Legislature(2011 - 2012)CAPITOL 120
03/28/2011 01:00 PM House JUDICIARY
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB169 | |
| SB61 | |
| HB171 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| + | HB 169 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | SB 61 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| += | HB 171 | TELECONFERENCED | |
HB 169 - LAA REVIEW OF PROPOSED REGULATIONS
1:12:20 PM
CHAIR GATTO announced that the first order of business would be
HOUSE BILL NO. 169, "An Act relating to the review of proposed
regulations by the Legislative Affairs Agency; and providing for
an effective date."
The committee took an at-ease from 1:13 p.m. to 1:15 p.m.
1:15:23 PM
SARAH MUNSON, Staff, Representative Carl Gatto, Alaska State
Legislature, on behalf of the sponsor, the House Judiciary
Standing Committee, chaired by Representative Gatto, explained
that [by amending AS 24.20.105(e),] HB 169 would fix problems
with the statutes pertaining to regulation review. Existing
AS 24.20.105 enumerates who can request Legislative Legal and
Research Services to conduct a review of proposed regulations -
a standing committee, the Administrative Regulation Review
Committee, and Legislative Council - and who Legislative Legal
and Research Services is allowed to notify of the results of
such a review when it finds a problem with the proposed
regulations - the Administrative Regulation Review Committee,
the president of the Senate, and the speaker of the House of
Representatives. The existing statute does not, however,
currently allow the standing committee or the Legislative
Council that requested the review to be notified of such
results, and HB 169 would address this problem by adding those
entities to the list of those who could be notified.
Furthermore, in order to address situations involving a review
of proposed regulations implementing newly enacted legislation,
HB 169 would add language allowing the prime sponsor of such
legislation to also be consulted by Legislative Legal and
Research Services during the review and to be notified of the
results of the review if a problem with the proposed regulations
is found. The bill would also add language allowing Legislative
Legal and Research Services to notify the requester of the
review in situations where no problem with the proposed
regulations is found.
MS. MUNSON mentioned that under the bill, when proposed
regulations are found to have a problem, notification must be
made in writing, but when no problem is found, notification may
be communicated by [other, less formal means]. She also
mentioned that some people have expressed concern that HB 169
would alter how regulations are promulgated, but pointed out
that those concerns are unfounded because the bill only pertains
to Legislative Legal and Research Services' review of, and
subsequent communications regarding, proposed regulations.
CHAIR GATTO indicated that HB 169 was developed at his request.
MS. MUNSON, in response to questions, reiterated that under
existing law, reviews may be requested by a standing committee,
the Administrative Regulation Review Committee, or Legislative
Council; and offered her understanding that when a problem with
proposed regulations is found by Legislative Legal and Research
Services, just the chair of the committee or council that
requested the review would be notified.
REPRESENTATIVE HOLMES indicated interest in possibly expanding
the list of who could be notified.
1:22:15 PM
LISA KIRSCH, Attorney, Legislative Legal Counsel, Legislative
Legal and Research Services, Legislative Affairs Agency (LAA),
as [one of the drafters], explained that under Alaska's
Administrative Procedure Act (APA), all legislators get notice
of proposed regulations, and so if an individual legislator has
an interest in a particular proposed regulation but is not a
member of one of the aforementioned legislative bodies, under
other provisions of existing AS 24.20, he/she could still
request a legal opinion on the proposed regulation, which would
then undergo a similar, confidential review as that provided for
under AS 24.20.105. In response to a question about the phrase,
"consult with", as used on page 1, lines 6 and 9, she explained
that under current law, when conducting a review of proposed
regulations, Legislative Legal and Research Services is allowed
to discuss the proposed regulation and the issues surrounding it
with the Department of Law (DOL), the requesting legislative
body, and the state agency proposing the regulatory change.
Under the bill, in conducting a review of proposed regulations
implementing newly enacted legislation, Legislative Legal and
Research Services would also be able to discuss those things
with the sponsor of the enabling legislation.
MS. MUNSON - in response to a question about the term,
"statutory standards" as used in the sponsor statement -
clarified that under existing AS 24.20.105(d)(1)-(3), in
reviewing a proposed regulation, Legislative Legal and Research
Services is required to evaluate the legality and
constitutionality of the proposed regulation; whether the state
agency has the statutory authority to adopt the proposed
regulation in order to implement, interpret, make specific, or
otherwise carry out a statute; and whether the proposed
regulation is consistent with the applicable statutes.
MS. KIRSCH noted that during such reviews, Legislative Legal and
Research Services also evaluates whether a proposed regulation
is consistent with legislative intent - at least in so far as
such can be determined.
CHAIR GATTO, after ascertaining that no one else wished to
testify, closed public testimony on HB 169.
1:33:39 PM
DEBORAH BEHR, Chief Assistant Attorney General - Statewide
Section Supervisor, Legislation & Regulations Section, Civil
Division (Juneau), Department of Law (DOL), in response to
questions and comments, indicated that the existing limitations
under AS 24.20.105 regarding who may request a Legislative Legal
and Research Services' review of a proposed regulation and who
receives notification of the results of such a review were meant
to ensure that a review didn't take on a life of its own,
particularly when the proposed regulation raised constitutional
issues. She, too, noted that under Alaska's Administrative
Procedure Act (APA), all legislators get notice of proposed
regulations, and that under other provisions of AS 24.20, any
legislator may request a review of a proposed regulation from
Legislative Legal and Research Services.
CHAIR GATTO indicated that he is disinclined to further expand
the bill's proposed list of who is notified of review results.
MS. KIRSCH, in response to a question, clarified that the bill
is not proposing to expand the list of who can request a review
under AS 24.20.105; reiterated aspects of Ms. Munson's
explanation of the bill; and pointed out that if a legislator
isn't specifically entitled under AS 24.20.105 to receive
notification of the results of a review conducted under that
provision, he/she could simply ask Legislative Legal and
Research Services to conduct a review of the proposed regulation
under other provisions of AS 24.20.
REPRESENTATIVE KELLER expressed favor with keeping the bill's
proposed list of who may receive notification of review results
under AS 24.20.105 as is.
1:40:45 PM
REPRESENTATIVE PRUITT moved to report HB 169 out of committee
with individual recommendations and the accompanying fiscal
notes. There being no objection, HB 169 was reported from the
House Judiciary Standing Committee.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| HB169 Sponsor Statement 03-08-11.pdf |
HJUD 3/28/2011 1:00:00 PM |
HB 169 |
| HB169 Version A 02-23-11.pdf |
HJUD 3/28/2011 1:00:00 PM |
HB 169 |
| HB169 Relevant Statutes 24.20.105.pdf |
HJUD 3/28/2011 1:00:00 PM |
HB 169 |
| HB169 Fiscal Note-LEG-COU 03-10-2011.pdf |
HJUD 3/28/2011 1:00:00 PM |
HB 169 |
| HB169 Supporting Documents-Memo Legal Services 02-18-11.pdf |
HJUD 3/28/2011 1:00:00 PM |
HB 169 |
| SB61 Sectional Analysis 03-21-11.pdf |
HJUD 3/28/2011 1:00:00 PM |
SB 61 |
| SB61 Version B 01-24-11.pdf |
HJUD 3/28/2011 1:00:00 PM |
SB 61 |
| SB61 CS (STA) Version I 02-21-11.pdf |
HJUD 3/28/2011 1:00:00 PM |
SB 61 |