Legislature(1997 - 1998)
03/13/1997 01:20 PM House RES
Audio | Topic |
---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
HB 138 - BOARD OF STORAGE TANK ASSISTANCE Number 0135 CO-CHAIRMAN OGAN announced the first order of business was House Bill No. 138, "An Act relating to the Board of Storage Tank Assistance; and providing for an effective date." JOHN C. BARNETT, Executive Director, Board of Storage Tank Assistance, came forward to testify. Number 0191 CO-CHAIRMAN OGAN referred to the zero fiscal note by the Department of Environment Conservation (ADEC) and said he had requested clarification. The explanation had been that the costs associated with the board's activities are already in the ADEC's FY 98 budget request. However, the fiscal note extends beyond that, to the year 2000. He asked whether it should reflect those costs. MR. BARNETT said current statutory provisions for underground storage tank owners allow them to appeal costs related to financial assistance. In addition, they allow owners who have a disagreement with the ADEC to appeal costs for cleanup plans for a leaking tank site. The ADEC believes those appeals would still have to be dealt with, resulting in hiring an unbiased hearing officer and other costs to deal with appellants over the next few years. MR. BARNETT said those costs have already been considered while the board is in place. If the board were not in place, those costs would be carried forward in the ADEC's budget. It would not be an increase to the existing budget but would basically maintain the status quo over the next few years. Number 0375 REPRESENTATIVE JOE GREEN suggested there should be a savings. He asked whether this meant the allocated time and expense would be borne by the ADEC. He further asked whether there was so much leeway in the ADEC that it could either operate the program or not. MR. BARNETT said the board contains volunteer members who serve without compensation. He himself is the sole employee. In addition, there is a travel budget, plus minor miscellaneous costs. If the board did not exist, the ADEC would hear appeals through an independent hearing officer. That would probably cost more than the combined expenses for travel and the executive director. MR. BARNETT advised members there was a review the previous summer by the ADEC. Hearing officers are predominantly attorneys, and those appeals would take place in communities statewide. On the other hand, the board has tried to minimize costs by conducting teleconferences. Only when an appeal is complex or involves a serious issue does the board go to that location. Adding a hearing officer when needed, on an on-call basis, plus the costs associated with that, was determined to cost the same as the existing configuration. In addition, Mr. Barnett believed if he were a tank owner, he would rather talk to private-sector members, who were volunteers and somewhat unbiased, than to an attorney. NUMBER 0547 REPRESENTATIVE BEVERLY MASEK referred to a letter by Michele Brown, Commissioner of the ADEC, explaining the zero fiscal note is appropriate because costs associated with the board's activities are already in the FY 98 budget request. Representative Masek asked what the total budget request is for FY 98. MR. BARNETT said the total annual cost is $110,000. This has been pretty much the same since the board's inception in 1990. Number 0606 CO-CHAIRMAN OGAN said it seems the fiscal note should be zero for 1998 and $110,000 for every year past that. There being no House Finance Committee referral, he would take it upon himself to see whether a zero fiscal note is appropriate. He said from a resources standpoint, he has no opposition, and he believes it is a good program. Number 0640 CO-CHAIRMAN BILL HUDSON made a motion to move HB 138 from the committee with a zero fiscal note. He asked unanimous consent. There being no objection, it was so ordered.
Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
---|