Legislature(2023 - 2024)DAVIS 106
04/12/2023 08:00 AM House EDUCATION
Note: the audio
and video
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB139 | |
| HB106 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| += | HB 71 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | HB 139 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| += | HB 106 | TELECONFERENCED | |
HB 106-TEACHER RECRUITMENT; LUMP SUM PAYMENT
9:16:56 AM
CO-CHAIR ALLARD announced that the final order of business would
be HOUSE BILL NO. 106, "An Act authorizing lump sum payments for
certain teachers as retention and recruitment incentives; and
providing for an effective date."
9:17:27 AM
HEIDI TESHNER, Acting Commissioner, Department of Education and
Early Development, presented HB 106 on behalf of the bill
sponsor, House Rules by request of the governor. She explained
that recruitment and retention of teachers has long been an
issue in Alaska. She stated that teachers have a tremendous
impact on student achievement. She stated that priority number
four of Alaska's Education Challenge is to prepare, attract and
retain effective education professionals, and that HB 106
supports Alaska's teachers. She gave statistics on the number
of teachers in the state, including teachers recruited from
outside Alaska, and of teacher turnover. She reminded the
committee of a task force ordered by the governor in 2020 to
examine teacher recruitment and retention, and of the six
essential areas identified by the task force, salary was ranked
number one. The bill would provide 3 tiers of incentive
payments related to the type of district.
9:21:43 AM
MS. TESHNER explained that "doing the same thing" is not
working, and the incentive payments are just a single solution.
She noted the proposed incentives would be a pilot to see if it
would improve teacher recruitment and retention, and to analyze
fluctuations per district. In summary, she explained, there are
years of data and discussion about investing in Alaska's
teachers, and through the introduction of HB 106, the governor
is showing he is listening to stakeholders and directly
incentivizing those who work in the classrooms.
9:23:25 AM
MS. TESHNER, in response to a question from Representative Story
regarding retention and recruitment incentives, replied that in
the fiscal note, an additional $6.4 million has been added to
provide the payment directly to districts, so it does not become
an unfunded mandate to come up with the mandatory reduction. In
response to a follow-up question, she suggested that DEED could
determine incentive pay through its annual survey.
9:26:01 AM
REPRESENTATIVE PRAX gave his understanding that the 3 tier
payments are based on regions, but each teacher in a given
region will get the same bonus, and asked for clarification that
is correct.
MS. TESHNER responded that DEED would put out an application,
and teachers would have to apply and certify that they had
worked for the year. The districts would then distribute the
payments that DEED approved.
REPRESENTATIVE PRAX expressed his concern that a [three-year]
"state-wide experimental plan" is being proposed, and it has
been stated that there is 20 percent turnover every year. He
asked whether the other 80 percent who stay would get a cut in
pay.
MS. TESHNER replied it is subject to appropriation, and there
are other teacher recruitment efforts that will be forthcoming,
but it will not be determined until the end of the three years
whether or not things truly work.
9:29:48 AM
REPRESENTATIVE MCKAY commented that if [teacher recruitment
efforts] work, "keep doing it."
MS. TESHNER replied it is one mechanism; if there is success at
the end of the three years, it would be determined how best to
move forward.
9:30:51 AM
CO-CHAIR ALLARD commented on recruitment and retention, and
stated she was in favor of the bonus program. She reported
hearing over and over that teacher salaries are not enough, and
expressed her desire to "help that." She asked Ms. Teshner
about rankings.
MS. TESHNER replied she could not provide the information today
but would follow up with the committee.
9:32:45 AM
REPRESENTATIVE MCCORMICK asked Ms. Teshner to speak on how the
lump sum payment compares to [a return to the] defined benefits
system.
MS. TESHNER replied she does not have an answer. She further
stated that the bill is intended to determine whether the
proposed incentives work.
9:33:43 AM
REPRESENTATIVE STORY stressed the importance of having an annual
evaluation or report back to the legislature imposed under HB
139, as it would help with accountability.
MS. TESHNER replied that DEED would have to create regulations
around HB 106.
9:35:57 AM
REPRESENTATIVE HIMSCHOOT asked whether defined benefits would be
addressed in the survey DEED is to provide.
MS. TESHNER replied that retirement benefits is number four [in
the survey].
REPRESENTATIVE HIMSCHOOT asked Ms. Tesher to read the top five.
MS. TESHNER read the top five as follows: adequate compensation
for assigned duties; positive workplace conditions; personal
connections with students; retirement benefits; and good
healthcare benefits.
REPRESENTATIVE HIMSCHOOT commented that she appreciated the
attention to the survey and trying to meet the needs of the
practitioners.
9:37:42 AM
CO-CHAIR ALLARD indicated she wants educators to know that the
proposed incentives "stay in their pockets," stay in the
classroom, and go towards their retirement. She encouraged
educators to get on board; it is solely a benefit to them.
9:38:31 AM
REPRESENTATIVE MCCORMICK asked for information on other states
that may have implemented a similar program, and if the states
also offer defined benefits on top of "these lump sums."
MS. TESHNER explained she can follow up with more information,
but the amounts in the tiered incentive align with what other
states have done; she stated she will get back to the committee
with a more solid answer.
9:39:24 AM
CO-CHAIR ALLARD opined that the incentive would be great for
families, those who are married to teachers, and in rural
communities where she noted many times both spouses are
teachers. Under HB 106, their income could be significantly
increased.
9:39:59 AM
REPRESENTATIVE HIMSCHOOT pointed out that the State of
Washington did something similar in 2020, and the State of
Massachusetts in 1998, and she asked Ms. Teshner to provide more
information on the outcomes of those states thus far.
9:40:36 AM
REPRESENTATIVE STORY provided her understanding that in
Washington, there were parameters around lump sum payments, such
as for teachers at high poverty schools.
9:42:08 AM
CO-CHAIR ALLARD announced that HB 106 was held over.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| HB106 - Sectional Analysis.pdf |
HEDC 4/12/2023 8:00:00 AM |
HB 106 |
| HB0106A.PDF |
HEDC 4/12/2023 8:00:00 AM |
HB 106 |
| HB0106-Fiscal Note.PDF |
HEDC 4/12/2023 8:00:00 AM |
HB 106 |
| HB106 - Sponsor Statement.pdf |
HEDC 4/12/2023 8:00:00 AM |
HB 106 |
| IDEA Presentation 4-2023.v1.3 041023 edit.pdf |
HEDC 4/12/2023 8:00:00 AM |
IDEA Presentaiton |
| HB106- House Education Hearing Request.pdf |
HEDC 4/12/2023 8:00:00 AM |
HB 106 |
| Appendix - AS 14.17.430 State Funding For Correspondence Study Letter.pdf |
HEDC 4/12/2023 8:00:00 AM |
Appendix - AS 14.17.430 |
| HB 139 Fiscal Note DEED_K12 Aid to Schools as of 3.29.23.pdf |
HEDC 4/12/2023 8:00:00 AM |
HB 139 |
| HB 139 Fiscal Note_Fund Capitalization as of 3.29.23.pdf |
HEDC 4/12/2023 8:00:00 AM |
HB 139 |
| HB 139 presentation.pdf |
HEDC 4/12/2023 8:00:00 AM |
HB 139 |
| HB 139 Sectional Analysis.pdf |
HEDC 4/12/2023 8:00:00 AM |
HB 139 |
| HB 139- Connections Homeschool Correspondence Program.pdf |
HEDC 4/12/2023 8:00:00 AM |
HB 139 |