Legislature(2023 - 2024)BARNES 124
03/14/2024 08:00 AM House COMMUNITY & REGIONAL AFFAIRS
Note: the audio
and video
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB345 | |
| HB347 | |
| HB151 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| += | HB 347 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | HB 151 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | HB 345 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
HB 151-FORMATION OF BOROUGHS
9:14:48 AM
CHAIR MCCORMICK announced that the final order of business would
be HOUSE BILL NO. 151, "An Act relating to proposals for borough
incorporation submitted to the legislature by the Local Boundary
Commission."
9:15:09 AM
REPRESENTATIVE MIKE CRONK, Alaska State Legislature, prime
sponsor, presented HB 151. He paraphrased the sponsor statement
[included in the committee packet], which read as follows
[original punctuation provided]:
Unfortunately, and hopefully through simply oversight,
the public process and the "Will of the people" failed
to be included in a 2005 piece of legislation that
became codified in 2006. ( AS 29.05.115.)
HB 151 simply corrects the deficiency by requiring
that a full public process be carried out before the
legislature receives a proposal from the Local
Boundary Commission under Title X, Section 12 of the
Constitution.
As laid out in Article I, Section 12 if the
legislature receives a proposal by the Local Boundary
Commission, there are only two options. First, the
legislature may reject the proposal with a majority in
the House and the Senate.
Second, the legislature can choose to take no action,
in which case the proposal remains law.
Under this method of forming government the LBC
without any legislative public hearings, establish a
new Borough unless rejected by the legislature.
It is extremely important under present law that the
legislature know the "Will of the people" contained in
any proposal submitted.
Presently the LBC is required to hold two public
hearings in the area being proposed and under no
obligation to follow the opinions of those giving
testimony at the hearings.
HB 151 ensures the legislature will know the level of
public support before making any decision concerning a
proposed Borough.
9:16:53 AM
DAVE STANCLIFF, Staff, Representative Mike Cronk, Alaska State
Legislature, on behalf of Representative Cronk, prime sponsor of
HB 151, presented the sectional analysis [included in the
committee packet], which read as follows [original punctuation
provided]:
Section 1:
Adds new language to existing statute AS 29.05.115 (a)
Ensures that before the Legislature takes action on
incorporation of a Borough, they will know that voting
age residents within the area support it.
MR. STANCLIFF expounded on the Alaska Constitution and
emphasized that the legislature is within its rights as an
elected body to determine how the Local Boundary Commission
(LBC) would act and conduct its procedures.
CHAIR MCCORMICK sought questions from committee members.
9:21:34 AM
REPRESENTATIVE RUFFRIDGE asked how to best determine that a
majority of residents of voting age within the area support the
proposal. He opined that a public hearing may not be the best
method.
REPRESENTATIVE CRONK deferred to Mr. Stancliff.
MR. STANCLIFF explained that the LBC can hold two hearings and
is under no obligation to take directive from the opinions
provided by testifiers.
9:25:29 AM
REPRESENTATIVE HIMSCHOOT pointed out that the second way to form
a borough the local option - is through signature gathering.
She asked whether this option is suggested in the bill.
REPRESENTATIVE CRONK deferred to Mr. Stancliff.
MR. STANCLIFF gave further historical context. He explained
that the committee's options would be to return to the public
process or stick with the language that requires a majority.
The language could be made more "open," he said, to avoid a
"precise number." He acknowledged that the process could be a
lot more public than it is now.
REPRESENTATIVE HIMSCHOOT sought to confirm that per [AS
29.05.115 subsection] (b), the LBC should not initiate the
action of forming a borough. She asked what would cause
[subsection] (a) to occur.
MR. STANCLIFF recounted an attempt to force a borough where it
was not wanted.
REPRESENTATIVE HIMSCHOOT asked whether it would be an "insane
idea" to remove [subsection] (a) all together.
MR. STANCLIFF explained that if subsection (a) were removed
entirely, nothing would change, so the LBC would not be required
to involve the public in the creation of a borough aside from
two public hearings.
REPRESENTATIVE HIMSCHOOT clarified that if subsection (a) were
removed, the local option would remain intact.
MR. STANCLIFF shared his belief that the bill sponsor would be
open to that idea. He emphasized that the goal was to involve
the public as much as possible.
9:33:10 AM
REPRESENTATIVE MCCABE described the formation of a local
improvement district (LID). Similarly, he shared his
understanding that the LBC would have to determine how they know
that the majority of voting age citizens support the proposal.
REPRESENTATIVE CRONK asserted that the legislature is
responsible for determining the role of boards and commissions.
In response to Representative Ruffridge's previous question, he
said if it were up to him, a majority would be determined by a
vote of the people.
9:37:18 AM
REPRESENTATIVE MEARS sought to confirm that the current public
process involves two required public meetings of the LBC and any
public legislative hearings.
MR. STANCLIFF said that is partially correct. If the LBC
receives a request from a government entity or anyone to form a
borough, two public hearings are held, and the commission alone
makes the decision by a vote of all five members. The LBC is
then required to submit the request to the legislature. Unless
the legislature votes down the proposal by a majority in both
bodies, the request becomes law.
REPRESENTATIVE MEARS expressed concern that obtaining "a
majority of residents of voting age" would create a very high
bar in terms of participation.
MR. STANCLIFF said maybe someone on the committee could come up
with a better way to assess the community's preference. He
suggested that the list of permanent fund dividend (PFD)
applicants could be polled.
9:42:11 AM
REPRESENTATIVE RUFFRIDGE spoke to the difficulty of determining
the will of a people group and advocated for a multi-faceted
approach that includes an educational component. He opined that
currently, there is no way to determine whether the process was
done "rightly and well."
MR. STANCLIFF made reference to a commissioner who is
politically active. He agreed that the process should be long,
detailed, and unrushed, and that the members should be unbiased,
adding that the legislature may find a biased, five-member board
with constitutional authority very difficult to deal with.
9:46:39 AM
REPRESENTATIVE MCCABE said he could see where this particular
law needs some "massaging" to ensure that the board is not
politically motivated. He opined that control should be given
to the citizens.
REPRESENTATIVE CRONK emphasized that the voice of the people
should be prioritized.
REPRESENTATIVE MCCABE clarified that his point was that the LBC
knows how survey the will of the people instinctively. He added
that the bill would just put that sentiment "in words on a piece
of paper."
MR. STANCLIFF reflected on the actions of a recent LBC meeting.
9:53:46 AM
REPRESENTATIVE HIMSCHOOT recalled a similar scenario in which
the state Board of Education took action without prior notice on
a consequential matter. She requested an explanation of the
local option process and whether certain aspects pertaining to
citizen input could be replicated in the bill.
9:55:15 AM
SANDRA MOLLER, Director, Division of Community and Regional
Affairs, Department of Commerce, Community & Economic
Development (DCCED), described the local option process, which
involves a vote of the people in the affected areas through the
Division of Elections (DOE).
9:57:55 AM
REPRESENTATIVE HIMSCHOOT shared her understanding that the local
option involves an election and asked whether a similar election
could be implemented in HB 151.
MS. MOLLER answered yes, a similar process would be acceptable.
9:59:41 AM
CHAIR MCCORMICK announced that HB 151 would be held over.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| HB151 Sect. 3.12.24.pdf |
HCRA 3/14/2024 8:00:00 AM |
HB 151 |
| HB151 Sponsor Statement 3.12.24.pdf |
HCRA 3/14/2024 8:00:00 AM |
HB 151 |
| HB151 Version B 3.12.24.pdf |
HCRA 3/14/2024 8:00:00 AM |
HB 151 |
| HB 345 Ketchikan Harbor Board Stories in the News 5.11.21 - 3.14.24.pdf |
HCRA 3/14/2024 8:00:00 AM |
HB 345 |
| HB 345 Fishermen's News 9.1.23 - 3.14.24.pdf |
HCRA 3/14/2024 8:00:00 AM |
HB 345 |
| HB 345 Northern Harbors and Small Ports 3.14.24.pdf |
HCRA 3/14/2024 8:00:00 AM |
HB 345 |
| HB 345 Sectional Analysis 3.14.24.pdf |
HCRA 3/14/2024 8:00:00 AM |
HB 345 |
| HB 345 Sponsor Statement 3.14.24.pdf |
HCRA 3/14/2024 8:00:00 AM |
HB 345 |
| HB 345 State AK Epidemiology bulleting drowning 3.14.24.pdf |
HCRA 3/14/2024 8:00:00 AM |
HB 345 |
| HB0345A.pdf |
HCRA 3/14/2024 8:00:00 AM |
HB 345 |
| HB 151 Fiscal Note 3.14.24.pdf |
HCRA 3/14/2024 8:00:00 AM |
HB 151 |
| HB 345 Fiscal Note 1 3.14.24.pdf |
HCRA 3/14/2024 8:00:00 AM |
HB 345 |
| CSHB347.pdf |
HCRA 3/14/2024 8:00:00 AM |
HB 347 |
| HB 347 Fiscal Note 3.12.24.pdf |
HCRA 3/14/2024 8:00:00 AM |
HB 347 |
| HB 347 Public Testimony 3.12.24.pdf |
HCRA 3/14/2024 8:00:00 AM |
HB 347 |
| HB 347 Sectional Analysis (CR&A) 3.12.24.pdf |
HCRA 3/14/2024 8:00:00 AM |
HB 347 |
| HB 347 Sponsor Statement (CR&A) 3.12.24.pdf |
HCRA 3/14/2024 8:00:00 AM |
HB 347 |
| HB0347A.pdf |
HCRA 3/14/2024 8:00:00 AM |
HB 347 |
| HB 345 Supporting Document #1 3.14.24.pdf |
HCRA 3/14/2024 8:00:00 AM |
HB 345 |
| HB 345 Written Testimony 3.14.24.pdf |
HCRA 3/14/2024 8:00:00 AM |
HB 345 |