Legislature(2019 - 2020)GRUENBERG 120
05/14/2019 03:00 PM House STATE AFFAIRS
Note: the audio
and video
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| Presentation(s): Vote at Home/vote by Mail by Dennis Wheeler. | |
| SB100 | |
| HB132 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| + | SB 100 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 132 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED |
HB 132-PERM. FUND:DEPOSITS;DIVIDEND;EARNINGS
5:21:35 PM
CO-CHAIR KREISS-TOMKINS announced that the final order of
business would be HOUSE BILL NO. 132, "An Act relating to the
Alaska permanent fund; relating to the earnings reserve account;
relating to the permanent fund dividend; relating to deposits
into the permanent fund; relating to appropriations to the
dividend fund and general fund; and providing for an effective
date."
5:21:53 PM
CO-CHAIR FIELDS moved to adopt Amendment 1, [labeled 31-
LS0799\U.1, Nauman, 5/13/19], which read:
Page 5, line 21:
Delete "33"
Insert "40"
CO-CHAIR KREISS-TOMKINS objected for the purpose of discussion.
CO-CHAIR FIELDS explained that Amendment 1 would change the
percentage used to calculate the permanent fund dividend (PFD)
from 33 percent to 40 percent. This would ensure that the PFD
provided under HB 132 would be about $1,400; he maintained that
this amount would be "imminently reasonable and defensible" and
comparatively substantial.
5:22:36 PM
REPRESENTATIVE WOOL commented that he supports the amendment.
He stated that based on 2018 revenues, 33 percent would yield a
$1,142 PFD; 40 percent would yield a $1,384 PFD. He added that
based on 2019 revenues, [40 percent] would yield a $1,435 PFD.
CO-CHAIR KREISS-TOMKINS removed his objection. There being no
further objection, it was so ordered.
REPRESENTATIVE WOOL maintained that a PFD formula is needed,
which was his motivation for introducing HB 132. He gave an
analogy: A group of investors own a restaurant. At the end of
the year, they each get a percentage of the profit based on the
performance of the restaurant. If the restaurant has a good
year, the investors get more money. If the restaurant loses
money, the investors get less or no money. He maintained that
no one would suggest that the investors get a percentage of
profit based on the value of the building. Real estate values
may be escalating every year, but the percentage of profit that
the investors get as stakeholders in the restaurant would be
based on the performance of the restaurant. Some day the
investors may sell the building; but in this analogy, the
building is the permanent fund, and Alaska would not sell it.
He reiterated that the dividend should be based on the
performance of oil and other mineral resources.
CO-CHAIR KREISS-TOMKINS expressed that he has some reservations,
but the conversation about the PFD formula is important.
REPRESENTATIVE HOPKINS stated that many constituents mention
"running the state like a business" and finding efficiencies;
when a business does well, it pays dividends based on its
profitability. He recalled in 2008, Governor Sarah Palin
approved an energy rebate in addition to that year's PFD. Even
though the state's economy was healthy, Alaskans felt the
negative impacts of higher heating fuel costs. He maintained
that HB 132 would alleviate the adverse consequences of this
inverse relationship. He encouraged further dialogue about the
percentage to be appropriated for the dividend, but maintained
that linking that percentage to oil revenues more accurately
gives Alaskans their share of the resource wealth and does mote
to helps assist with the cost of living than does linking the
PFD amount to the performance of "Wall Street." He reminded the
committee that in the late 2000s, when the price of oil was
increasing, the stock market was crashing, and the PFDs were
smaller; under HB 132, the dividends would reflect the oil
revenues.
5:29:41 PM
CO-CHAIR FIELDS moved to report HB 132, as amended, out of
committee with individual recommendations and the accompanying
fiscal note. There being no objection, CSHB 132(STA) was
reported from the House State Affairs Standing Committee.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| SB100 ver A 4.22.19.PDF |
HSTA 5/14/2019 3:00:00 PM |
SB 100 |
| SB100 Sponsor Statement 4.22.19.pdf |
HSTA 5/14/2019 3:00:00 PM |
SB 100 |
| SB100 Fiscal Note DOA-FAC-4-11-19.pdf |
HSTA 5/14/2019 3:00:00 PM |
SB 100 |
| SB100 Supporting Document - Letter of Support (Collins) 4.22.19.pdf |
HSTA 5/14/2019 3:00:00 PM |
SB 100 |
| SB100 Supporting Document - Letter of Support (Crews) 4.22.19.pdf |
HSTA 5/14/2019 3:00:00 PM |
SB 100 |
| SB100 Supporting Document - Letter of Support (Aspelund) 4.22.19.pdf |
HSTA 5/14/2019 3:00:00 PM |
SB 100 |
| HB132 Amendment #1 Fields 5.13.19.pdf |
HSTA 5/14/2019 3:00:00 PM |
HB 132 |
| PresentationH STA VAH.pptx |
HSTA 5/14/2019 3:00:00 PM |
Vote at Home |
| HB132 Fiscal Note DOR-APFC 5.14.19.pdf |
HSTA 5/14/2019 3:00:00 PM |
HB 132 |