Legislature(2009 - 2010)BELTZ 211
04/14/2009 01:00 PM Senate LABOR & COMMERCE
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| SB12 | |
| SB126 | |
| HB93 | |
| HB101 | |
| HB102 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| + | HB 93 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 101 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 102 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| = | SB 12 | ||
| = | SB 126 | ||
CSHB 102(JUD)-UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE
2:04:18 PM
CHAIR PASKVAN announced CSHB 102(JUD) to be up for
consideration.
ALLISON LEFINE, staff to Representative Gruenberg, sponsor of HB
102, said it amends Alaska statutes to reflect the recent
revisions to Articles 1 and 7 of the Uniform Commercial Code
(UCC). The bill has two non-UCC provisions as well.
TERRY THURBON, Public Member, Alaska Uniform Law Commission,
said updating the UCC is a priority this year in large part
because it is cleanup legislation to get Alaska up to date with
electronic documents of title with respect to bills of lading
and warehouse receipts for the transportation industry. It
updates a few other general provisions as well.
She said it seems like an overwhelmingly large bill at 60-plus
pages, but the Uniform Commercial Code parts, sections 8 and 4,
are the only ones she is speaking to. Those provisions are by
and large changes in terminology to make the code consistent
with a handful of substantive changes that are made. It is
divided up into two parts, Article 1, which is general
provisions, and covers things like definitions and obligations
of good faith, and then Article 7, which has the warehouse
receipts, bills of lading and documents of title provisions.
2:08:34 PM
MS. THURBON said the revisions in general deal almost entirely
with bringing us into the electronic age for shipping and
transportation, and how title is transferred amongst parties
(Article 7). Some of those provisions were originally developed
in the early 1900s and the last update was in 1951. In 2003 the
Uniform Law Commission came up with these revisions. Thirty-two
states have already adopted these provisions and three other
states besides Alaska have introduced legislation this year.
The general provisions starting in section 8 of the bill
regarding Article 1 are peppered throughout Title 45 and are
mainly conforming terminology and amendments, but there are
about half dozen substantively important things those do to the
UCC.
MS. THURBON said some of the changes clarified scope of coverage
to make it clear that these provisions are applicable only to
UCC-covered transactions. The statute of frauds requirement
which governs when an agreement has to be in writing was a
little fuzzy and appeared to apply to transactions outside of
the UCC; so that was fixed. The rules on choice of law were
clarified so that the parties in agreement can choose the law of
whichever jurisdiction they want to apply - with some
limitations meant to protect consumers so that they can have the
protection of their own state's laws.
2:12:13 PM
Another substantive change clarified the definition of "good
faith" in the context of UCC to mean honesty and fact and the
observance of reasonable commercial standards for fair dealing.
It clarifies use of evidence of course of performance of a
contractual arrangement in addition to the uses of trade and of
dealings. The bottom line is that these changes bring Alaska
into the fold of the critical mass of nearly all of the states
that are using the same version of the UCC in these two areas.
2:13:26 PM
PROFESSOR BILL HENNINGS, Alabama Uniform Law Commissioner, said
he was executive director of the Uniform Law Commission from
2001-2007, which is when these two acts were finally produced.
He teaches in the area of the UCC and works with these
provisions every day.
PROFESSOR HENNINGS said that over the last 20 years, the UCC has
been updated to accommodate electronic transactions. Articles 1
and 7 were the last to be revised, and they found industry was
already far ahead of them in terms of using electronic
documents, but industry wanted legal provisions that would put
them on solid ground to make certain their documents were
entirely effective. He said that Article 7 had not been
thoroughly revised, but the electronic documents sections were
dealt with almost exclusively.
2:16:24 PM
Article 1 is general provisions applicable to all the other
articles, Professor Hennings explained. After 20 years of
revisions there was sort of a disconnect between the other
articles mostly in terms of definitions. So the revision of
Article 1 is designed to clean everything up and pull the UCC
together.
2:17:16 PM
SENATOR THOMAS said one area talks about proceeds from goods and
possessions being sold. Does someone determine the value of
those goods so that if $1,000 is owed and the carrier decides to
dispose of $10,000 worth of furniture just to get their $1,000
is there some claim that causes it to be a fair disposal?
PROFESSOR HENNINGS replied that no specific procedure is set up
requiring commercially reasonable sales like those in Article 7
foreclosures, but the general standards of the UCC, which are
good faith and commercial reasonableness are applied. Good faith
is honesty; and commercial reasonableness means that you have to
comport with standards of fairness that are consistent with
other similar entities would do in the commercial world. He has
no doubt that a court could regulate that kind of conduct and
treat a sale for a ridiculously small amount as something in the
nature of a conversion. However, there is no broad structure for
that in Article 7, unless he has forgotten it.
2:19:58 PM
CHAIR PASKVAN closed public testimony. He added that bringing
st
Alaska up to the 21 Century is a good thing.
SENATOR THOMAS moved to report CSHB 102(JUD), version S, from
committee with individual recommendations and attached fiscal
note(s). There were no objections and it was so ordered.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|