Legislature(2023 - 2024)ADAMS 519
02/01/2024 01:30 PM House FINANCE
Note: the audio
and video
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
Audio | Topic |
---|---|
Start | |
Overview: Fy 24 Supplemental Request | |
HB81 | |
HB148 | |
Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ | TELECONFERENCED | ||
+= | HB 81 | TELECONFERENCED | |
+ | HB 148 | TELECONFERENCED | |
+ | TELECONFERENCED |
HOUSE BILL NO. 148 "An Act relating to the Alaska performance scholarship program." 3:24:35 PM REPRESENTATIVE JUSTIN RUFFRIDGE, SPONSOR, introduced himself and relayed that he appreciated the committee's time. Co-Chair Johnson MOVED to ADOPT the proposed committee substitute for HB 148, Work Draft 33-LS0624/U (Marx/Bergerud, 1/30/24). Co-Chair Foster OBJECTED for discussion. Representative Ruffridge indicated that his staff would go through the summary of changes in the committee substitute (CS). BUD SEXTON, STAFF, REPRESENTATIVE JUSTIN RUFFRIDGE, reviewed the summary of changes (copy on file). The first change was related to a new subsection within Section 2 of the bill which would alter notification timelines. The subsection ensured that students would receive information about the Alaska Performance Scholarship (APS) program earlier in high school, which could positively influence students' decisions to attend a postsecondary institution in Alaska. He continued that Section 4 and Section 7 were related and would ensure that high schools that did not award grades on a four-point or five-point scale would be able to participate in the APS award program. Co-Chair Foster OPENED public testimony. 3:28:37 PM JANELLE GRENIER, NIKISKI HIGH SCHOOL, NIKISKI (via teleconference), testified in support of the bill. She relayed that Alaska needed nurses, teachers, accountants, biologists, firefighters, and many other professions that required secondary education. She thought that HB 148 would help support students. She told kids at Nikiski High School that APS was one of the best opportunities available. She did not think there were many scholarships available and it was increasingly hard for students to receive loans, and parents often had to cosign. She relayed that 20 of the 40 high school seniors with whom she worked were at a 3.0 grade point average (GPA). Only one student had qualified for the highest level of the SATs. She argued that in order to do well on the SATs, students needed to have a solid background in math. There needed to be incentives for students to go to school in Alaska in order for there to be a qualified workforce in the state. She added that it was often difficult to access the SAT for students in rural areas. College was expensive in Alaska and she had found cheaper options for her students outside of the state. Many of her students wanted to go to college in Alaska but could not afford it. 3:33:35 PM PAUL LAYER, VICE PRESIDENT FOR ACADEMICS, UNIVERSITY OF ALASKA, FAIRBANKS (via teleconference), was calling in support of the changes to the bill in the CS. He thought the changes helped students in Alaska, particularly through the increased accessibility of APS. The university would be able to put together more competitive aid packages to help keep more students in Alaska. The changed testing requirements would increase testing eligibility and allow for more scholarship packages to be offered to more students. He thought that the current APS process worked for the state and students, but the changes in the CS would make it more accessible and help keep more students in the state. He relayed that less than 25 percent of students leaving the state for college would return to Alaska after completing schooling, but more than 90 percent of APS recipients stayed in Alaska after graduation. 3:35:38 PM Co-Chair Foster CLOSED public testimony. Co-Chair Foster WITHDREW the OBJECTION to the adoption of the work draft for HB 148. There being NO further OBJECTION, Work Draft 33-LS0624/U was ADOPTED. Representative Josephson asked about lines 20 through 23 on page 2 of the bill, which would delete a portion of the law stating that APS was for in-state students. The law currently required that a student be in good academic standing and study at a post-secondary institution in the state to qualify for APS. He asked why Representative Ruffridge disliked the portion of the law that he proposed to delete. Representative Ruffridge responded that much of the language was only removed from the current placement within the law and it was moved to a different section. Representative Galvin referred to page 4, lines 10 through 20 of the committee substitute. She asked how the award level amounts were determined as the amount did not seem to be proportionate. She also wondered if there was consideration of the cost of tuition at the time the award program was initiated and if inflation had been considered. Representative Ruffridge responded that the intent of the bill was to drive an incentive for performance. He relayed that the step-up provisions were in place to ensure that students would continue to strive for the highest possible performance award amount. He added that rising tuition costs were the impotence to raising scholarship costs in general. 3:40:13 PM SENA EFFIRD, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, ALASKA COMMISSION ON POSTSECONDARY EDUCATION, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AND EARLY DEVELOPMENT, responded to Representative Galvin that she understood that the dollar amounts for the awards were proportionate. She referred to a PowerPoint presentation "House Education Committee Bill HB 148" dated January 26, 2024 (copy on file) and moved to slide 9 to show the cost of attendance changes from 2010 through 2023. The APS increase of 47 percent aimed to mitigate the increases in cost of attendance. She reiterated that about 96 percent of APS recipients attended a university campus. The intention was to arrive at a dollar amount that would keep the scholarship as level as possible. If a student was in a post-secondary program and reached the continuing eligibility GPA, the student would have the ability to step up to a higher level of the scholarship. Representative Galvin asked if there was consideration of the current students through a survey to determine whether there was a trigger-point to encourage more students to participate. Representative Ruffridge responded that the Alaska Commission on Postsecondary Education (ACPE) report (copy on file) highlighted the issue of students choosing to leave Alaska. He thought APS was not being utilized at its highest level. There was more information from students inside the report. Vocational and technical education students were currently ineligible for APS, but the bill proposed to change the eligibility requirements. Ms. Effird responded that all of the anecdotal responses received by DEED were included in the ACPE report. The department generally did not hear from students that there was a specific dollar amount that would keep students in the state, but students reported there were many barriers to becoming eligible for APS. The testing requirement had been a particular barrier to rural students because students were required to take the test in person with qualified proctors. The APCE report showed that the department waived the testing requirement from 2020 through 2021 during the COVID-19 pandemic and the eligibility numbers jumped dramatically. Unfortunately, the usage of APS did not experience a similar increase because students were not going to secondary education school due to the pandemic. 3:45:55 PM Co-Chair Foster explained how to submit written testimony for the bill. Co-Chair Foster WITHDREW the OBJECTION. There being no further objection, Work Draft 33-LS0624/U was ADOPTED. HB 148 was HEARD and HELD in committee for further consideration. Co-Chair Foster reviewed the agenda for the following day's meeting.
Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
---|---|---|
HB 148 APS_OutcomesReport_2024 1.27.24.pdf |
HFIN 2/1/2024 1:30:00 PM |
HB 148 |
HB 148 CS WorkDraft v.U 013024.pdf |
HFIN 2/1/2024 1:30:00 PM |
HB 148 |
HB 148 Support_Redacted as of 1.29.24.pdf |
HFIN 2/1/2024 1:30:00 PM |
HB 148 |
HB 148APS_At-A-Glance_2024 1.27.24.pdf |
HFIN 2/1/2024 1:30:00 PM |
HB 148 |
HB 148 presentation - updated 1-26-2024.pdf |
HFIN 2/1/2024 1:30:00 PM |
HB 148 |
HB0148 Summary of Changes 1.29.24 CS.pdf |
HFIN 2/1/2024 1:30:00 PM |
HB 148 |
HB148 CS Sponsor Statement 1.27.24.pdf |
HFIN 2/1/2024 1:30:00 PM |
HB 148 |
02.01.24 OMB House Finance FY2024 Supplemental Budget Overview.pdf |
HFIN 2/1/2024 1:30:00 PM |
HB 299 |
OMB FY2024 Supplemental Bill Summary Spreadsheet - 1.30.2024 HFIN.pdf |
HFIN 2/1/2024 1:30:00 PM |
HB 299 |
HFIN OMB Supplemental Budget Follow-up to 02.01.24 Hearing 02.23.24 .pdf |
HFIN 2/1/2024 1:30:00 PM |
HB 299 |