Legislature(2021 - 2022)BARNES 124
04/26/2021 01:00 PM House RESOURCES
Note: the audio
and video
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB135 | |
| HB171 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| += | HB 135 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | HB 171 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED |
HB 135-GEOTHERMAL RESOURCES
1:04:16 PM
CHAIR PATKOTAK announced that the first order of business would
be HOUSE BILL NO. 135, "An Act relating to geothermal resources;
relating to the definition of 'geothermal resources'; and
providing for an effective date."
1:05:44 PM
The committee took a brief at-ease.
1:06:23 PM
HAILEY PAINE, Deputy Director, Division of Oil and Gas (DOG),
Department of Natural Resources (DNR), resumed the PowerPoint
presentation [hard copy included in the committee packet], began
during the April 23, 2021, meeting of the House Resources
Standing Committee, with slide 26, "Examples of Geothermal
Systems." She explained that this section of the presentation
would highlight the locations in Alaska which could be affected
under HB 135. She then deferred to Mr. Masterman to continue
the presentation.
1:07:53 PM
STEVE MASTERMAN, Director, Division of Geological and
Geophysical Surveys (DGGS), Department of Natural Resources,
began his presentation with slide 27, "Mt Spurr," showing a map
of the Mt. Spurr volcanic system across Cook Inlet from
Anchorage, approximately 35 miles from the power lines that
service Anchorage. He said that with a surface temperature of
about 40 degrees Celsius, Mt. Spurr is classified as a warm
spring, so there will be further exploration in hopes of finding
warmer water containing more energy. He noted that GeoAlaska
LLC and Raser Power Systems, LLC are exploring the area since
Ormat Technologies, Inc. found only dry wells and subsequently
moved out . He continued to slide 28, "Pilgrim Hot Springs,"
showing a map of a geothermal system on the Seward Peninsula
with a surface water temperature of 50 degrees Celsius, 92
degrees Celsius at drilling depth of 120 meters, and a suspected
temperature of 150 degrees Celsius in the reservoir. He noted
the hot spring's proximity to Nome and Graphite Creek, each
requiring about six megawatts of power but currently using
diesel generated power. He said that if the hot water reservoir
at Pilgrim Hot Springs is found, the energy generation will be
in the tens of megawatts, powering both Nome and the Graphite
Creek Mine. He pointed out the areas where drilling has already
happened and the nearby fault line which could contain more hot
water.
1:18:57 PM
REPRESENTATIVE HANNAN referred to slide 24 and asked about the
phrase "naturally or artificially in the geothermal system."
MR. MASTERMAN explained that some of the new developments of
geothermal energy allow for dry systems; for instance, liquids
injected into an area of hot rock could be recovered from the
same bore hole, creating a closed-loop system.
1:21:28 PM
SEAN CLIFTON, Policy and Program Specialist, Division of Oil and
Gas, Department of Natural Resources, addressed questions
remaining from the House Resources Standing Committee meeting on
April 23, 2021. He said that geothermal resource production
would be the only instance in which a subsurface mineral
resource owned by the state would contain an exemption for
private use. He clarified that if a landowner were to find gold
or oil on the property to which they own the surface rights,
they would be required to go through the state for permits and
pay royalties on the resource production.
1:22:49 PM
REPRESENTATIVE FIELDS inquired about recent geothermal projects
and the associated prices per kilowatt hour.
MR. CLIFTON responded that he doesn't have an answer.
1:23:46 PM
JEREMY PRICE, Commissioner/Chair, Alaska Oil and Gas
Conservation Commission (AOGCC), Department of Commerce,
Community, and Economic Development (DCCED), said that DNR
worked with AOGCC to identify any areas of concern prior to
introducing HB 135.
1:24:22 PM
MR. CLIFTON said that, with regards to preferential rights, it's
established in AS 38.05.125 that a subsurface owner or lessee
must be given reasonable use of the surface for purposes of
exploration and production. He explained that if a developer
wanted access to private surface property, the developer and
surface owner would need to have a private agreement with some
form of compensation, such as money or building a road. With
geothermal development, he said, free energy could be part of
the compensation. He said that private, mutually-beneficial
agreements are very common, but if the parties are unable to
come to an agreement and the developer can't find other access,
DNR may be asked to intervene under AS 38.05.130, with the
procedure defined in 11 AAC 86.145.
1:27:17 PM
REPRESENTATIVE HANNAN asked what the surface infrastructure
would be once a geothermal site is identified for development.
MR. CLIFTON replied that the geothermal plant would be built as
close to the water source as possible, with power lines
stretching to the end of the grid.
MR. MASTERMAN explained that there would be a small facility at
the well field with a building housing the power turbines and a
road or airstrip for access. He said that the facilities would
be self-contained, as the only end product is the power that
travels along the powerline.
REPRESENTATIVE HANNAN asked Mr. Masterman how he would define
"small."
MR. MASTERMAN replied that geothermal systems producing hundreds
of megawatts would require a large powerplant, but a system like
Chena Hot Springs that produces hundreds of kilowatts would
require only "a small warehouse kind of size."
CHAIR PATKOTAK asked about the size of the Pilgrim Hot Springs
plant.
MR. MASTERMAN noted that it would be helpful to provide some
visual examples of powerplants around the world.
1:33:04 PM
CHAIR PATKOTAK asked Mr. Clifton whether imminent domain would
play a role in geothermal development.
MR. CLIFTON replied that imminent domain applies to scenarios
within the purview of the Department of Transportation and
Public Facilities (DOT&PF) rather than DNR.
CHAIR PATKOTAK noted that Mr. Clifton had earlier asserted that
the state would intervene if a developer and surface owner
couldn't come to an agreement.
MR. CLIFTON explained that it would be the DNR commissioner
mediating a reasonable agreement between the parties rather than
the state seizing the land or forcing a sale.
1:35:24 PM
REPRESENTATIVE GILLHAM asked about a possible timeline for a
power plant to begin production.
MR. MASTERMAN explained that once a geothermal reservoir is
found there would be a period of engineering studies,
permitting, and economics to be established and confirmed. He
said that five to ten years would be a reasonable timeline for a
facility in a remote part of the state.
CHAIR PATKOTAK noted that it would be a privately owned or co-
operated facility.
1:37:18 PM
REPRESENTATIVE HANNAN asked what the subsurface rights are under
current law.
MS. PAINE responded that currently, if a developer requested a
geothermal prospecting permit, the surface owner would have 30
days to apply for their own permit, which would have preference.
Under HB 135 the surface owner would not be allowed to apply.
CHAIR PATKOTAK asked why a surface owner would apply.
MS. PAINE replied that the surface owners would most commonly
apply for a permit in the hope of reselling the exploration
rights to the developer. He clarified that a landowner could
still use the subsurface resource for a personal use like a home
heat pump.
1:40:18 PM
CHAIR PATKOTAK announced that HB 135 was held over.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| HB 135 Sponsor Statement 4.23.2021.pdf |
HRES 4/23/2021 10:30:00 AM HRES 4/23/2021 1:00:00 PM HRES 4/26/2021 1:00:00 PM HRES 1/21/2022 1:00:00 PM |
HB 135 |
| HB 135 Sectional Analysis Version A 4.23.2021.pdf |
HRES 4/23/2021 10:30:00 AM HRES 4/23/2021 1:00:00 PM HRES 4/26/2021 1:00:00 PM HRES 1/21/2022 1:00:00 PM |
HB 135 |
| HB 135 DNR Presentation 4.23.2021.pdf |
HRES 4/23/2021 10:30:00 AM HRES 4/23/2021 1:00:00 PM HRES 4/26/2021 1:00:00 PM |
HB 135 |
| HB 171 Sponsor Statement 4.12.2021.pdf |
HRES 4/26/2021 1:00:00 PM |
HB 171 |
| HB 171 Sectional Summary 4.12.2021.pdf |
HRES 4/26/2021 1:00:00 PM |
HB 171 |
| HB 171 PFAS-FAQs-Fact-Sheet-ATSDR and CDC.pdf |
HRES 4/26/2021 1:00:00 PM |
HB 171 |
| HB 171 PFAS Reference Sheet 4.12.2021.pdf |
HRES 4/26/2021 1:00:00 PM |
HB 171 |
| HB 171 Letter Deborah Hemenway 4.23.2021.pdf |
HRES 4/26/2021 1:00:00 PM |
HB 171 |
| HB 171 Executive Summary - Michigan Report on PFAS Health Effect 4.12.2021.pdf |
HRES 4/26/2021 1:00:00 PM |
HB 171 |
| HB 171 EPA PFAS Information Sheet 4.12.2021.pdf |
HRES 4/26/2021 1:00:00 PM |
HB 171 |
| HB 171 Letter American Chemistry 4.26.2021.pdf |
HRES 4/26/2021 1:00:00 PM |
HB 171 |
| HB 171 Letter Melanie Lesh 4.26.2021.pdf |
HRES 4/26/2021 1:00:00 PM |
HB 171 |
| HB 171 Letter Janet Neilson 4.26.2021.pdf |
HRES 4/26/2021 1:00:00 PM |
HB 171 |
| HB 171 Draft Fiscal Note DEC EH 4.26.2021.pdf |
HRES 4/26/2021 1:00:00 PM |
HB 171 |
| HB 171 Draft Fiscal Note DOT COM 4.26.2021.pdf |
HRES 4/26/2021 1:00:00 PM |
HB 171 |
| HB 171 Draft Fiscal Note DEC SPAR 4.26.2021.pdf |
HRES 4/26/2021 1:00:00 PM |
HB 171 |
| HB 171 Draft Fiscal Note DEC AQ 4.26.2021.pdf |
HRES 4/26/2021 1:00:00 PM |
HB 171 |
| HB 171 Letter ACAT 4.26.2021.pdf |
HRES 4/26/2021 1:00:00 PM |
HB 171 |
| HB 171 Letter AKPIRG 4.26.2021.pdf |
HRES 4/26/2021 1:00:00 PM |
HB 171 |
| HB 135 Example Geothermal Facilities 4.27.2021.pdf |
HRES 4/26/2021 1:00:00 PM HRES 1/21/2022 1:00:00 PM |
HB 135 |
| HB 135 Support University of Michigan Center for Sustainable Systems 4.27.2021.pdf |
HRES 4/26/2021 1:00:00 PM HRES 1/21/2022 1:00:00 PM |
HB 135 |