Legislature(2023 - 2024)ADAMS 519
04/22/2024 09:00 AM House FINANCE
Note: the audio
and video
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
Audio | Topic |
---|---|
Start | |
HB116 | |
HB144 | |
HB45 | |
Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+= | HB 116 | TELECONFERENCED | |
+= | HB 144 | TELECONFERENCED | |
+ | HB 45 | TELECONFERENCED | |
+ | TELECONFERENCED |
HOUSE BILL NO. 116 "An Act relating to appropriations from the restorative justice account." 9:04:58 AM Co-Chair Edgmon asked the bill sponsor to provide a brief recap on the legislation. REPRESENTATIVE JULIE COULOMBE, SPONSOR, explained that the bill reorganized the percentages of the funds that passed through the Restorative Justice Account that fund non- profit organizations through the Council on Domestic Violence and Sexual Assault (CDVSA) for services for victims and domestic violence and sexual assault programs. The legislation changed the share of the funds, reversing the share for CDVSA in the Department of Corrections (DOC). Co-Chair Edgmon asked staff to provide a review of the fiscal notes. BRODIE ANDERSON, STAFF, REPRESENTATIVE NEAL FOSTER, provided a review of two House Finance Committee fiscal notes. He began with the DOC fiscal note, OMB component number 2952. The policy discussed in the bill switched percentages coming from the Restorative Justice Account. The fiscal notes reflected the policy in the bill. He discussed fund sources and noted the Restorative Justice Fund had a decrement of $7 million for the FY 25 budget (the amount available) and would be appropriated in FY 25. There was a fund source swap to UGF for the corresponding equal amount, and in the outgoing years the funds were indeterminate. The fiscal note assumed a 3 percent allocation to DOC. He pointed out that the UGF FY 25 appropriation replaced the restorative justice funds, and also allowed the department time to transition to a lower allocation of restorative justice funds in outgoing years. 9:09:10 AM Mr. Anderson reviewed OMB component number 521 for CDVSA in the Department of Public Safety (DPS). The note reflected an increase of $7.5 million transferred from DOC to the Restorative Justice Funds. He noted that the grants and benefits line showed the same amount available. The bill allocated 79 percent to CDVSA and victims. 9:10:20 AM Representative Josephson observed that the fiscal notes would get a stamp if the bill was moved out of committee. He noted that the funds in question were not in the operating budget but asked if the funds would be considered by the Conference Committee and would effectively be in the budget. Mr. Anderson answered affirmatively and explained that the fiscal notes would replace the previous fiscal notes in the packets. The Conference Committee would consider and negotiate a fiscal note package. Conference Committee would have the ability to reconcile the operating budget components, but after conference committee approval the bill would enforce whatever funding had been allocated for FY 25. Co-Chair Johnson asked if there were two or three fiscal notes. Mr. Anderson replied that there were two fiscal notes. Co-Chair Johnson asked if the fiscal notes were a decrement to DOC. Mr. Anderson replied that DOC would be held harmless with no cuts visible for FY 25. There was a fund source swap between the Restorative Justice Fund and the undesignated general funds (UGF). In outgoing years, there was no UGF designated in FY 26 through FY 30. He explained that the DOC fiscal note would only fund FY 25, and in FY 26 DOC would be required to request an increment in future years. The $7.5 million would not enter the base budget in perpetuity until requested the following year. Co-Chair Johnson stated her understanding that at some point incarcerated individuals' Permanent Fund Dividends (PFDs) were garnished to go to the fund. She recalled that the fund was renamed as a restorative justice account, and most of the funding went to offset the cost of having people incarcerated. She did not want the situation to happen again and noted that the fund was originally set up to offset the cost of incarceration rather than benefit prisoners. She wanted to ensure that there was a name change and they were now taking a large portion of the account. She thought it was a significant fiscal load. 9:16:08 AM Representative Coulombe relayed that the fund was established in 1988. In 2018 there was a policy change, and it was determined that more funding would go towards victims instead of offsetting DOC costs. The percentages laid out at the time still favored DOC, and she thought the bill was another step to fulfill the policy changes that happened in 2018 to restore victims. She mentioned people sharing concerns that victims were not getting restitution or restoration, and the bill was one vehicle to help stabilize efforts for victims. She mentioned that in statute CDVSA was required to put together a prevention program, but it did not have the money to do so. The funding would aid the agency with doing more preventative education programs. She added that the House had put $3.7 million in the budget for CDVSA and thought that the amount would be balanced. Representative Galvin thanked Representative Coulombe for finding some way to ensure victims were better supported. She understood the original intent of the fund may have been different than the current use, but thought the legislature needed to find some common ground to support victims. She supported the bill. She asked about the funding. She observed that the act was effective on July 1, 2024. She understood the fund was filled with PFD dollars that happened in October. She asked if FY 24 dollars would be rolled into the fund first. EDRA MORLEDGE, STAFF, REPRESENTATIVE JULIE COULOMBE, confirmed that the funds were from the PFD in 2023. Co-Chair Edgmon understood that the PFD funds were dispersed in the year after the calendar year of the dividend. Representative Ortiz supported the bill. He wanted to clearly understand the fiscal implications. He asked if the intent of the bill would direct more funding resources to victims in the first year of its enactment. He asked if the money would be replaced with General Fund money, and there would not be any immediate impact on DOC. Mr. Anderson replied affirmatively. The DOC would be held harmless for FY 25. Co-Chair Edgmon noted there were no amendments for the bill. Co-Chair Johnson MOVED to REPORT CSHB 116(STA) out of committee with individual recommendations and the accompanying fiscal notes. There being NO OBJECTION, CSHB 116(STA) was REPORTED out of committee with eight "do pass" recommendations and one "no recommendation" recommendation and with one new indeterminate fiscal note from the House Finance Committee for the Department of Public Safety and one new indeterminate fiscal note from the House Finance Committee for the Department of Corrections. 9:22:38 AM AT EASE 9:23:45 AM RECONVENED
Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
---|---|---|
HB 45 Sponsor Statement Version B.pdf |
HFIN 4/22/2024 9:00:00 AM |
HB 45 |
HB 45 Sectional Analysis Version B.pdf |
HFIN 4/22/2024 9:00:00 AM |
HB 45 |
HB 45 Explanation of Changes Version A to B.pdf |
HFIN 4/22/2024 9:00:00 AM |
HB 45 |
HB045 Additional Document--Pick.Click.Give chart 5.16.23.pdf |
HFIN 4/22/2024 9:00:00 AM |
HB 45 |
HB045 Public Testimony Rec'd by 5.16.23.pdf |
HFIN 4/22/2024 9:00:00 AM |
HB 45 |
HB 116.FiscalNote. HFIN.DOC.4.19.pdf |
HFIN 4/22/2024 9:00:00 AM |
HB 116 |
HB 116.FiscalNote. HFIN.DPS.VS.CDVSA.4.19.pdf |
HFIN 4/22/2024 9:00:00 AM |
HB 116 |