Legislature(2017 - 2018)GRUENBERG 120
03/17/2017 01:00 PM House RESOURCES
Note: the audio
and video
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
Audio | Topic |
---|---|
Start | |
HB19 | |
HB46 | |
HB172 | |
Presentation(s) Agriculture Activities in Alaska | |
Presentation(s): Nenana Agriculture Land | |
Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
*+ | HB 19 | TELECONFERENCED | |
+ | TELECONFERENCED | ||
+ | TELECONFERENCED | ||
+ | TELECONFERENCED | ||
+= | HB 46 | TELECONFERENCED | |
+= | HB 172 | TELECONFERENCED | |
HB 172-INDUSTRIAL HEMP PRODUCTION LICENSES 3:13:07 PM CO-CHAIR TARR announced that the next order of business would be HOUSE BILL NO. 172, "An Act relating to the regulation and production of industrial hemp; relating to industrial hemp pilot programs; providing that industrial hemp is not included in the definition of 'marijuana'; and clarifying that adding industrial hemp to food does not create an adulterated food product." 3:13:11 PM CO-CHAIR TARR opened public testimony on HB 172. 3:13:21 PM DAVID OTNESS testified that he thinks it is important that "we expand into a hardy crop that has so many applications and none of the negatives formerly associated with it." He opined that there is potential in Alaska for those willing to remain in the state "through thick and thin," and he remarked that what the state is about to endure is "the thin." MR. OTNESS said [HB 172] should give people "a good means of supplementing their existing operations and perhaps incentivize others to ... start up." He said [hemp] seems to have "unlimited potential" and is a hardy plant that should thrive with [Alaska's] daylight hours. He concluded, "I just heartily endorse the idea of our agriculture expanding this direction." 3:14:42 PM JACK BENNETT, Alaska Representative, Industrial Hemp Manufacturing, LLC (IHM), testified that industrial hemp is not "a marijuana issue" - it is an agricultural issue. He encouraged the committee to "rethink the way we think about hemp." Mr. Bennett stated, "My company ... [is] North America's largest. It has the capability of producing 40 million pounds annually and it's ... devoted ... to the oil well companies, to help Alaskan fluids engineers drill faster, lighter, and cheaper." MR. BENNETT said all of the company's fiber is sold to an automotive partner in Indiana that manufactures American automobiles with bio-composites, hemp plastics, which he said are stronger than fiberglass on a boat [and more] flexible than a formula one race car. MR. BENNETT said he has presented [hemp] to the military as a remediation product that replaces polypropylene booms in the water, is five times more absorbent, and rather than ending up in a land fill turns into an energy source. He said, "That remediation product, through these plant fiber technologies, are also ... applied in the soil in the granular form to remediate land impacted by crude [oil], chemicals, radiation - what have you - within 90 days." MR. BENNETT shared that he is building a model home in Homer, Alaska, as an affordable housing solution. He said, "There are 6,000 unit shortages in rural Alaska." He relayed that 22,000 acres [of hemp grown] in one season produce 6,000 homes that are 1,000 square feet in size. Mr. Bennett concluded, "It doesn't matter how green it is; at the end of the day, we're all here to make money." 3:17:06 PM MR. BENNETT, in response to questions from Representative Rauscher, imparted that the equipment used by IHM costs $30 million and there are only five made: two in France, two in South Africa, and one in North Carolina. He said the company works with farmers in Alaska "to collect the material devoted to remediation and oil and gas industries in Alaska." 3:18:29 PM REPRESENTATIVE RAUSCHER asked, "Where do you get your hemp from now to be a head manufacturer incorporated?" MR. BENNETT answered that North Carolina is currently "shaping" its regulations and policies. He said 7,000 acres of industrial hemp is needed in order to produce 40 million annually and his "counterparts" are looking to purchase 14,000 acres, because the machinery "has the ability to expand to 80 million pounds." He indicated that the company is currently using kenaf, which is a member of the hibiscus family. He indicated the U.S. Navy had studied the high absorbency of kenaf in use as a remediation product, and he stated that hemp is even more absorbent. He indicated that IHM uses kenaf as an alternative to hemp. MR. BENNETT, in response to Representative Rauscher, said kenaf is grown in "the tobacco belt," in Georgia and North Carolina. To a follow-up question, Mr. Bennett informed the committee that kenaf is a legal product used in the automotive industry [in the] manufacture of automotive parts. The [automotive] companies are transitioning out of kenaf [use] into the use of industrial hemp, because the latter has "more value-added products." 3:20:28 PM REPRESENTATIVE PARISH offered his understanding that Mr. Bennett had implied that his organization is prepared to make a substantial investment in Alaska. He asked Mr. Bennett if that estimation is accurate and what the dollar amount might be. MR. BENNETT responded that he "has presented to many oil well drilling companies in Alaska." He stated, "This is an emergent ... technology that helps the fluids engineer, and this is what they'll use for now on. That industry alone - that mud additive - is a billion-dollar industry annually." 3:21:19 PM REPRESENTATIVE PARISH offered his understanding that Mr. Bennett had said IMH is considering "bringing a plant to Alaska." He asked how quickly "we" could expect to see "more substantive investment" from Mr. Barrett's organization if the proposed legislation was made law tomorrow. MR. BENNETT answered, "Baby steps." He said once legislation passes, the company would help Alaska acquire [equipment], while not as expensive as the $30 million ones previously mentioned, something that will work in Alaska in a centralized location accessible to farmers. 3:22:29 PM WES SCHACHT, Alaska Cannabis Advocacy, spoke to the long history of hemp being grown in American agriculture even before the inception of [the United States]. He shared that both sides of his ancestry raised hemp. He stated, "It's also helped the American economy off and on for years - Revolutionary War, Civil War - it was required by every farmer over five acres of land to raise one acre of industrial hemp, and to outlaw it and not have its production is ludicrous." MR. SCHACHT said there are many uses for hemp, including [the prevention of] soil erosion, the use of its fibers for building materials, the use of its oil "for everything from edible oil to bird seed." He urged everyone to read a pamphlet about industrial hemp [included in the committee packet] to learn about the product. He stated, "I find it really inane that we're allowed to grow psychoactive cannabis but not industrial hemp." He indicated that [the worst thing that could result] from smoking hemp is "a headache or sore lungs." 3:23:57 PM CO-CHAIR TARR commented on the historical aspect of agriculture and its renaissance. 3:24:57 PM CO-CHAIR TARR closed public testimony on HB 172. 3:25:48 PM REPRESENTATIVE RAUSCHER prefaced his query by stating that he is not "against this bill." He then asked for confirmation that the Division of Agriculture would "draw the regulations." 3:27:00 PM ROBERT CARTER, Manager, Plant Materials Center (PMC), Division of Agriculture, Department of Natural Resources (DNR), answered that it is DNR's intent to draft the regulations that would be needed upon passage of HB 172 to "make this a sustainable program for ... those interested all around the state of Alaska." He indicated that because [industrial hemp] is "guilty by association" with recreational marijuana, the department wants to ensure a good foundation so that the industrial hemp industry can grow. 3:28:23 PM REPRESENTATIVE RAUSCHER asked for comment regarding the three zero fiscal notes. 3:29:42 PM PATRICK FITZGERALD, Staff, Representative Harriet Drummond, Alaska State Legislature, on behalf of Representative Drummond, prime sponsor of HB 172, acknowledged that one of the fiscal notes states that the proposed legislation would regulate industrial hemp through the Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC). He explained that that was a mistake and, when corrected, there will still be three zero fiscal notes, but the [corrected] fiscal note will reflect that "the regulations will be under the Division of Agriculture." REPRESENTATIVE RAUSCHER indicated that he would like to hear from the division, because "we're looking for something else here." 3:30:41 PM CO-CHAIR TARR suggested that the drafting of regulations is something that [the Division of Agriculture] does within its "existing scope of work." MR. CARTER responded, "Wonderfully said." He added that from the standpoint of PMC, once a crop has been deemed agricultural, it becomes the purview of the Division of Agriculture, which takes on the responsibility of supporting agricultural industry in Alaska. 3:32:22 PM REPRESENTATIVE PARISH cited language at the top of page 3, of HB 172, which says that "the state may create and administer an agricultural pilot program to study growth, cultivation and marketing of industrial hemp." He suggested it may be useful to set a fee schedule to finance such a pilot program "so that we could be doing research as we're ... charging forward," 3:33:18 PM MR. FITZGERALD responded, "That's the idea of the pilot program." CO-CHAIR TARR asked Mr. Fitzgerald if he meant that [the pilot program] would be "self-funded through the fees." MR. FITZGERALD confirmed that "the fees would ... produce the funds in order to conduct the studies through ... [the pilot program]." REPRESENTATIVE PARISH offered his understanding that there would be allowance for regulating the industry, but not for the pilot program. MR. FITZGERALD responded, "I will take a look at the Section 76.06 of the farm bill, and I will follow up with that." 3:34:13 PM CO-CHAIR TARR reopened public testimony on HB 172. 3:34:18 PM GEORGE PIERCE recommended the committee take a look at a web site, called "information distillery." He said [industrial hemp] is not like marijuana; it cannot make someone high. He advised the committee that hemp is one of the most useful plants on earth, with the following attributes: the ability to enrich the soil where it is grown; seeds that are an excellent source of minerals, protein, and dietary fiber; and a source of all essential fatty and amino acids. MR. PIERCE noted that many individuals eat fish as a source of essential fats, but because of concern about commercial overfishing and possible chemical contaminants, many have chosen to switch to hemp. He said hemp is also good for animals and can be used for body care and papermaking. He relayed that the first American Flag was made from hemp. Mr. Pierce said hemp is also good for: fiber, textile, rope, petroleum, and to "replace gasoline for diesel engines." He called the product "amazing." MR. PIERCE restated the safe nature of hemp and repeated his recommendation about the information distillery. He noted that hemp is a renewable resource, as well as being a source of income, of which he said the state is in need. CO-CHAIR TARR said that as a botanist, she is familiar with the many uses of hemp, and she expressed appreciation to Mr. Pierce for his comments. 3:37:39 PM ED MARTIN, JR. said he currently owns property in Sterling Alaska, which would be available for growing both marijuana and hemp; however, he pointed out that he and his wife are not allowed to get a license to grow in Alaska, because although they have been residents in Alaska for many years, they do not apply for the Alaska Permanent Fund Dividend (PFD). He expressed hope that there would not be "a requirement for a protection racket in the industry to just Alaskans" under HB 172. He said he had pleaded with the legislature to review administrative regulations related to marijuana law. MR. MARTIN said there is a distinction between [marijuana law and law pertaining to hemp] and both are "revenue getters" for Alaska. He talked about the efforts on the House floor to state spending. He indicated that the sale of land could result in the ability to grow more product and create both jobs and revenue for the state. He said many legislators "voted against cutting government," and he urged legislators to "be responsible and create an industry that'll create revenue for the state." MR. MARTIN explained that he has to be out of state during the winter for medical reasons but is "every bit of an Alaskan" and will defend [the state's] constitution and individual and property rights. He urged the committee, "Please look at this." CO-CHAIR TARR said the reason the committee is hearing HB 172 is that it would provide an opportunity for Alaska. She noted that following the bill hearing, the committee would segue into a presentation related to access to agricultural land. She offered her understanding that Representative Talerico had introduced a bill on the topic of getting more Alaskans access to some of the state-owned land. 3:41:22 PM REPRESENTATIVE DRUMMOND asked Mr. Martin to expound on his comment about licenses being limited to residents of Alaska. She said she knows that licenses for marijuana businesses have been limited to Alaskans, because "the department is trying to keep outside influence out of our local marijuana business." 3:41:56 PM MR. MARTIN responded that when regulations were passed for marijuana growth or sale, there was a requirement that [growers and sellers] must be PFD applicants. He said he and his wife left Alaska in 2004, but he reemphasized his commitment to Alaska. He indicated that he had served in the military and was involved in rebuilding training facilities in Hawaii. He said he has no desire to live year-round in Alaska any more, but he claimed that does not make him any less Alaskan. MR. MARTIN said under current law pertaining to PFD qualifications, [Alaskan residents] are allowed to be out of the state for six months. He indicated that representatives working for the Alaska Permanent Fund Division informed him that he could "go back to 2006 and maybe apply for that." He said he doesn't necessarily wish to do that, but he is being barred from entering into business in Alaska. He said he is "somewhat upset" about Representative Mike Chenault having worked to do away with the Administrative Review Committee, because "you folks should be reviewing those regulations to see how they violate people like my wife and our individual liberty to be in business in our own state." He said he and his wife pay taxes in both Alaska and Hawaii, but his heart is and always will be in Alaska. He urged the committee not to pass legislation that would bar him and his wife from entering in to commerce in their own state. 3:44:43 PM CO-CHAIR TARR re-closed public testimony on HB 172. [HB 172 was held over.]
Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
---|---|---|
HB019 Sponsor Statement 3.16.17.pdf |
HRES 3/17/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/24/2017 1:00:00 PM |
HB 19 |
HB019 Ver A 3.16.17.pdf |
HRES 3/17/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/24/2017 1:00:00 PM |
HB 19 |
HB019 Ver D 3.16.17.pdf |
HRES 3/17/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/24/2017 1:00:00 PM |
HB 19 |
HB019 Fiscal Note - DEC - SWM 3.16.17.pdf |
HRES 3/17/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/24/2017 1:00:00 PM |
HB 19 |
HB019 Supporting Document - Beyond Pesticides 3.16.17.pdf |
HRES 3/17/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/24/2017 1:00:00 PM |
HB 19 |
HB019 Supporting Document - Center Food Safety 3.16.17.pdf |
HRES 3/17/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/24/2017 1:00:00 PM |
HB 19 |
HB019 Supporting Document - Letter of Support - Scott Lawrence 3.16.17.pdf |
HRES 3/17/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/24/2017 1:00:00 PM |
HB 19 |
HB019 Supporting Document - Letter of Support ACAT 3.16.17.pdf |
HRES 3/17/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/24/2017 1:00:00 PM |
HB 19 |
HB019 Supporting Document - Letter of Support Yarducopia 3.16.17.pdf |
HRES 3/17/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/24/2017 1:00:00 PM |
HB 19 |
HB019 Supporting Document - Letters of Support 3.16.17.pdf |
HRES 3/17/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/24/2017 1:00:00 PM |
HB 19 |
HB046 Sponsor Statement 3.14.17.pdf |
HRES 3/15/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/17/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/20/2017 7:00:00 PM HRES 3/22/2017 6:00:00 PM |
HB 46 |
HB046 Ver J 3.14.17.PDF |
HRES 3/15/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/17/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/20/2017 7:00:00 PM HRES 3/22/2017 6:00:00 PM |
HB 46 |
HB046 Fiscal Note - DOA - DGS 3.14.17.pdf |
HRES 3/15/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/17/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/20/2017 7:00:00 PM HRES 3/22/2017 6:00:00 PM |
HB 46 |
HB046 Fiscal Note - DNR - AGS 3.14.17.pdf |
HRES 3/15/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/17/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/20/2017 7:00:00 PM HRES 3/22/2017 6:00:00 PM |
HB 46 |
HB046 Supporting Docuemnt - A Performance Audit of the Alaska Agriculture and Fisheries Products Preference.pdf |
HRES 3/15/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/17/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/20/2017 7:00:00 PM HRES 3/22/2017 6:00:00 PM |
HB 46 |
HB046 Supporting Document-AlaskaAgFacts08.pdf |
HRES 3/15/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/17/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/20/2017 7:00:00 PM HRES 3/22/2017 6:00:00 PM |
HB 46 |
HB046 Supporting Document-Articles 3.14.17.pdf |
HRES 3/15/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/17/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/20/2017 7:00:00 PM HRES 3/22/2017 6:00:00 PM |
HB 46 |
HB172 Sponsor Statement 3.13.17.pdf |
HRES 3/15/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/17/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/20/2017 7:00:00 PM HRES 3/22/2017 6:00:00 PM |
HB 172 |
HB172 Ver A 3.14.17.PDF |
HRES 3/15/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/17/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/20/2017 7:00:00 PM HRES 3/22/2017 6:00:00 PM |
HB 172 |
HB172 Fiscal Note -DCCED-AMCO 3.13.17.pdf |
HRES 3/15/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/17/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/22/2017 6:00:00 PM |
HB 172 |
HB172 Fiscal Note - LAW-CRIM 3.13.17.pdf |
HRES 3/15/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/17/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/20/2017 7:00:00 PM HRES 3/22/2017 6:00:00 PM |
HB 172 |
HB172 Fiscal Note - DNR-PMC 3.14.17.pdf |
HRES 3/15/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/17/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/20/2017 7:00:00 PM HRES 3/22/2017 6:00:00 PM |
HB 172 |
HB172 Section Analysis 3.14.17.pdf |
HRES 3/15/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/17/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/20/2017 7:00:00 PM HRES 3/22/2017 6:00:00 PM |
HB 172 |
HB172 Supporting Document - Letter of support-Constance Fredenberg 3.14.17.pdf |
HRES 3/15/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/17/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/20/2017 7:00:00 PM HRES 3/22/2017 6:00:00 PM |
HB 172 |
HB172 Supporting Document - Letter of Support-Jack Bennett 3.14.17.pdf |
HRES 3/15/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/17/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/20/2017 7:00:00 PM HRES 3/22/2017 6:00:00 PM |
HB 172 |
HB172 Supporting Document - 2014 Farm Bill Sec. 7606 3.15.17.pdf |
HRES 3/15/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/17/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/20/2017 7:00:00 PM HRES 3/22/2017 6:00:00 PM |
HB 172 |
HB172 Supporting Document - Letter of Support - Kenai Peninsula Borough 3.15.17.pdf |
HRES 3/15/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/17/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/20/2017 7:00:00 PM HRES 3/22/2017 6:00:00 PM |
HB 172 |
HB172 Supporting Document - Industrial Hemp Updated Slide Presentation 3.15.17.pdf |
HRES 3/15/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/17/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/20/2017 7:00:00 PM HRES 3/22/2017 6:00:00 PM |
HB 172 |
HB172 Supporting Document - Modern-uses-for-cannabis-Chart3-640x453 3.15.17.jpg |
HRES 3/15/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/17/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/20/2017 7:00:00 PM HRES 3/22/2017 6:00:00 PM |
HB 172 |
Nenana Totchaket Bridge To Resources Presentation.pdf |
HRES 3/17/2017 1:00:00 PM |