Legislature(2015 - 2016)SENATE FINANCE 532
04/16/2016 09:00 AM Senate FINANCE
Note: the audio
and video
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB100 | |
| HB83 | |
| HB155 | |
| HB231 | |
| HB375 | |
| HB156 | |
| HB41 | |
| HB259 | |
| SB130 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| += | HB 100 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 83 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 155 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 231 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 375 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 156 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 41 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 259 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | SB 130 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| + | TELECONFERENCED |
CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 100(FIN)
"An Act establishing a credit against the net income
tax for an in-state processing facility that
manufactures urea, ammonia, or gas-to-liquid products;
relating to establishing the value of the state's
royalty share of gas production based on contracts
with certain in-state processing facilities that
manufacture urea, ammonia, or gas-to- liquid products;
and providing for an effective date."
9:08:01 AM
AT EASE
9:08:28 AM
RECONVENED
9:08:55 AM
TOM WRIGHT, STAFF, SENATOR MIKE CHENAULT, explained the
legislation.
9:11:02 AM
AT EASE
9:11:17 AM
RECONVENED
9:11:22 AM
Senator Bishop MOVED to ADOPT Amendment 1, 29-LS0423\S.4,
Nauman, 4/12/16 (copy on file):
Page2, line 8:
Delete "and"
Page 2, line 20, following the second occurrence of
"gas":
Insert "; and
(3) the agreement requires, to the maximum extent
permitted by law, the lessee to
(A) hire qualified residents from throughout
the state for the management, engineering,
construction, operation, and maintenance of,
and other positions for, a natural gas
pipeline project;
(B) establish hiring facilities in the state
or use existing hiring facilities in the
state; and
(C) use, as far as practicable, the job
centers and associated services operated by
the Department of Labor and Workforce
Development and an Internet-based labor
exchange system operated by the state"
Page 3, line 5, following "shall":
Insert"(l)"
Page 3, line 10, following "gas":
Insert "; and demonstrate to the department that
the taxpayer, to the maximum extent possible,
A) hires qualified residents from throughout the state
for the management, engineering, construction,
operation, and maintenance of, and other positions
for, a natural gas pipeline project;
(B) establishes hiring facilities in the state or uses
existing hiring facilities in the state; and
(C) uses, as far as practicable, the job centers and
associated services operated by the Department of
Labor and Workforce Development or an Internet-based
labor exchange system operated by the state"
Co-Chair MacKinnon OBJECTED for DISCUSSION.
Senator Bishop explained the amendment. He stated that it
complemented the intent of the bill.
Senator Hoffman wanted to be listed as a sponsor of
Amendment 1.
Senator Dunleavy queried the change to page 2, line 6.
Senator Bishop replied that the job center system would be
used to access the labor in the state.
Senator Dunleavy surmised that private and public entities
could access the system. Senator Bishop agreed
9:13:58 AM
Senator Olson wondered if there were any disagreements
between Pt. Thompson as opposed to Cook Inlet, as related
to constitutionality. Senator Bishop replied in the
negative.
Senator Olson wondered whether the amendment was
constitutional. Senator Bishop replied in the affirmative.
Senator Olson asked whether the sponsor was in support of
the amendment. Senator Bishop replied in the affirmative.
Co-Chair MacKinnon asked whether the sponsor was in support
of the amendment. Mr. Wright replied in the affirmative.
Vice-Chair Micciche supported the amendment. He asked to be
a cosponsor of the amendment. He did not feel that the bill
created an issue with constitutionality.
Co-Chair MacKinnon WITHDREW the OBJECTION. There being NO
OBJECTION, Amendment 1 was adopted.
Vice-Chair Micciche explained the fiscal note.
Vice-Chair Micciche MOVED to report SCS CSHB 100(FIN) out
of Committee with individual recommendations and the
accompanying fiscal note. There being NO OBJECTION, it was
so ordered.
SCS CSHB 100(FIN) was REPORTED out of committee with a "do
pass" recommendation and with the previously published
fiscal note: FN2 (REV).
9:17:28 AM
AT EASE
9:20:49 AM
RECONVENED
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| HB 100 Amendment S.4 Bishop.pdf |
SFIN 4/16/2016 9:00:00 AM |
HB 100 |
| HB 41 Amendment 2 Olson.pdf |
SFIN 4/16/2016 9:00:00 AM |
HB 41 |
| HB 41 Amendment 1 Dunleavy.pdf |
SFIN 4/16/2016 9:00:00 AM |
HB 41 |
| HB 156 Amendment 1 Micciche.pdf |
SFIN 4/16/2016 9:00:00 AM |
HB 156 |
| HB 156 Conceptual Amendement to Amendment 1 Micchiche.pdf |
SFIN 4/16/2016 9:00:00 AM |
HB 156 |