Legislature(1995 - 1996)
03/03/1995 01:35 PM House FIN
| Audio | Topic |
|---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
HOUSE BILL 106
"An Act relating to art in public places requirements
and the art in public places fund."
SYBIL DAVIS, SELF, JUNEAU, testified in support of keeping
the 1% for art. Representative Parnell asked if public
buildings had been funded for art prior to the 1%
allocation. Ms. Davis responded that the 1% for art would
insure that some aspect of aesthetics would be placed into
each public facility which did not exist before the
mandatory allocation.
JOAN JACKSON, (TESTIFIED VIA TELECONFERENCE), ARTIST,
CORDOVA, urged the Committee not to pass HB 106 and pleaded
for continued support of art in public places.
JENETTA WAKEFIELD, (TESTIFIED VIA TELECONFERENCE),
FAIRBANKS, echoed that art daily enriches peoples lives who
use public buildings. She urged the Committee to not adopt
HB 106.
Representative Brown referenced the summary of an amendment
to HB 106. [Attachment #1]. The amendment provides an
alternative approach which would offer the private sector
incentives to fund the Percent for Art Program. She pointed
out her support of the current program, noting that it has
been important and valuable. Representative Brown
recommended using another approach which would work the art
percentage into the bidding process, while emphasizing that
the amendment would provide greater accountability. All
Percent for Art Funds would be disbursed through the Art in
Public Places Fund, making it easier to track and report on
procurement activity. Because so many departments now have
2
construction authority, the current process makes it very
difficult to track projects and compliance. The amendment
would solve that problem.
TIM WILSON, (TESTIFIED VIA TELECONFERENCE), EXECUTIVE
DIRECTOR, ALASKA COUNCIL ON THE ARTS, ANCHORAGE, spoke to
the bid preference approach. He noted that the amendment
does have merit and warrants consideration by the Arts
Council. He requested that the amendment be referred to
subcommittee in order to provide more time to consider the
effects. He elaborated that members of the Arts Council are
currently being elected and the issue deserves the new
body's consideration.
Mr. Wilson commented that the proposed amendment would
effect how the Percent for Art procurement would be
implemented. He noted that currently, 75% of all projects
for public art are done by Alaskan artists and that there is
preference given to Alaskan artists. That percentage rate
was based on the actual executions of commissions and not
the income generated.
Representative Martin voiced his legal concerns in limiting
the program to only Alaskan artists. Representative Brown
advised that the amendment did not represent any interest
group and that she provided the changes as suggested in the
amendment in order to save the program although she
supported the current program.
Mr. Wilson noted before the 1% art allocation funding in
public buildings, there was little activity and
participation in the arts. The law has provided a public
art incentive and with extra attention provided to
participate by municipalities and corporations in the
private sector.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|