Legislature(1997 - 1998)
05/06/1997 09:15 AM Senate FIN
| Audio | Topic |
|---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 146(FIN)
"An Act relating to competency testing requirements for
secondary students; and providing for an effective
date."
Co-chair Sharp called HB 146. Representative Con Bunde,
sponsor of the bill was invited to join the committee and
offered a brief explanation. He said achievement tests
should be taken seriously. Students should not be passed
socially. It should be required that all students be able
to read by third grade.
Senator Pearce said there should be competency exams before
graduation as before. It should be an exam administered and
graded by the school. Representative Bunde responded that
the department would set the standards and administer the
exams but the school would be responsible for grading them.
Students would take the exam in ninth grade and it would not
be a one-time test at the end of the senior year. In that
manner students and parents would know their standing in
classes. This was a proposed implementation to prevent last
minute failure. Senator Phillips felt that when a student
reaches the eighth grade they should be fairly well aware of
their standing. Representative Bunde said unfortunately
this was not the case and that the exam must be insisted
upon. It was too bad since the teaching service was already
paid for.
Senator Torgerson asked if this was the same test as for
GED. Representative Bunde said there was no relationship
between the GED and the competency test. Senator Adams felt
that if students were tested too early that would only set
them up for failure. Representative Bunde felt that early
testing was a start to correct the situation because as it
stood students get their graduation diplomas whether they
were functionally literate or not.
Shirley Holloway, Commissioner, Department of Education was
invited to join the committee. She said the department
opposed the bill first off, and second the bill should have
been heard in the Senate HES committee. She said one,
parents had a right to know the standing of their child in
class; two, schools should be responsible; and three,
schools should provide prevention and mediation so students
will be successful. There should be a comprehensive plan
know to both parents and teachers and the system must be
responsible for communicating the status of the child.
Testing was a critical aspect of learning and the problem
must be fixed if the child is not learning. In response to
Senator Phillips she said she opposed the exit exam as set
up in this bill. The present exam was set up to national
norms and did not necessarily reflect what the student had
been taught. In further response to Senator Parnell,
Commissioner Holloway felt that developmental profiles
should be a must for all 5 - 6 year olds and that the tests
being used presently were not being used proficiently.
Co-chair Sharp said that the schools were getting full money
to educate students. Commissioner Holloway concurred but
said they presently had no authority to do anything to
failing students. Something must be done early for those
students not achieving. Co-chair sharp asked if there were
any recommendations for a remedy and Commissioner Holloway
responded that a quality education plan had been submitted
to the committee.
Senator Adams moved amendment #1 and asked how this would
address the afore-mentioned problems. Senator Parnell
objected. Senator Adams said money spent how would save
money later. By a vote of 3 - 4 (Donley, Parnell, Sharp,
Pearce) amendment #1 failed.
John Cyr, President NEA, Alaska was invited to join the
committee. He said tests do little to ascertain the level
of a specific student. There were no statewide standards
and the bill should be in Senate HES and not Senate Finance
Committee. Co-chair Sharp concurred. Senator Pearce felt
children needed to be motivated.
Senator Parnell moved CSHB 146(FIN) with individual
recommendations and accompanying fiscal notes. Senator
Adams objected. By a vote of 6 - 1 (Adams) the bill was
reported out.
Co-chair Sharp called SB 107.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|