Legislature(2019 - 2020)DAVIS 106
02/27/2020 03:00 PM House HEALTH & SOCIAL SERVICES
Note: the audio
and video
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB189 | |
| HB242 | |
| HB184 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| *+ | HB 242 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | HB 189 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | HB 184 | TELECONFERENCED | |
HB 184-CONTROLLED SUB. DATA: EXEMPT VETERINARIAN
4:27:34 PM
CHAIR ZULKOSKY announced that the final order of business would
be HOUSE BILL NO. 184, "An Act exempting veterinarians from the
requirements of the controlled substance prescription database."
4:27:59 PM
REPRESENTATIVE DAVE TALERICO, Alaska State Legislature,
introduced HB 184 and paraphrased from the Sponsor Statement
[Included in members' packets], which read:
HB 184 is proposed to exempt Veterinarians from
Prescription Drug Monitoring Programs (PDMPs).
Prescription Drug Monitoring Programs (PDMPs) were
designed for use in human medicine to identify doctor
shopping by human patients and monitor trends in
prescribing practices by health care providers.
Veterinarians want to be part of the solution of the
opioid crisis, but PDMPs have not been an effective
mechanism to do this.
By mandating that veterinarians query and report the
owner's name and date of birth, there are significant
concerns about potential violations of privacy of
human medical information. Veterinarians are not
trained in privacy regulations concerning human
medical data, nor are they trained in appropriate
medications, doses, or prescribing practices for human
medicine. As we have talked informally with pet owners
and others in the general public, they are not aware
that their veterinarian would have access to any part
of their medical information and are dismayed to learn
this.
Animal patients themselves cannot be effectively
tracked through PDMPs. Animals do not have a unique
identifier such as a social security number or even
date of birth. The animal's name may be changed over
time, the date of birth is often not known, and the
owner may change over time.
One national survey found that fewer than 10 cases of
veterinary shopping occur annually in the United
States and concluded that "veterinarians are a de
minimus source of controlled substances." Even those
few cases of veterinary shopping are typically
identified by the veterinarians themselves, not
through PDMPs. In 2017 veterinarians prescribed 0.34%
of all the opioids dispensed by retail pharmacies in
the country (source IQVIA National Prescription
Audit).
Exempting veterinarians from the PDMP will not
diminish the judicious use of controlled substances
that is already practiced by veterinarians and
regulated by the Drug Enforcement Agency and the state
licensing board. Exempting veterinarians from the PDMP
will allow veterinarians to provide timely and
appropriate medical management for each individual
patient. It may save state funds and increase the
efficiency of the PDMP for its intended purpose by
allowing for more accurate interpretation of
prescription data and prescribing trends in human
medicine.
Over 30 states currently exempt veterinarians from
PDMP requirements. Several of those states originally
required veterinarians to report to the PDMP but have
since exempted veterinarians for many of the same
reasons described above.
4:31:04 PM
CHAIR ZULKOSKY asked about the percentage rate in commercial
pharmacies.
REPRESENTATIVE TALERICO stated that, in 2017, veterinarians
prescribed 0.34 percent of all the opioids dispensed by retail
pharmacies in the country. In response to Chair Zulkosky, he
said that he did not have the hard number for this percentage.
4:32:00 PM
REPRESENTATIVE SPOHNHOLZ asked what percentage veterinarians
were of the total prescribers in the country.
REPRESENTATIVE TALERICO deferred to later testifiers.
REPRESENTATIVE CLAMAN asked about the percentage of prescription
dispensing veterinarians in Alaska relative to the rest of the
country.
REPRESENTATIVE TALERICO replied that he did not know.
REPRESENTATIVE CLAMAN asked whether the veterinarians were also
the dispensers.
REPRESENTATIVE TALERICO offered his belief that it was necessary
to be a licensed pharmacy to dispense an opioid.
4:34:52 PM
DR. SARAH COBURN, President, Alaska State Veterinary Medical
Association (AKVMA), stated the AKVMA was "a professional
association dedicated to promoting the excellence and
professionalism of Alaska veterinarians in advancing the health
and well being of animals in the public." She declared support
of the proposed bill, as it would exempt veterinarians from
participating in the state Prescription Drug Monitoring Program
(PDMP). She stated that the veterinary community wanted to
contribute to solutions to the opioid crisis, but participation
in a program designed for use by humans was not appropriate.
She reported that more than 30 states exempted veterinarians
from the PDMP requirements, and some states have now enacted
legislation which removed veterinarians from participation
because their inclusion has not proven to be helpful in
addressing the human opioid epidemic.
DR. COBURN listed numerous reasons for not requiring
veterinarians to search or report information into the PDMP,
including that animal patients cannot be effectively tracked,
and veterinarians are not trained to evaluate human prescription
information or in privacy regulations concerning human medical
data. She added that most pet owners were not aware that the
licensed veterinary technician was the delegated person to
access the personal medical prescription history, considered an
invasion of privacy by many people. She expressed concern that
information entered the PDMP for animal patients would skew the
data and place a disproportionate cost and burden on veterinary
clinics as small business owners. She pointed out that the
information had to be submitted manually as the veterinary
software did not interface with the PDMP. She pointed out that
exempting veterinarians would not diminish the effectiveness of
the PDMP program. She acknowledged that although opioids were
used by veterinarians, these were used for surgical procedures
and anesthesia. She pointed out that veterinarians still had to
meet strict security, record keeping, and storage requirements
of controlled substances. She added that the DEA monitored the
flow of controlled substances. She concluded, offering her
belief the exemption of veterinarians from using the PDMP would
not weaken the success of the program or affect the judicious
and highly regulated use of controlled substances by
veterinarians. She reiterated that the AKVMA supported HB 184.
REPRESENTATIVE CLAMAN asked if the statistics she referenced
were for Alaska.
DR. COBURN said that these were recent statistics from the PDMP
annual report for each profession in Alaska.
REPRESENTATIVE CLAMAN asked if veterinary clinics were
considered retail pharmacies.
DR. COBURN said, "they are not."
4:42:53 PM
DR. JIM DELKER, Alaska State Veterinary Medical Association, in
response to Representative Claman, he said that a prescription
for a pet could be filled either by the veterinarian or a
pharmacist. He declared that most veterinarians had the
pharmacy fill the prescription for opiates to relieve the
veterinarian of the pressures to report. In response to
Representative Claman, he said that who dispensed a medication
would depend on the drug. He pointed out that the drugs
indicated in more drug overdoses such as oxycontin, Percocet,
and Vicodin were not commonly dispensed by veterinarians.
REPRESENTATIVE CLAMAN asked for clarity for the difference
between prescribing and dispensing.
DR. DELKER said that he would write a prescription to the
pharmacy for a medication they did not carry, noting that a
controlled substance had to have a written prescription, whereas
an antibiotic did not.
REPRESENTATIVE CLAMAN asked if veterinarians dispensed small
quantities of opioid medication from their clinic.
DR. DELKER replied that the majority of those were sent to a
retail pharmacy.
CHAIR ZULKOSKY asked if Alaska veterinarians could dispense
opioids within the clinic.
DR. COBURN said, "yes."
CHAIR ZULKOSKY asked about the percentage of opioids dispensed
from a clinic before using a commercial pharmacy.
DR. COBURN said that she would follow up for the number. She
stated that opioids were in limited use as take-home
medications, that most opioids were used in the hospital related
to surgical procedures and were not to be dispensed.
CHAIR ZULKOSKY pointed out that the PDMP illuminated the data
for opioid prescriptions. She expressed her understanding that
there were conditions for opioids dispensed in a clinic. She
asked how often Alaska veterinarians used commercial pharmacies
versus directly dispensing controlled substances.
DR. COBURN said that she would research that.
CHAIR ZULKOSKY shared an anecdote that animal owners had
intentionally harmed an animal in order to drug shop for
controlled substances, and she asked if there was mandatory
reporting in Alaska for suspicion of animal abuse.
DR. COBURN stated that there was not mandatory reporting but
that it was authorized to report without any privacy concerns.
She declared that animal abuse was illegal in Alaska, and that
ethical conduct would lead a veterinarian to report to an
appropriate authority if there was concern for intentional
injury. She stated that, as it was necessary to have a
veterinarian-client/patient relationship, the standard of care
in veterinary medicine was for an in-person physical examination
of the animal to establish that relationship. She shared that
the PDMP was not designed for animal data.
CHAIR ZULKOSKY asked about the training or guidance provided to
veterinarians to utilize the PDMP.
4:52:23 PM
MS. CHAMBERS explained that when the PDMP became mandatory for
all prescribing professions and pharmacists, which included
veterinarians, the Board of Veterinary Examiners had the
authority and ability to work with the Board of Pharmacy to
write the regulations to figure these out. She declared that it
had been a struggle for the Board of Veterinary Examiners to
wrestle with these issues for how to make it work. She reported
that these efforts to make it work did not progress, and, since
2018, there had not been an attempt at a regulations project or
a move to adapt the technology.
CHAIR ZULKOSKY reiterated that there was not broad support
provided to users of the PDMP by the Department to ensure they
had what was necessary to access or provide information.
MS. CHAMBERS pointed out that the PDMP was primarily designed
for human use. When the Board of Veterinary Examiners reviewed
the statutes, they realized that, with the way the law was
written and the way the technology was set up, it was necessary
for more work to understand how to advise their licensees. She
stated that it was not possible for her department to train
licensees until the Board of Veterinary Examiners worked through
these problems with regulation and technology changes.
4:55:49 PM
DR. SCOTT FLAMME, Board of Veterinary Examiners, reported that
he had been practicing in Fairbanks for the past 17 years. He
declared that 38 states had now exempted veterinarians from the
PDMP. He acknowledged the difficulty for using a data base for
animal data that was designed for humans, and shared that other
states had this same struggle. He emphasized that it "just does
not work." He declared that veterinarians cared about the
opioid epidemic and wanted to do their part to help prevent
addiction and to prevent any harm to Alaskans. He pointed out
that veterinarians in Alaska only prescribed 0.34 percent of the
controlled substances. He offered an analogy of buying a
$60,000 pickup truck to plow a driveway that was 12 feet long
and 5 feet wide., adding that it did not make any sense as the
data was not helpful.
DR. FLAMME stated that the PDMP was costly to the public, and
that the public was shocked when it learned that veterinarians
who had no training in human medicine or privacy laws were
mandated to access the private health data before prescribing to
an animal patient. He added that the public was equally
dismayed when their PDMP risk scores were altered because of an
animal prescription, as the assessments included a mix of human
and animal data. He stated that the cost to the public would be
borne out with an increase in the shortage of veterinarians. He
pointed out that the Board of Veterinary Medical Examiners was
mandated to investigate and discipline veterinarians who failed
to correctly use the PDMP, while paying for those
investigations. He noted that Alaska had the highest licensing
fees for veterinarians in the United States. He urged support
for HB 184.
5:00:21 PM
HB 184 was held over.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| HB 184A 02.17.2020.PDF |
HHSS 2/27/2020 3:00:00 PM |
HB 184 |
| HB 184 Veterinarian Medical Association PP.pdf |
HHSS 2/27/2020 3:00:00 PM |
HB 184 |
| HB 184 Sponsor Statement.pdf |
HHSS 2/27/2020 3:00:00 PM |
HB 184 |
| HB 184 Legislative Alert PDMP exemption for veterinarians 12.21.2019.pdf |
HHSS 2/27/2020 3:00:00 PM |
HB 184 |
| HB 184 Board of Veterinarian Examiners Letter.pdf |
HHSS 2/27/2020 3:00:00 PM |
HB 184 |
| HB 184 Fiscal Note DCCED.pdf |
HHSS 2/27/2020 3:00:00 PM |
HB 184 |
| HB 189 ver A 1.24.20.PDF |
HHSS 2/27/2020 3:00:00 PM |
HB 189 |
| HB 189 Sponsor Statement 1.24.20.pdf |
HHSS 2/27/2020 3:00:00 PM |
HB 189 |
| HB 189 Fiscal Note DHSS.pdf |
HHSS 2/27/2020 3:00:00 PM |
HB 189 |
| HB 242 Sectional Analysis.pdf |
HHSS 2/27/2020 3:00:00 PM |
HB 242 |
| HB 242 Pharmacy Board Audit 2017.pdf |
HHSS 2/27/2020 3:00:00 PM |
HB 242 |
| HB 242 PDMP 2019 Legislative Report.pdf |
HHSS 2/27/2020 3:00:00 PM |
HB 242 |
| HB 242 Sponsor Statement.pdf |
HHSS 2/27/2020 3:00:00 PM |
HB 242 |
| HB 242 Audit of the Medical Board 2019.pdf |
HHSS 2/27/2020 3:00:00 PM |
HB 242 |
| HB 242.PDF |
HHSS 2/27/2020 3:00:00 PM |
HB 242 |
| HB 242 Fiscal Note DCCED.pdf |
HHSS 2/27/2020 3:00:00 PM |
HB 242 |
| HB 242 Fiscal Note DHSS.pdf |
HHSS 2/27/2020 3:00:00 PM |
HB 242 |
| HB 242 Overprescription by Spayd & Davidhizar.pdf |
HHSS 2/27/2020 3:00:00 PM |
HB 242 |