Legislature(2023 - 2024)DAVIS 106
04/25/2023 01:00 PM House TRANSPORTATION
Note: the audio
and video
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
Audio | Topic |
---|---|
Start | |
HB128 | |
Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ | TELECONFERENCED | ||
+= | HB 128 | TELECONFERENCED | |
HB 128-OIL TERMINAL FACILITY 1:03:27 PM CHAIR MCCABE announced that the only order of business would be HOUSE BILL NO. 128, "An Act relating to the definition of 'oil terminal facility.'" [Before the committee, adopted as the work draft on 4/20/23, was the proposed committee substitute (CS) for HB 128, Version 33-LS0634\U, Gunther/Radford, 4/20/23, "Version U."] 1:04:18 PM CRYSTAL KOENEMAN, Legislative Liaison, Department of Environmental Conservation, addressed the revised zero fiscal note from the Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC), noting that it would remain in draft form until the bill moved from committee. She presented the fiscal note analysis, which read as follows [original punctuation provided]: The House Transportation Committee Substitute for House Bill 128 clarifies that vessels that currently have oil spill contingency plans as required by current statute do not need to also comply with oil spill requirements for land-based terminals. This language reaffirms the practical application of the statute and longstanding interpretation of the department. In order to operate in Alaska, Alaska statutes require oil terminals and certain vessels, including tank vessels and oil barges, to maintain compliance with a contingency plan and proof of financial ability to respond to damages approved by the department. Since these statutes were put in place in the 1980's, the department has held that a plain reading of the statute says that tank vessels and oil barges operating as oil terminal facilities fulfill the contingency planning and financial responsibility requirements with their approved tank vessel or oil barge contingency plan and proof of financial responsibility that includes proposed operations. The statutes do not require vessels conducting ship-to-ship oil transfers to have both a vessel plan and an oil terminal facility plan, or "double" financial responsibility coverage. CSHB128 (TRA) reaffirms the practical application of the statute and longstanding interpretation of the department to ensure industry is able to continue providing timely, affordable, and safe delivery of fuel to communities in rural Alaska. CHAIR MCCABE invited questions from members of the committee. 1:08:15 PM REPRESENTATIVE VANCE asked Ms. Koeneman to clarify the department's position on barges, should Version U fail to pass this legislative session. MS. KOENEMAN explained that the department's day-to-day operations would not change, adding that the industry would not be required to obtain double coverage. The practical application, she said, was understood by DEC. 1:09:22 PM REPRESENTATIVE VANCE sought to confirm that the administration would not take action to prevent service from being provided. MS. KOENEMAN confirmed that service would not be disrupted. 1:10:00 PM REPRESENTATIVE VANCE moved to report CSHB 128, Version 33- LS0634\U, Gunther/Radford, 4/20/23, out of committee with individual recommendations and the accompanying fiscal notes. There being no objection, CSHB 128(TRA) was reported out of the House Transportation Standing Committee.
Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
---|---|---|
CSHB128.Version.U.pdf |
HTRA 4/20/2023 1:00:00 PM HTRA 4/25/2023 1:00:00 PM STRA 5/2/2023 1:30:00 PM |
HB 128 |
HB128.Explanation of Changes.Version A to U.pdf |
HTRA 4/25/2023 1:00:00 PM STRA 5/2/2023 1:30:00 PM |
HB 128 |