Legislature(2015 - 2016)BARNES 124
03/10/2015 08:00 AM House COMMUNITY & REGIONAL AFFAIRS
Note: the audio
and video
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
Audio | Topic |
---|---|
Start | |
HB104 | |
HCR1 | |
HJR3 | |
Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+= | HB 104 | TELECONFERENCED | |
+= | HJR 3 | TELECONFERENCED | |
+ | TELECONFERENCED | ||
+= | HCR 1 | TELECONFERENCED | |
HB 104-IMMUNITY FOR FIRE DEPT. & MEMBERS 8:04:27 AM CHAIR TILTON announced that the first order of business would be HOUSE BILL NO. 104, "An Act relating to immunity for a fire department and employees or members of a fire department." 8:05:00 AM REPRESENTATIVE SEATON moved to adopt CSHB 104, Version 29- LS0550\W, Shutts, 3/9/15, as the working document. CHAIR TILTON objected for discussion purposes. 8:05:21 AM DAN BELLERIVE, Staff, Representative Tilton, Alaska State Legislature, reviewed the changes encompassed in Version W. He explained that page 1, line 11, exempts intentional misconduct and gross negligence from the protection afforded to the fire departments. Page 1, lines 12-14, addresses the concern that the proposed language of HB 104 would provide protection for a fire department while carrying out duties under contract with a private entity that had a contract with a village. Page 2, lines 3-4, would provide legal protection for fire departments that are registered with the state fire marshal and provide services under contract or agreement with a municipality or village. He noted that existing statute only provides protection for fire departments operated and maintained by a municipality or village. Page 2, line 6, provides conforming language to ensure that the immunity in subsection (c) doesn't conflict with or restrict the immunities provided in subsection (d). 8:06:52 AM REPRESENTATIVE HUGHES recalled the question from the last hearing regarding whether the term "village" is sufficient or whether the term "established village" is more appropriate. MR. BELLERIVE directed attention to AS 09.65.070(e)(2), as follows: (2) "village" means an unincorporated community where at least 25 people reside as a social unit. 8:07:25 AM CHAIR TILTON withdrew her objection. There being no further objection, Version W was adopted. 8:07:46 AM REPRESENTATIVE SEATON moved to report CSHB 104, Version 29- LS0550\W, Shutts, 3/9/15, out of committee with individual recommendations and the accompanying [zero] fiscal note. There being no objection, CSHB 104(CRA) was reported from the House Community and Regional Affairs Standing Committee.
Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
---|---|---|
CSHCR 1 Amendment H.1 PROPOSED.pdf |
HCRA 3/10/2015 8:00:00 AM |
HCR 1 |
CSHJR 3 Amendment W.1 PROPOSED.pdf |
HCRA 3/10/2015 8:00:00 AM |
HJR 3 |
HB 104 Draft Committee Substitute, Version W.pdf |
HCRA 3/10/2015 8:00:00 AM |
HB 104 |