Legislature(2023 - 2024)ADAMS 519
02/01/2024 01:30 PM House FINANCE
Note: the audio
and video
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| Overview: Fy 24 Supplemental Request | |
| HB81 | |
| HB148 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| += | HB 81 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 148 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED |
HOUSE BILL NO. 148
"An Act relating to the Alaska performance scholarship
program."
3:24:35 PM
REPRESENTATIVE JUSTIN RUFFRIDGE, SPONSOR, introduced
himself and relayed that he appreciated the committee's
time.
Co-Chair Johnson MOVED to ADOPT the proposed committee
substitute for HB 148, Work Draft 33-LS0624/U
(Marx/Bergerud, 1/30/24).
Co-Chair Foster OBJECTED for discussion.
Representative Ruffridge indicated that his staff would go
through the summary of changes in the committee substitute
(CS).
BUD SEXTON, STAFF, REPRESENTATIVE JUSTIN RUFFRIDGE,
reviewed the summary of changes (copy on file). The first
change was related to a new subsection within Section 2 of
the bill which would alter notification timelines. The
subsection ensured that students would receive information
about the Alaska Performance Scholarship (APS) program
earlier in high school, which could positively influence
students' decisions to attend a postsecondary institution
in Alaska. He continued that Section 4 and Section 7 were
related and would ensure that high schools that did not
award grades on a four-point or five-point scale would be
able to participate in the APS award program.
Co-Chair Foster OPENED public testimony.
3:28:37 PM
JANELLE GRENIER, NIKISKI HIGH SCHOOL, NIKISKI (via
teleconference), testified in support of the bill. She
relayed that Alaska needed nurses, teachers, accountants,
biologists, firefighters, and many other professions that
required secondary education. She thought that HB 148 would
help support students. She told kids at Nikiski High School
that APS was one of the best opportunities available. She
did not think there were many scholarships available and it
was increasingly hard for students to receive loans, and
parents often had to cosign. She relayed that 20 of the 40
high school seniors with whom she worked were at a 3.0
grade point average (GPA). Only one student had qualified
for the highest level of the SATs. She argued that in order
to do well on the SATs, students needed to have a solid
background in math. There needed to be incentives for
students to go to school in Alaska in order for there to be
a qualified workforce in the state. She added that it was
often difficult to access the SAT for students in rural
areas. College was expensive in Alaska and she had found
cheaper options for her students outside of the state. Many
of her students wanted to go to college in Alaska but could
not afford it.
3:33:35 PM
PAUL LAYER, VICE PRESIDENT FOR ACADEMICS, UNIVERSITY OF
ALASKA, FAIRBANKS (via teleconference), was calling in
support of the changes to the bill in the CS. He thought
the changes helped students in Alaska, particularly through
the increased accessibility of APS. The university would be
able to put together more competitive aid packages to help
keep more students in Alaska. The changed testing
requirements would increase testing eligibility and allow
for more scholarship packages to be offered to more
students. He thought that the current APS process worked
for the state and students, but the changes in the CS would
make it more accessible and help keep more students in the
state. He relayed that less than 25 percent of students
leaving the state for college would return to Alaska after
completing schooling, but more than 90 percent of APS
recipients stayed in Alaska after graduation.
3:35:38 PM
Co-Chair Foster CLOSED public testimony.
Co-Chair Foster WITHDREW the OBJECTION to the adoption of
the work draft for HB 148.
There being NO further OBJECTION, Work Draft 33-LS0624/U
was ADOPTED.
Representative Josephson asked about lines 20 through 23 on
page 2 of the bill, which would delete a portion of the law
stating that APS was for in-state students. The law
currently required that a student be in good academic
standing and study at a post-secondary institution in the
state to qualify for APS. He asked why Representative
Ruffridge disliked the portion of the law that he proposed
to delete.
Representative Ruffridge responded that much of the
language was only removed from the current placement within
the law and it was moved to a different section.
Representative Galvin referred to page 4, lines 10 through
20 of the committee substitute. She asked how the award
level amounts were determined as the amount did not seem to
be proportionate. She also wondered if there was
consideration of the cost of tuition at the time the award
program was initiated and if inflation had been considered.
Representative Ruffridge responded that the intent of the
bill was to drive an incentive for performance. He relayed
that the step-up provisions were in place to ensure that
students would continue to strive for the highest possible
performance award amount. He added that rising tuition
costs were the impotence to raising scholarship costs in
general.
3:40:13 PM
SENA EFFIRD, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, ALASKA COMMISSION ON
POSTSECONDARY EDUCATION, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AND EARLY
DEVELOPMENT, responded to Representative Galvin that she
understood that the dollar amounts for the awards were
proportionate. She referred to a PowerPoint presentation
"House Education Committee Bill HB 148" dated January 26,
2024 (copy on file) and moved to slide 9 to show the cost
of attendance changes from 2010 through 2023. The APS
increase of 47 percent aimed to mitigate the increases in
cost of attendance. She reiterated that about 96 percent of
APS recipients attended a university campus. The intention
was to arrive at a dollar amount that would keep the
scholarship as level as possible. If a student was in a
post-secondary program and reached the continuing
eligibility GPA, the student would have the ability to step
up to a higher level of the scholarship.
Representative Galvin asked if there was consideration of
the current students through a survey to determine whether
there was a trigger-point to encourage more students to
participate.
Representative Ruffridge responded that the Alaska
Commission on Postsecondary Education (ACPE) report (copy
on file) highlighted the issue of students choosing to
leave Alaska. He thought APS was not being utilized at its
highest level. There was more information from students
inside the report. Vocational and technical education
students were currently ineligible for APS, but the bill
proposed to change the eligibility requirements.
Ms. Effird responded that all of the anecdotal responses
received by DEED were included in the ACPE report. The
department generally did not hear from students that there
was a specific dollar amount that would keep students in
the state, but students reported there were many barriers
to becoming eligible for APS. The testing requirement had
been a particular barrier to rural students because
students were required to take the test in person with
qualified proctors. The APCE report showed that the
department waived the testing requirement from 2020 through
2021 during the COVID-19 pandemic and the eligibility
numbers jumped dramatically. Unfortunately, the usage of
APS did not experience a similar increase because students
were not going to secondary education school due to the
pandemic.
3:45:55 PM
Co-Chair Foster explained how to submit written testimony
for the bill.
Co-Chair Foster WITHDREW the OBJECTION. There being no
further objection, Work Draft 33-LS0624/U was ADOPTED.
HB 148 was HEARD and HELD in committee for further
consideration.
Co-Chair Foster reviewed the agenda for the following day's
meeting.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| HB 148 APS_OutcomesReport_2024 1.27.24.pdf |
HFIN 2/1/2024 1:30:00 PM |
HB 148 |
| HB 148 CS WorkDraft v.U 013024.pdf |
HFIN 2/1/2024 1:30:00 PM |
HB 148 |
| HB 148 Support_Redacted as of 1.29.24.pdf |
HFIN 2/1/2024 1:30:00 PM |
HB 148 |
| HB 148APS_At-A-Glance_2024 1.27.24.pdf |
HFIN 2/1/2024 1:30:00 PM |
HB 148 |
| HB 148 presentation - updated 1-26-2024.pdf |
HFIN 2/1/2024 1:30:00 PM |
HB 148 |
| HB0148 Summary of Changes 1.29.24 CS.pdf |
HFIN 2/1/2024 1:30:00 PM |
HB 148 |
| HB148 CS Sponsor Statement 1.27.24.pdf |
HFIN 2/1/2024 1:30:00 PM |
HB 148 |
| 02.01.24 OMB House Finance FY2024 Supplemental Budget Overview.pdf |
HFIN 2/1/2024 1:30:00 PM |
HB 299 |
| OMB FY2024 Supplemental Bill Summary Spreadsheet - 1.30.2024 HFIN.pdf |
HFIN 2/1/2024 1:30:00 PM |
HB 299 |
| HFIN OMB Supplemental Budget Follow-up to 02.01.24 Hearing 02.23.24 .pdf |
HFIN 2/1/2024 1:30:00 PM |
HB 299 |