Legislature(2009 - 2010)HOUSE FINANCE 519
04/11/2009 09:00 AM House FINANCE
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB175 | |
| HB186 | |
| HB141 | |
| HB44 | |
| HB186 | |
| HB105 | |
| HB212 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| + | HB 175 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 105 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 141 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 186 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | HB 212 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| += | HB 44 | TELECONFERENCED | |
HOUSE BILL NO. 105
"An Act relating to the state training and employment
program; and providing for an effective date."
10:59:51 AM
RYNNIEVA MOSS, STAFF, REPRESENTATIVE JOHN COGHILL, SPONSOR,
explained that the State Training Employment Program (STEP)
was established in 1989 and had been re-authorized by the
legislature seven times. The seventh time, the legislature
asked the Department of Labor and Workforce Development
(DLWD) to improve the program, especially addressing
concerns about training given to non-residents and a lack of
participation with private enterprise. A task force was
formed to study the program and make recommendations.
Ms. Moss noted that the taskforce recommended taking the
politics out of the program by empowering the Alaska
Workforce Investment Board to become an active partner in
the STEP process, including annual supervision over the
scoring of projects and who would obtain the training
grants, and oversight of regulations adopted by DLWD.
Provisions were also added requiring Alaskan residency to
participate, strengthening partnership with private
business, and limiting how much money could be spent on
administration costs. Finally, the bill requires the
adoption of regulations to implement an appeal process for
applicants who have been denied a grant.
DAVID STONE, DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND
WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT, MEMBER, ALASKA WORKFORCE INVESTMENT
BOARD, and CO-CHAIR, STEP TASKFORCE, reported the bill was a
result of recommendations from the STEP taskforce. He
detailed that the taskforce was composed of ten people
representing employers, employees, the U.S. Department of
Labor, the University of Alaska, and Alaska Workforce
Investment Board. Taskforce recommendations include:
· Offering services to an expanded pool of workers who
may be displaced;
· Clarifying the Workforce Investment Board's oversight
and accountability;
· Supporting resident hire through targeted projects and
services;
· Increasing input from local businesses and regional
advisory councils;
· Streamlining the grantee application reporting process;
and
· Making STEP a permanent program.
11:03:58 AM
Mr. Stone added that STEP has been the most successful job-
training program in Alaska. The program is funded by
unemployment insurance (UI) employee contributions at the
rate of 1/10 of 1 percent. The program has worked for
Alaskans seeking training, and unemployed or underemployed
workers; by reducing the amount of time workers are
employed, the program has reduced the amount of UI benefits
paid out.
Vice-Chair Thomas pointed to page 7, line 20 referring to
residency and queried adding language such as being eligible
for the permanent fund dividend. Ms. Moss did not think the
language would be a problem but did not know what the
ramifications would be.
Co-Chair Stoltze cautioned that the criteria for the two
programs are different.
Vice-Chair Thomas noted that people are allowed to vote as
residents of Alaska when living out-of-state or moving back
and forth. He opined that people should receive a permanent
fund check or be eligible for one before spending money on
them through STEP. Ms. Moss suggested conferring with
Legislative Legal Services and offering an amendment on the
floor if applicable.
Representative Joule referred to life-long residents who do
not apply for the permanent fund dividend for various
reasons, but may want to participate in STEP. He stated
concerns about citizens who would be cut off.
11:07:11 AM
Vice-Chair Thomas clarified that he meant the person may
either be eligible or receive the dividend; he did not mean
the person had to receive the dividend.
Representative Kelly queried the balance between union and
non-union and rural and non-rural access to the program as
per earlier concerns. Ms. Moss responded that the sponsor
was confident that the concerns had been addressed.
Representative Gara pointed to page 4, line 12 of the bill,
and wondered if it unintentionally excluded people from
STEP. The provision protects people who have had a job and
who run out of UI benefits or are receiving UI benefits, but
may not allow people without a job history to participate.
Ms. Moss did not think the status would change with the
legislation. Section 4 removes language setting a six-month
limit on employees liable to be displaced under existing
statute; however, because the funds come from UI benefits,
STEP participants must have contributed to UI.
Representative Gara queried expanding the program to people
who were new to the work force. Ms. Moss thought the issue
was a policy question.
11:10:15 AM
GUY BELL, ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER AND DIRECTOR, DIVISION OF
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND WORKFORCE
DEVELOPMENT, agreed with Ms. Moss's answer.
Representative Gara offered language for a third category of
people: "or are seeking employment." Mr. Bell thought that
would be a policy call for the legislature, since the
funding is derived from employee contributions to UI. He
noted that the policy in the past has been to limit the
program to those who have contributed to UI.
Co-Chair Stoltze pointed out that the legislature has made
policy calls in the past with direction from the department.
He asked if the department had an opinion. Mr. Guy responded
that the department has funds for youth training that are
separate from STEP, providing other options for youth.
Representative Gara asked whether STEP had training not
provided in other programs that would be beneficial to
youth. Mr. Stone replied that STEP is a funding mechanism
for funding training specifically for underemployed or
unemployed workers who have contributed through the UI fund;
there are other funds that can be used for youth.
Representative Gara queried STEP job training services that
would be beneficial to youth. Mr. Bell answered that there
were services, and added that the STEP demographic includes
youth as young Alaskans have contributed to UI.
11:14:08 AM
Representative Gara wondered the downside of allowing youth
without a job history accessing STEP training. Ms. Moss
thought the downside was that STEP is designed for people
who have worked and are about to lose work or are unemployed
or underemployed. She stressed that the program is unique
for an existing workforce; there are many other programs for
youth.
Representative Gara gave the example of another program with
limited funds and spoke of young people who cannot get jobs.
Ms. Moss emphasized that STEP was a limited pool of money
that the sponsors wanted to protect.
Representative Joule reported experience related to youth
vocational education and financial aid through the Bureau of
Indian Affairs. He stated that there are funds for many
rural young people coming out of high school, as well as
local scholarships. He noted that people in rural areas are
supportive of vocational and technical training for youth.
He recalled deciding to use the UI funds for the program and
thought the bill accomplished what it meant to.
11:19:27 AM
DOUG WARD, DIRECTOR, SHIPYARD DEVELOPMENT, ALASKA SHIP AND
DRYDOCK, and MEMBER, WORKFORCE INVESTMENT BOARD and STEP
TASKFORCE, KETCHIKAN (via teleconference), testified in
support of the legislation. He listed membership in several
groups working to employ and train people. He stated that
Alaska Ship and Drydock participates in STEP. He reminded
the committee that in 2007 the commissioner directed the
board to provide for oversight. He reported that the board
has successfully done the job, as has the STEP taskforce. He
urged passage of the legislation.
Mr. Ward spoke to programs for youth. He noted individual
training accounts at job centers that can be accessed by
youth seeking employment.
11:23:14 AM
LINDA HULBERT, MEMBER, ALASKA WORKFORCE BOARD, FAIRBANKS
(via teleconference), testified in support of the
legislation. She listed extensive involvement with
employment and training programs in Alaska. She echoed the
comments of those supporting the provision. She emphasized
that the fund is for a specific group of people not normally
funded by other federal employment training funds. Research
and analysis by DLWD has consistently shown the
effectiveness of the program in getting people back into the
workforce. She noted the importance of Alaskans being able
to control the funds and urged passage of the unique
program.
DON ETHRIDGE, ALASKA WORKS PARTNERSHIP AND ALASKA AFL-CIO,
spoke in support of the bill. He pointed out that rural
areas were targeted by Alaska Works. He addressed youth
training and stated he preferred not to use STEP funds.
Co-Chair Stoltze referred to the fiscal note.
Co-Chair Hawker asked how funding levels shown on the fiscal
note compared with the current funding level for the
program. Mr. Bell responded that the levels were equivalent.
Vice-Chair Thomas asked whether there was a GED or high
school requirement to participate in STEP. Mr. Bell did not
think there was the requirement.
11:28:10 AM
Vice-Chair Thomas noted GED or high school graduation
requirement for the apprenticeship program. Mr. Bell replied
that there were entrance criteria set by various training
programs; the criteria are not set by STEP. He added that
often a training component is added for persons who need to
get to a certificate level.
Vice-Chair Thomas stated concerns that with the high rate of
dropout, there might be more incentive to quit school. He
suggested a side bar requiring a GED or high school
equivalency.
Co-Chair Stoltze read the legislation another way.
Ms. Moss noted that a GED is not required for the program.
She stated concerns that the requirement could be a problem
for someone who has been working for years without a GED.
Vice-Chair Thomas reiterated concerns regarding drop-out
rates. Ms. Moss thought the point should be brought up with
Department of Education and Early Development, as part of
the problem could be youth who do not get vocational
training in high school. She gave an example of a North Pole
school with a program that kept youth from dropping out.
11:31:10 AM
Representative Gara queried DLWD involvement with Education
and Training Voucher (ETV) funds provided to youth at the
Office of Child Services (OCS) and wondered if there was a
way to ensure the funds are not cut off. Mr. Bell promised
to get more information.
Co-Chair Hawker MOVED to report CCSS HB 105(L&C) out of
Committee with individual recommendations and the
accompanying fiscal notes. There being NO OBJECTION, it was
so ordered.
CSSS HB 105(L&C) was REPORTED out of Committee with a "do
pass" recommendation and with attached fiscal note 1 by
Department of Labor and Workforce Development and fiscal
note 2 by Department of Labor and Workforce Development.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| 02 SSHB105 Sponsor Statement.pdf |
HFIN 4/11/2009 9:00:00 AM |
HB 105 |
| 01 HB141 Sponsor Statement.pdf |
HFIN 4/11/2009 9:00:00 AM |
HB 141 |
| 07 CSHB175_L&C_ Sponsor Statement.pdf |
HFIN 4/11/2009 9:00:00 AM |
HB 175 |
| 06 CSHB175_L&C_ Sectional Analysis.pdf |
HFIN 4/11/2009 9:00:00 AM |
HB 175 |
| 06 SSHB105 29 USC 50 Apprentice Labor Federal Law.pdf |
HFIN 4/11/2009 9:00:00 AM |
HB 105 |
| 05 SSHB105 AK Workforce Investment Board Resolution.pdf |
HFIN 4/11/2009 9:00:00 AM |
HB 105 |
| 04 SSHB105 AK Workforce Investment Board Recommendations.pdf |
HFIN 4/11/2009 9:00:00 AM |
HB 105 |
| 03 SSHB105 Sectional Analysis.pdf |
HFIN 4/11/2009 9:00:00 AM |
HB 105 |
| 03 HB141 Sectional.pdf |
HFIN 4/11/2009 9:00:00 AM |
HB 141 |
| 07 HB141 Letters of SupportOpposition.pdf |
HFIN 4/11/2009 9:00:00 AM |
HB 141 |
| 05 HB186 Backup.pdf |
HFIN 4/11/2009 9:00:00 AM |
HB 186 |
| 03 Sectional for CSHB186 version E.pdf |
HFIN 4/11/2009 9:00:00 AM |
HB 186 |
| Amendment 1.doc |
HFIN 4/11/2009 9:00:00 AM |
HB 44 |
| HB 141 backup.pdf |
HFIN 4/11/2009 9:00:00 AM |
HB 141 |
| HB 141 backup2.pdf |
HFIN 4/11/2009 9:00:00 AM |
HB 141 |
| HB 186 Explanation of Changes.pdf |
HFIN 4/11/2009 9:00:00 AM |
HB 186 |
| HB 141 DHSS Response to HJUD.pdf |
HFIN 4/11/2009 9:00:00 AM |
HB 141 |
| HB 186 Sponsor Statement.pdf |
HFIN 4/11/2009 9:00:00 AM |
HB 186 |
| HB 186--legal memo.pdf |
HFIN 4/11/2009 9:00:00 AM |
HB 186 |
| HB 212 sectional.pdf |
HFIN 4/11/2009 9:00:00 AM |
HB 212 |
| HB 212 sponsor statement.pdf |
HFIN 4/11/2009 9:00:00 AM |
HB 212 |
| NCSL Pending Firearm Legislation April 2009.pdf |
HFIN 4/11/2009 9:00:00 AM |
HB 186 |
| HB186CS(JUD)-LAW-CRIM-4-8-09Fical Note New Replace.pdf |
HFIN 4/11/2009 9:00:00 AM |
HB 186 |
| HB212-DOLWD-UI-04-10-09.pdf |
HFIN 4/11/2009 9:00:00 AM |
HB 212 |
| SB 133 Additional backup.pdf |
HFIN 4/11/2009 9:00:00 AM |
SB 133 |
| SB 57 JSD Letter.pdf |
HFIN 4/11/2009 9:00:00 AM |
SB 57 |
| SB1 133 Q & A Sen. Paskvan.pdf |
HFIN 4/11/2009 9:00:00 AM |
SB 133 |
| SB133_Backup_AK_HISPC_Project_Summary.pdf |
HFIN 4/11/2009 9:00:00 AM |
SB 133 |
| SB133_Backup_Cost_Savings.pdf |
HFIN 4/11/2009 9:00:00 AM |
SB 133 |
| SB133_Backup_Media.pdf |
HFIN 4/11/2009 9:00:00 AM |
SB 133 |
| SB133_Backup_NCSL_HIT_State_Legislation.pdf |
HFIN 4/11/2009 9:00:00 AM |
SB 133 |
| SB133_Letters_of_Support.pdf |
HFIN 4/11/2009 9:00:00 AM |
SB 133 |
| SB133_Presentation_AeHN overview April 2009.ppt |
HFIN 4/11/2009 9:00:00 AM |
SB 133 |
| Tennessee Firearms Freedom Act.pdf |
HFIN 4/11/2009 9:00:00 AM |
HB 186 |
| SB133_Sponsor Statement.pdf |
HFIN 4/11/2009 9:00:00 AM |
SB 133 |