Legislature(2001 - 2002)
04/30/2001 05:35 PM Senate RES
| Audio | Topic |
|---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
HB 154-FISHERY BUS. TAX/FISHERIES RES. LAND. TAX
CHAIRMAN TORGERSON announced HB 154 to be up for consideration.
REPRESENTATIVE SCALZI, prime sponsor, said the fisheries business
tax is set up so that processors will collect the tax during the
year, hold it and pay it to the state on April 1 of the following
year. He explained:
They're allowed to hold that tax so they can pay their
fishermen and sell their pack before they are financially
solvent. In doing so, they give a security to the state
of Alaska of either three times the amount of lienable
property in the amount of taxes they collected the year
before or a bond in that amount. This works fine for
canneries and large processors who have a lot of real
property as assets, but after the advent of IFQs we have
new buyers - a fish processor who operates an option
block for some type of quick sales of fish. In doing so,
they generate a lot of money and a lot of raw fish tax,
sometimes in excess of half million dollars. To do this
under current statutes, they have to bond for that money
for the next year. Even though they haven't collected
any, if they had a half million dollars worth of taxes
collected the previous year, they have to bond for half a
million dollars or have three times that amount in
lienable property, which would be $1.5 million.
These fish buyers don't have that kind of assets. They
operate with a computer, an office, a few cell phones.
They operate on a very small margin, but they are very
valuable to the industry right now. We have produced a
very high price for halibut and sable fish since IFQs and
with the long season we have, they are very valuable to
the industry. When we have higher fish prices, we also
have higher fisheries business tax.
I went to the Department of Revenue to see how we could
make this work and they were very cooperative in
designing something that they felt would secure the State
of Alaska, which would be to allow these fish buyers to
pay their raw fish tax on a 30-day allotment. So, if they
pay as they go, the Department of Revenue has no problem
with that. For a bond, they will have to issue a $50,000
bond or have $100,000 in lienable property.
MR. CHUCK HARLEMERT, Division of Tax, Department of Revenue (DOR),
supported HB 154.
CHAIRMAN TORGERSON indicated there were no further questions and
that he would hold the bill for a quorum.
He announced an at-ease from 6:37 to 6:39 p.m.
HB 154-FISHERY BUS. TAX/FISHERIES RES. LAND. TAX
CHAIRMAN TORGERSON announced that a quorum was present and they
would take up HB 154.
SENATOR TAYLOR moved to pass HB 154 from committee with individual
recommendations. There were no objections and it was so ordered.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|