Legislature(2015 - 2016)SENATE FINANCE 532
04/16/2016 03:00 PM Senate FINANCE
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB118 | |
| HB373 | |
| SB55 | |
| HB41 | |
| HB290 | |
| HB41 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| + | HB 118 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 373 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 290 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | SB 55 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| += | HB 41 | TELECONFERENCED | |
CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 118(FIN)
"An Act adopting the Municipal Property Assessed Clean
Energy Act; authorizing municipalities to establish
programs to impose assessments for energy improvements
in regions designated by municipalities; imposing
fees; and providing for an effective date."
3:12:37 PM
Co-Chair MacKinnon noted that the companion bill to HB 118
was SB 56.
3:13:14 PM
AT EASE
3:14:02 PM
RECONVENED
3:14:20 PM
GENE THERRIAULT, DEPUTY DIRECTOR, STATEWIDE ENERGY POLICY
DEVELOPMENT, ALASKA ENERGY AUTHORITY, DEPARTMENT OF
COMMERCE, COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, shared that
the committee had adopted the Committee Substitute (cs) for
SB 56 on March 14th. He furthered that when the house had
decided to adopt and move identical language in HB 118. He
said that Section 5 in the current bill version would
establish a new program that would allow local governments
that levied property tax to work with business communities,
local lenders, and potential outside funding sources to
loan money for energy improvements to commercial
properties. He felt that the strength of this mechanism
would be that the repayment of the loans would be done
through a voluntary assessment, agreed to by the property
owner, added to the yearly tax bill. He stated that the
extra assessment would result in low default rates for
businesses that used the mechanism. He said that the low
default rate would result in low-cost capital because the
lending would be low-risk. He continued that Sections 1
through 4 had been added to the bill as clarifying language
pertaining to the listing of programs for first and second
class boroughs in statute. He said that Section 5 laid out
the process that local governments would need to navigate
in order to initiate the program at the local level. He
relayed that local governments would need to pass a
resolution that conveyed to the business community a plan
for initiating the process, provide detail of the source of
funding that would be used, provide detail of the
contractual language that would be used, hold public
hearings, and go through the regular local process of
introducing an ordinance. He stated that the program was
voluntary for local government to use, and is subsequently
voluntary for individual property owners to use. He relayed
that there were protections built into the bill so that
improvements would not be made to properties that did not
make economic sense. He said that the bill would require an
energy audit that would suggest which improvements would
make sense for the property, and once those improvements
were done a follow-up audit would need to be performed to
show that improvements had been done correctly. He stated
that the process was similar to the process that had
already been in place for the Alaska Housing Finance
Corporation (AHFC) energy rebate program. He related that
the bill contained protections related to commercial
property mortgages; before PACE financing could be
approved, permission from the local lender allowing the
PACE financing would be required because the PACE financing
would become a superior lean on the property.
3:18:09 PM
Mr. Therriault furthered that the local government could
not use general obligation bonds to come up with the pool
of money, and protections had been included that would keep
local government from taking coercive action to force a
commercial property owner to use the program. He believed
that the bill would help the state and local government to
work with business communities to gain federal funds at low
interest rates.
3:19:29 PM
Vice-Chair Micciche discussed zero fiscal note attached to
the bill.
3:20:26 PM
Vice-Chair Micciche MOVED to report CSHB 118(FIN) out of
Committee with individual recommendations and the
accompanying fiscal note.
CSHB 118(FIN) was REPORTED out of committee with a "do
pass" recommendation and with one new zero fiscal note from
Department of Commerce, Community and Economic Development.
3:21:09 PM
AT EASE
3:22:46 PM
RECONVENED
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| SB 55 AOA AKOMA Letter.pdf |
SFIN 4/16/2016 3:00:00 PM |
SB 55 |
| SB 55 Public Testimony Morris.pdf |
SFIN 4/16/2016 3:00:00 PM |
SB 55 |
| SB 55 ASPS NWSPS Comments - Scope Optometric - AK SB55 - 04-15-16.pdf |
SFIN 4/16/2016 3:00:00 PM |
SB 55 |
| HB 118 - PACE Legislation Steele.pdf |
SFIN 4/16/2016 3:00:00 PM |
HB 118 |
| SB 55 Opposition Letter Reinhardt.pdf |
SFIN 4/16/2016 3:00:00 PM |
SB 55 |
| SB 55 work draft version G.pdf |
SFIN 4/16/2016 3:00:00 PM |
SB 55 |