Legislature(2013 - 2014)FAHRENKAMP 203
04/15/2014 01:30 PM Senate JUDICIARY
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB250 | |
| HB127 | |
| HB140 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| += | HB 140 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 127 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 250 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED |
HB 140-REGULATIONS: NOTICE, REVIEW, COMMENT
2:40:23 PM
CHAIR COGHILL announced the consideration of HB 140. "An Act
relating to the proposed adoption, amendment, or repeal of a
regulation; and relating to contact with agencies about
regulations." This was the second hearing and he noted the new
committee substitute (CS).
2:41:24 PM
SENATOR DYSON moved to adopt the work draft committee substitute
to HB 140, labeled 28-LS0478\K, as the working document.
CHAIR COGHILL objected. He explained that the CS removes the
Regulatory Commission of Alaska (RCA), the Board of Fisheries,
the Board of Game, the Alaska Public Offices Commission (APOC),
and the Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission (AOGCC) from
the requirements in the bill.
2:42:11 PM
REPRESENTATIVE LORA REINBOLD, Alaska State Legislature, Juneau,
Alaska, sponsor of HB 140 expressed concern that Version K
unnecessarily excludes a number of agencies and may decrease
transparency. She stated her four guiding principle when she
wrote the legislation:
1. The highest level of prosperity occurs when there is a free
market economy and a minimum of government regulations.
2. The government should be separated into three branches. She
said that she wanted to ensure that the Department of Law
does not have any undue influence over the legislative
branch.
3. A system of checks and balances should be adopted to
prevent the abuse of power by the different branches of
government.
4. Only limited and carefully defined powers should be
delegated to government and all others being retained by
the people. She said the whole purpose of the legislation
was to empower the people and she wanted to maintain that
as much as possible.
CHAIR COGHILL opened public testimony.
2:46:15 PM
MARK ECK, representing himself, Fairbanks, Alaska, stated that
passing HB 140 would impose unconstitutional and overreaching
regulations on the people and businesses that support the
Alaskan and U.S. economies. He mentioned overregulation by
agencies that have little to no check on the way they operate,
regulations that have the unintended consequence of hurting more
people than they help, and the financial impact of regulations
on businesses that support Alaskan families and bring revenue to
the state. He stated support for having the governor review
regulations and posting notifications to the public about
regulations that would help the people comply with such
regulations.
2:47:50 PM
JAMES ARTHUR SQUYRES, representing himself, Delta Junction,
Alaska, testified in support of HB 140. He said that the fact
that there is an Administrative Regulation Review Committee and
that Governor Parnell wrote Administrative Order 266 support the
notion that many state regulations overreach the statutes. He
stressed the importance of checks and balances to ensure that
new regulations are well written and fully vetted to avoid the
unnecessary burden of changing or removing them after the fact.
This can be very difficult because departments say they need
every one of their regulations, citing broad statutory powers
that allow their bureaucracies to grow seemingly unchecked. He
pointed out that Alaska has a looming financial crisis on the
horizon which makes it more important than ever to run the
leanest most efficient state government possible. He applauded
HB 140 as a new tool to hold regulation writing state agencies
accountable, to encourage dialog between all parties, and to
protect the people of Alaska from overreaching regulations.
2:51:07 PM
PAMELA GOODE, representing herself, Delta Junction, Alaska,
testified in support of HB 140. She said she used to think that
state government had control over the state bureaucrats and the
regulations that they write but she now realizes that isn't
necessarily true. She discussed the problems that the
groundwater protection and water well stakeholder work group is
having because wellhead protection is funded 100 percent by the
EPA and is a required element for Alaska to maintain primacy for
Clean Water Act regulations. The group came to realize that the
conflict over data and well drillers logs were an overreach of
statute and constitutionality. She urged the legislature to
regain its proper lawful authority.
CHAIR COGHILL asked Mr. Pound to comment on the Senate committee
substitute, Version K.
2:55:01 PM
JIM POUND, Staff, Representative Wes Keller, Alaska State
Legislature, Juneau, Alaska, said he worked on HB 140 with
Representative Reinbold over the Interim and he had concerns
with Version K. He agreed with the sponsor that the RCA should
not be exempt because their decisions directly affect the
public. If they approve a pipeline tariff, gas prices go up and
if they approve a rate increase for a utility, light bills or
telephone bills go up. He declined to address the APOC exemption
without doing some homework.
CHAIR COGHILL said he wanted to highlight APOC because he was
concerned that it was taking over the ethics statute, but he
didn't necessarily mean to provide an exemption.
SENATOR MCGUIRE asked Mr. Pound his thoughts on the Board of
Fisheries and AOGCC.
MR. POUND said the sponsor had no objection to those exemptions
because their processes are more public than other boards and
commissions.
2:59:16 PM}
CRYSTAL KOENEMAN, Staff, Representative Lora Reinbold, Alaska
State Legislature, Juneau, Alaska, added that there are certain
justifications for potentially exempting the Board of Fisheries
the Board of Game, and AOGCC in the bill. She cited the cost
analysis of fish runs and the open public processes as reasons.
REPRESENTATIVE REINBOLD highlighted that those entities need to
be excluded from certain but not all provisions.
3:01:37 PM
CHAIR COGHILL stated that he was maintaining his objection to
Version K and would hold HB 140 for further consideration.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|