Legislature(2023 - 2024)ADAMS 519
02/08/2024 01:30 PM House FINANCE
Note: the audio
and video
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
Audio | Topic |
---|---|
Start | |
HB89 | |
HB178 | |
HB193 | |
Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+= | HB 89 | TELECONFERENCED | |
+= | HB 193 | TELECONFERENCED | |
+= | HB 178 | TELECONFERENCED | |
+ | TELECONFERENCED |
HOUSE BILL NO. 178 "An Act relating to village safe water and hygienic sewage disposal facilities." 2:35:12 PM Co-Chair Foster referenced a letter from the Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) Village Safe Water Program (VSW) (copy on file) regarding the change to the scoring system, which was the main provision in the bill. GENE MCCABE, DIRECTOR, DIVISION OF WATER, DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION, voiced that VSW heard the request from the legislature and starting with the current funding cycle DEC had eliminated the use of Operations and Maintenance Best Practices (O&M Best Practices) scores for eligibility criteria for VSW funding. The issues of capacity and sustainability would be discussed as part of project development as the process moved along. The management practice scores would be reviewed if they were voluntarily submitted as part of the evaluation process but would not be a perceived barrier. 2:36:48 PM Representative Hannan noted that she did not have a copy of the letter. 2:37:34 PM AT EASE 2:42:25 PM RECONVENED Co-Chair Foster indicated that the committee received the letter and had it in their possession. He recounted that the impetus for the bill was in response to small communities around the state without water and sewer or in need of upgrades and concerns shared by entities representing the communities like the Alaska Health Board and the Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium (ANTHC). Due to the cost of developing the infrastructure, capacity was an issue. If there was no one to maintain it would develop into a larger issue over time, which was the motivation behind the scoring system. However, scoring was an issue for small communities that lacked capacity but needed water and sewer systems the most; some communities lacked modern water and sewer systems for many years. He characterized the issue as a Catch 22. He remarked on the frustration over the slow progress on developing rural water and sewer systems. He believed that the systems should be supported. He voiced that the bill was one way to speed up the progress and figure out the problems later. He read the email from DEC's Office of the Commissioner that was attached to the letter: Good morning, DEC has heard the concerns expressed by communities and partners regarding the implementation of Operations and Maintenance Best Practices (O&M Best Practices) assessment tool for Capital Improvement Project (CIP) funding eligibility. To more effectively meet the needs of communities, collaborate with our partners, and ensure the efficient and timely use of the available funds, DEC will no longer use O&M Best Practices as an eligibility criteria for VSW CIP funding. Below you will find an email that will be shared with Stakeholders shortly regarding VSW Best Practice scoring. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you and have a great day. Co-Chair Foster wanted to ensure that the letter was on the record since the bill had been introduced, but the situation appeared to be resolved. He asked the department to explain how it will proceed without the scoring system. 2:46:59 PM CARRIE BOHAN, FACILITIES PROGRAM MANAGER, DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION, noted that DEC was not eliminating the best practices tool altogether but was removing the score as a criterion for funding. She believed that it was an important tool and the partners at the Rural Utility Business Advisor agreed. She delineated that the department needed a way to gauge how the communities were performing in the financial, managerial, and technical categories to determine how to allocate resources to provide the proper support. The department had programs and worked collaboratively with programs in the Department of Commerce, Community and Economic Development (DCCED) and outside technical agencies that received federal funding to provide support in the ongoing effort to build capacity. She indicated that communities may choose not to participate in the opportunity to use the tool. The best practices tool would be used as a component of project scoring but the bulk of the score was based on the health impact of the project. Unserved and underserved communities received additional points in acknowledgement that their need was crucial. She hoped that the perception of the tool would change overtime and become viewed as a resource. The division would continue to assess the metrics for their effectiveness. She wanted to move the tool away from a measure of eligibility to a resource available to help communities. Co-Chair Foster surmised that there was a gray area; the tool was not being eliminated but would not be a barrier to funding or less so. Representative Hannan wanted to know who wrote the letter since there was no signature. Ms. Bohan answered that she crafted the letter that was sent to stakeholders via email. She followed with a mailed letter to all the communities eligible for Village Safe Water (VSW) funding and informed them of the changes in the way the program would be administered. 2:50:56 PM Co-Chair Foster felt that VSW was moving in the right direction. The outcome would become more measurable moving forward. He appreciated VSW's work on the issue. Co-Chair Edgmon thanked DEC for moving forward with an alternative method. He related that the tool was effective when there was not significant funding for the program. However, with the current influx of funding over the current and prior fiscal year totaling roughly half a billion dollars for water and sewer facilities, a solution that was not prohibitive for small communities that lacked the operational capabilities to maintain its utilities was warranted. He personally thanked Ms. Bohan for taking the lead on the issue. He stated that "the devil was in the details" and he wanted the results monitored. He emphasized it was imperative that small communities in need must receive the funding. He hoped the effort was a step in the right direction. He wanted to avoid a situation that happened in Bethel in the prior year where a $19 million project was halted because the community was unable to meet a certain criterion in a very prescriptive scoring mechanism. He offered that he would be monitoring the results closely. Representative Cronk voiced that he had many communities served by VSW and thanked the department for addressing the issue. 2:53:40 PM Co-Chair Foster noted the bill would be set aside indefinitely. HB 178 was HEARD and HELD for further consideration. 2:53:45 PM
Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
---|---|---|
HB 89 Amendments 1-2.pdf |
HFIN 2/8/2024 1:30:00 PM |
HB 89 |
HB 89 Galvin Amendment 2 Explanation.pdf |
HFIN 2/8/2024 1:30:00 PM |
HB 89 |
HB 193 Public Testimony Rec'd by 020824.pdf |
HFIN 2/8/2024 1:30:00 PM |
HB 193 |
HB 178 DEC Letter re Best Practices VSW 012524.pdf |
HFIN 2/8/2024 1:30:00 PM |
HB 178 |