Legislature(2023 - 2024)ADAMS 519
02/08/2024 01:30 PM House FINANCE
Note: the audio
and video
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB89 | |
| HB178 | |
| HB193 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| += | HB 89 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 193 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 178 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED |
HOUSE BILL NO. 178
"An Act relating to village safe water and hygienic
sewage disposal facilities."
2:35:12 PM
Co-Chair Foster referenced a letter from the Department of
Environmental Conservation (DEC) Village Safe Water Program
(VSW) (copy on file) regarding the change to the scoring
system, which was the main provision in the bill.
GENE MCCABE, DIRECTOR, DIVISION OF WATER, DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION, voiced that VSW heard the
request from the legislature and starting with the current
funding cycle DEC had eliminated the use of Operations and
Maintenance Best Practices (O&M Best Practices) scores for
eligibility criteria for VSW funding. The issues of
capacity and sustainability would be discussed as part of
project development as the process moved along. The
management practice scores would be reviewed if they were
voluntarily submitted as part of the evaluation process but
would not be a perceived barrier.
2:36:48 PM
Representative Hannan noted that she did not have a copy of
the letter.
2:37:34 PM
AT EASE
2:42:25 PM
RECONVENED
Co-Chair Foster indicated that the committee received the
letter and had it in their possession. He recounted that
the impetus for the bill was in response to small
communities around the state without water and sewer or in
need of upgrades and concerns shared by entities
representing the communities like the Alaska Health Board
and the Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium (ANTHC). Due
to the cost of developing the infrastructure, capacity was
an issue. If there was no one to maintain it would develop
into a larger issue over time, which was the motivation
behind the scoring system. However, scoring was an issue
for small communities that lacked capacity but needed water
and sewer systems the most; some communities lacked modern
water and sewer systems for many years. He characterized
the issue as a Catch 22. He remarked on the frustration
over the slow progress on developing rural water and sewer
systems. He believed that the systems should be supported.
He voiced that the bill was one way to speed up the
progress and figure out the problems later. He read the
email from DEC's Office of the Commissioner that was
attached to the letter:
Good morning,
DEC has heard the concerns expressed by communities
and partners regarding the implementation of
Operations and Maintenance Best Practices (O&M Best
Practices) assessment tool for Capital Improvement
Project (CIP) funding eligibility. To more effectively
meet the needs of communities, collaborate with our
partners, and ensure the efficient and timely use of
the available funds, DEC will no longer use O&M Best
Practices as an eligibility criteria for VSW CIP
funding.
Below you will find an email that will be shared with
Stakeholders shortly regarding VSW Best Practice
scoring. Please let me know if you have any questions.
Thank you and have a great day.
Co-Chair Foster wanted to ensure that the letter was on the
record since the bill had been introduced, but the
situation appeared to be resolved. He asked the department
to explain how it will proceed without the scoring system.
2:46:59 PM
CARRIE BOHAN, FACILITIES PROGRAM MANAGER, DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION, noted that DEC was not
eliminating the best practices tool altogether but was
removing the score as a criterion for funding. She believed
that it was an important tool and the partners at the Rural
Utility Business Advisor agreed. She delineated that the
department needed a way to gauge how the communities were
performing in the financial, managerial, and technical
categories to determine how to allocate resources to
provide the proper support. The department had programs and
worked collaboratively with programs in the Department of
Commerce, Community and Economic Development (DCCED) and
outside technical agencies that received federal funding to
provide support in the ongoing effort to build capacity.
She indicated that communities may choose not to
participate in the opportunity to use the tool. The best
practices tool would be used as a component of project
scoring but the bulk of the score was based on the health
impact of the project. Unserved and underserved communities
received additional points in acknowledgement that their
need was crucial. She hoped that the perception of the tool
would change overtime and become viewed as a resource. The
division would continue to assess the metrics for their
effectiveness. She wanted to move the tool away from a
measure of eligibility to a resource available to help
communities.
Co-Chair Foster surmised that there was a gray area; the
tool was not being eliminated but would not be a barrier to
funding or less so.
Representative Hannan wanted to know who wrote the letter
since there was no signature. Ms. Bohan answered that she
crafted the letter that was sent to stakeholders via email.
She followed with a mailed letter to all the communities
eligible for Village Safe Water (VSW) funding and informed
them of the changes in the way the program would be
administered.
2:50:56 PM
Co-Chair Foster felt that VSW was moving in the right
direction. The outcome would become more measurable moving
forward. He appreciated VSW's work on the issue.
Co-Chair Edgmon thanked DEC for moving forward with an
alternative method. He related that the tool was effective
when there was not significant funding for the program.
However, with the current influx of funding over the
current and prior fiscal year totaling roughly half a
billion dollars for water and sewer facilities, a solution
that was not prohibitive for small communities that lacked
the operational capabilities to maintain its utilities was
warranted. He personally thanked Ms. Bohan for taking the
lead on the issue. He stated that "the devil was in the
details" and he wanted the results monitored. He emphasized
it was imperative that small communities in need must
receive the funding. He hoped the effort was a step in the
right direction. He wanted to avoid a situation that
happened in Bethel in the prior year where a $19 million
project was halted because the community was unable to meet
a certain criterion in a very prescriptive scoring
mechanism. He offered that he would be monitoring the
results closely.
Representative Cronk voiced that he had many communities
served by VSW and thanked the department for addressing the
issue.
2:53:40 PM
Co-Chair Foster noted the bill would be set aside
indefinitely.
HB 178 was HEARD and HELD for further consideration.
2:53:45 PM
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| HB 89 Amendments 1-2.pdf |
HFIN 2/8/2024 1:30:00 PM |
HB 89 |
| HB 89 Galvin Amendment 2 Explanation.pdf |
HFIN 2/8/2024 1:30:00 PM |
HB 89 |
| HB 193 Public Testimony Rec'd by 020824.pdf |
HFIN 2/8/2024 1:30:00 PM |
HB 193 |
| HB 178 DEC Letter re Best Practices VSW 012524.pdf |
HFIN 2/8/2024 1:30:00 PM |
HB 178 |