Legislature(2013 - 2014)HOUSE FINANCE 519
03/31/2014 08:30 AM House FINANCE
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| Confirmation Hearing: Angela Rodell, Department of Revenue | |
| HB21 | |
| HB127 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| + | HB 127 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 21 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED |
HOUSE BILL NO. 127
"An Act clarifying that the Alaska Bar Association is
an agency for purposes of investigations by the
ombudsman; relating to compensation of the ombudsman
and to employment of staff by the ombudsman under
personal service contracts; providing that certain
records of communications between the ombudsman and an
agency are not public records; relating to disclosure
by an agency to the ombudsman of communications
subject to attorney-client and attorney work-product
privileges; relating to informal and formal reports of
opinions and recommendations issued by the ombudsman;
relating to the privilege of the ombudsman not to
testify and creating a privilege under which the
ombudsman is not required to disclose certain
documents; relating to procedures for procurement by
the ombudsman; relating to the definition of 'agency'
for purposes of the Ombudsman Act and providing
jurisdiction of the ombudsman over persons providing
certain services to the state by contract; and
amending Rules 501 and 503, Alaska Rules of Evidence."
10:21:29 AM
BETH LEIBOWITZ, ASSISTANT OMBUDSMAN, OFFICE OF THE
OMBUDSMAN, offered a sponsor statement:
The Ombudsman Act (AS 24.55) has not changed much
since enactment in 1975, which speaks well for its
basic structure. The ombudsman requested and obtained
some modifications of the Ombudsman Act in 1990. It
has become apparent that the Ombudsman Act would
benefit from updates to address several issues that
have arisen since 1990.
The following is a brief sectional description of the
bill:
· Section 1 of CSHB 127(JUD) provides that the
ombudsman may receive a step increase in salary,
rather than remaining Step A of Range 26 for the
ombudsman's entire term or terms.
· Section 2 clarifies the ombudsman's authority to
hire additional staff using a personal services
contract pursuant to AS 24.55.060(f).
· Section 3 amends a section on the ombudsman's
investigatory authority to refer simply to
"agency" instead of "state agency." This brings
the section into conformance with the rest of the
Ombudsman Act (AS 24.55), which consistently
refers to the ombudsman's authority to
investigate an administrative "agency."
· Section 4 prevents a general waiver of attorney-
client privilege by an agency if it shares its
attorney's advice with the Officer Ombudsman in
order to explain the agency's actions.
· Section 5 improves the wording of the ombudsman's
existing privilege not to testify or produce
records regarding matters brought to the
ombudsman's attention in the course of her
duties.
· Section 6 modernizes the ombudsman's procurement
authority.
· Sections 7 and 8 state that sections 4 and 5 are
indirect court rule amendments because they
modify evidentiary rules, and that therefore
sections 4 and 5 only take effect if the
legislation is approved by a two-thirds majority
vote of each house, as required by Art. IV,
Section 15 of the Constitution of the State of
Alaska.
10:26:41 AM
LINDA LORD-JENKINS, STATE OMBUDSMAN, ANCHORAGE (via
teleconference), supported the comments provided by her
assistant.
Representative Guttenberg asked whether sections 4 and 5.
applied when the ombudsman was not an attorney.
Ms. Leibowitz clarified that the section did not speak to
attorney-client privilege. She said that the privilege was
typical of ombudsman statutes and was designed to keep the
ombudsman from being a witness in other forms of
litigation.
Representative Guttenberg understood that the courts could
not compel an ombudsman or their staff under Section 5.
Ms. Leibowitz replied that that was her understanding of
the section.
10:29:13 AM
Co-Chair Stoltze asked about jurisdiction and interface
between criminal activities of a statutorily empowered
agency.
Ms. Lord-Jenkins replied nothing had changed in the way the
office had historically handled those matters.
Co-Chair Stoltze CLOSED public testimony.
HB 127 was HEARD and HELD in committee for further
consideration.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| HB127 Sponsor Statement March 26 2014.pdf |
HFIN 3/31/2014 8:30:00 AM |
HB 127 |
| HB127 Explanation of Changes March 26 2014.pdf |
HFIN 3/31/2014 8:30:00 AM |
HB 127 |
| HB 21 - CS(FIN) - Ver S - 3.30.14.pdf |
HFIN 3/31/2014 8:30:00 AM |
HB 21 |