Legislature(1999 - 2000)
04/15/2000 09:20 AM House FIN
| Audio | Topic |
|---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
HOUSE BILL NO. 121
"An Act relating to patients' rights under a health
care insurance plan or contract providing coverage for
dental care, and prohibiting certain practices by
health care insurers relating to dental care."
Representative Con Bunde, Sponsor spoke in support of HB
121. He noted that the legislation no longer prohibits
insurers from reimbursing a covered person at a different
rate because of the person's choice of dentist. He observed
that the legislation was introduced to aid dentists to serve
their patients effectively. He maintained that the House
Labor and Commerce Committee version is supported by the
parties impacted by the legislation. The legislation
supports consumers by allowing them the right to receive
full information regarding their care options without
fearing adverse actions from insurance companies. The bill
also allows patients to take civil action against health
care insurers to enforce their rights and requires a dental
treatment plan review or utilization review to be conducted
by a dentist.
PATTI SWENSON, STAFF, REPRESENTATIVE BUNDE provided
information on the legislation. She noted that the
legislation was amended in the House Labor and Commerce
Committee on page 2, line 8 - 13 to allow individuals to use
a dentist outside of the dental preferred provider
organization. The language was added to satisfy union
opposition to the bill.
In response to a question by Representative Phillips, Ms.
Swenson stated that the legislation would apply anywhere
there is a dental preferred provider organization.
Representative J. Davies asked for more information
regarding arbitration.
Ms. Swenson explained that insurance companies have a formal
system of arbitration. The arbitration is to be a final
agreement. If the parties do not agree a civil action can
take place. Representative Bunde added that the arbitrator's
decision is the end of the process. Patients can go on to
sue.
Representative J. Davies expressed concern that there be a
time limit to the arbitration. He asked if arbitrators must
act in a specified time period. Ms. Swenson did not know if
a time limit exists, but stressed that it would cost the
insurance company to continue the arbitration.
DAVID LOGAN, DENTIST, JUNEAU spoke in support of the
legislation as an advocate for patients. He pointed out that
dentists do not receive an economic benefit from the
legislation. Each company has a different arbitration plan.
Most plans do not have a time specification. He pointed out
that patients would have rights with the Insurance
Commission to expedite the process.
Representative Foster MOVED to report CSHB 121 (L&C) out of
Committee with the accompanying fiscal note. There being NO
OBJECTION, it was so ordered.
CSHB 121 (L&C) was REPORTED out of Committee with "no
recommendation" and a zero fiscal note by the Department of
Community and Economic Development and a zero fiscal note by
the Department of Administration, both published on 4/14/00.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|