Legislature(2015 - 2016)HOUSE FINANCE 519
04/10/2015 01:30 PM House FINANCE
Note: the audio
and video
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB123 | |
| HB176 | |
| HB15 | |
| HB137 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| + | HB 123 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | HB 176 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 137 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 15 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED |
HOUSE BILL NO. 176
"An Act eliminating geographic pay differentials for
employees of the legislature; repealing state employee
salary schedule increases; and providing for an
effective date."
1:49:24 PM
Vice-Chair Saddler MOVED to ADOPT the proposed committee
substitute for HB 176, Work Draft 29-LS0796\E (Wayne,
4/2/15). There being NO OBJECTION, it was so ordered.
Co-Chair Thompson noted that staff from various departments
were available to answer questions.
JANE PIERSON, STAFF, REPRESENTATIVE STEVE THOMPSON,
provided the changes in the Committee Substitute (CS). The
geographic pay differential had been removed from the
legislation due to potential problems outlined in a legal
opinion (copy on file). The bill only addressed the Cost of
Living Allowance (COLA), which was scheduled as a 2.5
percent increase on July 1, 2015, and would not occur for
state, legislative, and court employees. She detailed that
COLA had ranged from zero to very high rates; the previous
year it had been 1 percent. She relayed that the savings
under the legislation would be approximately $9,296,100
annually for all branches of the government.
Representative Gara understood the need for cost savings;
however, he recalled a three-year pay increase that was
minimal for state employees. He detailed that the first two
years had been increases of 1 percent, which had lagged
behind inflation, whereas, the third year was planned at
2.5 percent in order to even out with inflation over the
three-year period. He believed the bill took away the one
increase that would hold employees even with inflation. He
asked for verification that his understanding was accurate
and relayed his concern.
Ms. Pierson replied that Representative Gara's numbers were
accurate. She reiterated that historically the COLA
increases had ranged from zero to 4 percent.
HB 176 was HEARD and HELD in committee for further
consideration.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| Workdraft CSHB15 4-8-2015.pdf |
HFIN 4/10/2015 1:30:00 PM |
HB 15 |
| HB 137 CS WORKDRAFT FIN G Version.PDF |
HFIN 4/10/2015 1:30:00 PM |
HB 137 |
| HB 176 CS WORKDRAFT E version.pdf |
HFIN 4/10/2015 1:30:00 PM |
HB 176 |
| HB 176 Legal Opinion.pdf |
HFIN 4/10/2015 1:30:00 PM |
HB 176 |
| HB 176 Letters.pdf |
HFIN 4/10/2015 1:30:00 PM |
HB 176 |
| HB 176 Sponsor Statement.pdf |
HFIN 4/10/2015 1:30:00 PM |
HB 176 |
| HB 137 Support letter.pdf |
HFIN 4/10/2015 1:30:00 PM |
HB 137 |
| HB 15 Amendment #1.pdf |
HFIN 4/10/2015 1:30:00 PM |
HB 15 |
| HB 137 Additional Info Sommerville.pdf |
HFIN 4/10/2015 1:30:00 PM |
HB 137 |