Legislature(2021 - 2022)DAVIS 106
04/09/2021 08:00 AM House EDUCATION
Note: the audio
and video
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB132 | |
| HB108 | |
| HB19 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| + | HB 132 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | HB 108 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | HB 19 | TELECONFERENCED | |
HB 132-SCHOOL APPRENTICESHIP PROGS; TAX CREDITS
8:03:15 AM
CO-CHAIR STORY announced that the first order of business would
be HOUSE BILL NO. 132, "An Act relating to technical education
and apprenticeships; relating to concurrent vocational
education, training, and on-the-job trade experience programs
for students enrolled in public secondary schools; relating to
child labor; and providing for an effective date." [Before the
committee was CSHB 123(L&C)
8:03:57 AM
REPRESENTATIVE ZACH FIELDS, Alaska State Legislature, presented
CSHB 132(L&C) on behalf of the sponsor, the House Labor and
Commerce Standing Committee, on which he serves as co-chair. He
stated that apprenticeships are part of a larger ecosystem and
shared that the goal of the proposed legislation was to expand
apprenticeship and school-to-apprenticeship linkages, so more
Alaska youth can enter living wage careers that have nationally
recognized post-secondary credentials, including college credit
and apprenticeship.
REPRESENTATIVE FIELDS shared that Alaska has high performing
apprenticeship programs in the traditional building trades, and
recent innovation with apprenticeship in new industries. He
opined that Alaska has fantastic career and technical education
(CTE) programs in its school districts, including some school-
to-apprenticeship linkage programs. He explained that the
school-to-apprenticeship programs' volume is not sufficient to
meet demand. In the last 10 years, he said, there has been a
focus across party lines and through administrations on
expanding apprenticeship and CTE with support from the
congressional delegation.
REPRESENTATIVE FIELDS argued that expansion of CTE helps "people
pull themselves up by their bootstraps" and avoid college debt.
He shared that he is from a poor family and opined that people
shouldn't have to choose between postsecondary credentials and a
career. He stated that some people cannot afford not to work,
need to have a job, and they must complete either an
apprenticeship program, college credit, or ideally both.
REPRESENTATIVE FIELDS noted that Alaska is in a fiscally
constrained position, but federal resources for apprenticeship
are expanding. He shared that Alaska is completing an
application for State Apprenticeship Expansion and Innovation
(SAEI) grants, and CSHB 132(L&C) would put policy in place to
capitalize on the federal investment.
8:06:48 AM
REPRESENTATIVE FIELDS said CSHB 132(L&C) would incentivize
employer participation with $1,000 per apprentice in an employer
tax credit. He shared that this is based on a model from South
Carolina, where it was found that apprenticeship can be scaled
up by incentivizing employer participation and linking it to the
school system. He commented that the legislature could learn
from that model and expand apprenticeship beyond traditional
building trades. He noted that there was a $1,500 credit for
veterans entering apprenticeship.
REPRESENTATIVE FIELDS explained that the second thing CSHB
132(L&C) would do is direct the Department of Labor and
Workforce Development (DLWD) and the Department of Education and
Early Development (DEED) to collaborate in technical and
financial support for school apprenticeship, science, math, and
engineering CTE programs. He noted that DLWD has supported
apprenticeship for a long time, and cited examples back to
Governor Frank Murkowski and also nodded to work by Senator
Click Bishop from his time as commissioner of DLWD. He noted
however, that there had not been a statutory directive to DEED
to support apprenticeship. Representative Fields commented that
as exemplified by international best practices for
apprenticeship, Alaska needed to better link vocational
education with higher education. He shared that the House Labor
and Commerce Standing Committee worked with DEED on the proposed
legislation, and that it is supportive of CTE and
apprenticeship.
8:09:15 AM
REPRESENTATIVE FIELDS stated that the University of Alaska (UA)
system has pioneered examples of college credit and
apprenticeship, including in the automotive industry. He said
this proposed legislation directed the university to support
[college credit for apprenticeship] and noted that there was a
forthcoming amendment to change the language in a way UA
supports. He emphasized the importance of linking college and
apprenticeship.
REPRESENTATIVE FIELDS said CSHB 132(L&C) has a wide range of
support, and listed entities in favor of the proposed
legislation, including Associated Builders and Contractors
(ABC), the Alaska State Hospital & Nursing Home Association
(ASHNHA), the Alaska Primary Care Association (APCA), the
Matanuska-Susitna Borough School District (MSBSD), and some
individual employers and unions. He noted that whether non-
union or union, building trades, or healthcare, the proposed
legislation had support from a broad range of stakeholders.
REPRESENTATIVE FIELDS summarized that CSHB 132(L&C) would
incentivize employer participation with a tax credit and a bonus
tax credit for veterans, encourages cross departmental
collaboration between DLWD and DEED, supports school districts'
work to expand school-to-apprenticeship programs, and provides
statutory support for UA to continue expanding its college
credit for apprenticeship programs.
8:12:09 AM
REPRESENTATIVE GILLHAM asked if there was a minimum age to begin
an apprenticeship.
REPRESENTATIVE FIELDS replied that it depended on the student
and the program. He offered that someone ages 16-18 could be in
a registered apprenticeship program and a middle college high
school program. He stated that in some occupations one can't
work before turning 18, so it would depend on the profession.
He shared that in other cases many Alaska schools have school-
to-college linkage programs, which prepare a student to enter an
apprenticeship program upon graduating high school. He offered
that in this scenario, the intention is to link college credit
to the program.
8:13:51 AM
MARI SELLE, Director, South Central Alaska Health Education
Center (SCAHEC), Alaska Primary Care Association (APCA),
testified in favor of CSHB 132(L&C). She shared that the
proposed legislation has the potential to open doors for youth
to enter health and human services careers. She told the
committee that APCA has been a multi-agency sponsor for
registered apprenticeships since 2017. The program was built
with the United States Department of Labor's (DoL's) American
Apprenticeship Initiative (AAI) and the State Apprenticeship
Expansion grant, managed by DLWD. She explained that APCA is a
multi-agency sponsor that works with different healthcare
employers, many of whom are community health centers. The
various employers employ the apprentices, and APCA manages the
apprenticeship program for its partners, she said. She stated
this is a system where students get paid while they learn.
MS. SELLE shared that about 25 percent of the program's
apprentices are youths ages 18-24. She said APCA has a
partnership with Alaska Works on a youth apprenticeship program
to increase the availability of apprenticeships. She offered
that APCA also works with school districts to get youth into its
apprenticeship programs. She commented that there is a lot of
energy at the moment to create apprenticeships for youth, and
she believes CSHB 132(L&C) will help take everything to the next
level. She said this model of apprenticeship works well for
people who are going into entry level jobs. She explained that
this is because healthcare facilities are mentoring and training
new staff. She said the recruitment pool for entry level jobs,
especially in rural Alaska, is limited so employers must often
hire individuals without experience. The apprenticeship model
provides the missing piece of structured, formal education that
leads to a certification and takes people with no experience and
puts them on a great career path, she opined. Ms. Selle noted
that APCA partners with Alaska Pacific University (APU), so all
participants earn college credit and an undergraduate
certificate at the successful completion of their
apprenticeship. That certificate can lead to an associate
degree or bachelor's degree, launching the student into a
career.
MS. SELLE reiterated her support for the proposed legislation
and said she felt that the tax credit incentive was a key
component. She shared that one of APCA's challenges has been
having more willing students than employers. She pointed out
the burden of mentorship and working with young, inexperienced
people, but she believed the financial incentive would help
employers "take the plunge."
8:19:20 AM
REPRESENTATIVE PRAX looked for clarification regarding if the
apprenticeship program would establish guidelines in the health
care industry to measure an apprentice's experience and
knowledge in a specific field.
MS. SELLE replied that there are two components to an
apprenticeship. She said there is an on-the-job learning
component with many metrics that one must meet. She said there
is also a related technical instruction (RTI) component, which
is classroom learning. She explained that it is similar to a
college class in which there are learning objectives that one
must meet. She shared that APCA's apprenticeships are one to
two years, and about 25-40 weeks are spent in a virtual
classroom for 1-2 hours per week.
8:21:23 AM
REPRESENTATIVE FIELDS added that apprenticeship is regulated by
DoL, so for any given occupation there are "standards of
apprenticeship" which govern the skills taught on the job and
RTI. He emphasized that the standards of apprenticeship are
consistent for any occupation across the United States, which
gives a guarantee of quality across sponsors.
REPRESENTATIVE PRAX asked how a university or school education
program interfaced with an employer to give credits and
accreditation.
REPRESENTATIVE FIELDS replied that the Northwest Commission on
Colleges and Universities (NWCCU), the region's accrediting
body, has long worked with universities. He explained that an
institution of higher education must look at an apprenticeship
program and determine whether the related technical instruction
and the on-the-job learning align with a college degree program.
The college can then either use an existing instructor, such as
one from APCA, for the program, or have college professors
deliver the RTI in a traditional college setting, he said. He
explained that NWCCU accommodates that range of options.
8:23:40 AM
REPRESENTATIVE GILLHAM asked Ms. Selle how CSHB 132(L&C) would
help existing apprenticeship programs. He commented that he
completed a union apprenticeship without needing college
credits.
MS. SELLE answered that healthcare apprenticeships are new. She
said she believed the proposed legislation would help school
districts strengthen apprenticeship programs and bring awareness
to the value of apprenticeships to both school districts and
employers. She commented that the financial incentive would
intrigue employers. She said there are differences among
different trades and said carpentry was an example of having a
long history of established apprenticeships, while healthcare
was still in the process of making apprenticeship an established
norm. She emphasized that retention and recruitment in
healthcare is an issue and has been for a long time. She
suggested that this could be a tool to train an a highly skilled
and qualified workforce.
REPRESENTATIVE FIELDS added that in South Carolina where similar
proposed legislation had passed, the $1000 incentive was enough
to incentivize employers to try the program, which then paid for
itself with reduced turnover and higher productivity. He
described it as an inducement that allowed employers to
experiment.
REPRESENTATIVE GILLHAM asked if the $1,000 incentive was one-
time or repeated.
REPRESENTATIVE FIELDS replied that it is a one-time incentive.
8:27:49 AM
REPRESENTATIVE FIELDS presented the sectional analysis of CSHB
132(L&C). He said Section 1 names the bill the Alaska
Apprenticeship Expansion Act; Section 2 adds duties to DEED and
states that it must collaborate with DLWD to provide financial
and technical support to school districts. He commented that
DEED has primarily supported CTE with the Carl D. Perkins grant,
which is insufficient to scale up school-to-apprenticeship
programs. He said this makes the statutory direction necessary,
because DEED will have to think creatively beyond the Perkins
grant. Section 3 provides statutory support to UA to
collaborate with DEED on apprenticeships aligned with higher
education, he explained. Section 4 is the registered apprentice
tax credit, he said.
8:29:38 AM
REPRESENTATIVE DRUMMOND commented that Ms. Selle had said COVID-
19 did not disrupt the remote instruction but did not mention
how it affected on the job training. She asked for discussion
on healthcare training during the pandemic.
REPRESENTATIVE FIELDS replied that APCA was well positioned
because they have a robust system for digital communication
including video from the APCA headquarters in Anchorage, Alaska.
He said in terms of the participating community health centers,
the health centers needed to identify the mentor for a given
apprentice in one of APCA's five apprenticeship programs. He
clarified that APCA is an umbrella organization that includes
numerous health care organizations throughout the state.
8:31:53 AM
CO-CHAIR STORY asked how the program would work for smaller
village schools.
REPRESENTATIVE FIELDS pointed to a teaching program in the Lower
Kuskokwim School District (LKSD) with registered apprenticeship
embedded in it. He said LKSD identifies people who want to
become elementary education teachers and allows them to start as
an apprentice, either as an associate teacher or a teacher's
aide. Students then work through apprenticeship while
completing their University of Alaska Fairbanks (UAF) Early
Education distance delivered program. He explained that these
participants are earning a wage while working towards a college
degree.
REPRESENTATIVE FIELDS offered a second example with building
trades. He said someone working in construction may complete
apprenticeship hours in different communities. He also
suggested there are rural residents who attend apprenticeship
training at a training center in Anchorage or Fairbanks.
8:33:33 AM
REPRESENTATIVE GILLHAM asked if individuals joining
apprenticeships would be required to join unions.
REPRESENTATIVE FIELDS replied no, apprenticeship as a system
works for both union and non-union employers. He said
apprenticeship programs can be sponsored by a single employer or
multiple employers. He gave Red Dog Mine as an example of a
single-employer, non-union apprenticeship program sponsor. He
said it has multiple apprenticeships and is a world leader in
terms of apprenticeship. He offered APCA and ABC as non-union,
multi-employer examples. He said there are also single-employer
union programs and mentioned employees at the Mat-Su Regional
Medical Center, which has employees represented by International
Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW) Local 1574 and started
an apprentice program in partnership with the union. He
explained that traditional building trades, such as carpentry,
are the multi-employer unions. He summarized that all four
models exist, and apprenticeship training is open to anyone. He
said some of the new innovative programs are still developing
standards of apprenticeship, which is what Dol and DLWD did with
APCA and the Red Dog Mine.
8:36:47 AM
REPRESENTATIVE DRUMMOND said she would like to see a chart of
the four models Representative Fields had described. She
commented that she had seen a chart by the Associated General
Contractors (AGC) of Alaska that compared apprenticeship wages
while working and learning to college wages while working and
learning, along with the debt at the end of either program. She
asked if he could provide something similar to show the benefits
of the program.
REPRESENTATIVE FIELDS replied that all apprenticeship programs
have a wage progression. He said the traditional building
trades with AGC typically offer 60 percent of wages for the
first year of apprenticeship, 70 percent for the second year,
then 80 and 90 with a four-year apprenticeship. He explained
that as an apprentice learns, he/she earns higher wages. He
suggested this is instrumental for a win-win for both the
employer and the employee. He referenced a study from the Palin
Administration on apprenticeship, Alaska hiring, and wages. He
suggested it had compelling data about apprenticeship leading to
living wages.
8:39:08 AM
CO-CHAIR STORY asked about the fiscal note. She observed that
DLWD and DEED appeared to be able to build these partnerships
with the current structure. She also commented that she was
curious how it extended into post-secondary high school
programs.
REPRESENTATIVE FIELDS replied that DEED and DLWD told his office
that both already wanted to support apprenticeship, so adding
statutory support did not add cost. He said the cost in CSHB
132(L&C) is going to be the tax credit.
CO-CHAIR STORY concluded by adding that CTE is one of DEED's
five priorities of Alaska's Education Challenge.
[HB 132 was held over.]
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| HB 132 v W 3.25.21.PDF |
HEDC 4/9/2021 8:00:00 AM |
HB 132 |
| HB 132 Sponsor Statement 3.12.21.pdf |
HEDC 4/9/2021 8:00:00 AM |
HB 132 |
| CSHB 132 ver W Sectional Analysis 4.7.2021.pdf |
HEDC 4/9/2021 8:00:00 AM |
HB 132 |
| CSHB 132 Summary of Changes ver B to ver W 4.7.2021.pdf |
HEDC 4/9/2021 8:00:00 AM |
HB 132 |
| HB 132 Sponsor PowerPoint 3.12.21.pdf |
HEDC 4/9/2021 8:00:00 AM |
HB 132 |
| HB 132 Letters of Support as of 4.7.21.pdf |
HEDC 4/9/2021 8:00:00 AM |
HB 132 |
| HB 132 Fiscal Note-DOLWD-WH-03-12-21.pdf |
HEDC 4/9/2021 8:00:00 AM |
HB 132 |
| HB 132 Fiscal Note-DOLWD-WIB-03012-21.pdf |
HEDC 4/9/2021 8:00:00 AM |
HB 132 |
| HB 132 Fiscal Note-DOR-TAX-03-12-21.pdf |
HEDC 4/9/2021 8:00:00 AM |
HB 132 |
| HB 132 Fiscal Note-EED-SSA-3-23-21.pdf |
HEDC 4/9/2021 8:00:00 AM |
HB 132 |
| HB0108 version G.PDF |
HEDC 4/9/2021 8:00:00 AM |
HB 108 |
| HB108 Sponsor Statement version G 03.09.21.pdf |
HEDC 4/9/2021 8:00:00 AM |
HB 108 |
| HB108 Sectional Analysis 03.31.21.pdf |
HEDC 4/9/2021 8:00:00 AM HL&C 4/4/2022 3:15:00 PM |
HB 108 |
| HB 108 Slide Presentation 3.31.21.pdf |
HEDC 4/9/2021 8:00:00 AM |
HB 108 |
| HB108 letters of support 04.01.21.pdf |
HEDC 4/9/2021 8:00:00 AM HL&C 4/4/2022 3:15:00 PM |
HB 108 |
| HB 108 Letters of Support 4.6.21.pdf |
HEDC 4/9/2021 8:00:00 AM HL&C 4/4/2022 3:15:00 PM |
HB 108 |
| HB 108 Letter of support 4.7.21.pdf |
HEDC 4/9/2021 8:00:00 AM |
HB 108 |
| HB 108 Fiscal Note DPS-CJISP-04-02-21.pdf |
HEDC 4/9/2021 8:00:00 AM |
HB 108 |
| HB 108 Fiscal Note EED-SSA-3-31-21.pdf |
HEDC 4/9/2021 8:00:00 AM |
HB 108 |
| HB 108 Fiscal Note-DOLWD-WH-04-02-21.pdf |
HEDC 4/9/2021 8:00:00 AM |
HB 108 |
| HB0019A.PDF |
HEDC 4/9/2021 8:00:00 AM |
HB 19 |
| HB 19 Sponsor Statement.pdf |
HEDC 4/9/2021 8:00:00 AM |
HB 19 |
| HB 19 Sectional Analysis.pdf |
HEDC 4/9/2021 8:00:00 AM |
HB 19 |
| HB 19 Fiscal Note-EED-TC-1-18-21.pdf |
HEDC 4/9/2021 8:00:00 AM |
HB 19 |