Legislature(2017 - 2018)GRUENBERG 120
03/17/2017 01:00 PM House RESOURCES
Note: the audio
and video
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB19 | |
| HB46 | |
| HB172 | |
| Presentation(s) Agriculture Activities in Alaska | |
| Presentation(s): Nenana Agriculture Land | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| *+ | HB 19 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| += | HB 46 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 172 | TELECONFERENCED | |
HB 172-INDUSTRIAL HEMP PRODUCTION LICENSES
3:13:07 PM
CO-CHAIR TARR announced that the next order of business would be
HOUSE BILL NO. 172, "An Act relating to the regulation and
production of industrial hemp; relating to industrial hemp pilot
programs; providing that industrial hemp is not included in the
definition of 'marijuana'; and clarifying that adding industrial
hemp to food does not create an adulterated food product."
3:13:11 PM
CO-CHAIR TARR opened public testimony on HB 172.
3:13:21 PM
DAVID OTNESS testified that he thinks it is important that "we
expand into a hardy crop that has so many applications and none
of the negatives formerly associated with it." He opined that
there is potential in Alaska for those willing to remain in the
state "through thick and thin," and he remarked that what the
state is about to endure is "the thin."
MR. OTNESS said [HB 172] should give people "a good means of
supplementing their existing operations and perhaps incentivize
others to ... start up." He said [hemp] seems to have
"unlimited potential" and is a hardy plant that should thrive
with [Alaska's] daylight hours. He concluded, "I just heartily
endorse the idea of our agriculture expanding this direction."
3:14:42 PM
JACK BENNETT, Alaska Representative, Industrial Hemp
Manufacturing, LLC (IHM), testified that industrial hemp is not
"a marijuana issue" - it is an agricultural issue. He
encouraged the committee to "rethink the way we think about
hemp." Mr. Bennett stated, "My company ... [is] North America's
largest. It has the capability of producing 40 million pounds
annually and it's ... devoted ... to the oil well companies, to
help Alaskan fluids engineers drill faster, lighter, and
cheaper."
MR. BENNETT said all of the company's fiber is sold to an
automotive partner in Indiana that manufactures American
automobiles with bio-composites, hemp plastics, which he said
are stronger than fiberglass on a boat [and more] flexible than
a formula one race car.
MR. BENNETT said he has presented [hemp] to the military as a
remediation product that replaces polypropylene booms in the
water, is five times more absorbent, and rather than ending up
in a land fill turns into an energy source. He said, "That
remediation product, through these plant fiber technologies, are
also ... applied in the soil in the granular form to remediate
land impacted by crude [oil], chemicals, radiation - what have
you - within 90 days."
MR. BENNETT shared that he is building a model home in Homer,
Alaska, as an affordable housing solution. He said, "There are
6,000 unit shortages in rural Alaska." He relayed that 22,000
acres [of hemp grown] in one season produce 6,000 homes that are
1,000 square feet in size. Mr. Bennett concluded, "It doesn't
matter how green it is; at the end of the day, we're all here to
make money."
3:17:06 PM
MR. BENNETT, in response to questions from Representative
Rauscher, imparted that the equipment used by IHM costs $30
million and there are only five made: two in France, two in
South Africa, and one in North Carolina. He said the company
works with farmers in Alaska "to collect the material devoted to
remediation and oil and gas industries in Alaska."
3:18:29 PM
REPRESENTATIVE RAUSCHER asked, "Where do you get your hemp from
now to be a head manufacturer incorporated?"
MR. BENNETT answered that North Carolina is currently "shaping"
its regulations and policies. He said 7,000 acres of industrial
hemp is needed in order to produce 40 million annually and his
"counterparts" are looking to purchase 14,000 acres, because the
machinery "has the ability to expand to 80 million pounds." He
indicated that the company is currently using kenaf, which is a
member of the hibiscus family. He indicated the U.S. Navy had
studied the high absorbency of kenaf in use as a remediation
product, and he stated that hemp is even more absorbent. He
indicated that IHM uses kenaf as an alternative to hemp.
MR. BENNETT, in response to Representative Rauscher, said kenaf
is grown in "the tobacco belt," in Georgia and North Carolina.
To a follow-up question, Mr. Bennett informed the committee that
kenaf is a legal product used in the automotive industry [in
the] manufacture of automotive parts. The [automotive]
companies are transitioning out of kenaf [use] into the use of
industrial hemp, because the latter has "more value-added
products."
3:20:28 PM
REPRESENTATIVE PARISH offered his understanding that Mr. Bennett
had implied that his organization is prepared to make a
substantial investment in Alaska. He asked Mr. Bennett if that
estimation is accurate and what the dollar amount might be.
MR. BENNETT responded that he "has presented to many oil well
drilling companies in Alaska." He stated, "This is an emergent
... technology that helps the fluids engineer, and this is what
they'll use for now on. That industry alone - that mud additive
- is a billion-dollar industry annually."
3:21:19 PM
REPRESENTATIVE PARISH offered his understanding that Mr. Bennett
had said IMH is considering "bringing a plant to Alaska." He
asked how quickly "we" could expect to see "more substantive
investment" from Mr. Barrett's organization if the proposed
legislation was made law tomorrow.
MR. BENNETT answered, "Baby steps." He said once legislation
passes, the company would help Alaska acquire [equipment], while
not as expensive as the $30 million ones previously mentioned,
something that will work in Alaska in a centralized location
accessible to farmers.
3:22:29 PM
WES SCHACHT, Alaska Cannabis Advocacy, spoke to the long history
of hemp being grown in American agriculture even before the
inception of [the United States]. He shared that both sides of
his ancestry raised hemp. He stated, "It's also helped the
American economy off and on for years - Revolutionary War, Civil
War - it was required by every farmer over five acres of land to
raise one acre of industrial hemp, and to outlaw it and not have
its production is ludicrous."
MR. SCHACHT said there are many uses for hemp, including [the
prevention of] soil erosion, the use of its fibers for building
materials, the use of its oil "for everything from edible oil to
bird seed." He urged everyone to read a pamphlet about
industrial hemp [included in the committee packet] to learn
about the product. He stated, "I find it really inane that
we're allowed to grow psychoactive cannabis but not industrial
hemp." He indicated that [the worst thing that could result]
from smoking hemp is "a headache or sore lungs."
3:23:57 PM
CO-CHAIR TARR commented on the historical aspect of agriculture
and its renaissance.
3:24:57 PM
CO-CHAIR TARR closed public testimony on HB 172.
3:25:48 PM
REPRESENTATIVE RAUSCHER prefaced his query by stating that he is
not "against this bill." He then asked for confirmation that
the Division of Agriculture would "draw the regulations."
3:27:00 PM
ROBERT CARTER, Manager, Plant Materials Center (PMC), Division
of Agriculture, Department of Natural Resources (DNR), answered
that it is DNR's intent to draft the regulations that would be
needed upon passage of HB 172 to "make this a sustainable
program for ... those interested all around the state of
Alaska." He indicated that because [industrial hemp] is "guilty
by association" with recreational marijuana, the department
wants to ensure a good foundation so that the industrial hemp
industry can grow.
3:28:23 PM
REPRESENTATIVE RAUSCHER asked for comment regarding the three
zero fiscal notes.
3:29:42 PM
PATRICK FITZGERALD, Staff, Representative Harriet Drummond,
Alaska State Legislature, on behalf of Representative Drummond,
prime sponsor of HB 172, acknowledged that one of the fiscal
notes states that the proposed legislation would regulate
industrial hemp through the Department of Environmental
Conservation (DEC). He explained that that was a mistake and,
when corrected, there will still be three zero fiscal notes, but
the [corrected] fiscal note will reflect that "the regulations
will be under the Division of Agriculture."
REPRESENTATIVE RAUSCHER indicated that he would like to hear
from the division, because "we're looking for something else
here."
3:30:41 PM
CO-CHAIR TARR suggested that the drafting of regulations is
something that [the Division of Agriculture] does within its
"existing scope of work."
MR. CARTER responded, "Wonderfully said." He added that from
the standpoint of PMC, once a crop has been deemed agricultural,
it becomes the purview of the Division of Agriculture, which
takes on the responsibility of supporting agricultural industry
in Alaska.
3:32:22 PM
REPRESENTATIVE PARISH cited language at the top of page 3, of HB
172, which says that "the state may create and administer an
agricultural pilot program to study growth, cultivation and
marketing of industrial hemp." He suggested it may be useful to
set a fee schedule to finance such a pilot program "so that we
could be doing research as we're ... charging forward,"
3:33:18 PM
MR. FITZGERALD responded, "That's the idea of the pilot
program."
CO-CHAIR TARR asked Mr. Fitzgerald if he meant that [the pilot
program] would be "self-funded through the fees."
MR. FITZGERALD confirmed that "the fees would ... produce the
funds in order to conduct the studies through ... [the pilot
program]."
REPRESENTATIVE PARISH offered his understanding that there would
be allowance for regulating the industry, but not for the pilot
program.
MR. FITZGERALD responded, "I will take a look at the Section
76.06 of the farm bill, and I will follow up with that."
3:34:13 PM
CO-CHAIR TARR reopened public testimony on HB 172.
3:34:18 PM
GEORGE PIERCE recommended the committee take a look at a web
site, called "information distillery." He said [industrial
hemp] is not like marijuana; it cannot make someone high. He
advised the committee that hemp is one of the most useful plants
on earth, with the following attributes: the ability to enrich
the soil where it is grown; seeds that are an excellent source
of minerals, protein, and dietary fiber; and a source of all
essential fatty and amino acids.
MR. PIERCE noted that many individuals eat fish as a source of
essential fats, but because of concern about commercial
overfishing and possible chemical contaminants, many have chosen
to switch to hemp. He said hemp is also good for animals and
can be used for body care and papermaking. He relayed that the
first American Flag was made from hemp. Mr. Pierce said hemp is
also good for: fiber, textile, rope, petroleum, and to "replace
gasoline for diesel engines." He called the product "amazing."
MR. PIERCE restated the safe nature of hemp and repeated his
recommendation about the information distillery. He noted that
hemp is a renewable resource, as well as being a source of
income, of which he said the state is in need.
CO-CHAIR TARR said that as a botanist, she is familiar with the
many uses of hemp, and she expressed appreciation to Mr. Pierce
for his comments.
3:37:39 PM
ED MARTIN, JR. said he currently owns property in Sterling
Alaska, which would be available for growing both marijuana and
hemp; however, he pointed out that he and his wife are not
allowed to get a license to grow in Alaska, because although
they have been residents in Alaska for many years, they do not
apply for the Alaska Permanent Fund Dividend (PFD). He
expressed hope that there would not be "a requirement for a
protection racket in the industry to just Alaskans" under HB
172. He said he had pleaded with the legislature to review
administrative regulations related to marijuana law.
MR. MARTIN said there is a distinction between [marijuana law
and law pertaining to hemp] and both are "revenue getters" for
Alaska. He talked about the efforts on the House floor to state
spending. He indicated that the sale of land could result in
the ability to grow more product and create both jobs and
revenue for the state. He said many legislators "voted against
cutting government," and he urged legislators to "be responsible
and create an industry that'll create revenue for the state."
MR. MARTIN explained that he has to be out of state during the
winter for medical reasons but is "every bit of an Alaskan" and
will defend [the state's] constitution and individual and
property rights. He urged the committee, "Please look at this."
CO-CHAIR TARR said the reason the committee is hearing HB 172 is
that it would provide an opportunity for Alaska. She noted that
following the bill hearing, the committee would segue into a
presentation related to access to agricultural land. She
offered her understanding that Representative Talerico had
introduced a bill on the topic of getting more Alaskans access
to some of the state-owned land.
3:41:22 PM
REPRESENTATIVE DRUMMOND asked Mr. Martin to expound on his
comment about licenses being limited to residents of Alaska.
She said she knows that licenses for marijuana businesses have
been limited to Alaskans, because "the department is trying to
keep outside influence out of our local marijuana business."
3:41:56 PM
MR. MARTIN responded that when regulations were passed for
marijuana growth or sale, there was a requirement that [growers
and sellers] must be PFD applicants. He said he and his wife
left Alaska in 2004, but he reemphasized his commitment to
Alaska. He indicated that he had served in the military and was
involved in rebuilding training facilities in Hawaii. He said
he has no desire to live year-round in Alaska any more, but he
claimed that does not make him any less Alaskan.
MR. MARTIN said under current law pertaining to PFD
qualifications, [Alaskan residents] are allowed to be out of the
state for six months. He indicated that representatives working
for the Alaska Permanent Fund Division informed him that he
could "go back to 2006 and maybe apply for that." He said he
doesn't necessarily wish to do that, but he is being barred from
entering into business in Alaska. He said he is "somewhat
upset" about Representative Mike Chenault having worked to do
away with the Administrative Review Committee, because "you
folks should be reviewing those regulations to see how they
violate people like my wife and our individual liberty to be in
business in our own state." He said he and his wife pay taxes
in both Alaska and Hawaii, but his heart is and always will be
in Alaska. He urged the committee not to pass legislation that
would bar him and his wife from entering in to commerce in their
own state.
3:44:43 PM
CO-CHAIR TARR re-closed public testimony on HB 172.
[HB 172 was held over.]
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| HB019 Sponsor Statement 3.16.17.pdf |
HRES 3/17/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/24/2017 1:00:00 PM |
HB 19 |
| HB019 Ver A 3.16.17.pdf |
HRES 3/17/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/24/2017 1:00:00 PM |
HB 19 |
| HB019 Ver D 3.16.17.pdf |
HRES 3/17/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/24/2017 1:00:00 PM |
HB 19 |
| HB019 Fiscal Note - DEC - SWM 3.16.17.pdf |
HRES 3/17/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/24/2017 1:00:00 PM |
HB 19 |
| HB019 Supporting Document - Beyond Pesticides 3.16.17.pdf |
HRES 3/17/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/24/2017 1:00:00 PM |
HB 19 |
| HB019 Supporting Document - Center Food Safety 3.16.17.pdf |
HRES 3/17/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/24/2017 1:00:00 PM |
HB 19 |
| HB019 Supporting Document - Letter of Support - Scott Lawrence 3.16.17.pdf |
HRES 3/17/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/24/2017 1:00:00 PM |
HB 19 |
| HB019 Supporting Document - Letter of Support ACAT 3.16.17.pdf |
HRES 3/17/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/24/2017 1:00:00 PM |
HB 19 |
| HB019 Supporting Document - Letter of Support Yarducopia 3.16.17.pdf |
HRES 3/17/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/24/2017 1:00:00 PM |
HB 19 |
| HB019 Supporting Document - Letters of Support 3.16.17.pdf |
HRES 3/17/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/24/2017 1:00:00 PM |
HB 19 |
| HB046 Sponsor Statement 3.14.17.pdf |
HRES 3/15/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/17/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/20/2017 7:00:00 PM HRES 3/22/2017 6:00:00 PM |
HB 46 |
| HB046 Ver J 3.14.17.PDF |
HRES 3/15/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/17/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/20/2017 7:00:00 PM HRES 3/22/2017 6:00:00 PM |
HB 46 |
| HB046 Fiscal Note - DOA - DGS 3.14.17.pdf |
HRES 3/15/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/17/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/20/2017 7:00:00 PM HRES 3/22/2017 6:00:00 PM |
HB 46 |
| HB046 Fiscal Note - DNR - AGS 3.14.17.pdf |
HRES 3/15/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/17/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/20/2017 7:00:00 PM HRES 3/22/2017 6:00:00 PM |
HB 46 |
| HB046 Supporting Docuemnt - A Performance Audit of the Alaska Agriculture and Fisheries Products Preference.pdf |
HRES 3/15/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/17/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/20/2017 7:00:00 PM HRES 3/22/2017 6:00:00 PM |
HB 46 |
| HB046 Supporting Document-AlaskaAgFacts08.pdf |
HRES 3/15/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/17/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/20/2017 7:00:00 PM HRES 3/22/2017 6:00:00 PM |
HB 46 |
| HB046 Supporting Document-Articles 3.14.17.pdf |
HRES 3/15/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/17/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/20/2017 7:00:00 PM HRES 3/22/2017 6:00:00 PM |
HB 46 |
| HB172 Sponsor Statement 3.13.17.pdf |
HRES 3/15/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/17/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/20/2017 7:00:00 PM HRES 3/22/2017 6:00:00 PM |
HB 172 |
| HB172 Ver A 3.14.17.PDF |
HRES 3/15/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/17/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/20/2017 7:00:00 PM HRES 3/22/2017 6:00:00 PM |
HB 172 |
| HB172 Fiscal Note -DCCED-AMCO 3.13.17.pdf |
HRES 3/15/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/17/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/22/2017 6:00:00 PM |
HB 172 |
| HB172 Fiscal Note - LAW-CRIM 3.13.17.pdf |
HRES 3/15/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/17/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/20/2017 7:00:00 PM HRES 3/22/2017 6:00:00 PM |
HB 172 |
| HB172 Fiscal Note - DNR-PMC 3.14.17.pdf |
HRES 3/15/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/17/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/20/2017 7:00:00 PM HRES 3/22/2017 6:00:00 PM |
HB 172 |
| HB172 Section Analysis 3.14.17.pdf |
HRES 3/15/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/17/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/20/2017 7:00:00 PM HRES 3/22/2017 6:00:00 PM |
HB 172 |
| HB172 Supporting Document - Letter of support-Constance Fredenberg 3.14.17.pdf |
HRES 3/15/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/17/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/20/2017 7:00:00 PM HRES 3/22/2017 6:00:00 PM |
HB 172 |
| HB172 Supporting Document - Letter of Support-Jack Bennett 3.14.17.pdf |
HRES 3/15/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/17/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/20/2017 7:00:00 PM HRES 3/22/2017 6:00:00 PM |
HB 172 |
| HB172 Supporting Document - 2014 Farm Bill Sec. 7606 3.15.17.pdf |
HRES 3/15/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/17/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/20/2017 7:00:00 PM HRES 3/22/2017 6:00:00 PM |
HB 172 |
| HB172 Supporting Document - Letter of Support - Kenai Peninsula Borough 3.15.17.pdf |
HRES 3/15/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/17/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/20/2017 7:00:00 PM HRES 3/22/2017 6:00:00 PM |
HB 172 |
| HB172 Supporting Document - Industrial Hemp Updated Slide Presentation 3.15.17.pdf |
HRES 3/15/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/17/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/20/2017 7:00:00 PM HRES 3/22/2017 6:00:00 PM |
HB 172 |
| HB172 Supporting Document - Modern-uses-for-cannabis-Chart3-640x453 3.15.17.jpg |
HRES 3/15/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/17/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/20/2017 7:00:00 PM HRES 3/22/2017 6:00:00 PM |
HB 172 |
| Nenana Totchaket Bridge To Resources Presentation.pdf |
HRES 3/17/2017 1:00:00 PM |