Legislature(2007 - 2008)BELTZ 211
05/12/2007 01:00 PM Senate STATE AFFAIRS
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB151 | |
| HJR22 | |
| HB45 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| + | HB 151 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HJR 22 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 45 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| HB 186 | |||
CSHB 151(JUD) - INDEMNITY CLAUSE IN PUBLIC CONTRACTS
CHAIR MCGUIRE announced the consideration of HB 151. [Before the
committee was CSHB 151(JUD).]
1:13:21 PM
TREVOR FULTON, Staff, to Representative Craig Johnson bill
sponsor, introduced the bill to the committee. The bill would
require uniform indemnification and hold harmless provisions in
professional services contracts for all public agencies within
the State of Alaska. The bill would close a loophole in
contracts that has caused considerable problems for companies in
the design profession. The loophole allows public agencies to
write provisions allowing them to pass responsibility for
negligence onto the consultant company they are contracting
with. The bill language mirrors Department of Transportation and
Public Facilities (DOTPF) contract language that has been in use
for years. He said the majority of public agencies use the
language contained in the bill, but this would make it standard
statewide.
SENATOR STEVENS asked why the bill should be passed.
MR. FULTON replied that the bill would ensure fair business
practices between the public and private sector.
1:16:25 PM
DALE NELSON, Chair, Legislative Liaison Committee, Alaska
Professional Design Council, Anchorage, said the purpose of the
bill is to standardize indemnification requirements through all
public agencies in Alaska, making each party responsible for
their own liabilities, errors, and omissions.
1:19:37 PM
BRAD THOMPSON, Director, Division of Risk Management, Department
of Administration, Juneau, testified the reason to pass this
bill is because professional design engineers or architects
obtaining an errors and omissions (EO) policy have no
contractual liability protection within an insurance policy. DOT
contracts, from which the language in the bill was drawn, have
always contained comparative fault allocation in the indemnity
language. Some public entities go beyond the comparative fault
allocation in their contracts which creates an uninsurable risk
for the independent design professional. This legislation would
obligate all public agencies as defined in the bill, to use a
comparative fault allocation within their indemnity language
when they contract with an independent professional.
SENATOR STEVENS asked what happens if the bill does not pass.
MR. THOMPSON answered there are public agencies that have
entered stronger indemnity terms in contracts. An independent
professional signing such a document to obtain the work is
obligating themselves beyond their insurability. There is no
effect on the State of Alaska.
1:22:21 PM
SENATOR FRENCH said there is an impressive number of letters of
support. He asked who opposes the bill.
MR. FULTON answered that there was little opposition as the bill
made its way through house committee reviews and the few
disagreements that surfaced were resolved.
SENATOR FRENCH asked if there was opposition from labor groups.
MR. FULTON answered there was none that he knew of.
1:24:16 PM
CHAIR MCGUIRE closed public testimony on HB 151.
1:25:36 PM
SENATOR GREEN moved to report HB 151 from committee with
individual recommendations and accompanying zero fiscal note.
Hearing no objections, CSHB 151(JUD) moved from the Senate State
Affairs committee.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|