Legislature(2007 - 2008)HOUSE FINANCE 519
04/24/2007 01:30 PM House FINANCE
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB90 | |
| HB238 | |
| HB164 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| + | HB 90 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | HB 238 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| += | HB 164 | TELECONFERENCED | |
HOUSE BILL NO. 164
"An Act relating to reporting of vessel location by
certain commercial passenger vessels operating in the
marine waters of the state, to access to vessels by
licensed marine engineers for purposes of monitoring
compliance with state and federal requirements, and to
the obligations of those engineers while aboard the
vessels; and providing for an effective date."
REPRESENTATIVE KYLE JOHANSEN, Sponsor explained the
legislation. He reported that the Alaska Constitution sets
up a system of checks and balances so no group has absolute
power. These apply to the initiative process in several
ways: the legislature's power to amend initiatives and the
legislature's power to control expenditures of the state
money, make changes to the initiative, and decide on
expenditures.
Representative Johansen related some of the facts brought
out in previous committees. The cruise ship fleet has
radically changed since April 2003 when the initiative was
initially filed. Only two ships had advanced wastewater
treatment systems. Today 24 out of 29 ships have advanced
wastewater treatment systems, which future ships will all
have. The Coast Guard determined that the discharge from
these systems is so clean it can be released 24 hours a day,
even in port. The Department of Environmental Conservation
(DEC) testing showed that the effluent presents no harm to
humans or to the environment.
Representative Johansen reported that there currently exists
trained, independent contractors and monitoring systems from
DEC, EPA, and the Coast Guard on board the ships. DEC
maintains that the current system works and does not need to
be supplemented by the Ocean Ranger program. The state
currently spends about $500,000 on monitoring programs and
the Ocean Ranger program would increase this spending by
"several 100 percent".
Representative Johansen addressed a change to the initiative
which replaces the requirement that Ocean Rangers be
licensed certified marine engineers. Instead, they will be
required to be level III wastewater treatment operators.
Also, the commissioner of DEC now has the discretion as to
how to implement the initiative and when to place the Ocean
Rangers on the vessels in Alaskan waters.
Representative Johansen related that the intent of the
initiative has been maintained, keeping safety and costs in
mind. A balance has been struck between being fiscally
responsible and getting the Ocean Rangers on board as soon
as possible.
3:36:37 PM
Vice Chair Stoltze asked about a requirement to have a
marine engineer on board. Representative Johansen reported
that the initiative language specified that a U.S. certified
Coast Guard marine engineer be on board, however, that
person would not be a professional in wastewater management.
There was concern that marine engineers from the Alaska
Marine Highway System would be taken to fill Ocean Ranger
spots. He maintained that professional wastewater treatment
specialists need to be on board the cruise ships.
Vice Chair Stoltze noted that there was little debate on
this issue during the election. Representative Johansen
reported that one of the initiative sponsors works for the
union representing the Alaska Marine Highway. He offered to
provide previous testimony as to the availability of marine
engineers.
3:39:10 PM
Representative Kelly summarized that the commissioner of DEC
would have the discretion to make decisions regarding Ocean
Rangers, including at sea. Representative Johansen said
that is correct. He envisioned putting Ocean Rangers on in
Juneau, Ketchikan, or Sitka because of current DEC support
in those locations. Representative Kelly concluded that the
commissioner has flexibility in carrying out the initiative.
CSHB 164 (JUD) was heard and HELD in Committee for further
consideration.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|