Legislature(2009 - 2010)HOUSE FINANCE 519
04/13/2009 08:30 AM House FINANCE
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB221 | |
| HB162 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| + | HB 162 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 212 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 221 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED |
HOUSE BILL NO. 162
"An Act establishing the Southeast State Forest and
relating to the Southeast State Forest; and providing
for an effective date."
MELANIE LESH, LEGISLATIVE LIAISON, DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL
RESOURCES (DNR), introduced HB 162, which would establish a
new Southeast State Forest (SESF). The bill is the state's
effort to ensure that timber processing continues to be part
of the economy in Southeast Alaska. She noted a zero fiscal
note by DNR. There was a very thorough hearing of the bill
previously in the House Resources Committee and in the
Senate Community and Regional Affairs Committee.
Ms. Lesh reported that the majority of timber in southern
Southeast is on federal land, but federal timber sales have
been in decline. Local mills now depend heavily on state
timber for survival. Demand for Southeast timber for wood
energy is also increasing, further raising the need for
securing a timber base for this region.
Ms. Lesh explained that the proposed bill consists of 20
parcels that are currently classified as general use state
land. She referred to maps of those parcels contained in
the members' packets. Regarding this proposal, DNR has
briefed many statewide groups. Letters of support are also
included in the packet.
9:01:55 AM
Co-Chair Stoltze inquired about the major harvesting and
processing forestry projects. Ms. Lesh deferred to Mr.
Maisch.
CHRIS MAISCH, DIRECTOR, DIVISION OF FORESTRY, DEPARTMENT OF
NATURAL RESOURCES, testified via teleconference, and
reported that about 50,000 acres of forestry land in
Southeast are currently managed by the state. This proposal
would designate about 25,000 acres as state forest. There
are three midsize or larger mills in Southeast, as well as
numerous small mills.
Mr. Maisch shared that the legislation is part of a multi-
faceted strategy. He related the process used to discuss
the proposal. He explained communities' concerns about
municipal entitlement. The bill will grandfather in any
communities for municipal entitlement selection. He pointed
out that Wrangell was currently going through the selection
process. He noted a zero fiscal note accompanying the bill.
Mr. Maisch emphasized the importance of transferring from
old growth to second growth management in Southeast. He
discussed pre-commercial thinning.
9:07:33 AM
Vice-Chair Thomas asked why all the state land was not
included in the proposed state forest. Mr. Maisch discussed
how the land was assigned to become state forest.
Vice-Chair Thomas pointed out that recently a bill giving up
41,000 acres of state land was passed. He wondered why
university lands were not included. Mr. Maisch thought it
was due to a recent Supreme Court ruling and lack of time.
He suggested that lands could be added in the future.
Vice-Chair Thomas asked what the sustained yield would be.
Mr. Maisch thought there would be 13 million board feet per
year.
Mr. Maisch added that all 50,000 acres would be managed,
including the 25,000 not within the state forest.
9:10:17 AM
Vice-Chair Thomas pointed out that a lot of land was left
out. He suggested that all lands should be included now, in
order to prevent future battles.
Representative Kelly asked if the land is still open to
mining once it goes into the state forest category. Mr.
Maisch said it was.
Representative Kelly asked what would happen if this bill
does not pass. Mr. Maisch explained that the bill allows
for the start of commercial thinning. A percentage of
timber receipts are prioritized for reforestation work. It
would allow DNR to be able to harvest the trees in the
future.
Representative Kelly asked what happens if the state wants
to do a remote cabin release. He wondered if the bill would
prevent that. Mr. Maisch believed it would. It would take
legislative change. He pointed out that many other lands
are set aside for that purpose. Representative Kelly
commented on problems with access to those areas.
9:15:26 AM
Co-Chair Stoltze echoed those sentiments.
Representative Gara asked about a parcel near Thorne Bay.
He wondered if it was in the Thorne River drainage. Mr.
Maisch said it does not appear to be. Representative Gara
pointed out that the Thorne River is a Steelhead and Salmon
drainage. He wondered if the 70-foot clear-cut buffer was
in place. Mr. Maisch reported that all regulations would
apply.
9:17:43 AM
Representative Gara asked about rules that say other options
have to be looked at before cutting the old growth. Mr.
Maisch reported on regulations relating to managing old
growth. The Alaska Department of Fish and Game looked at
water quality issues and supports this legislation.
Representative Gara asked about replanting requirements.
Mr. Maisch shared the restoration regulations. He commented
that in Southeast, forests reforest well on their own.
Representative Gara voiced concern about care needed in
dealing with drainage.
Co-Chair Stoltze noted who was in support of the bill. Mr.
Maisch listed others who have endorsed the bill.
9:21:00 AM
Co-Chair Stoltze noted a zero fiscal note by the Department
of Natural Resources. He requested assurance that more
money would not be requested in the future. Mr. Maisch
reviewed the funding sources, which require no additional
funding.
9:21:53 AM
Vice-Chair Thomas MOVED to report HB 162 out of Committee
with individual recommendations and the accompanying fiscal
note. There being NO OBJECTION, it was so ordered.
HB 162 was REPORTED out of Committee with "no
recommendation" and with zero fiscal note #1 by the
Department of Natural Resources.
HB 212 was scheduled but not heard.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| 02 HB221 Sponsor Statement.pdf |
HFIN 4/13/2009 8:30:00 AM |
HB 221 |
| 04 HB221 NMLS overview.pdf |
HFIN 4/13/2009 8:30:00 AM |
HB 221 |
| 04 HB221 NMLS overview.pdf |
HFIN 4/13/2009 8:30:00 AM |
HB 221 |
| 06 HB221 Letter of support-opposition_ JMartin 4-10-09.pdf |
HFIN 4/13/2009 8:30:00 AM |
HB 221 |
| Referral Summary.doc |
HFIN 4/13/2009 8:30:00 AM |
HB 221 |
| HB 162 DOF Background Paper.pdf |
HFIN 4/13/2009 8:30:00 AM |
HB 162 |
| HB 162 Sectional Analysis.pdf |
HFIN 4/13/2009 8:30:00 AM |
HB 162 |
| Maps DOF SE Multi per pg.pdf |
HFIN 4/13/2009 8:30:00 AM |
HB 162 |
| DNR Letters.pdf |
HFIN 4/13/2009 8:30:00 AM |
HB 162 |