Legislature(2023 - 2024)DAVIS 106
03/15/2024 08:00 AM House EDUCATION
Note: the audio ![]()
and video ![]()
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB55 | |
| HB274 | |
| HB183 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| += | HB 55 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | HB 183 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| += | HB 274 | TELECONFERENCED | |
HB 183-DESIGNATE SEX FOR SCHOOL-SPONSORED SPORTS
8:36:03 AM
CO-CHAIR RUFFRIDGE announced that the final order of business
would be HOUSE BILL NO. 183, "An Act relating to school
athletics, recreation, athletic teams, and sports; and providing
for an effective date."
8:36:21 AM
CO-CHAIR ALLARD, as prime sponsor, presented HB 183. She read
from the sponsor statement [included in the committee packet],
which read as follows [original punctuation provided]:
It is in our very recent history that women and the
men who champion them have had to fight for women's
rights and equality in our society. Can you believe it
has barely been 100 years since women were granted the
right to vote? Since then, we have come a long way,
with legislation supporting and protecting women's
rights and protecting us from discrimination. Our
culture has embraced and advanced the notion that
women deserve the same opportunities as men. And we
have made leaps and bounds in opportunities available
to women and girls to participate in sports.
Girls who participate in sports reap huge benefits for
a lifetime. They gain confidence, good habits, strong
bodies, and bones, and have a lower chance of
osteoporosis, breast cancer, and depression. They have
a more positive body image and higher levels of self-
esteem. They grow into strong women who are leaders
and role models in our communities. They carry the
lessons learned far beyond the playing field. And
thanks to Title IX, their right to equal opportunities
in sports and education is federally protected.
Title IX states that, "No person in the United States
shall, on the basis of sex, be excluded from
participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be
subjected to discrimination under any educational
program or activity receiving Federal financial
assistance." We can thank our very own Senator Ted
Stevens for this legislation which has protected and
promoted women in sports since its passage in 1972.
The impact of this legislation is profound. Before
1972, one in 27 girls participated in sports. That
number is now two in five! Girls' participation in
high school sports has increased by roughly 1000
percent. It has opened the door to more sports
scholarship opportunities for women and for women to
turn their sport into a career. We could even say that
the effects of more women in sports has rippled out
across all sectors, breaking glass ceilings and
elevating women as equals in our nation and even
around the world.
So, what happens when a biological male enters the
ring of women's sports? Being biologically bigger,
stronger, faster, their physical advantage over women
is anything but equal. It takes our nearly level
playing field, which we fought so hard to achieve, and
reduces it to women finishing second again. Women have
worked hard to get where we are today. To set us back
100 years is unacceptable.
When there were threatened changes to Title IX, Sen.
Ted Stevens said: "Having lived this long with Title
IX, I'm going to urge Congress not to support any
changes that could have an adverse effect on the
progress that has already been made under Title IX. We
want more progress." Stevens was the guardian angel of
women in athletics. He would not stand by and allow
culture wars to rob our girls and women of the
progress we have fought so hard to gain.
As a mom of two daughters, I would like to encourage
the State legislature in a bipartisan effort to
support "An Act relating to school athletics,
recreation, athletic teams, and sports." This bill HB
183 acknowledges the biological differences and
disparities between men and women and requires
students to play according to their biological sex.
Our girls deserve a fair playing field. They deserve
the chance to win first place, scholarships, and gold
medals.
Like US Senator Ted Stevens, I will be a champion for
our girls and women. I have endured discrimination and
have conquered obstacles, like my mom and grandmother
and great-grandmother before me, so that my daughters
don't have to. I don't do this for me, I do it for
them. We fight for all our daughters. Expecting women
to be physically equal to men is not equality.
Equality is giving women the same opportunities as
men. But if forced to physically compete against
biological males, women will be disadvantaged once
again. If men can compete as "better" versions of
women, all of our progress for equality is dead.
8:40:59 AM
CO-CHAIR ALLARD gave the sectional analysis to HB 183 [included
in the committee packet], which read as follows [original
punctuation provided]:
Section 1
This section amends the uncodified law of the State of
Alaska by adding a new paragraph with legislative
intent.
Section 2 AS 14.18.150
This section adds Athletic team and sport designation.
(a) A public school, or a private school whose
students or teams compete against a public school,
must designate each school-sponsored athletic team or
sport a
(1) male, men, or boys' team or sport;
(2) female, women, or girls team or sport; or
(3) coeducational or mixed team or sport. (
b) A student who participates in an athletic team
or sport designated female, women, or girls must be
female, based on the participant's biological sex as
either female or male, as designated at the
participant's birth. The biological sex listed on a
participant's birth certificate may be relied on to
establish the participant's biological sex designated
at the participant's birth if the sex designated on
the birth certificate was designated at or near the
time of the participant's birth.
Section 2 AS 14.18.160
This section amends and adds compliance protection
(a) A governmental entity, licensing or
accrediting organization, athletic association, or
school district may not take adverse action against a
school or school district for complying with AS
14.18.150.
(b) A school or a school district may decline to
consider a complaint brought against the school or
school district for complying with AS 14.18.150
Section 2 AS 14.18. 170
This section adds the liability protecting
(a) A student who is deprived of an athletic
opportunity or suffers direct or direct harm resulting
from a violation of AS 14.18.150 may bring a private
cause of action against the violating school.
(b) A student subjected to retaliation or other
adverse action as a result of reporting a violation of
AS 14.18.150 to an employee or representative of a
school, school district, or athletic association or
organization, or to a state or federal government
entity with oversight authority, may bring a private
cause of action against 2 the retaliating entity.
(c) If a school or school district suffers direct
or indirect harm as a result of a violation of AS
14.18.150, the school or school district may bring a
private cause of action against the violating entity.
(d) An action brought under this section must be
commenced within two years of the event giving rise to
the complaint.
Section 2 AS 14.18.180
This section adds Access to courts; relationship to
rights under federal law.
(a) Nothing in AS 14.18.150 - 14.18.190
abrogates, restricts, or otherwise limits
( 1) the access of any person to a state or
federal court; or
(2) a person's right to bring in state or federal
court a complaint or cause of action arising out of AS
14.18.150 - 14.18.190. (
b) AS 14.18.150 - 14.18.190 may not be construed
to modify a person's rights under 20 U.S.C. 1400 -
1482 (Individuals with Disabilities Education Act), 29
U.S.C. 794, or 42 U.S.C. 12101 - 12213.
Section 2 AS 14.18.190
This section adds Definitions. In AS 14.18.150 -
14.18.190,
(1) "school" means an elementary, junior high, or
secondary school; (
2) "school district" means a borough school district,
a city school district, a regional educational
attendance area, a state boarding school, and the
state centralized correspondence study program.
Section 3
This section adds an effective date per AS
01.10.070(c).
8:41:40 AM
CO-CHAIR RUFFRIDGE announced the committee would hear invited
testifiers.
8:42:17 AM
LARRY WHITEMORE, Retired Coach, Alaska High School Hall of Fame,
gave invited testimony in support of HB 183 and provided his
background as an official in sports. He explained the
differences between biological females and biological males. He
related the emotional and physical difficulties "each month"
that females go through, which effects their performance. He
further explained that the [mixed] competition is unfair and
everyone should be allowed to compete but on a fair and equal
playing field. Title 9 must be protected, he said, to save
women's sports from the unfairness of biological males competing
against biological females. He suggested having three
divisions: women's, men's, and a transgender division so
everyone would have an opportunity to participate in a fair and
equitable manner.
8:47:19 AM
The committee took a brief at-ease at 8:47 a.m.
8:47:23 AM
REPRESENTATIVE BARBARA DEE EHARDT, Idaho State Legislature,
provided her background as an athlete and coach and gave invited
testimony in support of HB 183. She explained that "sports are
about winning," especially at the collegiate level, and gave
examples of her experience in competitions. She added that
winning also plays a big role in coaches being able to keep
their jobs. She opined that if "we" are willing to accept "just
one boy," then everyone else's role on the team changes and
everyone must adjust. She thanked the committee for addressing
the issue and offered to stay online for questions.
8:52:46 AM
RILEY GAINES, Retired, NCAA Swimmer, gave invited testimony in
support of HB 183 to protect women's sports at all levels of
competition, she said. She related her experience of having
witnessed Lia Thomas [a transgender woman swimmer] win a women's
national title, beating out the most impressive and accomplished
women in the sport. She said it was clear to her that the NCAA
had reduced everything women had worked their entire lives for.
In addition to losing trophies, they were required to dress in
front of this "male," fully exposing himself, and they were not
asked for their consent, nor did they give it. This person was
not a "one off," and there are many more similar stories across
the nation. She further related scientific facts that have
proven that men have an athletic advantage over females which is
evident in almost every sport, and hormone therapy cannot close
this gap. Allowing men to play women's sports is risky, unfair,
discriminatory, and must stop, she said. She implored the
committee to vote in favor of HB 183 and for the bill to be
amended to include college athletes.
8:56:54 AM
MATTHEW SHARP, Senior Counsel, Director of Center for Public
Policy, Alliance Defending Freedom, gave invited testimony in
support of HB 183. He stated that his firm represented many
female athletes throughout several states who lost out on
championships and other athletic opportunities to biological
males. Women deserve to be on a level playing field, he said,
and it destroys fair competition as men will always have a
physical advantage. There are more instances where men are
taking away awards and women are losing out; therefore, laws
like HB 183 are becoming more urgent than ever and he requested
an amendment to include collegiate athletes so they can receive
full protection under the bill. He explained that federal
courts have long recognized it is constitutional to have
separate programs based on biological sex including sports teams
and locker rooms. He concluded his testimony and urged the
passing of HB 183.
9:02:13 AM
CO-CHAIR RUFFRIDGE invited questions from committee members.
9:02:28 AM
REPRESENTATIVE HIMSCHOOT noted Ms. Gaines had shared numerous
statistics and asked her to state how many transgender people
make up the general population.
MS. GAINES answered that she could not give an accurate
percentage but estimated 1 percent.
REPRESENTATIVE HIMSCHOOT echoed less than 1 percent.
MS. GAINES responded with an example in which 14,000 female
athletes "were displaced by one male athlete."
REPRESENTATIVE HIMSCHOOT noted that two schools in her district
are under threat of closure as a result of the state's inability
to fund them while the bill before the committee addresses less
than one percent of the population of the nation.
MS. GAINES stressed the worthiness of privacy, safety, and equal
opportunities for women, and she said she is disheartened to
hear [Representative Himschoot] sound as if women are
undeserving of those things.
CO-CHAIR ALLARD commented that the bill is as important as any
other bill brought forward in the body.
CO-CHAIR RUFFRIDGE noted that it is an emotion-filled day and
asked everyone to keep comments as kind and clear as possible.
9:05:18 AM
REPRESENTATIVE HIMSCHOOT asked Mr. Sharp whether he could
provide examples in Alaska.
MR. SHARP replied he did not have specific examples.
REPRESENTATIVE HIMSCHOOT asked Mr. Whitmore if he could state
the mission, vision, and value statements for the Alaska School
Activities Association.
MR. WHITMORE sought clarity.
REPRESENTATIVE HIMSCHOOT shared the mission statement and stated
she had no further questions for Mr. Whitmore.
9:07:22 AM
REPRESENTATIVE MCKAY reflected on Representative Himschoot
asking for examples of "these problems" in Alaska and related a
recent story of "a biological male exposing himself" in the
Alaska Club in Wasilla.
9:08:07 AM
REPRESENTATIVE STORY asked the bill sponsor how much work had
been done with Legislative Legal Services, and how the proposed
legislation would impact student privacy and Alaska law.
CO-CHAIR ALLARD confirmed she had worked with Legislative Legal
Services for the bill to be defined legally and not discriminate
against any athletes across the board.
9:10:04 AM
MR. WHITMORE referred to previous conversation about any
evidence of instances in Alaska, and he offered a story about "a
male" from Tok Junction who said he was female and could compete
[in track] because "he" was only "one person" and it wouldn't
make a difference. When parents found out their daughter lost
to "a biological male" and did not make finals, they were
devastated, he said, and this example is only one small part of
what is a "cancer" that will spread through women's sports and
destroy them.
9:11:50 AM
REPRESENTATIVE MCCORMICK reflected on Representative McKay's
story, among others, and stated he did not appreciate anecdotes
and throwing stories out that are unverifiable. He stated he
found it difficult to feel calm about a bill he knows is going
to "kill kids" in his district. He noted the potential for
schools to be sued if they are not in compliance with the bill
and the aftermath that could ensue. He asked the bill sponsor
whether she had given that any consideration.
CO-CHAIR ALLARD pointed out that the bill clearly states schools
cannot be sued. She offered an additional story that supported
the proposed legislation in reference to a male competing in a
female competition leaving the female athletes devastated and
exhausted. She stated that she also supports her own rights as
a woman not to be discriminated against. She stressed that her
concern is more about the discrimination that has already
started.
9:15:23 AM
REPRESENTATIVE MCCORMICK said he appreciated Representative
Allard's comments, but asked whether she gave thought to acts of
violence against transgender individuals, and he acknowledged a
recent case of a transgender individual who had been
hospitalized.
CO-CHAIR ALLARD responded that the bill is brought forward to
protect against the hatred and abuse that has been formed
against women and girls in sports by being exposed to males.
She said she could not speak to others being attacked but that
right now women are being attacked and marginalized, and she
stressed the importance of the bill.
REPRESENTATIVE MCCORMICK stated that transwomen are women, and
agreed only that women are discriminated against in that
context.
CO-CHAIR ALLARD specified that she and Representative McCormick
are not in concurrence. She expressed her belief that
"biological males are biological males and men, and women are
biological women and girls."
9:17:20 AM
REPRESENTATIVE HIMSCHOOT read from page 2, lines 26 to 28 in the
bill and sought confirmation that schools cannot be sued.
CO-CHAIR ALLARD wished to bring Mr. Sharp in to address
Representative Himschoot.
MR. SHARP explained that the bill operates to make sure schools
comply with the law to ensure females competing in sports are
protected and it provides a liability. There would be a legal
remedy available to women in the event of a school refusing to
protect fairness for young women playing on its sports teams.
REPRESENTATIVE HIMSCHOOT asked Mr. Sharp whether an individual
[emphasis on "individual"] could still sue the school district.
MR. SHARP reiterated that if the school were breaking the law,
there would be a legal remedy available for a young woman.
REPRESENTATIVE HIMSCHOOT then asked whether a trans woman could
sue the school.
MR. SHARP answered that under the proposed bill, only a young
woman who is denied an opportunity and suffered a harm could
sue. He indicated that "a man that's wanting to compete on a
women's team" is not "a right given under this"; therefore,
there would be no legal basis to sue the school. He clarified,
"This is only protecting athletes that are deprived
opportunities because of a man competing on a women's team."
REPRESENTATIVE HIMSCHOOT referred to a "right to win" in
athletics and asked whether a short woman who chooses to play
basketball and is surrounded by tall women still has a right to
win.
MR. SHARP responded that there is a right to a fair and equal
playing field, which is one of the things Title 9 was enacted to
do. He added that women were being denied equal opportunities
and HB 183 would fulfill the original intent of Title 9.
9:21:33 AM
REPRESENTATIVE PRAX opined that as a society, we need to "back
off a bit," winning isn't everything, and things are getting
carried away in general. He related a story of a high school
volleyball game recently where ladies were cowered by a young
man on the team; however, he said no one seemed to mind. He
shared his thought to "maybe go back to co-ed sports" and not
worry about scholarships and winning being everything.
9:23:46 AM
CO-CHAIR ALLARD drew attention to page 2 of HB 183 and began
reading on line 9. She explained that while the bill is "being
inclusive," there cannot be mixed, co-ed sports.
9:24:24 AM
CO-CHAIR RUFFRIDGE questioned the cost to districts or the state
for the bill being enacted.
CO-CHAIR ALLARD confirmed there is a zero fiscal note and the
bill would not generate a cost unless there were regulations or
policy changes.
CO-CHAIR RUFFRIDGE referred to page 2, lines 15 through 20, and
brought up "reverse language." He offered his belief that the
Alaska Constitution asks for equal protection, and he questioned
whether the language in the bill would violate that since it
only goes "in one direction."
CO-CHAIR ALLARD replied no but added that she personally thought
women should not participate in male sports because "you can't
have it both ways."
9:27:11 AM
REPRESENTATIVE HIMSCHOOT interjected a point of order and asked
whether questions could be directed to Alaska's own legal
department instead of Mr. Sharp.
CO-CHAIR RUFFRIDGE explained that no one from Legislative Legal
Services was present but they still could answer any questions
Representative Himschoot had.
9:27:57 AM
MR. SHARP explained the specifics in Title 9 about women
competing, and that in certain sports where there is only a
men's team available, women could compete. Title 9 was written
in a way as a "one way street," and to ensure equal
opportunities for young women, men cannot be allowed to come in
and take away opportunities which would therefore deny young
women of those opportunities. He further explained that the
goals behind the second point of the Equal Protection Clause are
not violated.
9:29:31 AM
CO-CHAIR RUFFRIDGE referred to taking someone's place [on a
team] and questioned whether the assumption is that if a woman
were to compete on a man's team, the woman would not be taking a
spot from a man.
MR. SHARP responded that the courts have been very consistent in
preserving the integrity of women's sports and not allowing men
to come in and take those opportunities away.
CO-CHAIR RUFFRIDGE referred to Ms. Bergerud's verbiage in her
legal memorandum dated March 14, 2024, and the legal concerns
with HB 183, particularly on question number 2.
9:31:12 AM
MARGRET BERGERUD, Legislative Counsel, Legislative Legal
Services, answered questions during the hearing on HB 183. She
offered her belief that the bill is subject to challenge on
equal protection grounds. She referenced an analysis of a
preliminary junction related to the Idaho law that has been
discussed in this hearing that distinguish cisgender males who
wish to play on sports teams from transgender women who wish to
play on women's sports teams. The bill singles out transgender
women in a way that it does not single out cisgender women or
men or transgender men. It had been decided in the Ninth
Circuit [Court of Appeals] that these types of divisions in the
law are subject to scrutiny, she explained. She added that the
bill is also subject to challenge under the Alaska
Constitution's Equal Protection Clause.
9:33:33 AM
CO-CHAIR RUFFRIDGE asked Ms. Bergerud whether she felt
comfortable talking through the case she referenced "in her
document" and describing the grounds for that and the results.
CO-CHAIR ALLARD interposed that Legislative Legal Services have
been using terms that she is not familiar with and asked for
more clarity when using these references.
9:34:41 AM
MS. BERGERUD clarified that the Idaho law that the Ninth Circuit
Court analyzed banned transgender girls - individuals who
transition from male to female - from competing on school
athletic teams that were reserved for girls. This was
challenged by plaintiffs who were transgender women playing on a
team.
9:36:40 AM
CO-CHAIR RUFFRIDGE asked Ms. Bergerud whether there was language
in the bill similar to the Idaho law regarding what she called
"intrusive medical procedures" and whether in her legal opinion
it puts the bill in a slightly different category but its
challenge to be put into law remains a concern either way.
MS. BERGERUD offered her belief that the bill would still be
subject to the same challenge due to not having a ruling on the
merits yet; therefore, it is hard to weigh in on the weight the
Ninth Circuit Court gave to a medical procedure issue when
making its determination.
9:38:10 AM
REPRESENTATIVE STORY read from page 2, lines 15 to 20, and cited
the word "may" use a birth certificate to establish a
participant's biological sex. She asked the bill sponsor how
she visualized the school districts verifying that.
CO-CHAIR ALLARD replied that the language could be changed to
read "shall" but currently it is left up to the school districts
to determine whether they would like to use a birth certificate
to verify. She added that she welcomed amendments.
REPRESENTATIVE STORY stated she did not want to make an
amendment for the language and noted her concern about violating
the privacy rights of students.
CO-CHAIR ALLARD stated that the bill is strategic and careful,
and the only rights being violated are against women.
REPRESENTATIVE STORY asked whether Legislative Legal Services
could explain the rationale.
9:40:45 AM
MS. BERGERUD, addressing Representative Story, replied that a
person's sex or gender identity is considered private
information and the amount of protection given is an open
question under Alaska's Constitution currently. She further
noted that Alaska's Constitution provides greater privacy rights
than the Constitution of the United States.
CO-CHAIR RUFFRIDGE mentioned that due to time constraints,
public testimony on HB 183 would be rescheduled. He apologized
to those waiting and encouraged people to e-mail their testimony
to the committee.
9:42:40 AM
REPRESENTATIVE MCKAY disagreed that it is an invasion of privacy
when one is asked to provide a birth certificate and related
that he has 5 kids and always had to provide birth certificates
for various things.
CO-CHAIR RUFFRIDGE added that the bill indicated that the
participant's birth certificate would be the method used and
asked Ms. Bergerud whether there were privacy issues with that
method.
MS. BERGERUD explained that the underlying issue is not about
providing birth certificates to a school but more so about the
school exposing someone's gender identity they were keeping
private, resulting in removal from a team, for example. The
privacy issue is about the school giving information to the
public.
9:44:50 AM
CO-CHAIR ALLARD reminded the public and the body that in order
for a child to attend school, a birth certificate must be
provided, one of the reasons being that they are the correct age
to get started therefore, she argued that the [birth
certificate] already has been made public.
9:45:59 AM
REPRESENTATIVE MCCORMICK offered his belief that there may be
situations where an individual's birth certificate could be
disputed, which in turn could lead to a school district needing
to access privileged health information. He sought clarity
whether that would be a Health Insurance Portability and
Accountability Act (HIPAA) violation.
MS. BERGERUD replied that she was not aware if Alaska is a state
that allows a transgender individual to get a new birth
certificate, and she offered her understanding that a new birth
certificate voids any prior birth certificate.
9:48:44 AM
CO-CHAIR ALLARD offered her understanding that birth certificate
changes in Alaska are allowed but that the bill clearly stated
it refers to the birth certificate at birth. She requested that
Mr. Sharp comment on the topic.
CO-CHAIR RUFFRIDGE asked for confirmation that Alaska is in fact
a state where one can change their birth certificate.
9:49:54 AM
MS. BERGERUD reiterated that she was unaware whether Alaska was
a state that allowed for a change of sex on an original birth
certificate, but she could get the information to the committee
at a later date.
9:50:14 AM
MR. SHARP added that he was of the belief that Alaska allowed
birth certificate changes and that the bill was written with a
designation referencing an original birth certificate for an
accurate reflection. He further explained it adds to an
eligibility in sports rule: an individual must be biologically
female to compete on a female team.
9:51:49 AM
REPRESENTATIVE MCCORMICK directed a concern to Representative
Ehardt and stated he was curious about the effects on trans
children when "they are forced play in a sport that does not
coincide with their gender identity."
REPRESENTATIVE EHARDT gave examples of athletes who competed as
males and did well, but not great, until after they decided to
compete as women. She stated that she believed the beauty of
the proposed legislation is to make very clear that if an
individual wished to compete, it must be with their biological
sex. Competition is encouraged, she said, and physicals include
asking about a person's biological sex in addition to questions
such as asking whether one has ever been hospitalized or is
taking any medications, which fall under doctor's questions that
are pertinent to the safety of the individual.
9:55:38 AM
CO-CHAIR RUFFRIDGE invited closing comments.
9:55:43 AM
CO-CHAIR ALLARD thanked the committee and acknowledged the
public testifiers who were waiting but unable to testify. In
addition, she recognized that Larry Whitmore is the only Alaska
coach inducted into the National High School Hall of Fame, and
his experience is invaluable. In reference to birth
certificates, she added that they are already intrusive, and one
must have physicals to participate in sports. She concluded by
encouraging the committee to move HB 183 out of committee.
9:56:34 AM
CO-CHAIR RUFFRIDGE thanked invited testifiers and members of the
public who joined online but were unable to testify. He
reassured the public that public testimony would be opened at a
later date.
CO-CHAIR RUFFRIDGDE announced that HB 183 was held over.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| HB 274 Amendment A.2 3.14.24.pdf |
HEDC 3/15/2024 8:00:00 AM |
HB 274 |
| HB 274 Amendment A.1 3.14.24.pdf |
HEDC 3/15/2024 8:00:00 AM |
HB 274 |
| HB 183 ver A.pdf |
HEDC 3/15/2024 8:00:00 AM |
HB 183 |
| HB183 - Sectional Analysis 3.14.2024.pdf |
HEDC 3/15/2024 8:00:00 AM |
HB 183 |
| HB183 - Sponsor Statement 3.14.2024.pdf |
HEDC 3/15/2024 8:00:00 AM |
HB 183 |
| HB 183 Legal Memo 03.14.24.pdf |
HEDC 3/15/2024 8:00:00 AM |
HB 183 |
| HB 183 ver A Fiscal Note 12.18.23.pdf |
HEDC 3/15/2024 8:00:00 AM |
HB 183 |
| HB 183 Support Emails.pdf |
HEDC 3/15/2024 8:00:00 AM |
HB 183 |