Legislature(2023 - 2024)BARNES 124
03/28/2024 08:00 AM House COMMUNITY & REGIONAL AFFAIRS
Note: the audio
and video
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB337 | |
| HB133 | |
| HB168 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| *+ | HB 337 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 133 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | HB 168 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
HB 133-PUBLIC MEETINGS: EXEMPT MUNI SVC AREA BD
8:16:22 AM
CHAIR MCCORMICK announced that the next order of business would
be HOUSE BILL NO. 133, "An Act exempting municipal service area
boards from the requirements of the Open Meetings Act; and
providing for an effective date."
8:16:34 AM
REPRESENTATIVE JESSE SUMNER, Alaska State Legislature, prime
sponsor, presented HB 133. He paraphrased the sponsor statement
[included in the committee packet], which read as follows
[original punctuation provided]:
House Bill 133 would give specific exemptions to local
municipalities on the Open Meetings Act.
Currently, the Open Meetings Act (OMA) doesn't allow
for Board Supervisors on the Road, Safety and
Assessment (RSA) board to ride in the same vehicle,
because of the quorum statute in OMA. For example, in
the Mat-Su Borough, RSA is an advisory only position
appointed by the Mayor. These positions are strictly
voluntary; with no power to contract or spend any of
the Borough's money.
Not only would this change incentivize local board
members; which has been a problem filling, but in the
Mat-Su Valley, it is critical to get all the
Supervisors together and brainstorm on how best to
solve Borough issues, without the cloud of the OMA.
Currently, in practice, if a board member found out
something wrong with a road, he or she does not have
the ability to call others on the board to come look
at said problem and discuss solutions on solving the
issue, because of the Open Meetings Act. This is a big
problem for local municipalities with an easy solution
set forth in this bill.
Please join us in supporting HB 133.
8:18:29 AM
CLARK BICKFORD, Staff, Representative Jesse Sumner, Alaska State
Legislature, on behalf of Representative Sumner, prime sponsor
of HB 133, presented the sectional analysis [included in the
committee packet], which read as follows [original punctuation
provided]:
Section I:
Just a small grammatical amendment AS 44.62.310(d)(5)
from UPON to ON.
And
Removes a portion of AS 44.62.310(d)(8) to ultimately
read "meetings of municipal service area boards
established under AS 29.35.450 29.35.490." This is
the heart of the Bill that will give the power back to
local municipalities to function reasonable in
deciding on how best to problem-solve and not be in
violation of the Open Meetings Act.
Section II:
If passed, this would take effect immediately under AS
01.10.070©.
CHAIR MCCORMICK opened invited testimony.
8:19:49 AM
JILL PARSON, board member, Big Lake Road Services Area (RSA),
gave invited testimony during the hearing on HB 133. She
informed the committee that she was a member of the Big Lake RSA
board of supervisors, adding that the Open Meetings Act (OMA)
greatly hindered the board's ability to observe road issues in a
timely manner and research possible solutions. Ideally, she
explained that the board would like to be able to ride together
in one van with the borough road maintenance superintendent to
view and discuss road problems as a group. This way, options
and research could be conducted more efficiently while learning
from other board members in preparation for the quarterly
meetings. However, subject to the OMA, supervisors must drive
in three separate cars so that no one car has a board majority
during a "ride around," which is far more time consuming. She
said RSA supervisors welcomed more efficient ways to handle
their responsibilities and preparation for regularly scheduled
meetings.
CHAIR MCCORMICK sought questions from committee members.
8:23:25 AM
REPRESENTATIVE MEARS asked whether the bill would be limited to
these types of boards.
REPRESENTATIVE SUMNER answered yes.
REPRESENTATIVE MEARS asked whether the bill would impact boards
all across the state or only those in Matanuska-Susitna ("Mat-
Su").
REPRESENTATIVE SUMNER said the bill would apply to municipal
service area boards established under AS 29.35.450 AS
29.35.490. He added that a forthcoming amendment would make the
exemption even more narrowly tailored.
8:24:56 AM
REPRESENTATIVE HIMSCHOOT sought to confirm that the bill would
remove the language "when meeting solely to act on matters that
are administrative or managerial in nature."
REPRESENTATIVE SUMNER confirmed. He noted that rather than
removing the language in question, a forthcoming amendment would
add one more exception for fact finding missions.
REPRESENTATIVE HIMSCHOOT said she supported the bill's intent,
but wanted to make sure that it was being done properly.
REPRESENTATIVE SUMNER stated that the Mat-Su borough was
particularly cautious about violating the OMA, as it was the
only municipality with a standing injunction for OMA violations.
8:26:36 AM
REPRESENTATIVE HIMSCHOOT sought to verify that the OMA was a
state law, so exemptions could not be made without changing
state statute.
REPRESENTATIVE SUMNER answered yes, any exemption would need to
be made through statute.
8:27:25 AM
REPRESENATIVE BAKER shared his understanding that under the OMA,
a meeting can be held as long as 24 hours' notice is given. He
asked, "Is there a specific reason for this kind of board, why
they had to go a month out because of the cancelled meeting ...
'meeting for the record.'"
REPRESENTATIVE SUMNER shared his understanding that it required
at least two weeks to notice a meeting because of the timing
requirements for publication.
8:29:05 AM
SANDRA MOLLER, Director, Division of Community and Regional
Affairs, Department of Commerce, Community & Economic
Development (DCCED), stated that there was strong interest in
maintaining the OMA and looked forward to hearing amendments.
8:29:42 AM
REPRESENTATIVE HIMSCHOOT asked for examples of other municipal
service area boards.
REPRESENTATIVE SUMNER stated that fire service area boards are
the most common.
REPRESENTATIVE HIMSCHOOT asked whether the bill would apply to
all service area boards.
REPRESENTATIVE SUMNER answered yes.
8:30:44 AM
CHAIR MCCORMICK announced that HB 133 would be held over.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| HB0133A.pdf |
HCRA 3/28/2024 8:00:00 AM |
HB 133 |
| HB 337 Supporting Document 3.28.24.pdf |
HCRA 3/28/2024 8:00:00 AM |
HB 337 |
| HB 133 Sectional Analysis 3.28.24.pdf |
HCRA 3/28/2024 8:00:00 AM |
HB 133 |
| HB 133 Sponsor Statement 3.28.24.pdf |
HCRA 3/28/2024 8:00:00 AM |
HB 133 |
| HB0337A.pdf |
HCRA 3/28/2024 8:00:00 AM |
HB 337 |
| HB 337 Sectional Analysis Version A 3.28.24.pdf |
HCRA 3/28/2024 8:00:00 AM |
HB 337 |
| HB 337 Sponsor Statement Version A 3.28.24.pdf |
HCRA 3/28/2024 8:00:00 AM |
HB 337 |
| HB 337 Supporting Document 3.28.24.pdf |
HCRA 3/28/2024 8:00:00 AM |
HB 337 |
| HB 168 version B 3.26.24.pdf |
HCRA 3/28/2024 8:00:00 AM |
HB 168 |
| HB168 Sponsor Statement Version B 3.26.24.pdf |
HCRA 3/28/2024 8:00:00 AM |
HB 168 |
| HB168 Sectional Analysis Version B 3.26.24.pdf |
HCRA 3/28/2024 8:00:00 AM |
HB 168 |
| HB 133 Amendment A.2 3.28.24.pdf |
HCRA 3/28/2024 8:00:00 AM |
HB 133 |