Legislature(2009 - 2010)HOUSE FINANCE 519
04/05/2010 01:30 PM House FINANCE
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB422 | |
| HB167 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| *+ | HB 422 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 167 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED |
HOUSE BILL NO. 167
"An Act relating to a corporation income tax credit
for contributions by a person owning or operating a
commercial passenger vessel to a qualified trade
association that was awarded a contract by the
Department of Commerce, Community, and Economic
Development, and used for planning and executing a
destination tourism marketing campaign."
5:15:31 PM AT EASE
5:16:40 PM RECONVENED
Representative Fairclough introduced the bill and solicited
public testimony.
GENEVIEVE WOJTUSIK, STAFF, REPRESENTATIVE MILLET, stated
that the tourism industry had encouraged the development of
HB 167. Alaska's tourism industry had informed lawmakers
that Alaska had failed to maintain, and grow, a market
share in national and international markets. Competing
destinations were outspending the state with increasing
marketing budgets. All sectors of Alaska's travel industry
were reporting an unprecedented drop in summer season
bookings. The bill attempts to secure funding for the
marketing of Alaska by taking money from the industry and
giving a tax credit back, which would create a sustainable
source of income. The bill would ensure that a person
making a contribution would not receive a direct benefit
from the contribution while also receiving the income tax
credit. The bill deals only with commercial passenger
vessel income, and a credible passenger vehicle tax.
REPRESENTATIVE CHARISSE MILLETT (via teleconference), she
stressed state investment in marketing the Alaska product.
She reiterated that the state was competing on the global
market with international destinations. Alaska has unique
wildlife attractions, but other areas often have the same
attributes. She stated that the tourism industry created
jobs and sustained the economy, and that infrastructure for
tourism had been built that should not go to waste. The
bill provided a mechanism for a steady stream of revenue
for marketing, which would alleviate the need for future
legislative allocations in the area of marketing.
5:22:08 PM
Representative Doogan asked how much revenue would be
generated by the tax to spend on tourism marketing. Ms.
Wojtusik replied that Title 44.33.125 defined how the
marketing would be done with both private and state
dollars.
JOHANNA BALES, DEPUTY DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE,
explained that the bill would allow credit against the
corporate income tax paid by operators of commercial
passenger vessels, which would be the difference between
the tax already paid without the excise tax, and the tax
paid including the excise tax. The department had
encountered 2 problems when trying to figure the actual
numbers. First, there were only 3 tax payers, so
confidentiality was an issue. Second, it the nature of the
corporate income tax made it difficult to make an
approximation.
Representative Doogan requested the amount that the cruise
industry would pay the state under the legislation. Ms.
Bales responded the ships were often subsidiaries of larger
corporations which made estimating the funds the state
would receive difficult.
5:26:40 PM
Representative Kelly noted that the version of the bill
before the committee referred to the 3 major recipients of
the credit. The governor's version was much broader in the
amount of businesses that could take part. He queried the
department's position on including larger groups. Ms. Bales
responded that the governor's bill was crafted to include
any corporation engaged in tourism activity in the state.
House Bill 167 was crafted to include only 3 companies, and
one small segment of the corporate base, that could take
advantage of the credit. The department had suggested
putting a cap on the credit, but opening the credit to all
corporations that were engaged in tourism in the state.
5:29:13 PM
SANDRA LOOMIS, BUSINESS MANAGER, TALKEETNA AIR TAXI, spoke
in favor of the legislation. She stated that the tourism
industry was vital to the community of Talkeetna. She
shared her experience with ATIA and the marketing help
provided by the association. She contested that there was
no end to the benefits for the state from the marketing
work done by ATIA.
ROARK BROWN, OWNER, HOMER OCEAN CHARTERS, HOMER, supported
the bill. He stated that ATIAs board of directors, on
behalf of the 1,100 member businesses in Homer, unanimously
endorsed the governor's plan to restore the health of
Alaska's travel industry. If the bill were amended to add
the governor's language the state's tourism marketing
program would be adequately funded. He noted that the
program had extensive state oversight, including veto
power.
Representative Kelly pointed out to the committee that the
element differences between HB 167 and HB 422, was the
discussion of the 3 taxpayers versus the broader based
plan, he wondered which method the testifier supported. Mr.
Brown supported the broad based plan.
5:36:34 PM
BRETT CARLSON, COOK, COLDFOOT AND DEADHORSE, testified in
support of the bill. He shared that in his region there
were many small businesses that were not primarily cruise
related businesses. The businesses focus on non-cruise
visitors and were dependent on a tourism marketing program
that reached out to non-cruise travelers. Declining
marketing funding over the past 20 years had made it
increasingly difficult for the non-cruise businesses. He
stated that the tourism numbers in the northern areas of
the state were dismal. He noted that the low tourism
numbers were expounded by the weak economy. He felt that
Alaska was comparable to other destinations like Hawaii,
New Zealand, and Australia. He concluded that the bill
offered a long term sustainable funding plan for marketing
the state.
5:42:19 PM
ALAN LEMASTER, ATIA, GLENALLEN, urged supported of the
governor's HB 422, but not HB 167. He argued that HB 167
was fragmented and contained no fiscal impact information.
He divulged that in his business experience, a reduction of
marketing equaled a reduction in visitation, which equated
to a reduction in jobs. He believed marketing was the first
step in reenergizing the tourism industry in Alaska.
COLLEEN STEPHENS, VALDEZ, voiced support for the
legislation. She stated that the reduction of visitors to
the state had negatively affected 10 full-time seasonal
jobs, and 1 full-time year-round position in the community.
She believed that seasonal employment help young people
develop a work ethic which would continue with them through
life. Scarce entry level jobs for young people across the
state would affect the work force in to the future, as well
as the economy and the viability of the state.
SCOTT REISLAND, DENALI GRIZZLY BEAR, DENALI NATIONAL PARK,
testified in support of the bill. He said that ATIA
marketing was critical for marketing his business. The
funding received by the passage of the legislation would
help with increasing the independent travel market.
MARY RICHARDS, ALL SEASON'S INN, FAIRBANKS urged support of
the bill. She explained that the only way the inn could be
effectively marketed was in cooperation with the ATIA
marketing plan. She used her money to reach out to the
association, who in turn reached out to the rest of the
world on her behalf.
MATT ATKINSON, FAIRBANKS spoke in support of the governor's
bill. He offered accolades to ATIA for the association's
ability to maximize available funds. He believed the tax
credit would allow the state to direct more focus on
marketing the state and less on requesting one-time
appropriations.
5:53:20 PM
LOIS WIRTZ, SELF, spoke in support of the legislation. She
stated that statewide marketing was crucial for tourism
development in Nome, Kotzebue, and Gamble. Reducing the
head tax was only one aspect of what was necessary to
foster tourism in the state. She believed that an ongoing
marketing effort was necessary to bring back non-cruise and
independent visitors.
JILLIAN SIMPSON, ALASKA TRAVEL INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION (via
teleconference), testified in support of the broad based
bill for tourism marketing tax credits. She felt that
Alaska needed sustainable marketing funding for to the
domestic and international market in order for the state to
continue to grow.
TOM HALL, KLONDIKE GOLD DREDGE BREWERY (via
teleconference), offered support for the bill. He testified
that ATIA offered unique opportunities for collaboration in
marketing the Alaska product to visitors from far away. He
felt that there would be significant return on the
marketing investment.
5:58:28 PM
TAMMY GRIFFIN, DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS, ALASKA HOTEL AND
LODGING ASSOCIATION (via teleconference), supported the
legislation. She stated that the association supported an
amended HB 167 that included the participation of a broader
selection of industry players in the tax credit. She
concluded that an increase in tourism marketing funding was
imperative for the future of the industry in Alaska.
FRANK FLAVIN, PHOTOGRAPHER supported the bill. He cited the
marketing spending increases made by other destinations in
the past 6 years. He revealed that Alaska had spent $10
million in 2005, with an additional $5 million match from
the industry, but had only increased to 11.7 million in
2010.
6:02:46 PM
SHANNON HAMRICK, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, KENAI PENINSULA
TOURISM MARKETING COUNCIL (via teleconference), testified
in support of the legislation. She opined the downturn in
the tourism economy of 2009, and the equally abysmal
forecast for 2010. She explained that her family business
relied on the building of lodges and bed and breakfast
establishments, which were is less demand because of the
industry slump. She said that the loss of visitors had a
ripple effect of loss throughout the community.
Co-Chair Stoltze closed public testimony.
Co-Chair Stoltze discussed housekeeping.
HB 167 was HEARD and HELD in Committee for further
consideration.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| Visitor Industry Impacts 3_30.pdf |
HFIN 4/5/2010 1:30:00 PM |
HB 422 |
| Sponsor Statement Tourism Enhancement 31Mar10.doc |
HFIN 4/5/2010 1:30:00 PM |
HB 422 |
| Sectional Analysis Tourism Enhancement 31Mar10.doc |
HFIN 4/5/2010 1:30:00 PM |
HB 422 |
| HB 422 Letters.pdf |
HFIN 4/5/2010 1:30:00 PM |
HB 422 |
| HB 422 Gov Transmittal Letter.pdf |
HFIN 4/5/2010 1:30:00 PM |
HB 422 |
| Testimony HB 167.docx |
HFIN 4/5/2010 1:30:00 PM |
HB 167 |
| Nov09HouseFinTourismReport.pdf |
HFIN 4/5/2010 1:30:00 PM |
HB 167 |
| McDowell Group GDS Presentation 2009.pdf |
HFIN 4/5/2010 1:30:00 PM |
HB 167 |
| HB 167 Testimony.PDF |
HFIN 4/5/2010 1:30:00 PM |
HB 167 |
| HB 167 Support Letters.pdf |
HFIN 4/5/2010 1:30:00 PM |
HB 167 |
| HB 167 Referral Summary.doc |
HFIN 4/5/2010 1:30:00 PM |
HB 167 |
| HB 167 Back Up.pdf |
HFIN 4/5/2010 1:30:00 PM |
HB 167 |
| 06 HB167 PPT Presentation by ATIA.pdf |
HFIN 4/5/2010 1:30:00 PM |
HB 167 |
| 03 CSHB167 ver E Sectional Analysis.pdf |
HFIN 4/5/2010 1:30:00 PM |
HB 167 |
| 02 CSHB167 ver E Sponsor Statement.pdf |
HFIN 4/5/2010 1:30:00 PM |
HB 167 |
| HB 422 CS WORKDRAFT VERSION 26-GH2210 R.pdf |
HFIN 4/5/2010 1:30:00 PM |
HB 422 |
| RCAgov31210.doc |
HFIN 4/5/2010 1:30:00 PM |
HB 422 |
| 4-2-10 Ltr support HB 422 (3).doc |
HFIN 4/5/2010 1:30:00 PM |
HB 422 |
| RCAhb4224510.doc |
HFIN 4/5/2010 1:30:00 PM |
HB4224 |
| Deputy Commissioner Thayer's Testimony on HB 422.PDF |
HFIN 4/5/2010 1:30:00 PM |
HB 422 |
| HB 422 Letters Additional.pdf |
HFIN 4/5/2010 1:30:00 PM |
HB 422 |
| HB 422 Letters Sharp-7000-OMb_20100406_165809.pdf |
HFIN 4/5/2010 1:30:00 PM |
HB 422 |
| HB 422 Letters Sharp-7000-OMb_20100409_113735.pdf |
HFIN 4/5/2010 1:30:00 PM |
HB 422 |
| HB 422 Support Letter.pdf |
HFIN 4/5/2010 1:30:00 PM |
HB 422 |