Legislature(2023 - 2024)DAVIS 106
02/26/2024 06:00 PM House WAYS & MEANS
Note: the audio
and video
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB142|| HB156 | |
| HB142 | |
| HB156 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| += | HB 156 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 109 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 142 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED |
HB 142-STATE SALES AND USE TAX
HB 156-INCOME TAX
6:07:41 PM
CHAIR CARPENTER announced that the first order of business would
be HOUSE BILL NO. 142, "An Act relating to a state sales and use
tax; authorizing the Department of Revenue to enter into the
Streamlined Sales and Use Tax Agreement; and providing for an
effective date." and HOUSE BILL NO. 156, "An Act relating to the
taxation of income of individuals, partners, shareholders in S
corporations, trusts, and estates; repealing tax credits applied
against the tax on individuals under the Alaska Net Income Tax
Act; and providing for an effective date."
6:07:56 PM
CHAIR CARPENTER opened public testimony on HB 142 and HB 156.
6:08:29 PM
PATRICK RACE, representing self, gave a brief history of Ernest
Gruening, Alaska's territorial governor in 1939, and Gruening's
efforts to establish a revenue system from taxes rather than
depending on revenue from resources that allow outside interests
to control lawmakers. He said history shows the essentiality of
taxes. He opined that Alaskans should reinstate an income tax.
6:10:51 PM
KRISTEEN F. PETERSON, representing self, said she supports an
income tax. She recalled paying income tax when she was 14.
She indicated that she would like everyone to be paying it, with
any exceptions decided by the legislature. She urged the
committee to "get it done this year."
6:12:52 PM
CINDY GILDER, representing self, testified in support of an
income tax, stating that a broad-based income tax is the fairest
and would ensure needed services are paid for.
MARY ODDEN, representing self, shared she and her husband paid
an income tax and school tax when they first came to Alaska in
the '70s and thought it "a good thing to do." She opined it is
fairer than a sales tax. She warned against looking to the
permanent fund to cover state expenses. She spoke about the
negative effects of an unstable income for Alaska. She allowed
there could be discussion regarding the proposed $200,000 income
level, and she spoke about making a ceiling and a progressive
tax - whatever is necessary. She encouraged the committee to
support HB 156.
6:16:08 PM
ALEX WERTHEIMER, representing self, stated support for an income
tax as part of a long-term fiscal plan for Alaska. He said the
income tax is more equitable than is a statewide sales tax,
which would disproportionally affect lower income households.
He noted other states require income tax paid and are doing well
economically. Notwithstanding that, he said he does not think
the 2 percent flat tax on higher income is "the way to go." He
mentioned a plan from the Walker Administration where people
would pay a small percentage of their federal tax assessment,
and the state would receive revenue from non-resident workers
who benefit from the infrastructure and services that make their
jobs possible.
6:17:37 PM
PAULA DAVIS, representing self, testified in support of HB 156.
She said she would like to see Alaska's income tax reinstated
because oil revenue is diminishing, Alaskans should pay for the
services they get, sales tax hits the poor more than the rich,
the 2 percent for those making more than $200,000 is fair, the
$20 is fair, and she does not like to be bribed by a large
permanent fund dividend (PFD). She opined that those who live
out of state and work on the North Slope two weeks on/two weeks
off should pay into the state's system. She said, "We'd hate to
be running out of money just because we don't want to tax
ourselves."
6:19:21 PM
MARGIE GOODRICH, representing self, testified in support of an
income tax. A lifelong Alaskan, she recalled the former income
tax being stopped and stated support for having an income tax.
She added that she thinks it should be [based on] $100,000
rather than $200,000, and she echoed that those with lower
income could not afford to pay as much tax as those with higher
income. She said those from out of state who work in Alaska
should contribute to the state's economy. She added that she
thinks an income tax would help to improve the state's education
system, which has declined over the years.
6:22:10 PM
LORI PICKETT, representing self, testified in support of HB 156.
She stated her belief that implementing an income tax is
imperative to the wellbeing of Alaska. She called HB 156
reasonable and said every wage earner has "buy-in." She talked
about the benefits of a state income tax to provide a stable
source of revenue for essential public services and
infrastructure, enhance economic stability and attract business,
cultivate a skilled workforce, and support education.
6:24:30 PM
PAUL SEATON, representing self, stated his support of HB 156 and
said revenue is needed to balance the state's essential
expenditures. He offered his understanding that [HB 156] is the
first real consideration [of an income tax] since the House
passed what would have been the fourth-lowest income tax in the
nation, as part of a long-term fiscal plan back in 2015. He
said he is pleased HB 156 proposes a 2 percent tax on S-
corporations because those that are involved in oil are avoiding
the corporate income tax.
6:26:05 PM
JOEL SALVINO, representing self, emphasized his four-year
residency in Alaska and being 33 and in the prime earning years
of life. He talked about his family, business, farm, and
choices for being in Alaska. He repeatedly emphasized the aging
membership of the legislature and questioned why they have
reaped success only to "pull the ladder out" from behind them
for the next generation. He urged the committee not to "burden
us with new taxes that you never faced." He emphasized his hard
work and opined that taxing his income is "stealing the most
valuable resource in the world." He requested a line-item
budget showing the need for more money.
6:29:10 PM
KEVIN BANKS, representing self, testified in support of HB 156.
He observed that a single-source revenue from the oil industry
is problematic, in that citizens of Alaska have enjoyed the
services of government without participating in it and have
acquired a sense of entitlement to the services provided by the
state, such as roads and education. He posited that "that
contribution" [of income tax] would give Alaskans a stake in
what is happening in government. He said he would favor an
income tax over a sales tax for reasons many previous testifiers
have already stated; a sales tax "has no consideration for the
situation faced by an individual taxpayer." He remarked on the
irony that while HB 156 proposes an income tax, another bill on
the docket proposes to reduce corporate income taxes.
6:31:41 PM
KATHY MORGAN, representing self, testified in support of HB 156.
She opined that Alaska needs to come up with more revenue to
support state services; it cannot continue spending more than it
earns and cutting state services more than they have already
been cut. She said she does not think the proposed income tax
under HB 156 goes far enough; she suggested taxing all income
over $100,000 earned in Alaska and increasing the annual head
tax to $200 per earner. She talked about being retired and in
the past paying a state income tax and a state disaster tax.
She proffered that for many Alaskans the head tax would be "more
than balanced by the PFD" and would help the permanent fund from
being depleted by state government. She said a statewide sales
tax would create disproportionate effects on Alaskans, while an
income tax would impose more of the burden on those who can
afford it.
6:35:11 PM
CHAIR CARPENTER, after ascertaining there was no one else who
wished to testify, closed public testimony on HB 142 and HB 156.
HB 156-INCOME TAX
7:02:39 PM
CHAIR CARPENTER announced that the final order of business would
be HOUSE BILL NO. 156, "An Act relating to the taxation of
income of individuals, partners, shareholders in S corporations,
trusts, and estates; repealing tax credits applied against the
tax on individuals under the Alaska Net Income Tax Act; and
providing for an effective date."
CHAIR CARPENTER announced there were no amendments submitted for
HB 156. He invited the bill sponsor to speak.
7:03:10 PM
REPRESENTATIVE ALYSE GALVIN, Alaska State Legislature, prime
sponsor of HB 156, stated she is grateful for the opportunity to
put another option on the table as the legislature thinks about
broad-based revenue. Every state in the nation has some form of
broad-based revenue, which is a policy decision. While the
state historically has been able to be without [income] taxes
for many years, it is responsible to consider it now, not
because it is needed today but because soon there will be a need
and putting anything in place takes 12-18 months. She urged the
committee to seriously consider the bill.
7:04:30 PM
CHAIR CARPENTER related that no amendments have been offered to
HB 156 and that perhaps the timeline for amendments should be
extended to 2/28/24.
REPRESENTATIVE GROH noted he is a co-sponsor of the bill and has
no amendments.
CHAIR CARPENTER stated he will not extend the deadline since it
appears there are no requests for amendments.
7:05:07 PM
REPRESENTATIVE GROH began a motion to report HB 156 out of
committee.
REPRESENTATIVE ALLARD voiced an objection.
CHAIR CARPENTER pointed out that motions must be worded
specifically and asked Representative McCabe for a motion.
7:05:33 PM
REPRESENTATIVE MCCABE moved to report HB 156 out of committee
with individual recommendations and the accompanying fiscal
notes.
REPRESENTATIVE MCKAY objected.
7:05:56 PM
A roll call vote was taken. Representatives Gray, Groh, and
Carpenter voted in favor of the motion to report HB 156 out of
committee with individual recommendations and the accompanying
fiscal notes. Representatives McKay, McCabe, Tilton, and Allard
voted against it. Therefore, by a vote of 3-4, HB 156 failed to
be reported out of the House Special Committee on Ways and
Means.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| HB0142A.PDF |
HW&M 3/29/2023 6:00:00 PM HW&M 2/26/2024 6:00:00 PM |
HB 142 |
| HB 142 Sponsor Statement.pdf |
HW&M 3/29/2023 6:00:00 PM HW&M 2/26/2024 6:00:00 PM |
HB 142 |
| HB 142 Sectional Analysis.pdf |
HW&M 3/29/2023 6:00:00 PM HW&M 2/26/2024 6:00:00 PM |
HB 142 |
| HB0156A.PDF |
HW&M 4/17/2023 6:00:00 PM HW&M 2/26/2024 6:00:00 PM |
HB 156 |
| HB 156-Section Analysis.pdf |
HW&M 4/17/2023 6:00:00 PM HW&M 2/26/2024 6:00:00 PM |
HB 156 |
| HB 156-Sponsor Statement.pdf |
HW&M 4/17/2023 6:00:00 PM HW&M 2/26/2024 6:00:00 PM |
HB 156 |
| 2021_Fiscal_Policy_Working_Group-Final_Rep.pdf |
HW&M 4/17/2023 6:00:00 PM HW&M 2/26/2024 6:00:00 PM |
HB 156 |
| ITEP Alaska Fiscal Solutions 4.10.21.pdf |
HW&M 4/17/2023 6:00:00 PM HW&M 2/26/2024 6:00:00 PM |
HB 156 |
| ITEP_Alaska-Distribution-Analysis-2020.pdf |
HW&M 4/17/2023 6:00:00 PM HW&M 2/26/2024 6:00:00 PM |
HB 156 |
| Matthew Berman_ADN_2023April.pdf |
HW&M 4/17/2023 6:00:00 PM HW&M 2/26/2024 6:00:00 PM |
HB 156 |
| Revenue Forecast 2023.pdf |
HW&M 4/17/2023 6:00:00 PM HW&M 2/26/2024 6:00:00 PM |
HB 156 |
| Telling_The_Story_Of_Taxes_In_Alaska.pdf |
HW&M 4/17/2023 6:00:00 PM HW&M 2/26/2024 6:00:00 PM |
HB 156 |
| HB 156-Initial Presentation-Final2 4-17-23.pdf |
HW&M 4/17/2023 6:00:00 PM HW&M 2/26/2024 6:00:00 PM |
HB 156 |
| HB142-DOR-TAX-02-23-24 Fiscal Note.pdf |
HW&M 2/26/2024 6:00:00 PM |
HB 142 |
| HB156-DOR-TAX-02-23-24 Fiscal note.pdf |
HW&M 2/26/2024 6:00:00 PM |
HB 156 |
| Amendments 1-4.pdf |
HW&M 2/26/2024 6:00:00 PM |
|
| HB 142 Amendments 1-4.pdf |
HW&M 2/26/2024 6:00:00 PM |
HB 142 |
| HB 156 Public Testimony 2.26.2024.pdf |
HW&M 2/26/2024 6:00:00 PM |
HB 156 |
| HB 142 Public Testimony on 2.26.2024.pdf |
HW&M 2/26/2024 6:00:00 PM |
HB 142 |
| HB 142 Amendment 5.pdf |
HW&M 2/26/2024 6:00:00 PM |
HB 142 |