Legislature(1999 - 2000)
05/18/1999 01:21 AM Senate FIN
| Audio | Topic |
|---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
SENATE COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE FOR COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE
FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 151(JUD)
"An Act relating to possession, control, or
consumption of alcohol by a person under 21 years of
age; relating to revocation and reinstatement of the
driver's license of a person at least 14 years of age
but not yet 21 years of age; and relating to offenses
involving operating a motor vehicle by a person not
yet 21 years of age."
This was the second hearing for this bill in the Senate
Finance Committee. Co-Chair John Torgerson noted that in
the earlier hearing, a proposed committee substitute was
submitted by the Chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee.
Co-Chair John Torgerson added that previous testimony from
the departments stated that with the adoption of the
committee substitute, the fiscal notes would be zeroed out.
Senator ROBIN TAYLOR, Chair, Senate Judiciary Committee,
indicated that he was distributing information provided by
GLAD, an organization working on this legislation. (Copy
not provided for the record.) He qualified that the bill's
prime sponsor, Representative Pete Kott does not support
the committee substitute. He apologized, but argued that
the Department of Law advised there was not adequate
support for repealing the entire statute as the original
version of the bill proposed.
Senator Robin Taylor stated that the committee substitute
solves the problem of individuals being prohibited from
receiving a driver's license until they are in their
forties or fifties. Changes in the proposed committee
substitute, he explained allows the department to review
those cases and issue a license if the individual's
behavior has improved.
Senator Robin Taylor then directed the Committee's
attention to page four of his proposed committee
substitute, saying that this version accomplishes a goal
that couldn't be worked out in the House of
Representatives. He explained the new provision as, "if a
court either finds you not guilty or the case is dismissed
by a court of law; that automatically dismisses the
administrative action that was based upon the same facts."
This eliminates the situation where cases have been
dismissed, but individuals still have their driver's
licenses revoked by an administrative action, according to
Senator Robin Taylor.
Representative PETE KOTT stressed that he still has
concerns with the establishment of the punishment in
relationship to the violation committed and the intended
results of the statute. He said that statistics suggest
this current law that revokes licenses for underage miners
in possession of alcohol is not working. His intent was to
establish legislation that will focus on those who posses
and/or consume alcohol while driving. He referred to a
Supreme Court case challenging the nexus of the existing
law that resulted in a non-binding, tied vote.
Senator Loren Leman asked Representative Pete Kott if he
was satisfied with the revocation penalties of 30 days, 60
days, 90 days and one-year periods as stipulated in Section
3 of the proposed committee substitute.
Representative Pete Kott responded that without the nexus
argument in the bill, he was satisfied. However, he was
hesitant to fully support the lowered penalties.
For Representative Pete Kott's benefit, Senator Loren Leman
repeated comments he made in the last hearing. His
preference is to increase the penalties but also to provide
a mechanism for juveniles to "buy back" some of that time
through community service and treatment programs. He wanted
to "encourage their good behavior through their positive
actions." Because of the late date, he noted that he would
not propose such an amendment unless there was full
concurrence. He suggested the matter could be addressed
during the interim.
Representative Pete Kott replied that the issue had been
discussed through an earlier version of the bill. However,
he said that the Department of Law advised that there are
"due process" problems and that court hearings would be
required, resulting in a fiscal note. He would have liked
to see that provision included in the final bill, he said.
In the interest of producing legislation that has at least
some benefit, Senator Loren Leman announced that he would
not offer an amendment at this meeting. He qualified that
he did want to revisit the matter later.
ANNE CARPENETI, Assistant Attorney General, Legal Services
Section, Criminal Division, Department of Law had reviewed
the proposed committee substitute at the request of Co-
Chair John Torgerson. She testified that the department was
comfortable with the changes.
JUANITA HENSLEY, Director, Division of Motor Vehicles,
Department of Administration relayed statistics supplied by
the Division of Public Health, Community Health and
Emergency Medical Services. She stressed that the
statistics show alcohol-related injuries involving youths
between ages fourteen and twenty from 1995-1997 decreased
by 9.5 percent. The alcohol-related motor vehicle injuries
had dropped twelve-percent for the same age group, she
stated. She also noted alcohol-related assault injuries for
this age group had decreased overall by thirty-three
percent.
Juanita Hensley was unsure if the reductions could be tied
directly to the "Use It-Lose It" law, and suggested it
could be a combination of all the juvenile laws passed in
the last several years. However, she believed this law has
had an impact.
Juanita Hensley also referred to information supplied by
the Highway Safety Planning Agency showing that the number
of alcohol related motor-vehicle fatalities for this age
group has dropped.
Co-Chair Sean Parnell moved for adoption of HB 151, Version
"P" as a Workdraft. It was adopted as a Workdraft without
objection.
Co-Chair Sean Parnell offered a motion to report from
Committee, SCS CSHB 151(FIN) with individual
recommendations and forthcoming zero fiscal notes from the
Department of Health and Social Services, Department of
Corrections and the Department of Law. There was no
objection and the bill was REPORTED OUT.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|