Legislature(2019 - 2020)GRUENBERG 120
05/10/2019 01:00 PM House JUDICIARY
Note: the audio
and video
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| Election of a Vice Chair | |
| SB71 | |
| HB123 | |
| HB115 | |
| HB142 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| + | SB 71 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| += | HB 123 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 115 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 142 | TELECONFERENCED | |
HB 142-NATIVE ORGANIZATIONS VPSO & TANF PROGRAMS
2:19:18 PM
CHAIR CLAMAN announced that the final order of business would be
HOUSE BILL NO. 142, "An Act relating to Alaska Native
organizations; relating to the village public safety officer
program; and relating to the Alaska temporary assistance
program."
2:19:45 PM
REPRESENTATIVE JONATHAN KREISS-TOMKINS, Alaska State
Legislature, said HB 142 is a technical fix bill" relating to
the Village Public Safety Officer (VPSO) and Temporary
Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) programs that have been
administered for decades by the Central Council of Tlingit and
Haida Indian Tribes of Alaska (CCTHITA). He explained that the
current statutes authorizing partnerships with regional native
nonprofit organizations such as Tanana Chiefs Conference allow
those organizations to administer the VPSO and TANF programs.
The problem, he said, is that CCTHITA has a different legal
identity than the other regional native nonprofit organizations
and is therefore technically not eligible to partner with SOA to
administer those programs. He noted that CCTHITA is already
administering VPSO and TANF programs and has without incident
for a long time. He said the issue was recently realized
between the Department of Public Safety (DPS) and CCTHITA. He
added that both sides are keen to resolve it. He explained that
HB 142 would adjust the statutes to add another category of
eligible entity that would encompass CCTHITA so that it can
legally continue to administer the VPSO and TANF programs.
CHAIR CLAMAN disclosed for the record that his wife works as
General Counsel to the Cook Inlet Tribal Council (CITC), a
regional native nonprofit organization. He said he does not
believe CITC has any financial interest in HB 142 and that his
wife's employment does not create a conflict. He explained his
intention was to make the record clear.
2:22:25 PM
REPRESENTATIVE EASTMAN said there are over a dozen organizations
that qualify as "Alaska Native organizations. He asked how
many of those organizations want to have VPSOs. He noted that
he does not think any of them currently have VPSOs.
REPRESENTATIVE KREISS-TOMKINS said he is not aware of any
organizations other than CCTHITA that have an interest in
administering the VPSO and/or TANF programs.
2:23:22 PM
CHAIR CLAMAN opened public testimony on HB 142.
RALPH WOLFE, 5th Vice President, Central Council of Tlingit and
Haida Indian Tribes of Alaska, said he is speaking on behalf of
Richard Peterson, President of CCTHITA. He echoed what
Representative Kreiss-Tomkins said about HB 142 being a
technical fix to an issue relating to the VPSO and TANF
programs. He said CCTHITA has been administering those programs
for 20 years. He explained that in 2018 the VPSO program was
administered via a corporation established by CCTHITA. He said
this setup created administrative difficulties. He explained
that the TANF program has been administered through an agreement
with the understanding that a technical fix would be made to the
statute. He restated that CCTHITA has already been
administering these programs and said it has endeavored to
achieve long-term productivity. He said DOL has determined that
there would be no negative impact to the enactment of HB 142.
2:25:41 PM
CHAIR CLAMAN, after ascertaining that no one else wished to
testify, closed public testimony on HB 142.
2:26:08 PM
REPRESENTATIVE EASTMAN asked whether it is the prime sponsor's
intent for HB 142 to relate solely to CCTHITA or if he intends
to open a potential new avenue for other organizations to
administer VPSOs.
REPRESENTATIVE KREISS-TOMKINS said the intent of the bill "is
just looking at [CCTHITA]. He characterized CCTHITA's
organizational structure as distinct, explaining that it was
recognized by the federal government as a regional tribal
organization - "an actual sovereign government" well before
the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (ANCSA) was signed into
law. He said the goal of the bill is to encompass only CCTHITA
since the other regional nonprofits are partnering at present
and without incident with SOA on these programs.
CHAIR CLAMAN posited that HB 142 would put CCTHITA on the same
level as other organizations that currently could choose to
participate in the VPSO program, so the bill would not change
the eligibility of other organizations. He said it would put
CCTHITA on par with other similarly situated organizations
because CCTHITA is defined differently by the federal
government.
REPRESENTATIVE KREISS-TOMKINS said that is correct. He
clarified that it would put CCTHITA "on par with [SOA]" given
SOA is ultimately funding the programs.
CHAIR CLAMAN suggested that if there were another organization
listed in the present statute that wanted to contract with the
state for a VPSO program, it could do that already. He said the
difference with HB 142 is that it would place CCTHITA on the
same level as those other organizations. He said it would not
require CCTHITA to reach agreement with SOA, but it would allow
it to do so.
REPRESENTATIVE KREISS-TOMKINS said that is an accurate summary.
2:28:26 PM
REPRESENTATIVE EASTMAN said that is different from what he heard
earlier. He noted that there are 13 organizations listed in AS
47.27.070. He asked, "Do we want to solidify in statute that
each of these organizations can be running the VPSO program in
their various areas and so forth?"
REPRESENTATIVE KREISS-TOMKINS consulted AS 47.27.070. He asked
Representative Eastman to restate his question.
REPRESENTATIVE EASTMAN addressed lines 28 and 29 on page 2 of
the bill, located in Section 4. He said the language therein
would add a new definition of "Alaska Native organization" that
draws in the list of organizations in AS 47.27.070. He asked
how the prime sponsor would feel about grandfathering CCTHITA in
to VPSO and TANF eligibility rather than impacting the other
statutes. He cited the potential for other implications and the
fact that there is no desire to change the way the other
organizations operate.
REPRESENTATIVE KREISS-TOMKINS said he would have to consider
that proposal. He explained that HB 142 was generated through a
partnership between DOL, DPS, and CCTHITA, plus private counsel
retained by CCTHITA. He said HB 142 was the final product of
several months of conversations and negotiations between all
stakeholders. He said all the stakeholders knew what they
wanted to accomplish; it was just a question of the right means
to accomplish it. He remarked that he would not want to "upset
the apple cart" given that HB 142 represents a settlement
between different stakeholders. He said he would prefer to stay
with the bill as presently structured. He noted that he is not
able to speak for the other entities that agreed on the language
of the bill.
REPRESENTATIVE EASTMAN said he would like to talk to those
stakeholders to discuss whether an amendment is necessary.
2:32:00 PM
The committee took a brief at-ease from at 2:32 p.m.
2:32:23 PM
CHAIR CLAMAN announced that HB 142 would be held for further
review. He expressed uncertainty that the bill would be taken
up again during the current session. He explained the process
through which members may submit amendments.
REPRESENTATIVE KREISS-TOMKINS quipped that he fully expects the
governor to put HB 142 on the call for a special session.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| SB071 ver S 5.10.19.PDF |
HJUD 5/10/2019 1:00:00 PM HJUD 5/11/2019 9:30:00 AM |
SB 71 |
| SB071 Sponsor Statement 5.10.19.pdf |
HJUD 5/10/2019 1:00:00 PM HJUD 5/11/2019 9:30:00 AM |
SB 71 |
| SB071 Sectional Summary 5.10.19.pdf |
HJUD 5/10/2019 1:00:00 PM HJUD 5/11/2019 9:30:00 AM |
SB 71 |
| SB071 Supporting Document-Statutory Instruction 5.10.19.pdf |
HJUD 5/10/2019 1:00:00 PM HJUD 5/11/2019 9:30:00 AM |
SB 71 |
| SB071 Supporting Document-Department of Law Approval 5.10.19.pdf |
HJUD 5/10/2019 1:00:00 PM HJUD 5/11/2019 9:30:00 AM |
SB 71 |
| SB071 Fiscal Note LAW-CIV 5.10.19.pdf |
HJUD 5/10/2019 1:00:00 PM HJUD 5/11/2019 9:30:00 AM |
SB 71 |
| HB123 ver M 5.3.19.PDF |
HJUD 5/3/2019 1:00:00 PM HJUD 5/10/2019 1:00:00 PM |
HB 123 |
| HB115 ver A 5.1.19.pdf |
HJUD 5/1/2019 1:00:00 PM HJUD 5/3/2019 1:00:00 PM HJUD 5/6/2019 1:00:00 PM HJUD 5/10/2019 1:00:00 PM HJUD 5/11/2019 9:30:00 AM |
HB 115 |
| HB115 Amendments #1-6.pdf |
HJUD 5/3/2019 1:00:00 PM HJUD 5/6/2019 1:00:00 PM HJUD 5/10/2019 1:00:00 PM HJUD 5/11/2019 9:30:00 AM |
HB 115 |
| HB142 ver K 5.8.19.pdf |
HJUD 5/8/2019 1:00:00 PM HJUD 5/10/2019 1:00:00 PM |
HB 142 |
| HB142 Sponsor Statement 5.8.19.pdf |
HJUD 5/8/2019 1:00:00 PM HJUD 5/10/2019 1:00:00 PM |
HB 142 |
| HB142 Sectional Analysis 5.8.19.pdf |
HJUD 5/8/2019 1:00:00 PM HJUD 5/10/2019 1:00:00 PM |
HB 142 |
| HB142 Fiscal Note DPS-VPSO 5.8.19.pdf |
HJUD 5/8/2019 1:00:00 PM HJUD 5/10/2019 1:00:00 PM |
HB 142 |