Legislature(2023 - 2024)ADAMS 519
04/22/2024 09:00 AM House FINANCE
Note: the audio
and video
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB116 | |
| HB144 | |
| HB45 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| += | HB 116 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 144 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 45 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED |
HOUSE BILL NO. 116
"An Act relating to appropriations from the
restorative justice account."
9:04:58 AM
Co-Chair Edgmon asked the bill sponsor to provide a brief
recap on the legislation.
REPRESENTATIVE JULIE COULOMBE, SPONSOR, explained that the
bill reorganized the percentages of the funds that passed
through the Restorative Justice Account that fund non-
profit organizations through the Council on Domestic
Violence and Sexual Assault (CDVSA) for services for
victims and domestic violence and sexual assault programs.
The legislation changed the share of the funds, reversing
the share for CDVSA in the Department of Corrections (DOC).
Co-Chair Edgmon asked staff to provide a review of the
fiscal notes.
BRODIE ANDERSON, STAFF, REPRESENTATIVE NEAL FOSTER,
provided a review of two House Finance Committee fiscal
notes. He began with the DOC fiscal note, OMB component
number 2952. The policy discussed in the bill switched
percentages coming from the Restorative Justice Account.
The fiscal notes reflected the policy in the bill. He
discussed fund sources and noted the Restorative Justice
Fund had a decrement of $7 million for the FY 25 budget
(the amount available) and would be appropriated in FY 25.
There was a fund source swap to UGF for the corresponding
equal amount, and in the outgoing years the funds were
indeterminate. The fiscal note assumed a 3 percent
allocation to DOC. He pointed out that the UGF FY 25
appropriation replaced the restorative justice funds, and
also allowed the department time to transition to a lower
allocation of restorative justice funds in outgoing years.
9:09:10 AM
Mr. Anderson reviewed OMB component number 521 for CDVSA in
the Department of Public Safety (DPS). The note reflected
an increase of $7.5 million transferred from DOC to the
Restorative Justice Funds. He noted that the grants and
benefits line showed the same amount available. The bill
allocated 79 percent to CDVSA and victims.
9:10:20 AM
Representative Josephson observed that the fiscal notes
would get a stamp if the bill was moved out of committee.
He noted that the funds in question were not in the
operating budget but asked if the funds would be considered
by the Conference Committee and would effectively be in the
budget.
Mr. Anderson answered affirmatively and explained that the
fiscal notes would replace the previous fiscal notes in the
packets. The Conference Committee would consider and
negotiate a fiscal note package. Conference Committee would
have the ability to reconcile the operating budget
components, but after conference committee approval the
bill would enforce whatever funding had been allocated for
FY 25.
Co-Chair Johnson asked if there were two or three fiscal
notes.
Mr. Anderson replied that there were two fiscal notes.
Co-Chair Johnson asked if the fiscal notes were a decrement
to DOC.
Mr. Anderson replied that DOC would be held harmless with
no cuts visible for FY 25. There was a fund source swap
between the Restorative Justice Fund and the undesignated
general funds (UGF). In outgoing years, there was no UGF
designated in FY 26 through FY 30. He explained that the
DOC fiscal note would only fund FY 25, and in FY 26 DOC
would be required to request an increment in future years.
The $7.5 million would not enter the base budget in
perpetuity until requested the following year.
Co-Chair Johnson stated her understanding that at some
point incarcerated individuals' Permanent Fund Dividends
(PFDs) were garnished to go to the fund. She recalled that
the fund was renamed as a restorative justice account, and
most of the funding went to offset the cost of having
people incarcerated. She did not want the situation to
happen again and noted that the fund was originally set up
to offset the cost of incarceration rather than benefit
prisoners. She wanted to ensure that there was a name
change and they were now taking a large portion of the
account. She thought it was a significant fiscal load.
9:16:08 AM
Representative Coulombe relayed that the fund was
established in 1988. In 2018 there was a policy change, and
it was determined that more funding would go towards
victims instead of offsetting DOC costs. The percentages
laid out at the time still favored DOC, and she thought the
bill was another step to fulfill the policy changes that
happened in 2018 to restore victims. She mentioned people
sharing concerns that victims were not getting restitution
or restoration, and the bill was one vehicle to help
stabilize efforts for victims. She mentioned that in
statute CDVSA was required to put together a prevention
program, but it did not have the money to do so. The
funding would aid the agency with doing more preventative
education programs. She added that the House had put $3.7
million in the budget for CDVSA and thought that the amount
would be balanced.
Representative Galvin thanked Representative Coulombe for
finding some way to ensure victims were better supported.
She understood the original intent of the fund may have
been different than the current use, but thought the
legislature needed to find some common ground to support
victims. She supported the bill. She asked about the
funding. She observed that the act was effective on July 1,
2024. She understood the fund was filled with PFD dollars
that happened in October. She asked if FY 24 dollars would
be rolled into the fund first.
EDRA MORLEDGE, STAFF, REPRESENTATIVE JULIE COULOMBE,
confirmed that the funds were from the PFD in 2023.
Co-Chair Edgmon understood that the PFD funds were
dispersed in the year after the calendar year of the
dividend.
Representative Ortiz supported the bill. He wanted to
clearly understand the fiscal implications. He asked if the
intent of the bill would direct more funding resources to
victims in the first year of its enactment. He asked if the
money would be replaced with General Fund money, and there
would not be any immediate impact on DOC.
Mr. Anderson replied affirmatively. The DOC would be held
harmless for FY 25.
Co-Chair Edgmon noted there were no amendments for the
bill.
Co-Chair Johnson MOVED to REPORT CSHB 116(STA) out of
committee with individual recommendations and the
accompanying fiscal notes.
There being NO OBJECTION, CSHB 116(STA) was REPORTED out of
committee with eight "do pass" recommendations and one "no
recommendation" recommendation and with one new
indeterminate fiscal note from the House Finance Committee
for the Department of Public Safety and one new
indeterminate fiscal note from the House Finance Committee
for the Department of Corrections.
9:22:38 AM
AT EASE
9:23:45 AM
RECONVENED
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| HB 45 Sponsor Statement Version B.pdf |
HFIN 4/22/2024 9:00:00 AM |
HB 45 |
| HB 45 Sectional Analysis Version B.pdf |
HFIN 4/22/2024 9:00:00 AM |
HB 45 |
| HB 45 Explanation of Changes Version A to B.pdf |
HFIN 4/22/2024 9:00:00 AM |
HB 45 |
| HB045 Additional Document--Pick.Click.Give chart 5.16.23.pdf |
HFIN 4/22/2024 9:00:00 AM |
HB 45 |
| HB045 Public Testimony Rec'd by 5.16.23.pdf |
HFIN 4/22/2024 9:00:00 AM |
HB 45 |
| HB 116.FiscalNote. HFIN.DOC.4.19.pdf |
HFIN 4/22/2024 9:00:00 AM |
HB 116 |
| HB 116.FiscalNote. HFIN.DPS.VS.CDVSA.4.19.pdf |
HFIN 4/22/2024 9:00:00 AM |
HB 116 |