.
3:56:20 PM
TREVOR STORRS, President and CEO, Alaska Children's Trust (ACT),
provided invited testimony in support of HB 184. He said ACT is
in strong support of an Alaska tribal child welfare compact, a
government-to-government partnership between the State of Alaska
and Alaska's 18 federally recognized Native tribes and tribal
organizations that would share the tasks of funding negotiated
child welfare services and supports. He pointed out that Alaska
Native children make up 15 percent of the state's general
population but represent about 65 percent of the kids in state
custody. These numbers, he stated, are a direct result of
colonization, historical trauma, and racism.
MR. STORRS said there is no question that the intervention from
state government may be well-meaning, but without consultation
or coordination with tribal entities it is at best the "white
savior complex" and at worst "reinforcing colonization." When
historically white institutions impose their practices and
policies as the right way even when they are doing harm, they
are sending the message of colonization, the message that Alaska
Native people can't be trusted to do or know what is best for
themselves. A compact, he continued, would be a first step in
addressing and changing the systemic racism in the system and
taking the long overdue steps towards acknowledgement,
accountability, and healing. Coming together to combat child
abuse and neglect across sectors works when local and state
governments have strong trust and partnership, he stated. Trust
is built by acknowledging harm that has been done to communities
and taking ownership of the ways colonization has shaped
operation of the child welfare system prior to the Alaska Tribal
Child Welfare Compact.
3:58:21 PM
MR. STORRS explained that taking children from their families,
cultures, and communities to place in foster care and adoption
outside their culture has caused multiple generations of
historical trauma. He said poor outcomes are seen for Alaska
Native children in the child protective system due to complex
chronic trauma reinforced by systems that are not built for, or
by, them. The impact of institutionalized child abuse and
neglect is a cycle of historical trauma that started with the
trauma of colonization and continues with personal family
trauma, removal of children from families, mental health issues,
collective trauma, and more. The basic principles of state
child protection, he continued, are that when a family fails to
ensure safety and well-being of the child, the state steps in,
possibly removes the child, and assumes the system is better
than the parent. This model does not work, he charged,
especially for Alaska Native children and families. When these
situations are identified, who better than the communities
themselves to work with the families and the tribe to identify
needs and resolve the issues? A key step in healing the
historical traumas caused over time, Mr. Storrs stated, is to
return power to the tribes to care for their own children in
ways that center tribal community knowledge, customs, and
values. He pointed out that identified at-risk families receive
very few services for poverty reduction, housing, mental health,
health, or substance misuse. He stressed the need to reframe
how child welfare services are thought about and urged that
these services be addressed when talking about child welfare.
MR. STORRS stated that now is the time to give self-
determination and sovereignty to the communities to determine
how best to care for their children and families by giving power
back to the tribes. He said a tribal child welfare compact
would be a huge step towards ensuring that Native children grow
up in safe, stable, and nurturing relationships and
environments. He related ACT's wholehearted support for HB 184.
4:01:36 PM
BRITANY MADROS, Director, Tribal Government & Justice Division,
Tanana Chiefs Conference (TCC), provided invited testimony in
support of HB 184. She noted that TCC is one of twelve Alaska
Native regional nonprofit corporations and provides a unified
voice in advancing sovereign tribal governments. She further
noted that TCC services all tribal members of the 37 federally
recognized tribes within its 235,000-square-mile region, as well
as all eligible Alaska Native and American Indians residing
within the Fairbanks North Star Borough.
MS. MADROS stated that since the early 1980s TCC has assisted
the tribes within its region with developing tribal courts, and
TCC supports this development through training, technical
assistance, and legal support. She said Alaska tribes are
confirmed to have clear civil jurisdiction, particularly in
domestic relations over children, even in the absence of Indian
Country or tribal reservations. In 2020, she conveyed, the TCC
region had 191 children in tribal court custody; intervened on
92 state Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA) cases; had 23 children
transferred from state to tribal court custody; reunified 21
children with one or both parents, resulting in family
preservation; had four youth age out of the foster care system;
had 10 children granted guardianships with family or extended
relatives; had 32 youth still in long-term guardianships; and
facilitated over 280 tribal court hearings for child welfare
cases.
4:04:43 PM
MS. MADROS said solutions are now emerging for multiple ways for
tribes and states to work together, including the tribal-state
welfare compact being discussed today. She related that TCC has
provided services through the diligent relative search scope
within the compact, has assisted with approximately 30 cases for
ensuring ICWA-preference placements for families, and assisted
about seven families with submitting a petition so they could be
considered a foster care placement for one of their family
members. She shared that TCC is looking to extend its scopes
and assist with safety evaluations, safe visitations, and
licensing given TCC also has its own tribal care licensing
program. However, Ms. Madros continued, due to staff shortages
and the amount of time needed to cover so many scopes, TCC is
hoping the state continues to work together on negotiations to
ensure the provision of these services, whether working with
tribal or state workers depending on the needs of those
families.
MS. MADROS expressed TCC's support for this compact agreement
and added that TCC is thankful the state is working with the
tribes regarding child welfare. She said it is important to the
tribes that the safety and well-being of their children is
protected, whether by the state or tribe, because without their
children the tribes will not continue to exist. She thanked the
committee for considering HB 184.
4:07:25 PM
REPRESENTATIVE PRAX offered his understanding that the state was
going to be talking with the tribes and reach an agreement.
However, he continued, the previous speaker made it sound like
somebody was going to dictate something to the state, and [the
legislature] had to go along with it. He asked whether there
are examples of what is being talked about in HB 184.
CO-CHAIR ZULKOSKY answered that the intent of HB 184 is not to
dictate but to provide a collaborative partnership to address
issues. She said the intention behind a tribal child welfare
compact, as highlighted by the testimony of Mr. Storrs, is that
it is a collaborative partnership to address the issues of child
welfare across Alaska, particularly given that a significant
disproportionate percentage of the children in foster care in
Alaska are Alaska Native youth. As heard in the testimony of
Ms. Madros, tribes are willing, able, and standing to negotiate
with the state every year to provide these programs in alignment
with the State of Alaska. The bill, she continued, merely says
that the state shall participate in a tribal child welfare
compact. The particulars related to the negotiations of the
scopes of work and the annual funding agreement are negotiated
between the tribes and the state every year, she explained.
Nothing is dictated in HB 184 beyond that this compact and
agreement will be enshrined and protected in statute.
4:09:50 PM
REPRESENTATIVE KURKA stated that while he is excited about the
progress being made here on the child welfare compact, he is
concerned about the requirement that the state participate. He
requested further explanation regarding the annual renegotiation
process.
CO-CHAIR ZULKOSKY responded that the current Alaska Tribal Child
Welfare Compact is an executive initiative within the governor's
office and administration. She related that it began under the
Walker Administration and has been continued under the Dunleavy
Administration. The compact itself is a legal document and
agreement that is outlined between the tribes and the state, she
explained, and updates are negotiated annually. They may
revisit scopes of work that can be expanded, they might identify
issues that were had in implementing certain scopes of work, or
they may revisit funding agreements related to those scopes of
work. Every year there is an effective and efficient evaluation
of the current scopes of work and what is being accomplished to
determine if updates need to be made, which is nimbler than
statute or regulation. It allows for more local control, she
continued, and more opportunity for tribes to provide feedback
on what is or isn't working, as well as for the state to provide
feedback, and allows an opportunity for those updates to be made
annually.
4:13:29 PM
REPRESENTATIVE KURKA asked who is negotiating the compact on
behalf of the state.
4:13:57 PM
KIM GUAY, Director, Office of Children's Services (OCS),
Department of Health and Social Services (DHSS), responded that
currently the state has three co-lead negotiators: herself as
director of OCS; Clinton Lasley, DHSS Deputy Commissioner,
Family, Community and Integrated Services; and John Moller of
the governor's office. She noted that the tribal side also has
three lead negotiators.
REPRESENTATIVE KURKA asked whether, from the perspective of the
administration, passage of HB 184 as written would tie hands,
alter the negotiations that are happening now, or change the
tone of the current negotiations.
MS. GUAY replied she doesn't know the answer to the question,
but that the compact is a legally binding document. She stated
that [the administration] is engaged in the tribal compact and
has no intention of not engaging in the compact.
REPRESENTATIVE SPOHNHOLZ noted that the first tribal compact was
signed in 2017, and both the Walker and Dunleavy administrations
have supported the compact. She explained that HB 184 is only
nine lines long, is very general and gives the administration a
lot of flexibility in how it would be implemented. The bill
doesn't say what specific scopes of work must be included and
has no fiscal note. She said it is a policy call on the part of
the legislature to say that child welfare compacting with tribes
is a good thing and the legislature wants the administration to
continue to do that.
4:17:36 PM
REPRESENTATIVE MCCARTY noted that the premise of this whole
thing is the protection of children. He asked Mr. Storrs
whether there are criteria for what represents child abuse.
MR. STORRS replied that it is already outlined, and OCS has
criteria that it follows.
REPRESENTATIVE MCCARTY recalled Mr. Storrs' statements about
multi-generational patterns within families and communities. He
inquired about the differences in criteria for child abuse in
tribal areas or villages versus non-tribal areas in Alaska.
Responding to Ms. Guay, he confirmed he is asking about the
difference of maltreatment between rural communities and more
urban communities but added that he is asking this with the
paradigm of criteria that are had for the care of all children
and making sure no child is abused, and the differentiation that
is being seen.
MS. GUAY answered that there is a disproportionate number, 60-65
percent, of Alaska Native children throughout the system and
that includes the number of children reported to OCS. She said
this disproportionate number is consistent on all decision
points that happen at OCS the reporting calls that come into
OCS, the calls that are subsequently investigated after
screening, the ones that end up into maltreatment, and the ones
that end up into foster care.
4:22:32 PM
CO-CHAIR ZULKOSKY offered her opinion that the last question is
a bit off topic and seems like an implication that Alaska Native
families are implicitly more likely to neglect or abuse their
children. She requested clarification of the question.
REPRESENTATIVE MCCARTY disagreed with that interpretation. He
stated that when doing an equitable review of all the children
in Alaska he is asking whether it is disproportionate because of
bias, or disproportionate because there is a need that exists
and how that need can be reached most effectively. What the
ways are to reach that need, he continued, and whether those are
being done is the whole question of the bill.
MS. GUAY stated that the best option for families is to have
tribal members meet the families where they're at to help them
access both cultural and modernized resources. She pointed out
that tribes can navigate both the tribal world and the state
world, so the tribes know how to seek the resources for their
families that are in need. Regarding Representative McCarty's
first question, Ms. Guay said she doesn't know the answer but
thinks it goes into poverty in children as well as bias of
people over-representing calling in reports on Alaska Native
children. Also, Alaska Native children and families are
surrounded with a lot more mandatory reporters than other
families, she noted. Alaska Native families are reported for
numerous reasons, including historical trauma and other things
that equate into why Alaska Natives are disproportionately
represented in OCS and amongst other systems.
MS. MADROS agreed the question is complex and that there are
many variables of why Alaska Native children are
disproportionately represented. She said a lot of that has
taken years to accumulate to where things are at today, although
the 60-65 percent has stayed steady for many years. Due to
services being harder to be received or met in isolated
communities, she continued, it possibly makes Alaska Native
families and communities have more hurdles to either get an
investigation closed or if a case is created to get that case
closed with reunification. Poverty and isolation play a role in
the many hurdles faced by Alaska Native families, she added,
along with other more sensitive topics like generational trauma
and topics that are heard as buzz words when speaking of child
welfare and child protection.
4:27:41 PM
REPRESENTATIVE PRAX asked whether the existing compact is
available for review.
CO-CHAIR ZULKOSKY replied that it is on the DHSS website. She
further noted that the tribes will make specific elements of the
compact available at the request of committee members.
REPRESENTATIVE MCCARTY requested that the committee receive the
compact.
CO-CHAIR SNYDER noted the request.
REPRESENTATIVE KURKA asked whether the entire compact is on the
website or just parts.
CO-CHAIR ZULKOSKY responded that the tribes will provide
elements at the committee's request and the compact itself is on
the DHSS website.
4:29:54 PM
KATY GIORGIO, Staff, Representative Tiffany Zulkosky, Alaska
State Legislature, on behalf of Representative Zulkosky, prime
sponsor of HB 184, answered that the 2017 compact is available
on the OCS website. She said Ms. Hensley could provide more
details on the annual negotiations
4:30:07 PM
CO-CHAIR SNYDER opened public testimony on HB 184, then closed
public testimony after ascertaining no one wished to testify.
4:30:28 PM
CO-CHAIR ZULKOSKY provided closing comments on HB 184. She said
the state and DHSS intend to continue the Tribal Child Welfare
Compact, which was related by Ms. Guay. A compact agreement is
signed, scopes of work are negotiated, and funding agreements
are tied to the different scopes of work. It is very important
for the state to meet families where they are at. She pointed
out that tribes offer an opportunity to wrap the preventative
resources that they receive from the federal government around
families; the intention is not to remove children from their
families, but to keep them preserved in their families. This
work complements the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA). All these
parts work together, Co-Chair Zulkosky continued, there is not
one element of child welfare that is going to turn the tide on
the disproportionality. There are multi-faceted components
which lead families to crisis, and which lead the state to
getting involved, and in this situation the intention is to
engender public trust by tribes. Families are more inclined to
work with the tribe than the state and better results are seen
because of that. The only way to turn the tide on the
disproportionality, she opined, is making a policy call that by
providing state services as close to home as possible through
familiar entities like tribes in Alaska villages is in the best
interest of both the state and the tribes. The intent behind
drafting the bill's current language is to keep it broad and
general to have the most amount of latitude so there is not any
tying of hands. If tribes can leverage federal resources, she
added, the state will see cost savings. She said HB 184 seeks
to protect and preserve the ingenuity of what the Tribal Child
Welfare Compact is.
4:34:48 PM
REPRESENTATIVE KURKA stated that due to unanswered questions he
will not vote to pass HB 184 out of committee.
REPRESENTATIVE SPOHNHOLZ stated that child welfare compacting
creates opportunity to make big progress in keeping families
together and keeping communities together. This compacting has
been successful so far by helping to provide higher quality
services closer to home at a lower cost, she continued. It has
helped to strengthen state services and leverage the resources
that tribes bring to the discussion on an issue of shared
interest, which has increased public trust in the process; it is
a proven strategy that builds on the strengths of communities.
She said the sponsor has done a great job of giving the
administration lots of flexibility to be able to manage it
effectively in partnership with local tribes. She offered her
support for advancing the bill.
REPRESENTATIVE FIELDS expressed his support for HB 184 as a
positive step.
4:38:47 PM
REPRESENTATIVE FIELDS moved to report HB 184 out of committee
with individual recommendations and the accompanying zero fiscal
note.
REPRESENTATIVE MCCARTY objected. He allowed there is merit in
what Representative Spohnholz has shared and that wrap-around
services in the community are best, he stated he needs more
information to be able to make an informed decision.
A roll call vote was taken. Representatives Spohnholz, Fields,
Zulkosky, and Snyder voted in favor of HB 184. Representatives
McCarty, Prax, and Kurka voted against it. Therefore, HB 184
was reported out of the House Health and Social Services
Standing Committee by a vote of 4-3.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| SB 65 v. B.pdf |
HHSS 4/27/2021 3:00:00 PM HHSS 4/29/2021 3:00:00 PM HHSS 5/4/2021 3:00:00 PM |
SB 65 |
| SB 65 Sponsor Statement 2.4.2021.pdf |
HHSS 4/27/2021 3:00:00 PM HHSS 4/29/2021 3:00:00 PM HHSS 5/4/2021 3:00:00 PM HJUD 5/5/2021 1:00:00 PM HJUD 5/17/2021 1:00:00 PM SHSS 2/16/2021 1:30:00 PM |
SB 65 |
| SB 65 Sectional Analysis v. B 2.4.2021.pdf |
HHSS 4/27/2021 3:00:00 PM HHSS 4/29/2021 3:00:00 PM HHSS 5/4/2021 3:00:00 PM SHSS 2/16/2021 1:30:00 PM |
SB 65 |
| SB 65 Letter of Support ASMA 2.11.2021.pdf |
HHSS 4/27/2021 3:00:00 PM HHSS 4/29/2021 3:00:00 PM SHSS 2/16/2021 1:30:00 PM |
SB 65 |
| SB 65 Letter of Support Alaska Chiropractic Society.pdf |
HHSS 4/27/2021 3:00:00 PM HHSS 4/29/2021 3:00:00 PM SHSS 2/18/2021 1:30:00 PM |
SB 65 |
| SB 65 Amendment 1 Hughes.pdf |
HHSS 4/27/2021 3:00:00 PM |
SB 65 |
| SB 65 Amendment 1 Hughes.pdf |
HHSS 4/27/2021 3:00:00 PM HHSS 4/29/2021 3:00:00 PM SHSS 2/18/2021 1:30:00 PM |
SB 65 |
| SB 65 Amendment 2 Wilson.pdf |
HHSS 4/27/2021 3:00:00 PM HHSS 4/29/2021 3:00:00 PM |
SB 65 |
| SB65 Amendment 3.12.21.pdf |
HHSS 4/27/2021 3:00:00 PM SJUD 3/12/2021 1:30:00 PM |
SB 65 |
| CSSB65 Ver. I.PDF |
HHSS 4/27/2021 3:00:00 PM HHSS 4/29/2021 3:00:00 PM HHSS 5/4/2021 3:00:00 PM SJUD 3/31/2021 1:30:00 PM |
SB 65 |
| SB 65.msg |
HHSS 4/27/2021 3:00:00 PM |
SB 65 |
| SB65 Public Testimony.pdf |
HHSS 4/27/2021 3:00:00 PM HHSS 4/29/2021 3:00:00 PM SJUD 3/31/2021 1:30:00 PM |
SB 65 |
| SB 65 Version C.PDF |
HHSS 4/27/2021 3:00:00 PM HHSS 4/29/2021 3:00:00 PM |
SB 65 |
| SB 65 Zero Fiscal Note.PDF |
HHSS 4/27/2021 3:00:00 PM HHSS 4/29/2021 3:00:00 PM |
SB 65 |
| HB 116 Sponsor Statement, v. A.pdf |
HHSS 4/27/2021 3:00:00 PM HHSS 4/29/2021 3:00:00 PM |
HB 116 |
| HB 116 Supporting Document - Carey Acquittal, 2017.pdf |
HHSS 4/27/2021 3:00:00 PM |
HB 116 |
| HB 116 Supporting Document, FAQs 4.10.21.pdf |
HHSS 4/27/2021 3:00:00 PM HHSS 4/29/2021 3:00:00 PM |
HB 116 |
| HB 116 Supporting Document - Temporary Secure Juvenile Holding Area.pdf |
HHSS 4/27/2021 3:00:00 PM HHSS 4/29/2021 3:00:00 PM |
HB 116 |
| HB 116, v. A.PDF |
HHSS 4/27/2021 3:00:00 PM |
HB 116 |
| HB 116 Letters of Support Received as of 4.20.21.pdf |
HHSS 4/27/2021 3:00:00 PM |
HB 116 |
| HB 116 PowerPoint Presentation.pdf |
HHSS 4/27/2021 3:00:00 PM HHSS 4/29/2021 3:00:00 PM |
HB 116 |
| HB 116 Sectional Analysis, v. A.pdf |
HHSS 4/27/2021 3:00:00 PM |
HB 116 |
| DHSS Comparison Memo- HB116 - HB105 and SB91 (4-14-21).pdf |
HHSS 4/27/2021 3:00:00 PM HHSS 4/29/2021 3:00:00 PM |
HB 105 HB 116 SB 91 |
| DHSS comparison of HB116 (HB105 or SB91) with notes.pdf |
HHSS 4/27/2021 3:00:00 PM HHSS 4/29/2021 3:00:00 PM |
HB 105 HB 116 SB 91 |
| HB 105 v. A 2.19.2021.PDF |
HHSS 4/15/2021 3:00:00 PM HHSS 4/17/2021 3:00:00 PM HHSS 4/27/2021 3:00:00 PM HHSS 4/29/2021 3:00:00 PM HJUD 3/5/2021 1:30:00 PM HJUD 3/10/2021 1:30:00 PM |
HB 105 |
| HB 105 Transmittal Letter 2.18.2021.pdf |
HHSS 4/15/2021 3:00:00 PM HHSS 4/17/2021 3:00:00 PM HHSS 4/27/2021 3:00:00 PM HHSS 4/29/2021 3:00:00 PM HJUD 3/5/2021 1:30:00 PM HJUD 3/10/2021 1:30:00 PM |
HB 105 |
| HB 105 Sectional Analysis v. A 2.23.2021.pdf |
HHSS 4/17/2021 3:00:00 PM HHSS 4/27/2021 3:00:00 PM HJUD 3/5/2021 1:30:00 PM HJUD 3/10/2021 1:30:00 PM |
HB 105 |
| HB 105 Fiscal Note DOC-IDO 2.8.2021.pdf |
HHSS 4/15/2021 3:00:00 PM HHSS 4/17/2021 3:00:00 PM HHSS 4/27/2021 3:00:00 PM HJUD 3/5/2021 1:30:00 PM HJUD 3/10/2021 1:30:00 PM |
HB 105 |
| HB 105 Fiscal Note DHSS-PS 2.10.2021.pdf |
HHSS 4/15/2021 3:00:00 PM HHSS 4/17/2021 3:00:00 PM HHSS 4/27/2021 3:00:00 PM HJUD 3/5/2021 1:30:00 PM HJUD 3/10/2021 1:30:00 PM |
HB 105 |
| HB 105 Fiscal Note DPS-AST 2.12.2021.pdf |
HHSS 4/15/2021 3:00:00 PM HHSS 4/17/2021 3:00:00 PM HHSS 4/27/2021 3:00:00 PM HHSS 4/29/2021 3:00:00 PM HJUD 3/5/2021 1:30:00 PM HJUD 3/10/2021 1:30:00 PM |
HB 105 |
| HB 105 Fiscal Note JUD-ACS 3.4.2021.pdf |
HHSS 4/15/2021 3:00:00 PM HHSS 4/17/2021 3:00:00 PM HHSS 4/27/2021 3:00:00 PM HJUD 3/5/2021 1:30:00 PM HJUD 3/10/2021 1:30:00 PM |
HB 105 |
| HB 105 Supporting Document - ABADA & AMHB Letter 3.5.2021.pdf |
HHSS 4/15/2021 3:00:00 PM HHSS 4/17/2021 3:00:00 PM HHSS 4/27/2021 3:00:00 PM HHSS 4/29/2021 3:00:00 PM HJUD 3/10/2021 1:30:00 PM |
HB 105 |
| HB 105 Testimony - Received as of 3.8.2021.pdf |
HHSS 4/15/2021 3:00:00 PM HHSS 4/17/2021 3:00:00 PM HHSS 4/27/2021 3:00:00 PM HHSS 4/29/2021 3:00:00 PM HJUD 3/10/2021 1:30:00 PM |
HB 105 |
| HB 105 Additional Document - Memo from DJJ to HJUD 3.9.2021.pdf |
HHSS 4/15/2021 3:00:00 PM HHSS 4/17/2021 3:00:00 PM HHSS 4/27/2021 3:00:00 PM HHSS 4/29/2021 3:00:00 PM HJUD 3/10/2021 1:30:00 PM |
HB 105 |
| HB 105 v. A Amendments #1-2 HJUD Final Votes 3.10.2021.pdf |
HHSS 4/15/2021 3:00:00 PM HHSS 4/17/2021 3:00:00 PM HHSS 4/27/2021 3:00:00 PM HHSS 4/29/2021 3:00:00 PM HJUD 3/10/2021 1:30:00 PM |
HB 105 |
| HB 105 v. B (Distributed by HJUD Committee) 3.12.2021.PDF |
HHSS 4/15/2021 3:00:00 PM HHSS 4/27/2021 3:00:00 PM HHSS 4/29/2021 3:00:00 PM HJUD 4/14/2021 1:00:00 PM |
HB 105 |
| HB 116 Additional Document - DHSS Comparison of HB 116 and HB 105 (SB 91) with Notes 4.14.2021.pdf |
HHSS 4/27/2021 3:00:00 PM HHSS 4/29/2021 3:00:00 PM HJUD 4/14/2021 1:00:00 PM HJUD 4/16/2021 1:00:00 PM |
HB 105 HB 116 SB 91 |
| HB 184 LOS_Alaska Childrens Trust.pdf |
HHSS 4/27/2021 3:00:00 PM HTRB 5/4/2021 8:00:00 AM SHSS 3/31/2022 1:30:00 PM |
HB 184 |
| HB 184 LOS_Alaska Regional Coalition.pdf |
HHSS 4/27/2021 3:00:00 PM SHSS 3/31/2022 1:30:00 PM |
HB 184 |