Legislature(2025 - 2026)BARNES 124
05/02/2025 01:00 PM House RESOURCES
Note: the audio
and video
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
Audio | Topic |
---|---|
Start | |
Confirmation Hearing(s):|| Board of Game|| Board of Fisheries|| Commercial Fisheries Entry Commission | |
HB125 | |
Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+= | HB 125 | TELECONFERENCED | |
+ | TELECONFERENCED | ||
HB 125-BOARD OF FISHERIES MEMBERSHIP 2:32:27 PM CO-CHAIR BURKE announced that the next order of business would be HOUSE BILL NO. 125, "An Act relating to membership of the Board of Fisheries." 2:32:32 PM CO-CHAIR BURKE opened public testimony on HB 125. 2:32:58 PM CHUCK DERRICK, President, Chitina Dipnetters Association, testified regarding HB 125, explaining that he opposed the bill unless it was amended to include personal use fishery as part of the Board of Fisheries. He supported amendments 3 and 4 which would change the make-up of the board by giving personal use fishery a voice on the board. 2:34:37 PM KAREN LINNELL, Executive Director, Ahtna Intertribal Resource Commission, spoke in support of HB 125 as written. She explained that in-river fisheries and subsistence fisheries have been under-represented on the Board of Fish for many years. This bill would create balance. 2:37:05 PM MARK RICHARDS, Executive Director, Resident Hunters of Alaska, explained that the Board of Game has similar issues to the Board of Fisheries and legislators should consider addressing the Board of Game as well. His organization did not believe designated seats would solve the problems because those seats would become just as politicized. He posited that individuals in those seats could still vote in ways that do not adhere to the state constitution and what is best for fish and game resources and the residents who depend on those resources to feed their families. The reforms needed on both boards would ensure strict adherence to article 8 of the Alaska constitution which holds the state's fish and wildlife as a public trust for the common use of Alaskans. The priority should always be doing what is best for the resources. He encouraged first restricting the commercial sector, explaining that fish and game have been managed according to who brings in the most money. He acknowledged the importance of commercial hunting and fishing, but that should not override what is best for fish and game populations and resident Alaskans who depend on those resources. 2:39:16 PM ROD ARNO, Policy Director, Alaska Outdoor Council, as Policy Director for the Alaska Outdoor Council, spoke in support of HB 125, explaining that the council had been advocating for a restructure of the Board of Fisheries since 1983. He stated that dedicated seats might be a good direction to go. He supported adopting Amendment 4 which provided for a personal use fishery, explaining that personal use is not sport and not subsistence. He discussed the Madison Decision and the McDowell Decision, and the definitions of subsistence use and personal use in statute. 2:41:33 PM CRAIG THYTHLOOK, Fisheries Policy Director, Native Peoples Action, explained that he represented Native Peoples Action, and they supported HB 125, emphasizing that tribal representation and subsistence seats should be a priority. He described the importance of traditional ways of life and indigenous knowledge. He also expressed concern regarding language referring to tribal appointments and opportunities. Regarding the proposed scientific seat, he pointed out that the definition of science could be subjective. 2:44:18 PM NANCY HILLSTRAND, Owner, Pioneer Alaskan Fisheries, spoke about sustaining fisheries and her concerns regarding losing fish. She emphasized the importance of having a person who was knowledgeable about how to sustain fish populations and avoid the decline of stocks. She proposed that the term "fishery manager" on p. 2, line 6, should be strengthened to become an ecosystem manager and that there needed to be "more science." 2:46:47 PM JAMES SIMON, representing self, spoke in support of HB 125. He explained that the bill emphasized fair representation of all Alaskans and would provide necessary representation of customary and traditional fisheries in Board of Fisheries decision making. As a former ADF&G Regional subsistence supervisor who attended many board meetings, he observed many commercial and sports fishery members claim subsistence user status, diminishing the impact of in-river subsistence users whose only interests are conservation and the continuation of age-old ways of life. He pointed out that many subsistence fishers lost their commercial fishing decades ago due to poor salmon returns and market shifts. He posited that HB 125 should not be amended to replace subsistence-designated seats with personal use seats because personal use fisheries are already adequately represented. He pointed out that the Chitina Dipnetters Association personal use fishery has consistently exceeded allocation targets in seven of the past ten years. He discussed past salmon harvest numbers compared to recent years. 2:49:51 PM CO-CHAIR BURKE, after ascertaining there was no one else who wished to testify, closed public testimony on HB 125. 2:50:05 PM CO-CHAIR BURKE announced HB 125 would be held over.
Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
---|---|---|
HB 125 written testimony recevied 5.1 HRES.pdf |
HRES 5/2/2025 1:00:00 PM |
HB 125 |
AFPC - Support for HB 125 -2025.04.10.pdf |
HRES 5/2/2025 1:00:00 PM |
HB 125 |
HB 125 Amendment N.2.pdf |
HRES 5/2/2025 1:00:00 PM |
HB 125 |
HB 125 Amendment N.3.pdf |
HRES 5/2/2025 1:00:00 PM |
HB 125 |
HB 125 Amendment N.4.pdf |
HRES 5/2/2025 1:00:00 PM |
HB 125 |
HB 125 Amendment N.5.pdf |
HRES 5/2/2025 1:00:00 PM |
HB 125 |
HB 125 Amendment N.6.pdf |
HRES 5/2/2025 1:00:00 PM |
HB 125 |
HB 125 presentation 5.2.pdf |
HRES 5/2/2025 1:00:00 PM |
HB 125 |
Leg Legal Memo - HB 125 Amendment N.6.pdf |
HRES 5/2/2025 1:00:00 PM |
HB 125 |
H RES written testimony HB 125 received 5.2_Redacted part 1.pdf |
HRES 5/2/2025 1:00:00 PM |
HB 125 |
H RES written testimony HB 125 received 5.2_Redacted part 2.pdf |
HRES 5/2/2025 1:00:00 PM |
HB 125 |
ARC_HB125.pdf |
HRES 5/2/2025 1:00:00 PM |
HB 125 |