Legislature(2013 - 2014)CAPITOL 120
03/01/2013 01:00 PM House JUDICIARY
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB100 | |
| HB81 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| *+ | HB 100 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | HB 81 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED |
HB 100 - GEOGRAPHIC COLA FOR JUSTICES AND JUDGES
1:06:38 PM
CHAIR KELLER announced that the first order of business would be
HOUSE BILL NO. 100, "An Act relating to the geographic cost-of-
living adjustment to the salaries of supreme court justices,
superior court judges, and district court judges; and providing
for an effective date."
1:07:32 PM
DOUG WOOLIVER, Deputy Administrative Director, Administrative
Staff, Office of the Administrative Director, Alaska Court
System (ACS), explained that HB 100 would update the statutes
governing the geographic cost-of-living adjustment (COLA)
applied to the salaries of Alaska's [justices and] judges.
Under current law, employees in both the judicial and executive
branches of government receive a COLA based on the cost of
living in the communities in which they work, and this COLA is
applied to their entire yearly salary. However, for [justices
and] judges, the COLA is only applied to the first $40,000 of
their yearly salary, and the maximum percentage by which that
portion of their salary can then be adjusted is 17.5 percent,
[but then only for justices and judges living in certain
communities,] resulting in a maximum yearly COLA of only $7,000
for such a [justice or] judge under current law. In contrast,
many [other ACS] employees receive a yearly COLA far in excess
of $30,000.
MR. WOOLIVER explained that via COLAs, the salaries of those
serving in rural areas of the state can be made commensurate
with the salaries of those serving in urban areas, something the
legislature has long recognized the value of, having provided
for COLAs in statute since 1966. The cost of living in
Kotzebue, for example, is 60 percent higher [than in Anchorage].
However, under current law, a [justice or] judge working in
Kotzebue "makes essentially the same as a [justice or] judge in
Anchorage," he remarked, [instead of being provided the same
COLA as other ACS employees serving in Kotzebue]. For Bethel,
especially, recruitment of [justices and] judges has been a big
challenge, in part because of the high cost of living in that
community - approximately 50 percent higher than in Anchorage.
Remarking on difficulties the Alaska Judicial Council (AJC) has
had in filling judicial positions in rural communities, and on
anticipated upcoming judicial vacancies, he acknowledged that an
increase in the COLA for justices and judges won't necessarily
solve the AJC's recruitment problem, but again pointed out that
the high cost of living in rural communities is one of the main
hurdles to judicial recruitment.
1:11:41 PM
MR. WOOLIVER noted that under current law, the COLAs applied to
the salaries of justices and judges are not also applied to
their retirement [contributions/benefits]; HB 100 would not
change this. Again, the goal is to update the statutes
governing the COLA applied to the salaries of Alaska's [justices
and] judges. Under the bill, the COLA would only be applied to
the first $100,000 of a [justice or] judge's salary, but would
be equal to the COLA received by other judicial-branch employees
assigned to serve in that particular community.
MR. WOOLIVER, in response to questions, relayed that the base
salary of a supreme court justice, a superior court judge, and a
district court judge is [$196,224], [$181,440], and [$153,840],
respectively; that the COLA currently applied to the salaries of
justices and judges serving in Fairbanks is [3.5 percent]; that
currently the only Alaska Supreme Court justice whose salary
would be impacted by the bill is Justice Daniel E. Winfree; that
the reason for having the bill's proposed COLA apply only to the
first $100,000 of a justice or judge's base salary is mainly to
minimize the bill's fiscal impact as much as possible, as well
as in recognition of the fact that at a certain point, a higher
cost of living won't necessarily result in a continued increase
in spending; and that no other state employee has his/her COLA
applied to only a portion of his/her salary - all COLA's except
for those applied to the salaries of justices and judges are
applied to the employee's entire base salary, though what
specific COLA is used varies [depending on which particular
statute governs the employee's salary].
REPRESENTATIVE GRUENBERG said he wouldn't have a problem with
having the COLA apply to a justice or judge's full salary.
MR. WOOLIVER - in response to other questions - indicated that
compared to other states, Alaska ranks about in the middle in
terms of what it pays its state justices and judges, and offered
to research nationwide statistics regarding such salaries and
associated COLAs further and provide that information to the
committee.
CHAIR KELLER indicated that he didn't have a problem with
providing for a fair salary for Alaska's justices and judges,
taking into account the state's current fiscal restraints,
however.
REPRESENTATIVE PRUITT characterized the bill's proposed changes
as substantial.
MR. WOOLIVER mentioned that via a past iteration of the bill,
the proposal was to have a justice or judge's COLA applied to
his/her entire salary, and relayed that the ACS would be
amenable to working on additional compromises regarding the
bill's proposed changes. In response to further questions and
comments, he provided additional information about the AJC's
judicial-recruitment challenges in rural areas of the state, and
again acknowledged that an increase in the COLA for justices and
judges won't solve those challenges, adding, however, that what
can be done is to at least make the salaries more commensurate,
in a real sense, with that received in the urban areas.
CHAIR KELLER relayed that HB 100 would be held over.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| HB 100 Hearing Request.pdf |
HJUD 3/1/2013 1:00:00 PM |
HB 100 |
| HB 100 Sponsor Statement.pdf |
HJUD 3/1/2013 1:00:00 PM |
HB 100 |
| HB 100 ver. U.pdf |
HJUD 3/1/2013 1:00:00 PM |
HB 100 |
| HB 100 Fiscal Note Court System.pdf |
HJUD 3/1/2013 1:00:00 PM |
HB 100 |
| HB 100 Support Document--Review of Geographic Cost Differentials.pdf |
HJUD 3/1/2013 1:00:00 PM |
HB 100 |
| HB 81 Sponsor Statement.pdf |
HJUD 3/1/2013 1:00:00 PM |
HB 81 |
| HB 81 Sectional Summary.pdf |
HJUD 3/1/2013 1:00:00 PM |
HB 81 |
| HB 81 ver. N.pdf |
HJUD 3/1/2013 1:00:00 PM |
HB 81 |
| HB 81 Fiscal Note-Department of Law.pdf |
HJUD 3/1/2013 1:00:00 PM |
HB 81 |