Legislature(2009 - 2010)BUTROVICH 205
04/15/2009 05:30 PM Senate JUDICIARY
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB152 | |
| SB68 | |
| HB49 | |
| HB170 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| += | SB 68 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 152 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 49 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 170 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED |
HB 170-REPEAL AUTHORITY FOR DAY FINES
6:37:59 PM
CHAIR FRENCH announced the consideration of HB 170.
TOM WRIGHT, staff to Representative Mike Chenault, said HB 170
repeals the authority for courts to impose day fines for certain
misdemeanor offenses. The original legislation, House Bill 119,
was passed in 1994 and required the Alaska Supreme Court to
create a committee to establish a fine schedule and implement
the day fine process. The committee found several problems in
adopting the day fine plan and recommended that the Legislature
solve the problem. Legislation was introduced in 1995 but it did
not pass so the court system could not implement the day fine
schedule. He explained that day fines were established to fine a
person based on their gross daily income.
6:39:13 PM
CHAIR FRENCH commented that when he came across the idea of day
fines as a prosecutor he scratched his head.
MR. WRIGHT said he understands that a Scandinavian country has
adopted a day fine plan and they seem to like it. HB 170 simply
asks to repeal the law because it is not being utilized.
CHAIR FRENCH commented that criminal defendants in Scandinavia
must have more money than they do here because it's his
impression that fines are the least enforced and least utilized
aspect of the criminal justice system. Typically, by the time a
person has been convicted of crimes once or twice they are out
of money. If there is any left it usually goes to restitution,
not a fine.
6:40:38 PM
SENATOR WIELECHOWSKI asked the intent of the original
legislation.
MR. WRIGHT explained that it was to reduce the prison population
by implementing a substantive fine system.
SENATOR WIELECHOWSKI asked what specific crimes were the focus.
MR. WRIGHT said that was one of the problems. The court had
concerns over which misdemeanors were included and which were
excluded. Thus the request for the 1995 clarifying legislation,
he said.
CHAIR FRENCH mentioned the 4/26/1995 letter from the court
system and said the frustration of the committee is apparent. He
summarized that they wanted to make it work but they couldn't,
so they tossed it back to the Legislature and it hasn't moved.
6:41:44 PM
DOUG WOOLIVER, Administrative Attorney, Alaska Court System,
said he is available for questions. He added that the court
usually takes a neutral position on bills, but this is something
that has never been implemented. "Statutes are confusing enough
without having provisions that are paragraphs long and don't
mean anything," he said.
CHAIR FRENCH asked Mr. Wright if anyone has testified in
opposition to the bill.
MR. WRIGHT said no, but there was one no vote on House Floor. In
response to a question, he said Representative Crawford voted
no.
6:42:55 PM
CHAIR FRENCH closed public testimony and asked the will of the
committee.
SENATOR WIELECHOWSKI moved to report HB 170 from committee with
individual recommendations and attached fiscal note(s). There
being no objection, HB 170 was reported from the Senate
Judiciary Standing Committee.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|