Legislature(2013 - 2014)CAPITOL 120
03/12/2013 10:00 AM House FISHERIES
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB110 | |
| HB143 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| += | HB 110 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | HB 143 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED |
HB 143-COMMERCIAL FISHING CREWMEMBER LICENSES
10:53:24 AM
CHAIR SEATON announced that the final order of business would be
HOUSE BILL NO. 143, "An Act relating to crewmember fishing
licenses."
10:53:34 AM
DOUGLAS DUNCAN, Staff, Representative Paul Seaton, Alaska State
Legislature, paraphrased from the sponsor statement, which read:
HB 143 increases the cost for a seven-day commercial
fishing crewmember license by $30, establishing the
cost at $60. This increase in license cost addresses
the growing problem of multiple consecutive short-term
license purchases. The seven-day license was created
by the Legislature as a way for tourists to experience
commercial fishing in Alaska. These short-term crew
licenses (also known as dude licenses) have been
successful in their original intent, but there is
concern that fishing crew members who would otherwise
purchase an annual license are instead purchasing
numerous consecutive short-term licenses.
As a trend, this decreases license receipt revenue to
the state and impacts the Fishermen's Fund (a fund
administered by the Department of Labor and Workforce
Development to assist with the medical costs of
accidents incurred during commercial fishing
operations). As a group, those purchasing short-term
licenses may be less experienced on a commercial
vessel, and thus more likely to get injured, placing a
burden on the Fishermen's Fund without helping to
adequately pay for the program.
MR. DUNCAN stated that the use of multiple licenses had resulted
in a revenue loss to the Fishermen's Fund, as 39 percent of the
license fee went to the fund. He estimated the loss of revenue
to the state and the Fishermen's Fund to be $285,000 since the
implementation of the program in 2005. He reiterated that the
proposed bill would increase the cost of the seven-day license
to $60, up from $30, to encourage the purchase of an annual
license. He stated that the current program was not able to
effectively limit the purchase to one temporary license per
person per year.
10:56:36 AM
CHAIR SEATON reminded the committee that there had been a
presentation about this from Alaska Department of Fish & Game
and Department of Labor & Workforce Development. He directed
attention to the charts from that presentation. [Included in
members' packets]
10:56:57 AM
CHAIR SEATON opened public testimony.
10:57:05 AM
MR. JORDAN stated his support for HB 143, and offered follow-up
comments on HB 110. Regarding proposed HB 143, he offered his
belief that a problem did exist when it was cheaper to purchase
seven-day commercial fishing licenses in succession versus a
seasonal license. He suggested that the seven-day commercial
licenses be priced at $30.00 for residents and $100.00 for non-
residents. Directing attention to page 1, line 7 of the
proposed bill, he pointed out that the seven-day commercial
license did not allow fishing with a rod and reel while on a
commercial fishing vessel. He expressed his support for the
proposed bill, with his suggested amendment for a change in the
price of the license.
CHAIR SEATON asked for clarification about fishing with rod and
reel, and whether the proposed $100.00 non-resident fee would
cover that aspect.
MR. JORDAN, in response, offered his understanding that a seven-
day commercial license would not allow fishing with a rod and
reel while on a commercial fishing vessel whereas, a full
commercial license would allow use of a rod and reel on the
commercial vessel. He expressed his support for this aspect.
11:02:48 AM
JAMES HERBERT, Commercial Fisherman, opened his comments with
three questions: what is the purpose of the seven-day license;
who benefits from this license; and, what is fair. He stated
that this idea had first been introduced in the Alaska State
Legislature in 2004, with an effective date in 2005. He
reported that this had been a difficult financial time for
commercial fishing in Western Alaska, and that this idea had
been to spur tourist interest in commercial fishing. He offered
his belief that the implications for licensing, liability, and
insurance associated with this had not been considered. He
pointed to the data which indicated a rapid increase in the
sales of non-resident, seven-day crew licenses, while the number
of resident seven-day licenses had decreased. He noted that,
although ADF&G did not indicate the districts for these licenses
purchases, he conjectured that the majority were for the short,
intense seasons in Bristol Bay and Cook Inlet, as multiple
shorter licenses were less expensive than an annual license.
Referring to the attached fiscal note, [Included in members'
packets] he pointed out that the projected revenue from the
proposed bill would be appreciably more if it also included the
sales of seven-day commercial licenses for only two or three
extensions. He offered his support for the seven-day commercial
license with "a fair allocation," for the benefit of Alaska
residents, while non-residents should be fairly assessed for
participation in commercial fishing. Offering some guidance for
pricing, he reminded the committee that the current price for a
seven-day non-resident sport fishing license was more than twice
the cost of a resident sport fishing license. He stated that
the limit for a claim to the Fishermen's Fund had been increased
to $10,000. He reported that 39 percent from the sale of each
fishing license was allocated to the fund. He offered his
belief that an increase to the non-resident seven-day permits
would lead to a decrease in revenue, with the possibility of
more injuries to less experienced, non-resident fishermen, and a
greater burden on the Fishermen's Fund. He expressed his
support for the proposed bill.
11:09:25 AM
REPRESENTATIVE HERRON asked if there could be a limit of two to
the number of consecutive licenses purchased.
MR. HERBERT offered his belief that the points of sale through
the large number of vendors would make it difficult to track and
to enforce.
11:10:33 AM
REPRESENTATIVE KREISS-TOMKINS shared that he had also explored
this possibility and had determined that, although it was a
great idea, it was "just not logistically feasible."
11:11:18 AM
CHAIR SEATON closed public testimony.
11:11:50 AM
CHAIR SEATON moved to adopt Amendment 1, labeled 28-LS0520\A.1,
Bullard, 3/11/13, which read:
Page 1, line 1, following "licenses":
Insert "; and providing for an effective date"
Page 1, following line 10:
Insert a new bill section to read:
"* Sec. 2. This Act takes effect January 1, 2014."
11:12:36 AM
REPRESENTATIVE HERRON objected for discussion.
CHAIR SEATON reviewed the need to coincide the effective date
with the publication of the ADF&G permit books.
11:13:35 AM
REPRESENTATIVE HERRON removed his objection. There being no
further objection, Amendment 1 was adopted.
11:13:50 AM
REPRESENTATIVE KREISS-TOMKINS suggested that the rate of the
commercial license remain at $30 for residents and be raised to
a rate of $60.00 for non-residents. He opined that it was the
non-residents who were "gaming the system, right now, to get
these multiple permits, instead of getting the year-long
commercial fishing license." He stated that this also kept the
seven-day price lower than a seasonal permit for an in-state
family member.
11:15:09 AM
KEVIN BROOKS, Deputy Commissioner, Office of the Commissioner,
Alaska Department of Fish & Game (ADF&G), in response, said that
the statutes would need to be reviewed, as there was an annual
resident fee with a differential, currently $140, for the annual
non-resident fee. He suggested that, for fee construct, it was
easier for a proposed bill to have the same fee for residents
and non-residents, as the specified differential for non-
residents already existed. He pointed out that this
differential was reviewed every three years; therefore the price
point would also change every three years. He reported that the
new annual differential rate would be $190. He expressed
agreement for the lower residential seven-day commercial permit,
as the records indicated that only 17 seven-day residential
permits were purchased for a second period. He pointed out that
the cost for two of these residential seven-day permits was
equal to the cost for an annual license. He suggested that the
cost for a seven-day commercial license for both residents and
non-residents be equal to half of the cost for an annual
commercial license.
REPRESENTATIVE KREISS-TOMKINS stated his disagreement with the
increase of the non-resident commercial license, and suggested
that a non-resident commercial license cost equal to one-third
of an annual commercial license would be more equitable, and
would be "pegged to that changing price point."
MR. BROOKS stated that analysis had indicated that the price
point could change the behavior of the buyer, and that the
fiscal note reflected an annual price which would be less
expensive than buying more than three seven-day permits. He
explained that the fiscal note would be revised if the prices in
the proposed bill were changed.
CHAIR SEATON asked if the committee wanted to work with ADF&G to
further investigate an option for the differential in license
price between residents and non-residents.
11:20:53 AM
REPRESENTATIVE GATTIS expressed her agreement with a price
differential between resident and non-resident licenses, and she
commented that the seven-day licenses were not always "gamed."
11:21:46 AM
CHAIR SEATON reviewed the rate proposals that had been
considered as a result from public comment. He asked ADF&G to
consider the differential, and suggest an appropriate rate that
would be optimally effective for a seven-day license.
[HB 143 was held over.]
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| HB 143 Sponsor Statement.pdf |
HFSH 3/12/2013 10:00:00 AM HFSH 3/19/2013 10:00:00 AM |
HB 143 |
| HB0143A.pdf |
HFSH 3/12/2013 10:00:00 AM |
HB 143 |
| HB143-DFG-DAS-03-08-13.pdf |
HFSH 3/12/2013 10:00:00 AM HFSH 3/19/2013 10:00:00 AM |
HB 143 |
| HB143-DOLWD-FF-3-8-13.pdf |
HFSH 3/12/2013 10:00:00 AM HFSH 3/19/2013 10:00:00 AM |
HB 143 |
| Copy of 7 day crew licenses sold-Res and NonRes.pdf |
HFSH 3/12/2013 10:00:00 AM HFSH 3/19/2013 10:00:00 AM |
HB 143 |
| Copy of 7-DayCrew_2005-2012_By-LicYr-Name.pdf |
HFSH 3/12/2013 10:00:00 AM HFSH 3/19/2013 10:00:00 AM |
HB 143 |
| Fish Fund license permit revenue (2).pdf |
HFSH 3/12/2013 10:00:00 AM HFSH 3/19/2013 10:00:00 AM |
HB 143 |
| Juneau Empire article on 7-day crew license.pdf |
HFSH 3/12/2013 10:00:00 AM |
HB 143 |
| HB0110A.pdf |
HFSH 2/21/2013 10:00:00 AM HFSH 2/26/2013 10:00:00 AM HFSH 3/12/2013 10:00:00 AM HFSH 3/21/2013 10:00:00 AM |
HB 110 |
| HB 110 Sponsor Statement.pdf |
HFSH 2/21/2013 10:00:00 AM HFSH 2/26/2013 10:00:00 AM HFSH 3/12/2013 10:00:00 AM HFSH 3/21/2013 10:00:00 AM |
HB 110 |
| Barbed and Barbless Hooks and their effect on Juvenile and Adult Salmonoid Mortality.pdf |
HFSH 2/21/2013 10:00:00 AM HFSH 2/26/2013 10:00:00 AM HFSH 3/12/2013 10:00:00 AM HFSH 3/21/2013 10:00:00 AM |
HB 110 |
| Washington State News Release Barbless Hooks on Colombia River.pdf |
HFSH 2/21/2013 10:00:00 AM HFSH 2/26/2013 10:00:00 AM HFSH 3/12/2013 10:00:00 AM HFSH 3/21/2013 10:00:00 AM |
HB 110 |
| ADF&G Notice - Recommended use of Barbless Hooks Susitna River.pdf |
HFSH 2/21/2013 10:00:00 AM HFSH 2/26/2013 10:00:00 AM HFSH 3/12/2013 10:00:00 AM HFSH 3/21/2013 10:00:00 AM |
HB 110 |
| ADF&G Notice - Recommended use of Barbless Hooks Chitna, Copper, Gakona, Gulkana.pdf |
HFSH 2/21/2013 10:00:00 AM HFSH 2/26/2013 10:00:00 AM HFSH 3/12/2013 10:00:00 AM HFSH 3/21/2013 10:00:00 AM |
HB 110 |
| Mortality of coho salmon caught and released using sport tackle in the Little Susitna River, Alaska.pdf |
HFSH 2/21/2013 10:00:00 AM HFSH 2/26/2013 10:00:00 AM HFSH 3/12/2013 10:00:00 AM HFSH 3/21/2013 10:00:00 AM |
HB 110 |
| Bendock and Alexandersdottir 1993.pdf |
HFSH 2/26/2013 10:00:00 AM HFSH 3/12/2013 10:00:00 AM HFSH 3/21/2013 10:00:00 AM |
HB 110 |
| Please be advised I oppose HB 110.pdf |
HFSH 2/26/2013 10:00:00 AM HFSH 3/12/2013 10:00:00 AM HFSH 3/21/2013 10:00:00 AM |
HB 110 |
| PVOA_HB 110_Comments.pdf |
HFSH 2/26/2013 10:00:00 AM HFSH 3/12/2013 10:00:00 AM HFSH 3/21/2013 10:00:00 AM |
HB 110 |
| Wertheimer 1988_Chinook discard mort (2).pdf |
HFSH 3/12/2013 10:00:00 AM HFSH 3/21/2013 10:00:00 AM |
HB 110 |
| HB 110 CS Work Draft Version N.pdf |
HFSH 3/12/2013 10:00:00 AM |
HB 110 |
| HB 110 Version N Amendments.pdf |
HFSH 3/12/2013 10:00:00 AM |
HB 110 |
| HB 143 Version A Amendment 1.pdf |
HFSH 3/12/2013 10:00:00 AM |
HB 143 |