Legislature(2013 - 2014)CAPITOL 120
03/18/2013 01:00 PM House JUDICIARY
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| Confirmation Hearing(s):|| Commission on Judicial Conduct | |
| Select Committee on Legislative Ethics | |
| HB104 | |
| HB140 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| += | HB 57 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | HB 140 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| += | HB 104 | TELECONFERENCED | |
HB 140-NOTICE FOR REGULATION ADOPTION
2:35:14 PM
CHAIR KELLER announced that the final order of business would be
HOUSE BILL NO. 140, "An Act relating to the information that
must be included with certain notices provided for the proposed
adoption, amendment, or repeal of a regulation."
2:35:32 PM
REPRESENTATIVE LORA REINBOLD, Alaska State Legislature,
explained that HB 140 is intended to address what many consider
to be too many regulations. The purpose of HB 140 is to make
the government and the regulators aware of the impacts of the
regulations. She opined that government agencies and regulators
need to work collaboratively with businesses and communities and
be reminded that they work for the people. Representative
Reinbold then paraphrased from the written sponsor statement,
which read:
Under current law, state agencies that propose changes
to the Alaska Administrative Code, our state
regulations, are required to disclose certain
information about the regulation, including the reason
for the proposed action, costs of implementation of
the regulation to the adopting agency and the origin
of the proposed regulation.
To provide better information about regulations that
may significantly affect private individuals and
businesses, other state agencies and local
governments, House Bill 140 requires that regulation
notices include information about estimated costs
beyond those to the agency. In view of the increasing
reach of the Washington D.C. into Alaska's affairs,
the bill also requires that when the federal
government is the reason for the regulation, the exact
federal law, executive order or decision be identified
in order for Alaskans to better understand government
actions that affect their businesses and lives.
Open government is a great American and Alaskan
tradition. I respectfully request your support for
House Bill 140.
REPRESENTATIVE REINBOLD then highlighted the letters of support
from the Council of Alaska Producers and the National Federation
of Independent Business/Alaska in members' packets and stated
that there are more letters of support to come.
2:40:45 PM
ROBERT PEARSON, Staff, Representative Lora Reinbold, Alaska
State Legislature, paraphrased from the following sectional
analysis, which read:
Sec. 1 Short title: "Regulation Impact Transparency
Act." House Bill 140 will require additional
information in state agency notices of proposed
regulations, specifically to increase transparency of
the proposal's fiscal impacts, including to the
private sector.
Sec. 2 Under current Alaska Statutes 44.62.190(d) the
agency is required to provide a "reason for the
proposed action." If the reason given is "federal," HB
140 will require identification of the federal action
that is the reason for the proposed regulation. It
also adds a requirement to estimate compliance costs
to private persons (including private businesses),
other state agencies and municipalities.
Sec. 3 Applicability: applies to regulations proposals
noticed on or after the effective date of this act.
MR. PEARSON then directed attention to the document entitled
"What does HB 140 do?" and noted that it's a notice of proposed
regulations. Page 2 of this document is what's known as
additional regulations notice information under AS 44.62.190(d),
which is the only part of the law that will be changed by
HB 140. As specified on page 2, Section 2(1) will require the
state agency supply a reference/citation of the federal law or
other action that could include anything from an executive order
to the combined federal register. The only other change HB 140
would make is to insert Section 2(3)(A),(B), and (C), which
would require the estimated costs to private individuals, other
state agencies, and municipalities will be included in the
regulation notice.
2:44:06 PM
MR. PEARSON pointed out that the fiscal note for HB 140 is
indeterminate and highlighted the fiscal note analysis language
that says, "... more detail is needed as to whether the estimate
required is a general estimate of impacts for a group or set of
municipalities or for each individual municipality, etc." He
offered his belief that the language in HB 140 is clear when it
refers to an estimate of annual costs. He acknowledged,
however, that it isn't a number encompassing every person in the
state who may be impacted by the regulations but rather is
simply an estimate of costs to the impacted entities. The
agencies should be able to make an estimate based on their
knowledge of the regulations and community to which the
regulations apply.
2:45:57 PM
CHAIR KELLER expressed favor with HB 140.
2:46:22 PM
REPRESENTATIVE MILLETT said she likes the concept of HB 140.
She then asked who would be responsible for making the estimates
of annual costs. If the Office of Management & Budget is
responsible for making the estimates, she surmised that the
workload would increase significantly or an economist would have
to be added to each department.
MR. PEARSON answered that the sponsor doesn't anticipate major
personnel requirements for this change. He noted that the
regulations notice always has a signature at the bottom of a
regulations specialist, assistant to the commissioner who, in
effect, is the one who signs the estimate. However, in each
department that promulgates regulations, there are those who
have expertise in the area being regulated. The regulation
specialist would ask for the necessary information to provide
the estimate and put it in the notice. The thought is that the
departments know the regulated community and who they're
regulating and should know to some degree when they propose a
regulation whether it will cost the public or other state
agencies and include that information.
REPRESENTATIVE LEDOUX expressed interest in hearing whether
departmental commissioners would anticipate an increase in
staff.
MR. PEARSON deferred to others who may be better able to address
that question.
2:49:25 PM
REPRESENTATIVE REINBOLD relayed that she is willing to work with
DOL to develop language that would make this legislation
possible. She then emphasized the need for the state to
identify from where the regulations are coming and do long-term
thinking. She mentioned that as chair of the Administrative
Regulation Review Committee she plans to hold hearings on this
issue, and thus there should be more information forthcoming.
CHAIR KELLER expressed interest in hearing from the Alaska
Municipal League (AML), particularly since the legislature does
impose mandates that cost [municipalities] money.
2:50:51 PM
REPRESENTATIVE LEDOUX inquired which department promulgates the
most regulations.
MR. PEARSON answered that the Department of Commerce, Community
& Economic Development (DCCED), with its licensing and
professional boards, is the largest promulgator of regulations.
REPRESENTATIVE LEDOUX suggested that the commissioner of DCCED
be invited to speak at the next hearing on HB 140.
2:51:53 PM
CATHY P. FOERSTER, Chair, Alaska Oil & Gas Conservation
Commission (AOGCC), Department of Administration, provided the
following testimony:
From the perspective of the AOGCC HB 140 is
problematic in its current wording. The commission
does not wish to be in the position of conceding that
federal law or a federal court decision does or even
could require us to promulgate regulations. And I
think that statement speaks for itself, it sets a
state's rights precedent that is counter to where we
[AOGCC] sit; we make regulations based on what's best
for the citizens of Alaska, based on what we do here
in Alaska.
MS. FOERSTER then expressed AOGCC's concern that it doesn't have
the time, resources, or expertise to make a determination as to
the economic impact on all the listed entities. The AOGCC, she
highlighted, has a process in place such that during the
promulgation of regulations ample public notice of the proposed
regulations, additions, or changes is included. Furthermore,
hearings on those changes are noticed and written comments
before or during the hearing are welcome as is testimony at the
hearing itself. She noted that generally lots of comments,
including the parties' estimates of the economic impact of any
regulation changes are received. The process, she opined, works
really well, even though the AOGCC doesn't have financial
experts. From conversations with DOL, Ms. Foerster related her
understanding that with a bit of collaborative "tweeking"
AOGCC's concerns with HB 140 can be addressed. Ms. Foerster
clarified that she isn't stating opposition to HB 140 but rather
believes it should receive the thought and attention necessary
to ensure that it says what is desired.
2:55:01 PM
CHAIR KELLER announced that HB 140 would be set aside.
REPRESENTATIVE REINBOLD related her expectation for push back
from the government as it's not accustomed to "looking down the
road." Therefore, Representative Reinbold said she is willing
to work with the departments in hopes that they are willing to
partner with industry in order to move the state forward toward
the goal of a long-term sustainable future for the state.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| HB 140 Sponsor Statement.pdf |
HJUD 3/18/2013 1:00:00 PM |
HB 140 |
| HB 140 Sectional Analysis.pdf |
HJUD 3/18/2013 1:00:00 PM |
HB 140 |
| HB 140 ver. N.pdf |
HJUD 3/18/2013 1:00:00 PM |
HB 140 |
| HB 140 Fiscal Note-Office of Management & Budget.pdf |
HJUD 3/18/2013 1:00:00 PM |
HB 140 |
| HB 140 Supporting Document-What Does HB 140 Do.pdf |
HJUD 3/18/2013 1:00:00 PM |
HB 140 |
| HB 140 Letter of Support-NFIB.pdf |
HJUD 3/18/2013 1:00:00 PM |
HB 140 |
| HB 140 Letter of Support-Council of Alaska Producers.pdf |
HJUD 3/18/2013 1:00:00 PM |
HB 140 |
| CS HB 57 ver. O.pdf |
HJUD 3/18/2013 1:00:00 PM |
HB 57 |