Legislature(2019 - 2020)GRUENBERG 120
05/03/2019 01:00 PM House JUDICIARY
Note: the audio
and video
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB123 | |
| HJR18 | |
| HB110 | |
| HJR18 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| + | HB 123 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 110 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| += | HJR 18 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 115 | TELECONFERENCED | |
HB 123-ELECTRIC-ASSISTED BICYCLES
1:23:05 PM
CHAIR CLAMAN announced that the first order of business would be
HOUSE BILL NO. 123, "An Act relating to electric-assisted
bicycles."
1:23:40 PM
REPRESENTATIVE WOOL introduced HB 123 as prime sponsor. He said
that the impetus for the bill was an incident during which a
constituent was pulled over and told he could not operate an
electric-assisted bicycle without a driver's license.
Representative Wool noted that motorized vehicles are defined by
statute, but electric-assisted bicycles are not. He said HB 123
would define electric-assisted bicycles and stipulate that they
be treated the same as bicycles. He explained that this means
an operator would not need a driver's license or helmet and that
the electric-assisted bicycle would not need to be registered.
He added that a municipality would be allowed the discretion to
impose different rules on electric-assisted bicycles.
1:25:28 PM
ANNE RITGERS, Staff, Representative Adam Wool, Alaska State
Legislature, began her PowerPoint presentation [hard copy
included in the committee packet]. She addressed slide 1 and
said the objective of HB 123 is to regulate electric-assisted
bicycles as bicycles, to update statute to reflect technological
advances, and to clarify the law for consumers and retailers.
MS. RITGERS addressed slide 2. She said the definition of an
electric-assisted bicycle can be found in section 8 of the bill.
She explained that an electric-assisted bicycle is a bicycle
that is designed to travel with not more than three wheels in
contact with the ground, has fully operative pedals for human
propulsion, and is equipped with an electric motor that has a
power output of not more than 750 watts, provides assistance
only when the rider is pedaling, and ceases to provide
assistance when the bicycle reaches a speed of 28 miles per
hour.
1:26:45 PM
MS. RITGERS addressed slide 3, which featured a map of the
United States displaying the 36 states that have some type of
electric bicycle definition in statute. She noted that Alaska
is not one of those states.
MS. RITGERS addressed slides 4 and 5, which featured
illustrations of electric-assisted bicycles. She highlighted in
one photo the battery pack mounted on the main frame and the
motor located in the hub. She restated that all electric-
assisted bicycles have fully operable pedals. She noted that
some electric-assisted bicycles have the battery and motor
within the frame, making them appear more like normal bicycles.
MS. RITGERS addressed slide 6, which featured a photo of an
electric scooter and a photo of a moped. She clarified that HB
123 draws a distinction between electric-assisted bicycles and
electric scooters or mopeds. She noted that the latter do not
have fully operative pedals and have larger gasoline engines.
1:27:52 PM
REPRESENTATIVE SHAW acknowledged the note made during the
presentation about the maximum speed of 29 miles per hour. He
noted that there is language on page 3, line 26 that reads "not
more than 15 miles an hour." He asked if this is conflicting
language.
MS. RITGERS said the definition to which Representative Shaw is
referring is of an "electric personal motor vehicle," which is
different from an electric-assisted bicycle.
REPRESENTATIVE SHAW thanked her for clarifying that there are
two definitions.
1:28:53 PM
CHAIR CLAMAN asked for an example of an electric personal motor
vehicle, defined in section 5 of the bill and in AS
28.90.990(a)(12).
REPRESENTATIVE WOOL said the drafters deduced that the statute
refers to a two-wheeled, non-tandem personal vehicle like a
Segway.
1:29:31 PM
REPRESENTATIVE LEDOUX asked if electric-assisted bicycles are
currently regulated.
MS. RITGERS said electric-assisted bicycles fall into a gray
area because they do not fit any current definitions of a
vehicle in Alaska statute. She restated that the purpose of the
bill is to clearly define them.
REPRESENTATIVE LEDOUX asked what the problem is that HB 123 is
attempting to fix.
REPRESENTATIVE WOOL restated that the bill was conceived after
one of his constituents was pulled over while riding an
electric-assisted bicycle. He explained that the constituent's
driver's license had been revoked and the electric-assisted
bicycle being used to commute. He said the constituent was told
he could not operate it without a driver's license.
Representative Wool noted that there are motorized vehicle
regulations in statute that refer to a 50cc gasoline motor or
larger. He said electric motors are not currently defined and
HB 123 would fix that. He said the bill would also distinguish
between electric-assisted bicycles and other bicycles that do
not require pedaling. He said the latter would not be
categorized as "e-bikes" under state law. He restated the
intention to define electric-assisted bicycles and to treat them
like bicycles.
REPRESENTATIVE LEDOUX mused that HB 123 would exclude electric-
assisted bicycles from regulation rather than regulate them.
REPRESENTATIVE WOOL stated that HB 123 would define them as a
class of bicycle not to be confused with scooters or other
motorized vehicles without pedals.
1:31:47 PM
CHAIR CLAMAN noted that HB 123 would establish a statutory top
speed of 28 miles per hour. He asked what happens if the
industry decides to change the standard top speed to 30 miles
per hour. He asked if they those bicycles would all be treated
as motorized vehicles.
REPRESENTATIVE WOOL said there are different classifications of
pedal-assisted electric bicycles. Some, he explained, cease to
assist when the bicycle reaches 20 miles per hour while others
cease at 28 miles per hour. He said if there were a new
generation of electric-assisted bicycles that went up to 35
miles per hour with pedal assist, then - assuming HB 123 becomes
law - they would be classified in a different category of
motorized vehicles where helmets, registration, and a driver's
license are required for operation.
1:32:48 PM
REPRESENTATIVE EASTMAN asked how the passage of HB 123 would
affect a situation in which Representative Wool's constituent is
pulled over again.
REPRESENTATIVE WOOL remarked that, if the constituent is riding
an electric-assisted bicycle that fits the new definition and
the police officer is aware of the definition, then there would
be no reason why the constituent could not ride his electric-
assisted bicycle on roads just like a normal bicycle.
REPRESENTATIVE EASTMAN said it seems the legislature has not
given discretion to traffic officers to pull over people for
riding electric-assisted bicycles. He asked, "Shouldn't the
response just be 'this isn't a vehicle'?"
REPRESENTATIVE WOOL said he thinks there is confusion about
vehicles with a motor that should not be treated as motorized
vehicles. He restated that electric motors are not directly
addressed in statute. He said HB 123 would make 750 watts
about 1 horsepower - the maximum size for electric motors.
REPRESENTATIVE EASTMAN asked how a police officer would be able
to tell the different between a 750-watt motor and something
larger or smaller. He asked if there is some sort of visual
cue.
REPRESENTATIVE WOOL said he does not have a definitive answer to
that question. He said a 2,000-watt motor would make the
vehicle larger, heavier, and allow it to go faster. He
suggested that a police officer who suspects that an electric-
assisted bicycle rider is going too fast could pull the rider
over to investigate. He mused that the officer would take a
commonsense approach to enforcement.
REPRESENTATIVE EASTMAN asked if there would be a speed limit for
electric-assisted bicycles should HB 123 become law.
REPRESENTATIVE WOOL said they would be treated like bicycles and
there is no speed limit for bicycles. He said if someone hits
45 miles per hour riding a bicycle down a hill, that is legal.
He said the rider should be wearing a helmet, but it is not
required by state law. He said the same would apply for
electric-assisted bicycles.
1:36:09 PM
REPRESENTATIVE LEDOUX asked what happened to Representative
Wool's constituent who was pulled over.
REPRESENTATIVE WOOL said he does not know. He said he thinks
the constituent was forced to walk home. He said he would
follow up to get the exact details.
REPRESENTATIVE LEDOUX said she is attempting to figure out
whether this is an issue that needs to be addressed in statute,
or if it is a matter of ensuring police officers are aware that
a driver's license is not necessary for the operation of an
electric-assisted bicycle.
REPRESENTATIVE WOOL said it would be great to ensure police
awareness. He said most states have statutes that address
electric-assisted bicycles for the purpose of eliminating
confusion about what is and isn't a motorized vehicle. He
argued that HB 123 would clearly define what is an electric-
assisted bicycle.
1:38:22 PM
CHAIR CLAMAN opened public testimony on HB 123.
1:38:57 PM
CARY SHIFLEA said he owns an electric bicycle store but is
testifying as an individual. He said he has been riding
electric bicycles since 2012 and has found that they allow him
to get out more than he typically would. He said it is
important to clarify the state law and to avoid lumping
electric-assisted bicycles with 50cc motors, which he argued
would not survive litigation as electric motors do not have a
cubic centimeter displacement value. He said he supports
aligning state law with the Municipality of Anchorage's electric
bicycle law, which he explained HB 123 would do. He said it
would also align with the federal definition of what an electric
bicycle is through the Consumer Product Safety Act. He noted
that an industry standard enacted in 2016 ensures that electric-
assisted bicycles are stamped with a class 1, 2, or 3
distinction. He said 90 percent of the electric-assisted
bicycle industry is building to the 20 miles per hour limit
while only a few are building to the 28 miles per hour limit or
higher. He stated that if an electric-assisted bicycle goes
faster than 28 miles per hour or has a larger motor than what is
deemed fit, then it should be classified as a motor vehicle. He
said an electric-assisted bicycle that goes 28 miles per hour or
less should be treated like a traditional bicycle.
1:41:00 PM
WILLIAM HARRINGTON said electric vehicles of all type are
"really going gang." He suggested changing the term "bicycle"
to "personal wheeled electric vehicle, a PWEV." He noted that
electric skateboards and electric scooters are becoming more
popular. He said electric-assisted bicycles are not the same as
pedal bicycles just like a speed boat is not the same as a
rowboat. He stated that personal injury can only be worse in an
accident when a helmet is not worn. He said helmets should be
required for use. He asked how many tragic accidents will be
necessary before state legislators upgrade safety requirements.
He discussed the electric scooter companies Lime and Bird and
said their products should be included in the present discussion
as they will become more popular in the future. He argued that
electric-assisted bicycles should be licensed, registered, and
have a state-issued title.
1:43:05 PM
CHAIR CLAMAN, after ascertaining that no one else wished to
testify, closed public testimony on HB 123.
1:43:30 PM
REPRESENTATIVE LEDOUX asked if police officers should currently
be stopping people who ride electric-assisted bicycles.
KEVIN HIGGINS, Assistant Attorney General, Labor & State Affairs
Section, Civil Division, Department of Law, said, "That is a
much more complicated question than just yes or no." He said
the answer depends on the circumstances of the interaction
between the officer and the person riding the [electric-assisted
bicycle].
REPRESENTATIVE LEDOUX said she does not understand that answer.
She said it is either considered a motor vehicle under state law
or it is not, regardless of the interaction between the officer
and rider.
MR. HIGGINS said the issue stems from the opaque definition of
-bikes" in statute. He said they are treated as motor
vehicles in one section, as motorcycles in another, and as
"motor-driven cycles" in yet another. He said they are not
currently regulated as bicycles or "off-highway vehicles." He
noted that the term "motorized bicycle" appears in some public
safety regulations, but that term is never defined. He stated
that, as it currently stands, electric-assisted bicycles must be
registered and insured.
REPRESENTATIVE LEDOUX asked for confirmation that HB 123 is
necessary to clarify whether electric-assisted bicycles should
be stopped.
MR. HIGGINS said he believes the bill would help clarify things.
He highlighted language located in section 3 on page 2, lines 10
through 13. He said the language is important because it would
allow the municipalities to develop their own regulations and
ensure that local law enforcement knows how to enforce them.
REPRESENTATIVE LEDOUX said she thought the Municipality of
Anchorage already has regulations. She asked how it has
regulations if HB 123 is necessary to allow it to regulate.
MR. HIGGINS said he is not entirely clear about the Municipality
of Anchorage's regulations. He clarified that section 3 would
make it explicit that state regulation could not prohibit the
use of an electric-assisted bicycle, but this limitation would
not apply to municipal regulation
1:47:17 PM
REPRESENTATIVE LEDOUX asked if state law requires the use of a
helmet for motorcycle riders.
MR. HIGGINS said he believes it is not required for people over
the age of 18.
REPRESENTATIVE LEDOUX asked if there are any rules about bicycle
helmets under state law.
MR. HIGGINS answered, "not under state law.
1:48:15 PM
CHAIR CLAMAN announced that the committee would hold HB 123 for
further review.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| HB123 ver M 5.3.19.PDF |
HJUD 5/3/2019 1:00:00 PM HJUD 5/10/2019 1:00:00 PM |
HB 123 |
| HB123 Sponsor Statement 5.3.19.pdf |
HJUD 5/3/2019 1:00:00 PM |
HB 123 |
| HB123 Sectional Analysis ver M 5.3.19.pdf |
HJUD 5/3/2019 1:00:00 PM |
HB 123 |
| HB123 Supporting Document-Letters 5.3.19.pdf |
HJUD 5/3/2019 1:00:00 PM |
HB 123 |
| HB123 PowerPoint Presentation 5.3.19.pdf |
HJUD 5/3/2019 1:00:00 PM |
HB 123 |
| HB123 Fiscal Note DOA-DMV 5.3.19.pdf |
HJUD 5/3/2019 1:00:00 PM |
HB 123 |
| HB123 Fiscal Note DPS-COM 5.3.19.pdf |
HJUD 5/3/2019 1:00:00 PM |
HB 123 |
| HB110 ver U 5.3.19.PDF |
HJUD 5/3/2019 1:00:00 PM |
HB 110 |
| HB110 Sponsor Statement 5.3.19.pdf |
HJUD 5/3/2019 1:00:00 PM |
HB 110 |
| HB110 Sectional Analysis ver U 5.3.19.pdf |
HJUD 5/3/2019 1:00:00 PM |
HB 110 |
| HB110 Explanation of Changes ver M to U 5.3.19.pdf |
HJUD 5/3/2019 1:00:00 PM |
HB 110 |
| HB110 Supporting Document-Affidavit for Collection of Personal Property, ACS 5.3.19.pdf |
HJUD 5/3/2019 1:00:00 PM |
HB 110 |
| HB110 Supporting Document-Senior Voice Article 4.24.19.pdf |
HJUD 5/3/2019 1:00:00 PM |
HB 110 |
| HB110 Supporting Document-DoA Boat Titles 5.3.19.pdf |
HJUD 5/3/2019 1:00:00 PM |
HB 110 |
| HB110 Supporting Document-Questions and Answers 5.3.19.pdf |
HJUD 5/3/2019 1:00:00 PM |
HB 110 |
| HB110 Supporting Document-Trusts, ACS 5.3.19.pdf |
HJUD 5/3/2019 1:00:00 PM |
HB 110 |
| HB110 Supporting Document-URPTODA Summary 5.3.19.pdf |
HJUD 5/3/2019 1:00:00 PM |
HB 110 |
| HB110 Supporting Document-Letters 5.3.19.pdf |
HJUD 5/3/2019 1:00:00 PM |
HB 110 |
| HB110 PowerPoint Presentation (Updated) 5.3.19.pdf |
HJUD 5/3/2019 1:00:00 PM |
HB 110 |
| HB110 Fiscal Note DOA-DMV 5.3.19.pdf |
HJUD 5/3/2019 1:00:00 PM |
HB 110 |
| HB115 ver A 5.1.19.pdf |
HJUD 5/1/2019 1:00:00 PM HJUD 5/3/2019 1:00:00 PM HJUD 5/6/2019 1:00:00 PM HJUD 5/10/2019 1:00:00 PM HJUD 5/11/2019 9:30:00 AM |
HB 115 |
| HB115 Sponsor Statement 5.1.19.pdf |
HJUD 5/1/2019 1:00:00 PM HJUD 5/3/2019 1:00:00 PM HJUD 5/6/2019 1:00:00 PM |
HB 115 |
| HB115 Supporting Document-Alaska Absentee Ballot Application 5.1.19.pdf |
HJUD 5/1/2019 1:00:00 PM HJUD 5/3/2019 1:00:00 PM HJUD 5/6/2019 1:00:00 PM |
HB 115 |
| HB115 Supporting Document-Hawaii Permanent Absentee Application 5.1.19.pdf |
HJUD 5/1/2019 1:00:00 PM HJUD 5/3/2019 1:00:00 PM HJUD 5/6/2019 1:00:00 PM |
HB 115 |
| HB115 Supporting Document-Vote at Home Letter 5.1.19.pdf |
HJUD 5/1/2019 1:00:00 PM HJUD 5/3/2019 1:00:00 PM HJUD 5/6/2019 1:00:00 PM |
HB 115 |
| HB115 Additional Document-Alaska Permanent Absentee Voter Regulation 5.1.19.pdf |
HJUD 5/1/2019 1:00:00 PM HJUD 5/3/2019 1:00:00 PM HJUD 5/6/2019 1:00:00 PM |
HB 115 |
| HB115 Additional Document-Alaska Sample By-Mail Return Ballot Envelope 5.1.19.pdf |
HJUD 5/1/2019 1:00:00 PM HJUD 5/3/2019 1:00:00 PM HJUD 5/6/2019 1:00:00 PM |
HB 115 |
| HB115 Additional Document-Municipality of Anchorage Response to Security Questions 5.1.19.pdf |
HJUD 5/1/2019 1:00:00 PM HJUD 5/3/2019 1:00:00 PM HJUD 5/6/2019 1:00:00 PM |
HB 115 |
| HB115 Additional Document-Municipality of Anchorage Sample Ballot 5.1.19.pdf |
HJUD 5/1/2019 1:00:00 PM HJUD 5/3/2019 1:00:00 PM HJUD 5/6/2019 1:00:00 PM |
HB 115 |
| HB115 Additional Document-NCSL Absentee and Early Voting 5.1.19.pdf |
HJUD 5/1/2019 1:00:00 PM HJUD 5/3/2019 1:00:00 PM HJUD 5/6/2019 1:00:00 PM |
HB 115 |
| HB115 Supporting Document-Alaska Commission on Aging Letter 5.1.19.pdf |
HJUD 5/1/2019 1:00:00 PM HJUD 5/3/2019 1:00:00 PM HJUD 5/6/2019 1:00:00 PM |
HB 115 |
| HB115 Fiscal Note OOG-DOE 5.1.19.pdf |
HJUD 5/1/2019 1:00:00 PM HJUD 5/3/2019 1:00:00 PM HJUD 5/6/2019 1:00:00 PM |
HB 115 |
| HB115 Amendments #1-6.pdf |
HJUD 5/3/2019 1:00:00 PM HJUD 5/6/2019 1:00:00 PM HJUD 5/10/2019 1:00:00 PM HJUD 5/11/2019 9:30:00 AM |
HB 115 |
| HJR018 ver S 5.1.19.PDF |
HJUD 5/3/2019 1:00:00 PM |
HJR 18 |
| HJR018 Sponsor Statement 5.1.19.pdf |
HJUD 5/3/2019 1:00:00 PM |
HJR 18 |
| HJR018 Sectional Analysis ver S 5.1.19.pdf |
HJUD 5/3/2019 1:00:00 PM |
HJR 18 |
| HJR018 Supporting Document-APFC Resolution 5.1.19.pdf |
HJUD 5/3/2019 1:00:00 PM |
HJR 18 |
| HJR018 Fiscal Note OOG-DOE 5.1.19.pdf |
HJUD 5/3/2019 1:00:00 PM |
HJR 18 |
| HJR018 Supporting Document-Public Comment 5.3.18.pdf |
HJUD 5/3/2019 1:00:00 PM |
HJR 18 |
| HB123 Supporting Document-Public Comment 5.3.18.pdf |
HJUD 5/3/2019 1:00:00 PM |
HB 123 |