Legislature(2025 - 2026)BARNES 124
03/19/2025 03:15 PM House LABOR & COMMERCE
Note: the audio
and video
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB123 | |
| SB79 | |
| HB30 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| *+ | HB 132 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 123 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | SB 79 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 30 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
HB 123-TAXATION: VEHICLE RENTALS, SUBPOENAS
3:17:02 PM
CO-CHAIR HALL announced that the first order of business would
be HOUSE BILL NO. 123, "An Act relating to vehicle rental taxes;
relating to the issuance of subpoenas related to tax records;
and providing for an effective date."
3:17:17 PM
REPRESENTATIVE KEVIN MCCABE, Alaska State Legislature, as prime
sponsor, gave a recap of HB 123, asserting that it would be a
"much needed fix to Alaska's broken vehicle rental tax system."
He explained that the bill was becoming increasingly important
due to new Internal Revenue Service (IRS) requirements for Turo
Inc. hosts. He clarified that his primary purpose for
sponsoring HB 123 was to protect people in Alaska who could be
harmed financially from the collection of retroactive taxes. He
stated that the percentage tax decrease in HB 123 was agreed
upon by members of the industry, including Turo Inc. and
Enterprise Rent-A-Car. He noted that there were letters of
support in committee packets from industry members.
REPRESENTATIVE MCCABE cautioned committee members that Alaska
could be subject to a lawsuit should the vehicle rental tax
system remain unchanged, and that a "big rental car company
could sue Alaska or quit paying taxes." He reminded committee
members that a court case, a judge had already ruled that rental
platform companies, such as Turo Inc., and rental car companies
were "similarly situated" from a legal standpoint. He stated he
would follow up with the committee with a legal memo from the
Department of Law (DOL) asserting that Alaska would lose against
a rental car company in court.
3:21:03 PM
CO-CHAIR FIELDS shared his concern with Turo Inc. hosts owing
taxes should there be a lawsuit. He asked whether HB 123 would
obviate this concern.
3:21:31 PM
REPRESENTATIVE MCCABE replied yes. He referenced Alaska Statute
(AS) stating that Turo Inc. should have been paying a tax and
further stated that the courts would put people in Alaska at
risk. He noted that there are approximately 1,500 people that
would be affected by a potential lawsuit and approximately
$6,000 that is owed.
3:23:02 PM
CO-CHAIR FIELDS offered his appreciation for HB 123.
3:23:16 PM
CO-CHAIR HALL opened public testimony on HB 123. After
ascertaining that there was no one who wished to testify, she
closed public testimony.
3:23:42 PM
REPRESENTATIVE COULOMBE noted that the fiscal note showed a
revenue change of over $1 million. She queried whether it was a
deficit.
3:24:24 PM
BRANDON SPANOS, Deputy Director, Tax Division, Department of
Revenue (DOR), answered that the fiscal note for HB 123 was
indeterminate. He explained that the platforms do not currently
pay taxes; rather, the individual would pay the tax. He
additionally explained that retail rental companies are paying
taxes. He noted that the reduction shown on page 2 of the
fiscal note is representative of the proposed rate change from
10 percent to 9 percent. He further explained that page 1 of
the fiscal note is indeterminate, as it is unknown how much of
an increase would result from the new 7 percent tax proposition
on the platforms.
3:25:24 PM
REPRESENTATIVE MCCABE noted that DOR does not know what would be
collected from Turo Inc., as the company is not currently taxed.
He further noted that DOR is uncertain whether the proposed
legislation would bring a revenue increase or be revenue
neutral. He offered his belief that it would not bring a
decrease in revenue. He suggested that after passage of the
legislation, the State of Alaska could look at adjusting the
taxes. He reminded committee members that the money collected
would go towards the Department of Transportation & Public
Facilities (DOT&PF) and the state parks system.
3:26:59 PM
REPRESENTATIVE COULOMBE clarified that the state is not
necessarily losing revenue. She referenced HB 123, stating that
at face value, it does appear to be a loss of revenue, but in
actuality, the fiscal impact is unknown.
3:27:41 PM
REPRESENTATIVE CARRICK moved to adopt Amendment [1] to HB 123,
labeled 34-LS0551\I.2, Nauman, 3/14/25, which read as follows:
Page 2, line 1:
Delete "(1)"
Page 2, lines 2 - 5:
Delete "not arranged through a vehicle rental
platform; or
(2) seven percent of the total"
Insert ", including"
3:27:47 PM
CO-CHAIR FIELDS objected.
3:27:51 PM
REPRESENTATIVE CARRICK explained that Amendment [1] would remove
the tiered tax structure in HB 123 and would add the peer-to-
peer car sharing platforms, and their own definition, at a tax
of 9 percent and would continue the reduction in traditional car
rentals at 9 percent. She shared her understanding that Turo,
Inc. and Enterprise Rent-A-Car had come to "some sort of grand
bargain agreement." She shared her concern about the potential
drop in revenue from traditional car rentals and the subsequent
decrease in state parks funding. She opined that it would be
reasonable for all rentals in Alaska to pay an equivalent tax.
She noted that ultimately it is the end consumer who pays the
tax, not the person or company who owns the vehicle. She
further noted that Turo, Inc. had testified previously that it
"shares" cars, it does not "rent" cars which she asserted was
a misnomer. She noted that both traditional car rental
companies and Turo, Inc. car owners have unique business
expenses. She asserted that Amendment [1] would preserve
revenue while maintaining an overall tax reduction. She offered
her desire to ensure equivalent rates for the end consumer.
3:30:56 PM
CO-CHAIR FIELDS concurred with Representative Carrick. He
stated that parity would be ideal without question, but that the
committee must acknowledge the reality of what the legislature
could do in the face of serious legal implications. He stated
that although the amendment was his preferred policy, he would
vote against it in the interest of advancing the bill.
3:31:51 PM
REPRESENTATIVE COULOMBE offered her agreement with Co-Chair
Fields. She reiterated that there would be a good chance that
there would be no loss of revenue. She stated that she would be
voting against the amendment.
3:32:08 PM
REPRESENTATIVE MCCABE noted that there was currently a 3 percent
tax levied on motorhomes. He noted that Enterprise Rent-A-Car
does not depend on airport services.
3:33:02 PM
REPRESENTATIVE CARRICK stated that she would support the
proposed legislation in either case but that she would prefer to
discuss it with transparency. She opined that policy decisions
should be made with respect to the end consumer, not based on
any particular company. She offered appreciation for the
companies that had contributed to the making of the proposed
legislation.
3:33:54 PM
CO-CHAIR FIELDS maintained his objection to Amendment [1] to HB
123.
A roll call vote was taken. Representative Carrick voted in
favor of the motion to adopt Amendment 1 to HB 123.
Representatives Saddler, Burke, Nelson, Coulombe, Fields, and
Hall voted against it. Therefore, Amendment 1 failed to be
adopted by a vote of 1-6.
3:34:38 PM
REPRESENTATIVE MCCABE thanked the committee for the opportunity
to present HB 123 and offered his strong belief in protecting
the people of Alaska.
3:35:10 PM
REPRESENTATIVE SADDLER offered his support for the proposed
legislation.
3:35:44 PM
REPRESENTATIVE NELSON thanked the bill sponsor for the proposed
legislation.
CO-CHAIR HALL entertained a motion.
3:36:05 PM
CO-CHAIR FIELDS moved to report HB 123 out of committee with
individual recommendations and the accompanying fiscal notes.
There being no objection, HB 123 was reported out of the House
Labor and Commerce Standing Committee.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| SB 79 HL&C Hearing Packet 3.19.2025.pdf |
HL&C 3/19/2025 3:15:00 PM |
SB 79 |
| HB 30 Amendment G.1.pdf |
HL&C 3/19/2025 3:15:00 PM |
HB 30 |
| HB 30 Amendment G.2.pdf |
HL&C 3/19/2025 3:15:00 PM |
HB 30 |
| HB 30 Amendment G.3.pdf |
HL&C 3/19/2025 3:15:00 PM |
HB 30 |
| HB 30 Amendment G.4.pdf |
HL&C 3/19/2025 3:15:00 PM |
HB 30 |
| HB 30 Amendment G.5.pdf |
HL&C 3/19/2025 3:15:00 PM |
HB 30 |
| HB 30 Amendment G.6.pdf |
HL&C 3/19/2025 3:15:00 PM |
HB 30 |
| HB 123-Amendment I.2.pdf |
HL&C 3/19/2025 3:15:00 PM |
HB 123 |
| HB123 Ver A Supporting Doc-FAQs 3.19.25.pdf |
HL&C 3/19/2025 3:15:00 PM |
HB 123 |
| HB123 Ver A Supporting Doc-Vehicle Rental Statutes 3.19.25.pdf |
HL&C 3/19/2025 3:15:00 PM |
HB 123 |
| HB123 VerA Supporting Doc-DOR Brief Analysis of Turo 3.19.25.pdf |
HL&C 3/19/2025 3:15:00 PM |
HB 123 |