Legislature(2003 - 2004)
03/24/2003 03:39 PM House FIN
| Audio | Topic |
|---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
HOUSE BILL NO. 104
"An Act relating to payment of the fisheries business
tax and to security for collection of the fisheries
business tax."
SENATOR GARY STEVENS, SALMON TASK FORCE, testified in
support of the bill. He pointed out that the previous bill
(HB 90) was modeled after a successful bill, which assisted
the pollock industry. He expressed his hope that the
current bill would have a similar affect on the salmon
industry.
Senator G. Stevens explained that HB 104 also pertained to
the processing industry. He noted that often the smaller
processors did not have the financial depth to pay tax
liabilities on an annual basis. He noted that the bill
allowed taxes to be paid on a monthly basis.
Senator G. Stevens indicated that larger processors might
choose to continue to pay their taxes annually. He noted
that participants would be required to file a bond for $50
thousand, or demonstrate lienable property valued at $100
thousand. He speculated that it might only be taken
advantage of by a handful of smaller processors. He
summarized that the bill allowed smaller processors to
expand development.
Representative Chenault expressed concern on behalf of
processors in his area. He asked about the accessibility of
a $50 thousand bond.
Senator Stevens responded that the legislation did not
prevent processors to continue with their current business
practices, but merely provided them with another
opportunity.
Ms. Sutton noted that a Salmon Task Force member who owns a
salmon processing center in Naknek viewed the bill as an
opportunity that would benefit his business management.
Representative Foster MOVED to report CSHB104 out of
Committee with the accompanying fiscal note
There being NO OBJECTION, it was so ordered.
CSHB 104 (FIN) was REPORTED out of Committee with a "do
pass" recommendation and with one new fiscal impact note
from the Department of Revenue.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|