Legislature(2011 - 2012)BARNES 124
03/08/2011 10:15 AM House ECON. DEV., TRADE & TOURISM
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HJR19 | |
| HB160 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| += | HB 160 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | HJR 19 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED |
HB 160-TOURISM MARKETING CONTRACTS/CAMPAIGNS
11:36:05 AM
CHAIR HERRON announced that the final order of business would be
HOUSE BILL NO. 160, "An Act establishing and relating to the
Alaska visitor industry investment fund; relating to matching
funds for state tourism marketing contracts with qualified trade
associations; and providing for an effective date."
CHAIR HERRON stated his intent to discuss and hold the bill for
amendments that are not ready at this time and to hear related
discussion by the House Finance Committee. He called attention
to Amendment 1, labeled 27-LS0509\I.1, Bannister, 2/28/11, which
read:
Page 2, line 27:
Delete "$2,700,000 [AT LEAST"
Insert "at least $2,700,000 ["
CHAIR HERRON, in response to Representative Joule, said work
draft Version I was before the committee. In response to
Representative Tuck, he clarified that "the $2.7 will become the
floor, rather than the ceiling."
11:38:59 AM
REPRESENTATIVE MUNOZ asked for the total amounts collected in
the three tax areas of vehicle rental tax (VRT), recreational
tax, and corporate tax associated with tourist activities.
TERRY HARVEY, Staff, Representative Cathy Munoz, Alaska State
Legislature, referenced a fiscal note from the Department of
Revenue (DOR) that indicated $7.3 million in VRT in 2009, and $8
million in 2010. He deferred to DOR for details.
11:40:28 AM
JOHANNA BALES, Deputy Director, Anchorage Office, Tax Division,
Department of Revenue, informed the committee the effective date
of the legislation is July 1, 2011, thus for this calculation
the division would look at revenues received in 2009-2011. The
division has data for 2009-2010, and for VRT the state collected
$7.3 million in 2009, $8 million in 2010, and estimates $7.5
million will be collected in fiscal year 2011 (FY 11).
Furthermore, for tourism corporate income tax the state
collected approximately $21.4 million in 2009, $5.1 million in
2010, and estimates $5.5 million will be collected in 2011.
Total revenue collected and estimated for three years is
approximately $54.8 million, and 30 percent of that is $16.4
million. Ms. Bales advised the first amount directed into the
sub fund in the general fund would become the "floor" for future
years.
REPRESENTATIVE MUNOZ asked whether the industry-to-state match
is a 70 percent to 30 percent split.
MS. BALES deferred the question to DCCED.
11:43:00 AM
MR. HARVEY said his understanding is that currently the industry
is operating under a 70 percent state and 30 percent industry
match. In response to Chair Herron, he said this arrangement
will expire at the end of this fiscal year.
11:43:34 AM
REPRESENTATIVE MUNOZ recalled that this year the governor made a
larger commitment to the tourism industry and asked for that
percentage.
MR. HARVEY stated that the governor has proposed an additional
$7 million; however, he was unsure of what percentage that would
be.
REPRESENTATIVE KELLER surmised this may be viewed as
unconstitutional because it may be dedicated funds.
MR. HARVEY explained this is an annual amount of money that is
subject to appropriation and identified in statute as funds
based on revenue from the tourism industry, and thus is not
considered a dedicated fund. He suggested hearing further
testimony on this issue from the commissioner of DCCED.
11:45:16 AM
REPRESENTATIVE KELLER described the reason for his interest,
saying that the proceeds are for a particular purpose, and
requested a review of the criteria by legal services.
CHAIR HERRON indicated he would direct staff to obtain a
response from Legislative Legal and Research Services,
Legislative Affairs Agency. In response to Representative
Olson, he said a response would also be obtained from the
Attorney General, Department of Law, and distributed to the
committee.
REPRESENTATIVE GARDNER observed that if the funding is subject
to appropriation each year, the legislature could refuse or
change the amount. She surmised the bill simply makes a
recommendation for what future legislators should appropriate.
MR. HARVEY agreed, and asked for the viewpoint of the
commissioner of DCCED.
11:47:22 AM
REPRESENTATIVE GARDNER turned to the amendment, and asked
whether passage of the amendment means that if the marketing
campaign is $10 million, the industry is paying less, and if the
marketing campaign is $5 million, the industry is paying more.
11:48:04 AM
SUSAN BELL, Commissioner, Department of Commerce, Community &
Economic Development (DCCED), concurred with Representative
Gardner's statement, and said the bill addresses visitor
industry-generated revenues, to make a connection between the
health of the visitor industry, restoring its growth, and
establishing a fund that preserves the legislature's power of
appropriation in Section 2, subsection (a).
REPRESENTATIVE GARDNER then asked for the historical cost of the
marketing campaign contract.
COMMISSIONER BELL advised last year there was a 60 percent
increase in the state contribution from $9 million to $16
million, bringing the total ATIA marketing contract to $18.7
million. She reviewed the contract process and the decline in
tourism visitors, and said increasing the state's marketing
program was a significant piece in restoring visitor interest in
Alaska. Thus, the total marketing campaign has grown from a
state contribution of about $9 million and an industry
contribution of $2.7 million, to a state contribution of $18.7
million.
11:50:55 AM
REPRESENTATIVE GARDNER understood that according to the original
bill draft, matching funds would be about $9.35 million;
however, if the amendment passes, matching funds would be $2.7
million, which is a savings to the qualified trade organization
of about $5.65 million in the year under discussion.
11:51:33 AM
COMMISSIONER BELL said correct. She further noted that the
current 70 percent to 30 percent match will sunset and become a
50 percent to 50 percent match; however, since the time of the
original contract in 1999, there has been a change in the
composition of taxes and fees on the industry. For example, VRT
now brings in between $7-$8 million annually, and there is
income from a suite of taxes and fees enacted by the Alaska
Shipping Tax Initiative of 2006, Ballot Measure 2. Although
revenue from the ballot measure has been "rolled back," the
landscape of the state collection of industry-related taxes and
fees has changed. In addition, the industry trade organization
collects the fees from its members.
REPRESENTATIVE KELLER, observing that the industry's need is
measured by the number of visitors to Alaska, asked for the
length of time required to judge the marketing campaign's
success.
11:53:43 AM
COMMISSIONER BELL related the travel industry feels the state's
marketing efforts are insufficient. Her experience was that the
state's marketing investment in the '90s was higher; in fact,
the state's investment has dropped, and the market and
competition has changed due to the terrorist attacks of
September 11, 2001, and the response to the economic decline by
other tourism destinations. Commissioner Bell confirmed that
DCCED monitors the volume of visitors to indicate the health of
the industry, and she concluded that the state's previous
marketing budget of $11 million is insufficient "to achieve the
presence that we wanted."
REPRESENTATIVE KELLER suggested "a sunset on this" would ensure
that the effectiveness is measured.
COMMISSIONER BELL indicated there are tools to assess the
success of the marketing plan such as a sunset, the power of
appropriation, and the legislature's ability to question DCCED.
11:56:18 AM
REPRESENTATIVE THOMPSON referred to the proposed transportation
highway bill that would be funded by a percentage of VRT.
COMMISSIONER BELL affirmed that there is a proposed bill
competing for a percentage of VRT revenue, but she was unsure of
the percentage affected.
11:57:18 AM
REPRESENTATIVE GARDNER pointed out that between 2009 and 2010,
corporate income tax related to tourism went down about 75
percent, and VRT went down about 10 percent. She asked whether
a large portion of VRT is not tourism-related.
COMMISSIONER BELL explained that VRT is collected at the time of
sale; however, corporate income taxes are affected by other
factors. She deferred to Ms. Bales for details.
11:58:38 AM
REPRESENTATIVE OLSON relayed his growing concern that the
proposed legislation codifies a level of expectation that may
not be sustained. He opined the funding of this program and
others may still be best handled on a year-by-year basis.
REPRESENTATIVE KELLER observed that VRT would include cars
rented for purposes other than tourism. He asked whether an
exemption for other uses would avoid a "dedicated fund"
situation.
12:00:30 PM
CHAIR HERRON asked for the administration's stand on the
proposed committee substitute (CS) for HB 160.
12:01:20 PM
COMMISSIONER BELL informed the committee the governor was
briefed on the proposed CS; in fact, the governor continues to
consider a healthy visitor industry a priority and "he still
remains comfortable with it."
HB 160 was heard and held.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| HB 160 - ATIA and ASMI Comparison.pdf |
HEDT 3/1/2011 10:15:00 AM HEDT 3/8/2011 10:15:00 AM |
HB 160 |
| HB 160 - Corporate Income Tax Collection Table.pdf |
HEDT 3/1/2011 10:15:00 AM HEDT 3/8/2011 10:15:00 AM |
HB 160 |
| HB 160 - Travel Industry Marketing FAQs.doc |
HEDT 3/1/2011 10:15:00 AM HEDT 3/8/2011 10:15:00 AM |
HB 160 |
| HB 160 -Sectional Analysis.pdf |
HEDT 3/1/2011 10:15:00 AM HEDT 3/8/2011 10:15:00 AM |
|
| HB 160 - Visitor_Industry_Impacts_3_30.pdf |
HEDT 3/1/2011 8:00:00 AM HEDT 3/8/2011 10:15:00 AM |
HB 160 |
| HB160 Sponsor Statement Final.pdf |
HEDT 3/1/2011 8:00:00 AM HEDT 3/8/2011 10:15:00 AM |
|
| HB160-Fiscal Note-CCED-DED-02-25-11.pdf |
HEDT 3/1/2011 8:00:00 AM HEDT 3/8/2011 10:15:00 AM |
|
| CS HB 160 (Version I).pdf |
HEDT 3/1/2011 8:00:00 AM HEDT 3/8/2011 10:15:00 AM |
|
| HB 160 -- Letters of Support 3.1.11.pdf |
HEDT 3/1/2011 10:15:00 AM HEDT 3/8/2011 10:15:00 AM |
HB 160 |
| HJR 19 - 06_08_08_arcticboundaries.pdf |
HEDT 3/8/2011 10:15:00 AM |
HJR 19 |
| HJR 19 - Economic Benefit.doc |
HEDT 3/8/2011 10:15:00 AM |
HJR 19 |
| HJR 19 - Polar Law Textbook (Law of the Sea Chapter).pdf |
HEDT 3/8/2011 10:15:00 AM |
HJR 19 |
| HJR 19 - Projected U.S.continental shelf.doc |
HEDT 3/8/2011 10:15:00 AM |
HJR 19 |
| HJR 19 - Sponsor Statement (LOST).pdf |
HEDT 3/8/2011 10:15:00 AM |
|
| HJR19 - Zero Fiscal Note.pdf |
HEDT 3/8/2011 10:15:00 AM |
HJR 19 |