Legislature(1995 - 1996)
04/07/1995 03:43 PM Senate RES
| Audio | Topic |
|---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
HB 169 DEPT. NAT RES. IS LEAD AGENCY FOR MINING
SENATOR LEMAN announced HB 169 to be up for consideration.
ROD MOURANT, Legislative Aide to Representative Pete Kott, said
this is recommendation #5 of the Alaska Minerals Commission Report
1995. It designates the Department of Natural Resources as the
coordinating lead agency in all regulatory matters relating to
mineral exploration, extraction, and development.
SENATOR TAYLOR asked if he had reviewed his proposed amendment.
MR. MOURANT said that was correct and Representative Kott fully
supports the amendment.
SENATOR TAYLOR moved to adopt amendment #1 and asked for unanimous
consent.
Number 413
SENATOR LINCOLN objected so she could understand the bill better
and wanted to hear DNR's position on this.
SENATOR LEMAN said he thought it meant that DNR would make the
final determination, but other departments would participate in the
decision.
JULES TILESTON, Director, Division of Mining, emphasized that they
like the uniform approach that HB 169 has, but their interpretation
of coordination, as it is currently being used in the Fort Knox and
the Illinois Creek, is not that they have authority to direct, but
that it is a cooperative effort between the applicant and all of
the permitting agencies including local governments and native
corporations.
He said that in their view, coordination did not mean that DNR
takes on the permitting or regulatory authorities of other
entities. On March 22 they suggested clarification language which
comes from the reclamation law which simply reads: "This chapter
does not alter or diminish the authority of another state agency or
state corporation, or the University of Alaska, or a municipality
under its laws or regulations." This has worked without difficulty
and DNR does not seek to have final determination authority over
another agency's, or another government's, existing regulatory
authority over mining or mineral resource development activities.
SENATOR LEMAN asked him if that is how he interprets this
amendment. He answered that that is what he thought.
SENATOR TAYLOR said he believed exactly the opposite of that. The
buck has to stop someplace. DNR should have the final authority
after consulting with those agencies and entities that should be
bringing that information to them. Giving complete veto power to
all the agencies forces people seeking permits to go through the
same process that the Kensington and the A-J are currently caught
up in right now. He thought that the bill wouldn't really do
anything different without the amendment.
MR. TILESTON said that right now there is no consistent approach to
mining and he viewed the bill, in any of the versions, as a message
that there needs to be a uniform approach which isn't currently
happening. Under the amendment, in reality the commissioner of DNR
would be the one who would have to defend whatever issue affected
a mining venture.
Number 287
SENATOR LINCOLN said she appreciated Senator Taylor's comments, but
she objects to the amendment, because she thought they were going
from one extreme to another. Giving DNR the final say on
everything is too dangerous when they earlier made a change saying
"may advise."
SENATOR LEMAN said he tended to agree with Senator Taylor in that
there needed to be some ultimate point at which someone takes
charge and he would fully expect that DNR would do that and would
not change things, like water quality standards, on its own.
SENATOR LINCOLN maintained her objections. The roll was taken as
follows: Senators Lincoln and Hoffman voted no; Senators Leman
Pearce, Halford, and Taylor voted yes; and the amendment was
adopted.
Number 221
SENATOR TAYLOR moved CSSB 169 (RES) from committee with individual
recommendations. There were no objections and it was so ordered.
SENATOR LINCOLN asked if DNR had looked at the fiscal note with the
new amendment. SENATOR LEMAN indicated that would be taken care
of.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|